Thanks for your edits! We hope you'll keep on editing with us. This is a great time to have joined us, because now you can play the Game of Rassilon with us and win cool stuff! Well, okay, badges. That have no monetary value. And that largely only you can see. But still: they're cool!
We've got a couple of important quirks for a Wikia wiki, so let's get them out of the way first.
British English, please
We generally use British English round these parts, so if you're American, please be sure you set your spell checker to BrEng, and take a gander at our spelling cheat card.
Spoilers aren't cool
We have a strict definition of "spoiler" that you may find a bit unusual. Basically, a spoiler, to us, is anything that comes from a story which has not been released yet. So, even if you've got some info from a BBC press release or official trailer, it basically can't be referenced here. In other words, you gotta wait until the episode has finished its premiere broadcast to start editing about its contents. Please check the spoiler policy for more details.
Other useful stuff
Aside from those two things, we also have some pages that you should probably read when you get a chance, like:
- the listing of all our help, policy and guideline pages
- our Manual of Style
- our image use policy
- our user page policy
- a list of people whose job it is to help you
If you're brand new to wiki editing — and we all were, once! — you probably want to check out these tutorials at Wikipedia, the world's largest wiki:
Hi, since you seem to be interested in the number of links to the same article from a page, I thought you might want to learn the exact policy. Here it is: T:OVER-WIKIFY. In short, there should be a link once per section. In your edit at Better Watch Out you do not follow the letter of this rule, but I grant you that you follow its spirit: the links were too close by, so I'm not going to revert this change. Hope this information helps. Amorkuz ☎ 14:42, October 20, 2018 (UTC)
Re: historical categories Edit
Hi, I've found the forum thread that I mentioned in the discussions. It's at Thread:227406 (and that thread has links to two other related threads).
Basically, until/unless we get some kind of official definition of what a historical story is, we can't really create a category (doing so would violate Tardis:Category naming conventions). And unfortunately it's not enough for us to come up with a definition ourselves and post it on the category page, because too few editors even bother to read the category descriptions before adding categories to pages.
- To give you more context, the situation is even worse. I did some research to try and save the category (I quite liked it), but I discovered that different production teams and people use the same term in different ways. I think it was Lisa Bowerman who gave an interview in the CD extras for The Forsaken was describing how nice it is to work on a "historical". But it wasn't a "pure historical", a term that is sometimes used to distinguish from pseudo-historical stories. The simple truth is that over 55 years, people described stories set in the past differently. The ambiguity precludes the use of it in a category name. Amorkuz ☎ 11:35, November 20, 2018 (UTC)
- I've been reading the threads and the HELP articles. So, if I were to write an article with sources and references from the crew (as it would be a Real World page) about the historical stories, and if it's all checked and it has coherency and a good definition, could the category be created again? Of course, I wouldn't write it on this Wikia, I'd make a draft in my computer first. Dr Von Wer ☎ 12:12, December 5, 2018 (UTC)
- That would be most useful. Several editors I know, including me, have thought of writing such an article for some time now, but, sadly, never got around it. There are some really good sources, including TEDW 8. I don't quite have the bandwidth for this in addition to my other wiki projects, but would be happy to contribute in principle. This is a wiki, after all. It can always be extended collaboratively. Note also that such an article would be useful independently of the category as this is clearly a real thing considered by many writers and producers in their work but that has no proper coverage on the wiki. By all means, go for it!
- PS You don't have to make a draft on your computer (which would make linking hard). If you wish, you can click on the following link, User:Dr Von Wer/Historical sandbox, create the page and do there whatever you like (that is legal, obviously). It is classified as your personal page, so you will have complete control over it. (Obviously you can also name it differently.) Amorkuz ☎ 13:57, December 5, 2018 (UTC)
- I was starting to write the sandbox, when I thought of something: Shouldn't it be better for the Historical stories to be inside the Fan Terminology category? I checked and the articles in it don't seem to have strong sources or references. I could write an article with an explanation based on sources like the Handbooks and other sources, and, instead of creating a category for these stories, make a list with the usually accepted historical and pseudo-historical stories (by usually accepted I mean based on the fandom, since it's fan terminology, or a source if I can find one), just like in the TARDIS team article, which states something not from official sources but from common knowledge. I might add both. I'll start making the article in the sandbox (with the list), from a fan terminology perspectivew. If this Wiki doesn't agree, I'll go back to the original plan.Dr Von Wer ☎ 13:43, December 22, 2018 (UTC)
Page moves Edit
Stories vs anthologies Edit
Hi, please stop moving categories from stories to anthologies. The matter is complex and I, for one, am against your recent edits. I do not have time right now for an extended explanation, but I will write to you within 1-2 days. Amorkuz ☎ 12:12, July 12, 2019 (UTC)