User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170309095026

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170309095026 I know, you've probably just been sick in your mouth but, if you hang with me, I can explain.

On this wiki, video games with alternative endings are not allowed as valid sources, even if the BBC consider them so.

My proposal is that any narrative video game with multiple endings are reconsidered, in the in universe articles we could just put "according to one account...".

E.G. Begins

'''According to one account, the Graske was once put in suspended animation for an unknown period of time, along with all of the people in his captivity. (GAME: Attack of the Graske)'''

'''However another account stated that the Graske was stopped and all of the individuals in his captivity were freed. (GAME: Attack of the Graske)'''

E.G. Over

If we settle at this many a sources would fit correctly in the in universe articles.

To understand my proposal, it is that any video game with multiple endings are covered but go into a "According to one account..." section which would be no different to how we treat discontinuous sources.

Stories such as Doctor Who and the Warlord, TARDIS Tennis, Attack of the Graske, Worlds in Time and Whodle would become quite rightly valid sources but using the "according to one account" classic routine.

What do you peeps think?