User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-27280472-20160208162907/@comment-1432718-20161123013433

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-27280472-20160208162907/@comment-1432718-20161123013433 Let's make something perfectly clear here. We do not re-open inclusion debates every time someone disagrees with an original decision or every time a new user joins and wants to know why something has been ruled invalid.

Furthermore, per Tardis:Do not disrupt this wiki to prove a point, and I quote: "Don't waste other editors' time by opening up discussions that are materially the same as other, concluded discussions. You may open up discussions on matters that have already been decided only when you have arguments which have not formed a part of that discussion, or other, precedent discussions on the same topic."

Thread:118228 ruled this series invalid. This was based largely on the comments made by Scott Handcock. I see no new arguments in its favor, and unless there are any forthcoming, this discussion will be closed in approximately a week.