Board Thread:The Panopticon/@comment-1272640-20161217032902/@comment-24894325-20170603225459

As already stated by Shambala108 upthread, the proposal directly violates rule #1 of the policy on valid sources, as explained under Tardis:Valid sources. The proposal falls under Fictional information presented non-narratively and the policy states:


 * Sometimes, [...] reference works [...] will present "biographical" or "historical" information about characters and situations in the DWU in a non-narrative style. Maybe this will be [...] an article that's a kind of "pseudo-history". None of this is allowed.