New to Doctor Who or returning after a break? Check out our guides designed to help you find your way!


This article needs a big cleanup.

This page treats still somewhat treats canon as a valid concept regarding Doctor Who, despite there not being a canon. Just needs a general cleanup in that regard.
As a suggested addition to this page, it could mention how it is commonly believed that the Doctor has been portrayed as a Time Lord since AUC despite that not being correct.

These problems might be so great that the article's factual accuracy has been compromised. Talk about it here or check the revision history or Manual of Style for more information.


Fanon is a body of popular suppositions and theories accepted by fans concerning the Doctor Who universe. It is a portmanteau of the words "fan" and "canon".

Fanon often gets confused for "canon", even if it is not supported by evidence either on screen or in print.


When stories break fanon conventions, it can cause controversy. A longstanding piece of fanon is the supposition that the Doctor, due to his alien nature, is incapable of romance or sexual attraction. Despite the existence of a granddaughter, and occasional minor references during the early years of the show, much of this supposition stems from the Fourth Doctor's odd reference to Countess Scarlioni in City of Death as "a beautiful woman, probably," as well as the 1963-89 series' general aversion to including romantic entanglements due to its long-standing image as a children's program. The Doctor Who 1996 telefilm was controversial with some fans in that it showed the Eighth Doctor kissing Grace Holloway twice, the latter in an unambiguously romantic way, which was accused of violating canon, even though it only violated fanon. The revived series has since thoroughly rendered this piece of fanon moot by featuring later Doctors in numerous romantic situations and entanglements; several novels published since 1991 have also featured romantic situations for the Doctor previously considered taboo; examples include Human Nature and the conclusion of The Dying Days.

An example of fanon stemming from the series revival is the question of "TARDIS coral". Fans have come to use this term to refer to pieces of TARDIS obtained by Jack Harkness (Torchwood) and the Meta-Crisis Tenth Doctor (TV: Journey's End - deleted scene). In fact, as of July 2009 no episode has ever used the term to describe these objects, nor have any close-ups indicated whether they are, indeed, coral-like. The issue is further muddied by the fact the Journey's End reference was deleted from the final episode, raising the question of its canonicity.

When fanon becomes canon[]

Fanon and canon are not necessarily exclusive of each other. It has been occasionally known for elements originating in fanon to be adopted into canon.

In spin-offs[]

The BBC has never made a firm proclamation regarding whether novels and other spin-off works should be considered canonical in relation to their television series. Still, spin-off media have been known to add elements of fanon into their own canon.

Some fan theories, such as the Season 6B theory, while not as yet explicitly confirmed on-screen, have been supported by expanded universe spin-offs such as novels. Others, such as the question raised by Planet of Fire as to whether the Doctor and the Master are actually brothers, have been denied by off-screen sources, if not necessarily on-screen.

The aforementioned Season 6B theory comes close to being "canon", having been featured in a BBC Past Doctor Adventures novel and endorsed by former script editor Terrance Dicks (who wrote the book in question, World Game). This theory started with a series of 1969 TV Comic stories featuring a companion-less Second Doctor exiled on Earth (and, after a few adventures, being forced to regenerate inside his TARDIS), and continued with his involvement in both The Five Doctors and The Two Doctors.

In televised Doctor Who[]

Occasionally, a piece of fanon will find its way not just into the spinoffs, but into Doctor Who proper.