Category talk:Individuals by location

Standardisation
Some of the categories in this category are written under the format of "residents of [place]" while others are "[place] residents", so I think we should establish which is the best method. I have no strong feelings on which, however I slightly veer towards "[place] residents" as it makes it more likely to come up when a user is searching for another category related to that location, providing an opportunity for education on some of the other available categories or category types. Danochy ☎  04:39, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Makes sense to me. Searching for "Category:Residents of..." would produce loads of results, and none of them would be discernable without moving to the search page. There's also plenty of precedent for this format, especially where there's a parent category involved, like category:Coal Hill School. (And "Residents of..." would require pipe switching each time for alphabetical order...) 07:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I would argue for the preservation of category:Residents of Gallifrey, though. "Gallifreyan" is a complex term when used to refer to individuals. I do also think "Residents of the Gamma Forests" works better grammatically than "Gamma Forests residents". If we set a standard, there may still be exceptions, but there would be justification for going against the grain. 07:56, 23 December 2021 (UTC)