User talk:Hellkaiserryo12

Eternal Dalek gallery and talk page
Galleries can sometimes give useful information if the subject is a very visual subject (something like the Time Field is a good example), bit often the images can be better integrated into the article rather than conforming to the rigid structure of a gallery format. As for the Eternal Dalek gallery specifically, both of the images were promotional images (which for in-universe articles are against our Tardis:Manual of Style policy). While the gallery was presented below the Behind the scenes section it wasn't a sub-heading of it. Additionally, as is the case with gallery additions across several pages the gallery seemed to be just there to 'show off' images of the Eternal Dalek and a group of Daleks it didn't provide any extra information to the article or have anything noteworthy in the images themselves that was relevant to the article.

As for my talk page, yes it is somewhat lengthy and I do try to trim it down here and there, but many of the things on it I am dealing with (or intend to deal with), keeping it long means I'm reminded things still need doing, if I hid it away in an archive I'd never get to those things. Thanks. --Tangerineduel 12:29, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Weevil Edit
Ok. Any page which isn't the episode page (or the series page) should not have any information on future appearances on it. Any future appearances are counted as spoilers (which is why the episode and series pages have the spoiler tags on them) so should not be on main article pages. Once an episode airs, then you can add it to the page as it is no longer a spoiler.

Imagine you are a real spoiler hater (like the Doctor). If you were looking at the weevil page and saw series 5 monsters, or the big bang etc in the infobox, you'd know that they appear in that episode and it would spoil their appearance for you.

If you see anything along these lines in future, then you should help to remove them from the articles. Thanks. The Thirteenth Doctor 22:44, June 18, 2010 (UTC)