Perhaps out of sympathy, the most recent DWM poll had the gall to suggest The Twin Dilemma might be bad, but was at least "never boring". This is a scandalous claim. Indeed it is possibly this serial's only achievement that something so garish can also be so dull.
Little thought has gone into structure. Characters appear for a couple of scenes and we assume their presence will be explained/developed... and then they're never seen again. Kevin McNally, perhaps the only person to come out of this with a shred of dignity, (later to play Jericho in Flux) can't be blamed for Lang's non-existent characterisation, and why he decides to change out of his uniform and don a sequined shirt is the least of our worries. The script is Anthony Steven's only contribution to the series, and is frequently awful ("What happens there?"). It lurches uneasily between scenes, planets, ideas. Even not one but two quarries.
It's a sobering thought that somewhere under the rubber of Mestor (despite protestations he's a giant turd) is Captain Hart from The Sea Devils. The Jacondans look ludicrous. Womulus and Wemus don't appear bwilliant for a second: they are pudding-headed lemons introduced playing a stupid game. All three of the cliffhangers are painful close-ups that show Baker and Bryant in the most unflattering light imaginable. What's worse is the direction is so lackadaisical they're pretty much the only memorable shots of the entire serial.
The Twin Dilemma is usually cited as the worst Doctor Who story of all time. I'm unsure about that—there are a handful of good lines and although the plot stretches its four episodes to breaking point I actually find Mestor's plan quite funny. Besides, the late 70s and 80s offer up several other deserving candidates. But if it's individually a disaster, it also establishes a series of disastrous defaults that would plunge the programme to its death. The titles. The outfit. The goading and abuse—even physical assault—with Peri (in both directions), which, while there are occasional chinks of light, would be a hallmark of the entire era. It only makes for alienating television, at times genuinely difficult to watch.
Too often this is defended with a lazy "it's interesting". It's not interesting. It's tragic. And it's a tragedy because of the enormous charisma, enthusiasm and talent of the programme's new lead star. Colin Baker had the potential to be one of the best Doctors. He has a laser focus on not wasting a second of screen time, and is an undeniable presence after the vapid Davison faded away. What makes The Twin Dilemma such a... dilemma to watch is that for me it is always tinged with a huge sadness. Although Davison was absolutely right that Nathan-Turner "managed to turn the Doctor into his own image", for my money this deliberately unlikeable incarnation resembles more the misguided confidence of Eric Saward—but regardless, it is a mystery how either thought this in any way acceptable. What an infuriating waste.
(E)