User talk:Duncs Kinnear-swift

<div style="background-color: transparent;	border: 1px dashed #2f2cb8;	color: #000;	margin: 2em 0 1em;	padding: .5em 1em;	vertical-align: middle;       align:center;        width:90%;        line-height:110%;        font-size:95%;	text-align: justify;        -moz-border-radius:10px !important;        -webkit-border-radius:10px !important;         border-radius:10px !important;         -moz-box-shadow:0 0 40px #2f2cb8 !important;         -webkit-box-shadow:0 0 40px #2f2cb8 !important;         box-shadow:0 0 40px #2f2cb8 !important;">

Welcome to the Duncs Kinnear-swift!

We hope you'll enjoy being a part of our community! If you're new to either us or wiki editing in general, you might want to check out some of these links:
 * Internal pages
 * Help pages
 * Manual of Style
 * Forums
 * Recent changes
 * User page policy


 * External Wikipedia pages
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial

Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes like this:  ~

Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the Help pages, add a question to one of the Forums or ask on my user talk page. 15:23: Tue 20 Dec 2011

Daleks in Manhattan Image
You replaced the file File:Daleks in Manhattan.jpg with a completely different picture. If you want to change the infobox image, please upload the file at a new name and edit the Daleks in Manhattan article.Americanwhofan ☎  21:05, September 15, 2012 (UTC)

Hold up there, pardner
Gotta block you for 30 minutes while I review your recent edits. Most of your recent edits to TV story infoboxes are adding unnecessary information which is adding to the overall length of these boxes. I'll give you more details shortly. 20:14: Wed 03 Oct 2012
 * Okay, the main issues I need you to watch out for are:
 * Please don't add parentheticals to the infobox like (in human form)
 * the variable should take only one answer
 * In general, too, I think you should just avoid editing the infoboxes of TV stories. You should assume that, since most of these pages are years old, we've probably already gotten them sorted.  Infoboxes should not contain a plethora of information.  They should just give a rough idea of what's going on.  A person should be able to read them in 30 seconds and not have any significant questions.  Adding parentheticals, slashes and qualifiers creates doubt that isn't appropriate for an infobox.  Who's the Doctor in The Almost People?  The Eleventh, full stop.  Who's the companion in The Impossible Astronaut?  Amy, Rory and River.  Period.  Sure, it might actually be "Ganger Amy" on reflection, but it's still Amy.  The Doctor even makes the point that the Amy has been Amy all along, even if she's been the Ganger.


 * So, thanks for your hard work, but please, when it comes to infoboxes, keep it simple. 20:34: Wed 03 Oct 2012

Infoboxes
Hi! Before you edit any more infoboxes, I suggest you view a large random sample of what we include and don't include in story infoboxes. I've had to revert a large number of your edits for different mistakes. For a couple of examples, we don't use line breaks or any other HTML in infoboxes, or for that matter, articles at all. There should not be multiple names under "main enemy" — one or two at most will do. Infoboxes are meant to be small snippets of info that lead the reader to the rest of the article. We are trying to reduce the height of infoboxes because they can make certain pages' layouts look odd. So please take a look at some of our infoboxes and try to get a feel for what they include and don't include. Thanks. Shambala108 ☎  18:04, August 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * In addition, please review the information provided in the message by CzechOut right above mine. Shambala108 ☎  18:06, August 6, 2013 (UTC)

Block
I have to block you for a week. You haven't paid much notice to the messages from CzechOut and me above, and have continued to make changes to well-established pages that violate various policies, but your block is due to the fact that you removed a warning message at Logopolis warning not to change the infobox field in question. This is considered a violation of Tardis:Vandalism policy.

