Howling:Series 5 Spans 2010.

Well, isn't that wizard. Since when was the timeline in sync with us? Though it has been noted that as of Children of Earth, The Sarah Jane Advetnures series 3, and The End of Time, the timeline is now in sycn with ours (stories that aired in 2008 and 2009 were both set in the same year). The latest stories set in 2009 wer Children of Earth in September 2009, The Sarah Jane Adventures series 3 in October and November 2009, The End of Time in December 2009. The Sarah Jane Advetnure sseries 2 was June, July, and August time 2009. But Planet of the Dead became a big discontinuity error: April 2009, seemingly before the series 4 Doctor Who finale. SIGH.

Donna's second wedding was spring 2010 (March, April, May), Jack left Earth in March 2010. Series 5 of Doctor Who spans the majority of 2010 for present day Earth stories. The Doctor meets Amy Pond in 2010, and there is an episode where Vincent Van Gogh is taken to Paris 2010- and the scene has snow! It has been reported that the Doctor meets Amy Pond in 1995 when she is a child, and later in 2010 15 years later. I was watching filming footage for the first episode of series 5 a while ago, and I believe there was some mention of how "time almost ended" in the episode dialouge. Seemingly some reference to The End of Time and how the world almost ended. As for exact dating, I reckon the first episode of series 5 will be set around April of June 2010. Let's hope specific dates are given in series 5 other than it spanning 2010. I don't like "unknown dates".

And don't go trying to say Planet of the Dead could take place afrer The End of Time. Somehow The End of Time ends up taking place before The Wedding of Sarah Jane Smith, too. Delton Menace 12:02, January 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree with the basic thrust of what you're saying — there's nothing in the 2009 specials to prevent the "present day" bits from being in 2009 — but you lose me in some of your details. Why does JE necessarily post-date POTD? Series 3 took place in 96 hours, from Francine's perspective. Why are we assuming JE takes place more than a few days after PIC? I don't recall, off the top of my head, any great time passage in the "current day" scenes. Also, how do you know COE is in September? I've only watched it entirely once, but I can't seem to find a reference anywhere in Day One. Is there a newscast, newspaper, calendar or some other obscure part of a frame I missed? Or is that a deduced date, based upon things that are said elsewhere, perhaps in a TW audio?


 * Not so sure why POTD vexes you enough to sigh heavily. Yes, it it's interesting to wonder when it's placed. I think I've asked the question where it fits in over at the episode page's talk. But it's hardly that important, since it's a self-contained episode, with no likely returning characters. All that matters is that, from the Doctor's perspective, it happens before TWOM and TEOT. It could very easily take place in 2010, or 2007, or 2009. Pretty sure the script doesn't tie down the narrative to even a month of the year, which would at least eliminate some years from contention, since we know it to take place on Easter. About the only thing tying it down, really, is the existence of the Oyster card and the early 21st century "vibe".


 * And I'm really not sure where you're getting the months for SJA series 3. Why is it in the fall of 2009, while series 2 was in the spring? WHy would you say with one breath that series 3 is in the fall of 2009, but that TWOSJS happens after TEOT?, definitively at Christmas? I admit it's a possibility that TWOSJS takes place after the sliver of a scene we have in TEOT, but it's surely not definite. The only thing I can find on screen is a logical deduction. A title card establishes "old Rani" to be from 2059 in TMWITA. It seems illogical that the story would be set 49 years in the future. Not impossible, mind, just illogical. Seems "neater" to assume that it's in 2009, but it honestly affects the narrative not a whit either way. The only thing that matters is that it's "a long way off". So what's your proof of a late 2009 setting, and why would only TWOSJS be set after TEOT?


