Forum:Facts vs. rumours

I am sick and tired of of confirmed rumours, promo pictures, and the like ending up in rumours. It's stupid. If something is confirmed, it's not a bloody rumour. Confirmations so far include the enemies who are appearing in The Pandorica Opens and/or The Big Bang (some of the pictures showing this are even visable at the bottom of the page), the confirmation that van Gogh, Winston Churchill, and Liz 10 return in some form. Not only was the latter confirmed in a new interview with Karen Gillan (who implied quite a number of series 5 characters will return for either part of the finale, not only the three of them), but some new info regarding the finale mentioned the van Gogh painting from the symnosis being passed through the ages (or something of the like) through people such as Chuchill, Liz 10, and eventually landing in the hands of River Song. Then, there was the spoilers that confirmed they're returning, and then there was a review of the first part which mentioned the events seen throughout series 5 being revisited from a different perspective (note: this really fits with the thoery that the Doctor goes back through the events of series 5, one picture even showing him with young Amelia again).

Therefore, it's not a rumour. It's a fact. The rumours are fopr the things there is no confirmation for, so stop putting confirmed things in the bloody rumours. It's getting really annoying, having to move them to story notes or something. At the bottom of the page, there is now a gallery showing several of the confirmed enemies that will appear (the ones pictured are Cybermen, Sycorax, Judoon with a helmet on, Silurians, and Weevils). Yet, they mysterious ended up in rumours, despite being confirmed both by spoilers and the images in the gallery.

This is getting absolutely ridiculous. Facts shouldn't be in the rumours section. Delton Menace 00:27, June 17, 2010 (UTC)


 * Facts aren't facts until the episode airs. Period.  I don't understand your apparent anxiety.  We have nine months of long, Who-less nights to edit this wiki and get our series 5 articles "right".   While we allow spoilers here, it's not the job of this wiki to be a source of news.  We're here to catalogue that which has happened, not which might happen.  Confirmation doesn't, I would suggest, mean what you think it does.  It is the job of the production team to whet our appetites, and thus they may give interviews which don't strictly lie, but do shade the truth in a most exciting way.  And, if you listened to Steven Moffat on his American tour at the beginning of the series, he believes he absolutely does have the right to lie.  So just because there's a pre-broadcast interview out there "confirming" something, well, it don't mean jack to this wikia.  What's even more annoying than what you describe, above, is having to come back months later and take out of the article those things that were "confirmed" but either never happened, or were massively more incidental than the initial language suggested.   Czech Out   ☎ | ✍  19:54, June 17, 2010 (UTC)