Talk:The Universe is Calling (TV story)

New title
I tried a couple of times giving this page a title containing the # sign. But apparently that is not possible, so I took a line from the teaser that I think describes it pretty well. --DCLM ☎  00:24, December 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * Please... someone respond. --DCLM ☎  08:05, December 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * You can't use number signs in titles because #Text means a link to the Text heading in a given article. Generally, if, say, credits give "Soldier #2", we link Soldier 2 instead. Where are these titles coming from, anyway? 10:18, December 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * "The Universe is calling ..." is the subject of the email I received on 13 Jul (from the BBC DW website), advertising that this teaser would be released soon. The following email, with this teaser (16 Jul), simply had "Unveiled: The Series 11 teaser is here ..." as the subject, and "New Doctor Who, New Friends, New Adventures" under the main image/link. 10:26, December 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see: the 13 July email was the same day as this video, a teaser for the teaser, called "The Universe is Calling". And the 15 July video is just "Doctor Who: Series 11 Teaser". But it does end with the "The Universe is Calling" title card. Couldn't we cover both on this page? 10:29, December 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * We could, yes. My initial thoughts were just that these two should be seperated. But you're the caretaker admin. Do what you must. --DCLM ☎  13:13, December 11, 2018 (UTC)

Fan Criticism
"The teaser notably received fan criticism for heavily featuring food in it and for the Doctor slowing down time around her." Do you have a source for this? Skeletondoctor ☎  10:35, December 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * That's what people complained about when it was released. --DCLM ☎  13:11, December 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * But do you have any noteworthy examples of these complaints? This is the first I have ever heard of people having such issues, it can't be taken as fact without sources. Skeletondoctor ☎  13:57, December 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * Since it's quite some time ago... no. But it was a pretty huge criticism back then. I'm sure if you were to do some digging, you'd find it though. --DCLM ☎  14:03, December 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * It's your responsibility to do that digging if you want to include it in a wiki article. Wikis don't work if anyone can submit unsourced claims. Skeletondoctor ☎  14:16, December 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * Tell that to the 100s of other unsourced claims that are also on this Wikia. --DCLM ☎  14:43, December 11, 2018 (UTC)

We don't make mention of fan opinion or polls on this wiki unless they are sourced. This material needs a source or it will be removed. And more importantly, one or more examples of a rule being broken doesn't mean the rule can be ignored. It just means we have too few clean-up users around here to do the job thoroughly. Shambala108 ☎  14:54, December 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * Then what must be done must be done. I certainly can't find it anymore. Things are much easier to find and add when they are relevant. This article should have been created when it was relevant back in July. --DCLM ☎  16:14, December 11, 2018 (UTC)