User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-188432-20130514042227/@comment-26975268-20130515183354

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-188432-20130514042227/@comment-26975268-20130515183354 Actually, that's a good point: it's, by definition, a. Not very common in modern art, particularly not in television, it's just another way of characters expressing their thoughts. Hopefully, we'll get more context for the soliloquy in the finale, but, even if we don't, I still think the "prequel" should be considered narrative, and therefore a valid source. Ruling out a soliloquy just because it's "different" would be like ruling out comic or prose just because it's not TV, which is very much contrary to T:NPOV.