Board Thread:The Panopticon/@comment-31010985-20180428165444/@comment-4028641-20191214002634

Well still, you bring it up as if it has some authority. It doesn't, this is a new platform for discussion, "my friends agreed with me over DMs" doesn't really matter that much.

I'm not admin, but I think you should just stop bringing up these fan fiction book in the debate, they really don't matter.

As for the rest of your post, I am now thoroughly confused as to what you're suggesting. Are you saying that you want Susan English to be a different page from Susan Foreman? Because you've said you're not arguing for Susan (Dr. Who and the Daleks) to be merged with Susan Foreman, but you keep comparing the foremer discrepancy.

I'm guessing that you want Susan Foreman to say something like "A few greatly different accounts claimed that Susan actually was a human born to her grandfather Dr. Who," and vise-versa. If that is the case, that seems like such a small argument that it totally takes us away from actually discussing the topic at hand? That's a small talk page debate to happen after we reach a consensus on the bigger issue.

I also strongly disagree about your take on "intent at the time." Your claim that the Dr. Who films weren't a reboot (they were) and thus we should see them as a fancy novelization (is that even what you're arging? I don't understand what you're getting at in the slightest) is additionally flimbsy.

No offense, but both of the topics you've brought up here seems like a frivious tangents, and I literally don't know what endgame you're trying to reach with them.

If people think we could find a place on the wiki for these stories, let's discuss how that could work. How the policy could take place. That's what I want to hear about.