30 March 2021

• curprev 14:4714:47, 30 March 2021‎ DoctorEnn talk contribs‎ 5,075 bytes +257‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Source edit
• curprev 14:0714:07, 30 March 2021‎ DoctorEnn talk contribs‎ 4,818 bytes +84‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Source edit
• curprev 14:0614:06, 30 March 2021‎ DoctorEnn talk contribs‎ 4,734 bytes +1,009‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Source edit

16 December 2016

• curprev 07:5207:52, 16 December 2016‎ SV7 talk contribs‎ m 3,725 bytes +1‎ Refreshing page order undo Tag: apiedit
• curprev 07:2607:26, 16 December 2016‎ SV7 talk contribs‎ m 3,724 bytes +4‎ Spacing undo Tag: apiedit

31 August 2016

• curprev 09:1609:16, 31 August 2016‎ EleanorBurns21 talk contribs‎ 3,720 bytes +205‎ No edit summary undo Tag: sourceedit

22 July 2014

• curprev 14:5614:56, 22 July 2014‎ AnthonyJDB talk contribs‎ 3,515 bytes +371‎ No edit summary undo

11 January 2014

• curprev 00:2400:24, 11 January 2014‎ 89.156.195.201 contribs‎ 3,144 bytes +177‎ No edit summary undo

18 December 2012

• curprev 04:0304:03, 18 December 2012‎ CzechBot talk contribs‎ m 2,967 bytes 0‎ CzechBot moved page Forum:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes/The Masque of Mandragora to Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes/The Masque of Mandragora without leaving a redirect: Robot: Moved page undo

25 May 2011

• curprev 22:0622:06, 25 May 2011‎ CzechBot talk contribs‎ m 2,967 bytes +34‎ Robot: Adding Category:DW TV discontinuity undo

10 December 2010

• curprev 23:3323:33, 10 December 2010‎ CzechOut talk contribs‎ 2,933 bytes +754‎ add from story page undo

27 September 2010

• curprev 10:1010:10, 27 September 2010‎ 82.3.31.238 contribs‎ 2,179 bytes +483‎ No edit summary undo

2 July 2010

• curprev 20:2720:27, 2 July 2010‎ Spreee talk contribs‎ 1,696 bytes +184‎ No edit summary undo

28 April 2010

• curprev 16:4716:47, 28 April 2010‎ MrThermomanPreacher talk contribs‎ 1,512 bytes +1,512‎ Created page with '{{Discontinuity}} *The astrologer has a telescope, and the Doctor doesn't like it very much; "A pity, in another fifty years we could've used Galileo's". Galileo was however one …'