Forum:Aliens and enemies templates: the final battle

We've had a number of discussions on whether the navigation boxes housed in category:Aliens Navigation templates should stay or go. They've persisted, it seems to me, because none of the preceding discussions were concluded. As I switch over navboxes to their new and more flexible format, I'm stumped as to whether I should do the work on converting these templates, because opposition to them in the various threads seems to have been reasonably high. It's an awful lot of work to do if we, as a community, don't even want the boxes in the first place.

For your review, here are the previous discussions on this issue that are giving me pause:
 * Forum:Aliens and Enemies
 * Forum:Aliens and Enemies Template
 * Forum:Navigation Templates

I think that some of the objections raised in these threads have been answered by the new format allowed by navbox. One major bone of contention in the previous thread was where the navbox was to be placed. I had argued for a placement under the infobox, but this new template neatly stows things above the category strip. Fine. That issue is settled. TD had hated, as do I, the bulkiness of a number of different navboxes on top of each other. That also has been solved by the new navbox system, since multiple navboxes can now be nested inside a single container. (See Sarah Jane Smith for an example of this in action.)

What remains, then, are three central questions. And, as we've already had a ton of discussion about this, it's time to have a clearer vote on these issues. Thus the questions are asked in a series of polls. These polls will remain open for one week from today, at which time the aliens and enemies templates will either be revamped in the new format, or redirected to a blank template, which will neatly make them disappear from all pages. 15:33:33 Tue 29 Mar 2011

Examine the following navbox:

Should we keep navboxes like the one above? Yes No

If you answered "yes" to the above question, then continue on to the following question. If you answered "no" please do not answer the following question.

If the answer to the above question is "yes", then do we keep the templates as "aliens and enemies" or do we divide it into SEPARATE "enemies" and "aliens" templates? Keep as "aliens and enemies" Divide into two navboxes, "aliens" and "enemies" Keep only the enemies part Keep only the aliens part

If you answered to keep "aliens" then continue to the next question. If you answered "keep only the enemies part", above, do not answer the following question:

If we keep "aliens", who counts as an alien? The Doctor is the titular character, so an "alien" is anyone not a Time Lord The audience is human so aliens are anyone not human Aliens are anyone who aren't the same species as the Doctor and/or companions (therefore, Alzarians, Trions, and Trakenites, for example, aren't aliens)

Discussion
Keep navboxes, they make the wiki richer, divide into aliens and enemies, both are important to note but should not be conflated, aliens are anyone not human (Alzarians count for Season 18, Time Lords for Season 6 and Season 15, etc.), otherwise the navbox omits the fact that a species was introduced or focused on. -- Noneofyourbusiness 13:59, March 31, 2011 (UTC)

I think they should be kept in principle but modified somewhat. Splitting them into separate aliens and enemies would probably solve the problem since they're a bit overfilled and unwieldy at the moments. Otherwise, concentrate on the main villains/races rather than listing every henchman or minor species. Skteosk 14:24, March 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * Just a point of clarification here. Splitting into two templates will mean that the total area on the page will be increased. Two templates, when fully opened, will cover more vertical space than one combined template.   21:22:33 Sat 02 Apr 2011

I might be missing something here in the discussion but when I make a distinction between the terms 'aliens' and 'enemies' I tend to think of them as (alien to human) 'species' and 'individually-named' enemies. The Librarian 14:58, March 31, 2011 (UTC)

Keep the navboxes, but divide into enemies and non-humans it will make it more understandable and the problem will be solved. The mysterious 13:22, April 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Just a question about this thought, though. If we divided into "non-humans" as you say, won't we then logically have to put Time Lord in every single story, except Mission to the Unknown?  Or won't we have to put "Alzarian" in every story featuring Adric?  20:23:30 Sat 02 Apr 2011

How about instead of "Non-human" it was "Non-terrestrial". I think, to sort this all out, we need to look at it from say (this will make me sound stupid) the Time Lord's point of view. I mean, to them, we are alien (non-terrestrial) and they are terrestrial. I was just looking at The Librarian's last comment, and that helped me a bit. Enemies are not nessecerally aliens, so that sort of covers both Aliens and Enemies. I know that somewhere that's already been mentioned and an admin has come up with a negative result, but isn't it time we do the rational and easy solution. There are other things on this wiki that need doing. --Ghastly9090 12:42, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm afraid that other users don't appear to see a "rational and easy solution" the same as you do. For instance, from my point of view, as the person who will probably end up actually implementing the results of the vote, the "rational and easy solution" is to redirect all these damned things to a blank template and thereby instantly remove them from the wiki.  That's 15 minutes of work, versus the hours and indeed possibly days of work involved in moving these navboxes to the new format.  But that's my view.  The point of this final vote is just to end the discussion that's been going on for about a year so that we can, as you say, get onto "other things".  21:17:01 Sun 03 Apr 2011

I created a selection of navboxes to illustrate three different versions of this box. I'm not sure if this is what people had in mind. Feel free to modify them if not.Skittles the hog-- Talk 13:39, April 3, 2011 (UTC)