User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-26975268-20130201045831/@comment-188432-20130202155232

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-26975268-20130201045831/@comment-188432-20130202155232 We don't need a discussion on whether to split this information. If an article has no in-universe information, it gets deleted. So if we want to keep the BTS information at all, it must go into a separate article, and one with a dab term attached.

And there's no doubt about which gets the un-dabbed term. This is already covered by long-standing policy. Let's say you have Brian Cox. You know that this person is the the in-universe character with that name. Brian Cox (actor) is the actor. The in-universe term always "wins" the un-dabbed version of the PAGENAME.

Similarly, 1 January must be an in-universe article.

Now, how we might split the article and what the dab term might be for real world stuff — yes, that might the subject for debate.

But that we should delete an article called 15 September because there's no in-universe material about that particular day? Nah, that's just a straightforward application of existing rules.