User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-43908-20150311013943/@comment-5918438-20151021014901

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-43908-20150311013943/@comment-5918438-20151021014901 I'm a bit confused about what you'd want to do with a single template. We need templates for the Master because in all cases (save Missy), he (again, save Missy) is to be referred to simply as "the Master", but needs linking to different sections of the article. An important question, should we do the Romana merge, is how we'll require linkage to be done. Right now, it's Romana I and Romana II, sure...but what about the others? If they're in separate sections on the merged article...how would policy dictate we link to them?

Also, and this may have been definitively answered upthread (I'm sorry if it was), but is there any actual proof that the incarnation we currently call Romana III is the third? It seems as though Trey definitely is, but is it clear that "Romana III" immediately follows Romana II? If not, then shouldn't both Trey and Romana III link to the section dealing with Trey, and the incarnation we currently understand as Romana III be in another section entirely, since the incarnation number is unclear? Is the incarnation number, in fact, unclear?