Tardis

New to Doctor Who or returning after a break? Check out our guides designed to help you find your way!

READ MORE

Tardis
Tardis
(→‎Evolution???: new section)
Line 16: Line 16:
   
 
16th??? i only thought is was the 5th going to the 6th! --[[User:80.175.253.37|80.175.253.37]] 12:57, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 
16th??? i only thought is was the 5th going to the 6th! --[[User:80.175.253.37|80.175.253.37]] 12:57, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Evolution??? ==
  +
  +
With the appearance of Rich Dawkins in "Stolen Earth" (just look at it empirically, these plants haven't come to us, we've been moved!!) it occurred to me that the presence of apparently normal human beings (for the 21st century, anyway) is out of place in the year 100 Trillion. We went from descending from trees to landing on the Moon in about, what - 3 million years? (Five if you go the Quatermass route). So the idea that we're still looking pretty much unchanged at the end of time seems hard to accept. I was wondering how the show dealt with this irony.
  +
[[User:Fatkat357|Fatkat357]] 19:54, 12 February 2009 (UTC)fatkat357

Revision as of 19:54, 12 February 2009

Professor YANA - Does YANA refer to You Are Not Alone, Boe's prophesy?

If so, what does ATILLO stand for?

andy

postmaster@scarletmanuka.plus.com

Wrong plotholes

In the plothole section, the first one says that there's a problem with Yana\the master regenerating. It's about regenaration limits of the time lords. However he has a new body by now, so can obviously regenerate up to the limit. It also adds that it was explained in sound of drums. The regenaration limit has'nt even been mentioned in the new seires yet! This thing should obviously be deleted!!


16th??? i only thought is was the 5th going to the 6th! --80.175.253.37 12:57, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Evolution???

With the appearance of Rich Dawkins in "Stolen Earth" (just look at it empirically, these plants haven't come to us, we've been moved!!) it occurred to me that the presence of apparently normal human beings (for the 21st century, anyway) is out of place in the year 100 Trillion. We went from descending from trees to landing on the Moon in about, what - 3 million years? (Five if you go the Quatermass route). So the idea that we're still looking pretty much unchanged at the end of time seems hard to accept. I was wondering how the show dealt with this irony. Fatkat357 19:54, 12 February 2009 (UTC)fatkat357