User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20190928203157/@comment-6032121-20191004170006

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20190928203157/@comment-6032121-20191004170006 @Shambala, I think you misread Athenadora very slightly, conflating her concerns with mines; Athenadora was worried about T:POINT violations in people restating here arguments that had been answered on the deleted thread, but never even mentioned T:BOUND.

Meanwhile, I was the one who namechecked T:BOUND upthread, as you know, having sent me a message on my talk-page directly related to that post of mine. My T:BOUND concerns had nothing to do with people repeating stuff from the old thread, and instead have to do with User:Amorkuz's pursuit of "it's self-published" as a line of argument for invalidity even though, much as Amorkuz obviously wishes this were otherwise, Tardis policy currently says nothing about self-publishing not counting as an official release.

Your rightful issues-taking about my non-admin-self being the one to apparently hold an admin to accounts concerning policy aside, this is a point where your (and, most importantly, Amorkuz himself's) answer would be much appreciated. Regardless of who said it, facts remain facts, and in this case the fact is that Amorkuz is acting as though his dream policy of banning self-publishing already existed, when in fact no thread about it has even been started.