Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161223201024/@comment-1789834-20170125231415

OncomingStorm12th wrote: Thefartydoctor wrote: It's about common sense really. No-one with half a brain-cell would allow Dr. Who and the Daleks to be valid in a billion years. I don't need to list any reasons because everyone in this comment thread knows them haha. Let's look at that Paul Cornell thing. But that's exactly my point. If even a story that wouldn't be valid "in a billion years" can be reprinted, how could a non-clear like Shalka be deemed valid only because it was reprinted?

I was talking more about my personal levels of comfort. For the record, I can't at the moment deem them as valid. I never have done. He's not the Ninth Doctor and the other dude isn't the Master. If someone comes up with a legit connection here to suggest a way of it being possible, then hooray. I wasn't suggesting you take my reprint suggestion overly seriously.