All posts by GaisterWoodGuy

What is the most controversial Doctor Who opinion you have? Like, something really controversial that'd make a bunch of people, who now want your head on a spike, show up with pitchforks outside your house (metaphorically)

At the end of Scream Of The Shalka, before leaving to go with the Doctor Alison tells Joe to call her mum to see if she's with her mum. Joe calls her mum and future Alison isn't at her mum's house. This left me wondering, what happened to Alison? Did she die, was it an Ian & Barbara-type situation or was it even an idk Leela-type situation? It's worth noting that in the Feast of the Stone she notices how the Doctor didn't hesitate to turn the Master off so she wonders what the Doctor will do if he believes it's necessary. This probably implies that something bad happened to Alison.

3 images I made showing what it would be like if the first doctor never regenerated. the bbc did cruel cruel experiments on william hartnell to discover the secret to immortality and keep him in the role

In the game "Doctor Who: The First Adventure" from the 1980s, you play as the 5th Doctor and you get 15 "regenerations" as lives. If you die, you lose a life/regenerate. So if you lose one life, you regenerate into the 6th doctor, then the 7th, 8th, war doctor possibly, 9th, 10th, 11th, 12th, 13th, 14th, 15th, 16th, 17th, 18th and at least the 19th. Then you die. So, technically, their first appearance was in this game, but it doesn't count because we all know how the 5th Doctor regenerates and it's not because of snake things in a weird maze. Just a funny thing to think about

If you really think about it, everything on this wiki is canonical. Everything. The TARDIS wiki has been mentioned and seen in different stories before, hence making it canonical. By extension, if you've made a post on the tardis wiki, have made a contribution or even have a visitable user page here, you are canon. This wiki also has a link to the doctor who fanon & doctor who expanded wikis (here: https://tardis.fandom.com/wiki/Tardis:Bad_uses_for_user_pages ). They are canon. Fanon is canon. There is even a page about fanfiction dot net. Doctor Who fanfiction on fanfiction dot net is canonical. Actually, all fanfiction on that website is canon not just Doctor Who. There's links to wikipedia on the wiki. Wikipedia is canon. As a result, the doctor who page for Wikipedia is canon. Going back to the user pages thing and how you're canon, if you put a link on your user page that link could technically be canon. If you put a link on a user page on Doctor Who Fanon or Doctor Who Expanded, that's also canon. If you've been on another wiki and have a user page there or have a contribution, that wiki is technically canon. If a wiki has a link to the fandom website on it, this entire website is canon. Everything is canon.

Or maybe not. Who knows.