User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20200505204802/@comment-27321963-20200505235144

There's no proof of anything in your last paragraph, though. There is a lot of "I think" going on, not just from you but from me as well, and at the end of the day what we think is irrelevant and speculation. You think that they were commissioned, while I think it was likely asked as a favour / to try out the new features and was promoted on the site to encourage others. The solution is to include the stories on the site but as invalid works. What part of that is inconsistent?