Talk:Widow

T:NO RW
Let's address this issue for a second. As User:Najawin noted in edit summaries, T:NO RW states:


 * "don't write the in-universe sections of articles about subjects that exist in both the DWU and the real world using Wikipedia. Trust only Doctor Who sources. And don't go further than what the DWU source actually tells you."

The conjecture part of the policy only applies to titles.

If we don't have an in-universe definition for a noun, we don't need to explicitly define it. That's what the tag is for.

As an example of in-universe definition, see Vegetable.

And "it's done this way on other pages" is not a reason for doing something against policy. There are tons of examples of violated policy all over the wiki that are just not fixed yet. That isn't an excuse to break policy on other pages. Shambala108 ☎  03:35, 15 February 2023 (UTC)


 * But it can mean, if something technically policy breaking is widespread enough, that it can mean the policy should be revised not the articles, as it is more of a sign of the policy not reflecting the needs of the editors/readers. But this is something to be discussed in the Forums. 03:58, 15 February 2023 (UTC)


 * But by that logic, we should just scrap the rule requiring image licenses since the policy breaking is widespread enough. What it comes down to is this: until and unless the policy is changed, Tardis:You are bound by current policy applies. Shambala108 ☎  02:07, 17 February 2023 (UTC)