 * I'm also not sure how you can be so certain of what will happen in Series 5 until it airs, based on a few rumors, or even based on one bit of dialogue confirmed by several witnesses to filming. All we have on screen right now is the end of EOT. And there, the TARDIS goes up into Earth orbit on 1 January 2005. It does not appear to enter the time vortex. And then it comes right back down, again with no sign of time travel. Using only the visual evidence before us, Series 5 could just as easily be based on a "current time" which is slightly pre-Rose.  Czech Out  ☎ | ✍ 20:19, January 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's a vexation because Planet of the Dead, which is Easter, takes place after Journey's End - we know this because one of the human passengers remembers seeing the planets in the sky and another says the Earth was moved. Journey's End took place in June, making Planet of the Dead the Easter of the next year. Planet of the Dead takes place before SJA Series 3, because the theft of the Cup of Athelstan is referred to in Mona Lisa's Revenge at the museum.
 * And Planet of the Dead presumably takes place before The End of Time, because there's a "Neon by Naismith" sign in it but Naismith is arrested in The End of Time. Also SJA Series 3 presumably takes place before The End of Time if The Wedding of Sarah Jane Smith contains Luke's first face-to-face meeting with the Doctor.
 * Yet Children of Earth is established as September 2009 by a newspaper. Jack leaves Earth six months later, in spring 2010. Donna's wedding is also spring 2010 according to RTD's commentary on The End of Time. Since the Doctor visits them both around the same time, that fits.
 * Until one realizes that with the episode "Rose" being 2005 and the one year jump to "Aliens of London", Journey's End should be in 2009. Which would make Planet of the Dead, Children of Earth, SJA Series 3, and The End of Time all 2010, except that Children of Earth and The End of Time have that evidence placing them in 2009.
 * This could be a stable timeline with Journey's End through The End of Time all being 2009 (that's why SJA Series 2 would be summer and Series 3 fall, to fit them in the same year), if Planet of the Dead wasn't Easter. -- Noneofyourbusiness 04:11, January 24, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah I agree we really cant judge when this will be set. CzechOut is right the doctor did still seem to be in 1st January 2005, but there have been rumours that Amy Pond will meet the Doctor in 1995 and filming clips show the Doctor and Amy taking Vincent Van Gogh to Paris 2010 so we really cannot tell until actual broadcast or closer the time. -- Michael Downey 20:34, January 23, 2010 (UTC)

I believe the Doctor meets Amy Pond as a child, which would be in 1995, and then as an adult (which she is in the trailer) in 2010, and the modern day Earth stories are all set 2010. Planet of the Dead, however, is a very big continuity error. As we know, it simply doesn't take place after The End of Time, and neither does The Wedding of Sarah Jane Smith. They both take place before The End of Time, which is Christmas 2010, a few months after Children of Earth

The Next Doctor would have been set Christmas 2009 if it wasn't set in the past, but it left Christmas 200 to be chronicled in The End of Time. Another thing that fits with this years stories: Children of Earth is in September, The Sarah Jane Advetnures series 3 October and November, The End of Time in December and spring 2010, which is when Donna gets married and Jack had left Earth.

With Children of Earth September 2009 and The End of Time December 2009, The Sarah Jane Advetnures series 3 fits right between them (where it's supposed to go anyway) in October and November 2009. But both The End of Time and SJA series 3 are set after Planet of the Dead, placing it in Easter 2009. Because Planet of the Dead is in April 2009 and takes place after The Stolen Earth/Journey's End, that's the problem: they're supposed to be after April unless you disregard to reference to "planets in the sky." The only way to solve the problem is by placing Doctor Who series 4 a little further back and possibly having the finale be in early April. Because some novels regard the first majority of Torchwood series 2 as being in late 2008 partly into early 2009, it gives room for Doctor Who series 4 to be pushed further back and the finale being in early April at the latest.

Plus, Russell T. Davies said he was going to clear up the things he casued- one of which is the series being set a year ahead. He would have cleared that for Moffat by having last years and this years stories set in the same year. Delton Menace 12:05, January 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * What's the evidence for Journey's End taking place in June?  Czech Out  ☎ | ✍ 02:42, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Beautiful Chaos' A-plot starts on May 15 and Journey's End takes place afterward, but somewhere within six weeks of it, as the framing story of Beautiful Chaos ends with Wilf and Sylvia receiving a letter that Donna told another character to give them six weeks after he last saw her. -- Noneofyourbusiness 05:11, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

I would like to point out to Delton Menance that he made a mistake if the Doctor meet Amy Pond in 1995 and then in 2010 she would only be five years old. So from what we already know she has a boyfriend so she must be either in her late teens or early twenty's at least. so i reckon she was born either in 1990 or late 1980s. User:Oliversmillie 2:44, February 2, 2010 (EST)
 * He meets her as a child and again as a young adult. -- Noneofyourbusiness 05:11, February 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * The problem is, with The End of Time being Christmas 2009, The Sarah Jane Adventures series 3 taking place not long before it in October and November time 2009, and Children of Earth in September 2009, what can be done about Planet of the Dead? That's set before them - in April! Unless we ignore the reference to their having been planets in the sky. Timeline wise, if you listen to Beautiful Chaos's date, Planet of the Dead happens before The Stolen Earth/Journey's End.

