Board Thread:The Panopticon/@comment-33094701-20180520053852

I noticed some slight inconsistencies with the start of the series 7 story articles.

For example, The Sons of Kaldor and The Crowmarsh Experiment both are formatted the same way as the last 6 series worth of stories, "[NAME] was the [NUMBER] story in the seventh series of Fourth Doctor Adventures." Two parters are usually indicated as being so, however in this case it is done with the rather convoluted "and part two of the final story of part one of series seven."

This is then continued on for the single part stories 5 and 6 "and the second story of part two of series seven." and for the finale, "and the final part of the final story of part two of series seven."

This long run on sentence about the different parts of stories and series seems unecessarily complicated, and I think that indicating whether its from Volume 1 or 2 of the series seems unecessary, especially since they can be bought individually, and it isn't mentioned on all the story pages.

I thought it would be a good idea to establish whether or not mentioning the volume was necessary, since it seems future stories in the series will also be in volumes. 