User talk:Lewody1

Proposed deletions
On some pages it is obvious that a page needs deleting, on other times it's not. Unless the page is blatantly offensive please leave the content and just put a, this way it's obvious the page needs deleting, but it is also easy for the admins to see the content rather than delving back into the page's history. Additionally if it's less obvious why a page should be deleted it allows others to see the content. Thanks. --Tangerineduel 16:01, December 12, 2009 (UTC)

Categories
Hi, when creating categories please pay attention to category naming conventions, for instance Category:Eleventh Doctor Enemies should be Category:Eleventh Doctor enemies.

However, categories should not be created unless they have 3 or more articles within them. Thanks. --Tangerineduel 13:55, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * Again can I please remind you to follow titling conventions when creating categories. Category:Character Timeline is an incorrect title. Firstly in a singular it basically means one character timeline. Secondly it should be cased as Category:Character timelines. Thanks. --Tangerineduel 12:35, March 20, 2010 (UTC)

Stub templates
Hi :) Thanks for creating Henrietta Goodheart! I noticed, however, that you didn't use the stub template, but instead copied the code from the template directly into the article. This is not desirable, because it means that changes made to the stub template itself would not have been reflected in the article you created. In future, please call a stub template (or, indeed, any template), by putting the name of the template within curly braces. For example:

is all you need to do to put the character stub on a page. Way easier, and more helpful, than cutting and pasting the code onto the page. Thanks again for your contribution!  Czech Out  ☎ | ✍ 21:16, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

Removing prop deletes
The discussion on the Portal:Companions is still on-going, please do not remove prop-deletes until discussions reaches an agreement. (The page was deleted accidentally during a mass removal of vandalism and restored following that (as the log for the page states). --Tangerineduel 14:03, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

Tenth doctor
You need proof for things like this or informationThe mysterious 14:32, May 29, 2010 (UTC)

Categories
Please look at surrounding categories before adding categories to pages. Category:Companions of the Fourth Doctor is already in Category:Allies of the Fourth Doctor'' this means that everyone who is in 'Companions of the Fourth Doctor' is already in 'Allies of the Fourth Doctor' because the Companions category is a sub-category of Allies. --Tangerineduel 12:24, July 21, 2010 (UTC)''

Feature article archive
DO NOT add articles to the feature article archive that have not been voted on. --Tangerineduel 12:39, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Spam
Why did you undo my edit to Planet of the Spiders? Adding links to outside sites is considered spam and a blockable offence. Do not do so again. The Thirteenth Doctor 23:05, August 25, 2010 (UTC)


 * It does not matter if you wanted to watch it, it is considered spam and undoing it's removal is also spam. I hope you won't do it again. The Thirteenth Doctor 12:36, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

Personal thoughts
Please do not add your own thoughts and theories to the series 6 page. It can be seen as vandalism. Given your history, I ''strongly' suggest you read the Tardis:Manual of Style and learn where and where not to post information. The Thirteenth Doctor 17:30, September 8, 2010 (UTC)''

You said it was impossible. That is you're personal thought. Your edit to my page was vandalism, hence the warning, and many of your edits are spamming or vandalism. If you do so again, you will be blocked. The Thirteenth Doctor 17:46, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Do not create pages for episodes which have not aired. They are considered spoilers until they do, and there is not sufficient information to warrant an article. The Thirteenth Doctor 17:54, September 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * Since then, the policies have changed. The Thirteenth Doctor 18:05, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, please sign all of your posts, and there is no need to start a new section for every post. --The Thirteenth Doctor 18:08, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Categories
The Ood are not allies of the Tenth Doctor. Ood Sigma is, hence he is in that category. And CAL is not an ally of the Tenth Doctor, as far as I am aware (I maybe wrong, you may want to check with an admin or other Users.) Also please do not take The Doctor Who DVD file as being 100% right, to you it may be. This wiki categories things and see things differently than the Doctor Who DVD file. Mini-mitch 16:30, September 14, 2010 (UTC)

Also, species are not allies of the Doctor's, the individuals within the species are. Revanvolatrelundar 16:32, September 14, 2010 (UTC)

Certain users
TheThirteenthDoctor giving you a hard time huh?

He's always enforcing every little rule, and is online 24/7, the worst part is, he;s in control.

NO OFFENCE!

Images
As the articles are written from an in-universe point of view, images have to be in-universe as well. That means they have to be taken from a televised episode from one of the actual shows, not a picture that was taken by any other photographer. That's why your recent edits have been undone. The Thirteenth Doctor 17:32, October 10, 2010 (UTC)

Coxrb001
I'm not and admin, but I've asked Tangerineduel to give them one final warning before blocking him. The Thirteenth Doctor 18:31, October 11, 2010 (UTC)

Admins & History
Hello. The Thirteenth Doctor may not be an admin, but the user has edited on this wiki for some time and is a trusted and experienced editor. Just because users may not be admins does not mean they care about a wiki any less than admins.

The history is located in the top left where it will say "Edited by..." hover your mouse over it and a menu will drop down and you can click "View full history", you can also click "My Tools" (bottom right hand corner) which also allows you to select "History". You can certainly send a request to Wikia central asking for the layout to be changed back, however many users made their views known during the beta-process, and only minor details were altered. The layout that is now in place isn't that bad once you've used it for some time. --Tangerineduel 16:32, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Exactly as Tangerineduel said. Also, could you sign your edits with ~ when you post comments, as it's difficult to follow a conversation if you don't. Thanks. --The Thirteenth Doctor 17:56, November 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * Never remove a deletion tag that has a reason for a page to be deleted. This is seen as vandalism and can get you blocked for editing this wiki.

 Czech Out  ☎ | ✍  21:07, January 3, 2011 (UTC) 18:56: Tue 20 Dec 2011

Comment on Missy (Deep Breath) page
Re your comments on Talk:Missy (Deep Breath): I would have thought that as a long time user you would be familiar with edit summaries. I left an edit summary when I removed your infoboxes. If an article is too short, we just don't use an infobox (per Tardis:Guide to images). If more content ever gets added, the infoboxes can be re-added.

In the future, if you have a question about an edit, ask the person directly instead of posting it off-topic on another talk page. The user you were defending on Talk:Missy (Deep Breath) has violated several policies, and you appear to be defending him/her while coming close to attacking another user.

I also suggest you take a look at the admin list so you can see who the admins are on this wiki. Thanks. Shambala108 ☎  22:41, August 29, 2014 (UTC)

OOU
Perhaps I wasn't clear enough in my edit summary. I put "oou" which is out of universe. I removed the text because it was written from the wrong perspective.-- 21:23, November 1, 2014 (UTC)

Re: changing edits
Hi! I've looked at some examples of 5.68's edits, but there have been so many edits to the page that I'm not sure what you mean. Can you give me some specific examples of questionable editing? Thanks. Shambala108 ☎  21:52, November 15, 2014 (UTC)