User talk:Solar Dragon-fduser/Archive 1

Hi nice to see you on here - Lewody1 18:21 7th July 2009
 * I'm only here after watching yesterdays Torchwood episode. Did you see it? Solar  Dragon  ( Talk ) 17:30, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeh it was good i watched on BBC iplayer i love doctor who and i like torchwood because its flimed down the road i live in Barry down the road from cardiff and I like this type of stuff - Lewody1 8 July 2009 20:10
 * Cool. I love it. Next episode in 5 minutes. "We are coming". Solar  Dragon  ( Talk ) 19:54, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for adding the catagory thing on the Jammy Dodger page i didn't know how to add them

Dan

Sorry didn't sign Danisfunny 18:44, April 17, 2010 (UTC)

Your welcome. And, to do it, just type: ☆  The  Solar  Dragon  ( Talk ) ☆ 18:45, April 17, 2010 (UTC)

i think we really do need a admin or someone high up, something has got to block those spammers indefinately
 * One has been contacted. Also, please sign comments with ~ ☆ The  Solar  Dragon  ( Talk ) ☆ 06:29, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

ok, sorry, please tell me when all of this is over and that all of those articles are deletedSclera1 06:36, May 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sure. I have even tried contacting the people even higher up than admins, the Wikia staff to see if any of them are able to help out. ☆ The  Solar  Dragon  ( Talk ) ☆ 06:38, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

Excuse me, Callum, I'm just trying to show the love of my life how much I care. Doginahat 06:43, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

please don't be rude guise this is a family oriented site Cumbucket 06:45, May 9, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, and please do not vandalize. This is a Doctor Who wiki. ☆ The  Solar  Dragon  ( Talk ) ☆ 06:48, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

Reply to User:Solar Dragon
You're right, but unfortunately anger like this builds up after you are undoing all the vandalism he's done for 4 hours or so then to be humiliated on one of the biggest Wikia's in the world.

Thanks you for reminding me gently but sternly,

Aldurnamiyanrandvora 06:50, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

P.S. I'm going away from my computer to cool off, so I won't be able to stop him, so good luck

P.P.S. In my defense, he had been making personal attacks of a far greater extent and degree
 * Yes, I understand that but you just have to be careful. ☆ The  Solar  Dragon  ( Talk ) ☆ 06:53, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

ok
okey dokey, its just he really annoyed me and i think his computer should br broken in half for vandalising.

- Thehumondalek  Speak to the Dalek! 07:14, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

im sorry to see you go, you were a good contributer Sclera1 00:57, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm just annoyed by much of the community here. Especially that admin. He didn't just ignore me twice, he even removed one of my comments I left on his talk page. ☆ The  Solar  Dragon  ( Talk ) ☆ 06:13, May 21, 2010 (UTC)

