Why is title of April 2013 one withheld?[edit source]

Why is the title of the April 2013 report still blocked? It's been out for several months now, so there's no need for it to still be blocked. And it doesn't reveal any plot information. Beyond that, though, it is not an in-universe item anyway (unlike the others) so it should probably be listed separately anyway. to me 14:16, June 20, 2013 (UTC)

Apparently it was in violation of Tardis:Spoiler policy. Shambala108 14:23, June 20, 2013 (UTC)
To answer your question more specifically, even the title revealed a minor spoiler about the fiftieth anniversary special. Minor while it may be, this is still, as Shambala said, in violation of T:SPOIL. Also, none of these are actual stories, and hence not considered a valid source on this wiki, and that includes "the others".
--SOTO 14:52, June 20, 2013 (UTC)
This is getting silly. Can someone at least include something regarding the subject matter, i.e. "Location filming coverage for the anniversary special" so the article isn't rendered completely useless by paranoia over spoilers? to me 20:59, September 29, 2013 (UTC)

Article needs updating[edit source]

A fifth Strax Field Report was released by the BBC on Nov. 7. The title violates that all-important spoiler policy (actually, to be fair, more obviously than the first one as it actually references a character in the special) but it should be added to the chart anyway. to me 15:49, November 11, 2013 (UTC)

  • A sixth Strax Field Report was released on Nov. 17. Even if we can't post the titles, isn't anyone going to try and keep this wiki up to date? to me 14:34, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

Spoilers no more[edit source]

Now that the 50th anniversary has been broadcast, is it possible to recreate the reports that were deleted because of spoilers?? Geek Mythology 22:42, November 27, 2013 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.