User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20121212231649/@comment-4028641-20121219163027

CzechOut wrote: OttselSpy25 wrote: Okay, fine, but if we have the info and it is useful and relevant to the average user, then we should try and include this story. Not including something on purpose because we "Don't cover it" is, as I've said before, not very okayish. Alright, let's try yet another tack, here. To me, the very meaning of "not covering something" is that there is a reduction in the amount of information about that subject we choose not to cover.

What would your operational, practical definition of "not covering something" be, then? How would pages on subjects differ from the 99.99% of the rest of our pages?

We... Don't cover them?

Look, the point I'm trying to make is that if we can't have continuity sections on these pages, then the useful info that goes there needs to go somewhere.