Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-45314928-20200606025128/@comment-45692830-20200606041822

Yes, my point is that in insisting that it's an excerpt rather than an independent short story you're begging the question. The people who think it's valid do not agree with you. So obviously I'm not going to use the terminology you think is appropriate because I don't think it's correct.

Again. You can think it's ridiculous, but let's look at what was actually said. They asked about the unproduced story, not the "excerpt", if you want to call it that. She then said that he mentioned it. Not posted, not released, mentioned. It is literally impossible to maintain that she's talking about the "excerpt" (read: short story) in this comment. She's quite clearly talking about his comments about the 2015 story, since that's what someone asked her about.

And, again, I pointed out that Lockdown! was coordinated in some respect with Chibnall and that we have reason to believe that this was part of Lockdown! Obviously you might think this is weak evidence, but to claim it's no evidence is simply false.