Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-45314928-20200606025128/@comment-6032121-20200606150028

I tried only to restate points previously meant when misquoted or when someone asked me to do so, starting with User:Thefartydoctor a few posts ago: "Now humour me and explain what's left to debate?"

- User:Thefartydoctor

@User:Shambala108, I completely agree and follow you on the problem with us repeating the same points back at each other and the "sniping".

But… if we're not allowed to "argue back and forth", so long as it is done civilly and in good faith as opposed to in an attacky, war-like way… how is this an inclusion debate? These things are called debates. This leads to an expectation of users in them debating thing, critiquing each other's points, replying to criticisms. It's not going very well in this one, of course. But in the general case…