Please spend the next week reviewing policies, particularly Tardis:Cast lists, and like I said in my earlier post, do some reviewing of story infoboxes to see what they're supposed to include and not include. Shambala108 ☎  15:01, August 7, 2013 (UTC)

Don't need to be blocked
Well i wasn't adding stupid information to the Logopolis page, i added the Watcher to the cast list because he appears in the episode and if you look on the Watcher's page, it has an actor so i added it. And as for the Doctor section at the top of the page, although the Fifth Doctor appears only briefly in the episode, he still appears in it and deserves to be casted. Duncs Kinnear-Swift, 16:08, 7th August 2013 (UTC)


 * It doesn't matter how valid the information was, we have certain guidelines and rules for story pages and infoboxes. Specifically, cast lists for TV stories must match the on-screen credits, as you can read at Tardis:Cast lists. Also, the infobox field for "Doctor" can only take one name; adding more than one messes it up.


 * Both CzechOut and I have left messages for you concerning classic Who stories and infoboxes, but according to your recent edits you either didn't see the messages or you ignored them. We have to have some guidelines for editing pages, or a big wiki like this would become a mess.


 * However, as I stated above, you weren't blocked for adding info contrary to policies, or for ignoring two admins telling you to stop. You were blocked for removing a message that warns editors not to make a particular edit. This, as I said above, is vandalism. Because most of your edits, though incorrect, are in good faith, I only blocked you for a week, far far shorter than the usual block for vandalism. Shambala108 ☎  15:35, August 7, 2013 (UTC)

Story infoboxes
At this point, I am telling you, stop editing story infoboxes. You do not appear to understand what we do/don't include in the infoboxes, and multiple attempts to educate you have failed. I have so many other things to do that I can't keep cleaning up after your edits. Please find another way to contribute to this wiki. Thanks. Shambala108 ☎  21:57, July 23, 2014 (UTC)


 * This is the last time I'm telling you, stop editing story infoboxes. Find some other way to contribute, because you are not familiar enough with our infobox guidelines to successfully edit them, and I do not wish to continue cleaning up after you. Shambala108 ☎  18:31, July 24, 2014 (UTC)

Block
I have to block you for a week because you have ignored my message to stop editing infoboxes. When your block is lifted, you are not to edit any more infoboxes. Shambala108 ☎  14:35, July 25, 2014 (UTC)

Block again
Yet again I have to block you for ignoring an admin warning. This time it's a month. There are many ways to contribute to this wiki; you've been warned away from editing infoboxes, yet you continue to edit them. Please spend the next month figuring out some other way to contribute. Shambala108 ☎  13:27, August 16, 2014 (UTC)

Story infoboxes revisited
Hi! I want to make myself perfectly clear. I am telling, not asking, you to stop editing story infoboxes. You do not appear to understand yet what we are looking for in infoboxes. There are many ways you can contribute to this wiki; stop adding/removing info from story infoboxes and please find another way to contribute. Thanks. Shambala108 ☎  21:28, November 7, 2014 (UTC)


 * I don't know how to make my message any clearer. I have had to undo several of your infobox edits, because you just don't understand how they work on this wiki. Unfortunately, I've had to block you again. Please, if you wish to continue editing here, spend some time reading through the pages located at Category:Infobox discussions and browse different page types on the wiki to see how we use infoboxes. Shambala108 ☎  19:16, November 10, 2014 (UTC)

Revisiting previous warnings
Once again, I have to tell you to stop editing infoboxes. You are adding unnecessary information which adds to the overall length of these boxes. You are also violating quite a few policies in your edits. It is crystal clear that you do not understand what we want in our infoboxes. You have been warned several times by two different admins, yet you haven't listened and you don't seem to care to learn how to use our infoboxes properly. Therefore, you are to stop editing infoboxes. Shambala108 ☎  13:18, June 7, 2015 (UTC)

Block
Once again, I have to block you for editing against policy after admin warning. You have been told multiple times to stop making frivolous edits to the infoboxes, and you have been asked multiple times to familiarize yourself with our policies. As you have refused to do either, you are blocked. Shambala108 ☎  13:10, June 16, 2015 (UTC)


 * Blocked again for six months for ignoring admin instructions against adding frivolous, unnecessary and/or incorrect information to infoboxes, most of which had to be undone. Shambala108 ☎  22:18, July 23, 2016 (UTC)