Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-28349479-20161216221639/@comment-27280472-20161216234438

Pluto2 wrote: Fwhiffahder wrote: TheChampionOfTime wrote: Personally, I agree that Faction Paradox and many other things were wrongfully considered invalid. The more and more I've interacted with fans online the more disgusting the word "canon" comes to be. But there's one major problem that no amount of debating can fix: this ship left port years ago. I'm drawn to a message that I've heard a number of times on this wiki: "The difficulty of the work involved isn't worth it."

There are an awful lot of pages on Faction Paradox wiki which took an awful lot of work to be imported there and would take an awful lot of work to reintegrate back into tardis.

That's not a valid reason in any way, shape, or form. Nobody has to help integrate it if they don't want to. I, personally, would love to do it, and know for a fact that there are other people who feel the same. I would happily help integrate. But the question is whether we put info about the War King on the page about the Master, given that we have no in-universe sources linking the two, or whether we can put Evil Renegade and the Doctor together, etc. No, the policy is already established for those. War King would be a separate page because it's not explicit, just like Man with the Rosette. The only story where the Doctor is called an evil renegade is Dead Romance (novel), which is already on this wiki.