Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20150911233947/@comment-4028641-20150923204701

I do comprehend the releasing behind our current decisions and the history of the audio. I am questioning that assessment of it as invalid and I am looking for direct quotes from Big Finish on their take on the project. If they say "alternate timeline," we'll put it under that. If they've said "alternate dimension," it's that. And if they said "not canon in any way" (yes, I know we don't say 'canon' but everyone else does) then it's invalid. Keep in mind that "alternate timeline" is also how they have rationalized the differences between their main range and the novel adaptation with Ace, so they'd have to be pretty clear on it being not legit for it to be invalid. "It's popular to make it 'invalid'" simply isn't a good rationale because the same can be said for the original 'Ultimate Adventure,' Lungbarrow, and any comic printed before DWM took over.