User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-24894325-20180907002807/@comment-4843510-20180910092934

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-24894325-20180907002807/@comment-4843510-20180910092934 I'd argue with the bullet points that losing and trying again and winning, or simply skipping does not deter validity. It's essentially like in the Adventure Games, the Wiki is not going to say "The Doctor was exterminated 5 times, then respawned and avoided them", but the game uses the best possible scenario of what the game intended. So either way for Infinity it would read "the TARDIS reaches its destination". With the positions on the board, I'll argue again using the Adventure Games as an example. The Wiki has inferred that the Doctor just gets along with the story and ignores little things like this. The Wiki would just write that the Doctor gets to his destination and not that he could be loitering around for 5 hours before he gets to where he needs to go. Hopefully you understand what I'm saying here, I completely support the notion that Infinity should be valid due to its coherance in storytelling as well as the other rules in the 4 rules for validity.