User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20121212231649/@comment-1317169-20121218151354

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20121212231649/@comment-1317169-20121218151354 Rowan Earthwood wrote: Do you always look at the talk pages on wikis you don't help edit? Not everyone does, and it won't be obvious to everyone there might be useful/interesting content hidden away there.

Yes I do. One any wiki I go on and I see that there is discussion on the talk page, I usually go and see what is on the page.

Rowan Earthwood wrote: If a section is considered worthy of the main page in most articles, then it seems odd to delete it based on a labeling technicality. Whether you call it continuity or a reference, it's still the sort of thing we normally consider to be interesting/valid.

You are still missing the point that myself, CzechOut, Shambala108, Tangerineduel and Imamadman have say. If the story is non DWU it cannot have continuity. It is impossible.

There might be interesting, but have continuity (and even references) go against what the non DWU does.

Rowan Earthwood wrote: Why would you include references without hyperlinks? Purely to make the wiki less functional?

Having links to the pages would encourages editors to add information from the story. For example, if Death Comes to Time has a link to beer, then someone might edit the article to include what happened with beer in the story - which cannot happen. Non DWU information cannot go on in universe articles.