Wait
hey, before you go, sory but maybe Tangerine didn't mean to ignore you, it is a busy job being an admin (let alone a big wiki such as this one) maybe you might just need some rest and relaxation for a while (especially after that huge event), i hope you can rest and maybe come back if you want to =) Sclera1 11:17, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * I might come back in little bits but that will only be to update the new episodes. I bet he did. He just removed my comment and ignored me. I know how it is like to be an admin. I am one myself on other wikis and I make it a priority to respond to everyone who leaves me a message. ☆ The  Solar  Dragon  ( Talk ) ☆ 12:05, May 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * I didn't mean to ignore you or delete your comments. I removed your comments pertaining to the vandalism issues as I didn't want the user's user name plastered all over my user page. So I apologise for removing that comment, I was busy acting on the vandalism issue. --Tangerineduel 12:36, May 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) You didn't even respond to me at all about it.
 * 2) I asked for rollback rights too, ignored.
 * The only way I will stick around is if you give me the rollback rights I requested. I think I deserve them. ☆ The  Solar  Dragon  ( Talk ) ☆ 12:37, May 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * I acted on your message concerning the vandalism. I'm sorry if you were waiting for a response to that (I had several messages and reports left, I generally usually act on them to try and keep vandalism minimum). I will however consider in the future acknowledging reports of vandalism left for me by users.
 * I'm not quite sure what you mean by that you "deserve" the user rights.
 * I'm ready to consider any user rights of users, but I think that people should want to stick around here to help out (whatever the user rights level) rather than being persuaded through certain levels of user rights. Looking at your edits they all appear to be to the post-2005 series/Torchood, I'm somewhat concerned that should you have rollback or other user rights levels that you might unknowingly rollback legitimate edits. I am also somewhat concerned at the rather rash comment left on your user page and edit comments such as "According to stupid people on this wiki...", as Sclera1 said this is a large (and active) wiki, there will be discussions and disagreements, in the case of the Cracks/Time Field discussion I would have suggested continuing the discussion on the forums to get further clarification on the subject away from the Time Field page. I do hope you understand my concerns regarding your request, once more I'm sorry it took me some time to get back to you. --Tangerineduel 13:06, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * I know some of my comments were harsh. I was in a bad mood when I stated them. I had a terrible day yesterday so, I am sorry if I offended anyone with those comments. I was rather rude to you, and I am sorry again. I am thinking a bit more clearly now anyway. We should really have a page to request rollback/admin/bureaucrat rights too, as many wikis do. Yes, we. I may stick around after all. And, I am sorry if I offended you or any one else. You are a great contributor after all. I mean, over 40000 edits! That is amazing. And, yes my knowledge of the past series isn't great but I do not revert edits that may be correct without asking on the talk pages first. I am very skilled with the rights, I am an admin on Wikisimpsons and many other wikis, and I am not asking you to give them to me now, only if you feel I should have them, but I won't misuse them. Once again, sorry. When I am in a bad mood, it really shows. ☆ The  Solar  Dragon  ( Talk ) ☆ 13:15, May 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * We could have a page for a request for admin/roll back rights. I say could only because generally most admin requests fall into two categories those who want them to so they can block people or those who want them so they can delete articles.
 * If you are curious there is this page Tardis:User rights (an attempt a while ago to set up a request page).
 * As to my edits, I've been around here a while and I've done numerous mind-numbing edits while here (I think I've gone through every major story article more than once). I have a fairly thick skin regarding this wiki, so no worries about offending me. I would suggest not editing here if in a bad mood though (as with everything on a wikia/wikipedia it's all on record and all in the history), I often just close the all the tabs I've got open and leave until I cool down. Thanks --Tangerineduel 13:31, May 21, 2010 (UTC)

Talk pages
They can do whatever they want on their talk pages, delete everything (same goes for their user page, keep it red lined, fill it with random stuff, in-keeping of course with our Tardis:User page policy), it's all in their history. (See also Tardis:Vandalism policy which just covers people editing other user's comments etc). Thanks. --Tangerineduel 13:35, May 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * I've not seen the star/heart rating used a lot articles in use. I'll look into changing it. (What's wrong with hearts?). --Tangerineduel 14:20, May 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * Perhaps they'll appeal to elements of the our community and inspire them to become more involved?
 * As far as ill-thought out ideas of wikia this one is somewhat minor. I'll wait an see though, it seems a relatively minor thing to go altering things. (I don't really see an issue with them, but I do understand wikia's thinking in needing to differentiate pictographically between the follow star and the rate this article selecting thing.) --Tangerineduel 14:43, May 21, 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism Template
I'm actually going to ask people not to use it for now, just till we can sort out some issues with it, actually there's only one. That is, why when it's used it adds the code rather than the template? --Tangerineduel 11:18, May 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes definitely fix it so it all works, with a signature and without all the code (or am I asking too much? as I didn't see that exact mix of things on the sandbox). Thanks. --Tangerineduel 11:47, May 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks (thought it was something simple like that!). --Tangerineduel 12:48, May 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * Actually not to ask one more thing (it's not a major thing) but the signature outside of the template..., it doesn't matter that much, just thought I'd ask if it can be within the template box? --Tangerineduel 13:10, May 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * What I was thinking, though it destroys some of the usefulness of the template is just having the page that was vandalised something that has to be filled rather than an if and the second  to be the signature. (Which is admittedly a more simplistic way to make it all work, and would force the person placing the template to be a little more aware. But, as I said it's a minor issue, as this is a template that shouldn't be trumped out too often (hopefully). It's not that much of a concern. --Tangerineduel 13:10, May 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * What I was thinking, though it destroys some of the usefulness of the template is just having the page that was vandalised something that has to be filled rather than an if and the second  to be the signature. (Which is admittedly a more simplistic way to make it all work, and would force the person placing the template to be a little more aware. But, as I said it's a minor issue, as this is a template that shouldn't be trumped out too often (hopefully). It's not that much of a concern. --Tangerineduel 13:10, May 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * It looks like it's working, I've tweaked it slightly so 'recent edits' links to the user's contributions page. Though I'm not sure why it's not working for you. Thanks though for working through my requests. --Tangerineduel 13:27, May 22, 2010 (UTC)