Russell T. Davies is well aware that series 4 was the in the era of the first part of 2009, and he is damn well aware that this year's stories are in later 2009 (excluding Planet of the Dead, which is seemingly not long after The Stolen Earth/Journey's End, despite being in April. However, Placing The Stolen Earth/Journey's End before May in 2009 clashes with The Waters of Mars, in which Adelaide was said to be 10 year's old. Born 12th May 1999, she was 10 when the Daleks invaded, which would mean it has to be after May 12th 2009. Equally, it is 2059, and she says the Earth was moved across space 50 years ago - 2009. But Planet of the Dead takes place after it, in April, which can't be. Nor can it be in 2010 for many reasons we know why- Naismith is in business, the recsession hasn't ended, among other things! Oh, and it also takes place before The Sarah Jane Advetnures series 3 (which references it in one episode), which takes place before The End of Time, which is Christmas 2009! UGH! Delton Menace 09:41, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's like Sarah Jane saying she's from 1980 in Pyramids of Mars, but the date of Mawdryn Undead making that impossible. I wouldn't be so sure he's well aware of Series 4 being in 2009, though. Did he make Adelaide's birthday May 12 1999 or did the prop people? My gut feeling is that if you asked anyone in The End of Time about the stolen planets, they'd say it was a year ago. -- Noneofyourbusiness 14:09, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * No, they would say it was half a year ago. Confirmation says The End of Time - Christmas 2009, and The Stolen Earth/Journey's End - June 2009. In between is SJA series 2 (July, August), Children of Earth (September), and SJA series 3 (October November), and then The End of Time (December). With the specials being part of series 4, they would still be part of 2009, too. Each new series is a new year on present day Earth: series 1 (majority 2006), series 2 (2007), series 3 (2008), series 4 (2009), series 5 (2010). The specials are part of series 4, too.

And indeed, the Doctor travels to 2010 throughout series 5. Dialouge, my friend. Dialouge. And because Jack left Earth in March 2010, it really fits with The End of Time when Christmas is over - the Doctor travels to Spring 2010 (MARCH, April, May). It's simply a continuity error - Russell T. Davies or Gareth Roberts didn't realise that The Stolen Earth/Journey's End happened after April.

People try to say past series happened in the same year (i.e. series 3 and 4 Doctor Who) to answer it, but that's even worse: if series 3 and 4 were both in the same year, that places series 4 before Voyage of the Damned. One person placed series 2 and 3 in the same year, placing series 3 before The Runaway Bride and placing series 4 before Voyage of the Damned. Big mistake. I like the think the bus passanger who mentioned "planets in the sky" was having a bad dream (no pun intended). Delton Menace 14:49, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * We all know Series 3 and 4 can't be in the same year, as shown by Turn Left.
 * It's conceivable that Davies mispoke when he said Donna's wedding was 2010 (forgetting the year skip) and Planet of the Dead, Children of Earth, SJA Series 3, and The End of Time were actually 2010, making the 2009 newspaper date in CoE a production error like the 2008 Dalek Invasion screen in Waters of Mars. If it happened once, it can happen again. That paper wasn't dialogue, after all. Just one of many possible ways of trying to resolve the mistake that's obviously been made somewhere.
 * You frequently bring up Davies' statement that he would tie up everything for Moffat, but it's not hard fact that this applies to the year skip until he outright says so. It may not even have crossed his mind when he said that. Many people thought his statement would mean a permanent return of the Time Lords and end of the Time War mythos, but it didn't. It did apply to loose ends like Queen E.
 * Series 5 could be set in the same year as the specials, because the Doctor's a time traveller. Alternatively, while we know he takes van Gogh to 2010 we don't know absolutely that it's Amy's home year, though it seems likely. We'll know more when it airs.
 * I'm not saying any particular way of resolving the problem is fact, I'm pointing out we don't know which is. We really need someone to talk to the producers about this. Or an updated Time Traveller's Almanac that resolves it.
 * This is really frustrating, and I sympathize with you and everyone else who wants to tie it up neatly. -- Noneofyourbusiness 15:39, February 1, 2010 (UTC)