User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45314928-20200606025128/@comment-45692830-20200606040701

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45314928-20200606025128/@comment-45692830-20200606040701 You're right, and Davies wrote an extra chapter of the Rose novelization, not a short story. C'mon. Obviously the people who are arguing that it's valid are maintaining that it's a stand alone short story and not an extract.

Again, your reading here is impossible to maintain. They asked about the unproduced story, not the "excerpt", if you want to call it that. She then said he "mentioned" it, not that he "posted" it, or "released" it. But "mentioned" it. Your reading here is just untenable.

Again, I've provided evidence that it's licensed. The only way for you to say it's not is to say it wasn't a Lockdown! release. But to do so is question begging with respect to Thread:273268 since we still do not have firm agreement on what constitutes a Lockdown! story. So when you say that this is the only Lockdown! release not promoted by Cook, I'm reminded of the old saying that one man's modus ponens is another man's modus tollens.