Talk:Asa Bamford

Merger
I assume the same argument for this merger is the same as the John and Gillian reasoning. Those two however are known together. I'm not familiar with the story they appear in, is there enough info that George and Asa's articles could be rewritten to have (even slightly) different information? --Tangerineduel / talk 03:55, May 28, 2013 (UTC)


 * We have other articles like Squidgy and Speckley which have similar information and no call for those to be merged. --Tangerineduel / talk 15:29, June 1, 2013 (UTC)


 * Hadn't seen those, but they should defo be merged. If the only changing words are names, it's pretty clear that they don't need to be separate. Cult Of Skaro Here.|Communicate here. 16:01, June 1, 2013 (UTC)


 * But should we not have articles for every article of the DWU? --Tangerineduel / talk 16:23, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but why have two where one will do just as well? Cult Of Skaro Here.|Communicate here. 18:12, June 1, 2013 (UTC)


 * Because as I've said we are covering every article of the universe. Why merge these two because they've got similar information? There are plenty of other articles that have similar or related information that could also be merged, but they're separate entities. --Tangerineduel / talk 07:32, June 2, 2013 (UTC)