User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-197.83.246.23-20200731095332/@comment-6032121-20200731163902

I'm not sure what exactly User:Najawin is saying when they say the earlier thread was closed due to "lack of narrative evidence for your view". The reason for this simple: I haven't the faintest idea what your actual view is.

You've created a number of thread, and with each new one the pattern repeats you throwing a bunch of (interpretations of) tangential facts at us, without a clear structure, let alone any sort of coherent suggestion. Not to toot by own horn, but look how I handled a somewhat similar topic in a much more orderly fashion at Thread:257167: clearly separating the evidence and my interpretation of it, separating the OP into several steps of the reasoning, and clearly spelling out what the material changes on the Wiki would be every step of the way.

I find your evidence shaky at best in a lot of cases — how does AUDIO: The Black Hole prove anything about whether the Meddling Monk is Mortimus-from-the-Academy, exactly? — but assuming for a moment if it is genuine, could you please give us a breakdown of how many pages you want created, and what info should go on what page? Then we might possibly get somewhere.

I think we can all agree that for the sake of anyone's sanity, the forum shouldn't be cluttered with formless threads full of hard-to-decipher facts, where no one seems interested in putting forward a practical, implementable solution.