User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-27343779-20160109192541/@comment-27343779-20160109202639

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-27343779-20160109192541/@comment-27343779-20160109202639 I'm mostly talking about covering this stage play, every information i could get about it is put into the Stage play page and indeed i think it deserves to be covered in its own page.

I'm fairly new to this wiki, when i said valid i was saying that it was licensed by the BBC. I now understands that it's a bit trickier than that for this wiki.

I just checked the page T:VS defining what is valid, and the argument about stage play points out that they are not valid because of ther uncertainty. However, some filmed sequences used on stage during the 2005 performance are posted on youtube by Hyde Fundraisers, which makes part of this stage play available on video (links to thses videos are included in the Stage play's page).

So, i was talking about coverage and i now argue that part of it is valid if we consider these youtube videos as official video capture (although not by the BBC).