User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-24894325-20170121220436/@comment-24894325-20170122220343

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-24894325-20170121220436/@comment-24894325-20170122220343 There was an open discussion over whether specifically Lolita can be considered a TARDIS. This is still open (I'm not gonna provide the link for the umpteenth time, it's above). The discussion was, in fact, initiated by you, on January 1, so you couldn't be unaware of it. The discussion was ongoing. Three editors were against considering Lolita a TARDIS. I added my voice to them before you removed the thread today at 21:25 as "redundant". Just for the record, I strongly disagree that this discussion was redundant. I will let admins decide who is right.

However, your edit to The Doctor's TARDIS on January 21 added Lolita as the sister of the Doctor's TARDIS in infobox. This both claims that Lolita is also a TARDIS while the discussion of it is ongoing, violating T:POINT and puts disputed information in the infobox, which is generally disallowed.