User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20130805171011/@comment-139.55.31.94-20130830230853

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20130805171011/@comment-139.55.31.94-20130830230853 Furthermore, DWM 464 goes into great detail about it; and while we don't have a page on that yet, that's because we don't have a page on DWM 56 either. Infact the cover has already been uploaded, at. (Which was a rational post and the poster deserves to sort of blocking) In that image you can see both his face and his name.

So are we to ignore all sorts of media coverage on the fact until Christmas because no one seems to be able to take a spoiler that everyone in the DW fandom already knew about well?

So are we to ignore all reason and ignore two pieces of media, because they both contained a spoiler we already knew about? Well then we can't have a page on DWM 459 either ,sense that has a big spoiler on the 50th. That's different? No, no it's not, you're just used to DWM. There is no actual difference between DWM and that special.

My suggestion?

We add the info on the special, on the magazine issues, and even on the page of the man himself (Who was already in Doctor Who and already has a locked page, as all of you already know) and add the spoiler template to all of them. Then we re lock the pages to prevent further spoilers past "You know who is playing the Doctor."

That's the only logical recourse in this current situation. I hope you all can pull together enough sense to enact it.