User talk:Dark Lord Xander

Featured article
Cheers, you seem to have just suddenly appeared on this wiki and become a part of everything lol.--Skittles the hog 14:57, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

IDW
I'll put it on my to-do list, certainly. It might take me awhile as I'm entering into a fairly busy week. 23skidoo 06:54, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Signing
It WAS my brother using my account. Im not a cheat.--Skittles the hog 13:31, 26 July 2008 (UTC) Ive resinged it for him, also the sontaran gallery was created by me and is a good feature on the page and is not messy.--Skittles the hog 13:34, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

I was jus telling you how you were wrong. You are entitled to your opinion.--Skittles the hog 17:36, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Its ok, you know now that it will be him sighning if i put his name so he maze well use my account.--Skittles the hog 12:06, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

SJA Names

 * Thanks for the note. Jack's the man - 21:16, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

"Going overboard"
All I'm doing by flagging these battle/event pages is to try to create debate. Logic demands that if the page for the battle in Revelation now has wide support for deletetion, many of the rest need to be culled as well. As for them being "vital" to the wiki, a quick look at their "What links here" pages puts paid to that argument. Most are basically stale pages, just like the Skirmish at Tranquil Repose page. I mean, c'mon, "Battle on the Dalek Saucer"? What the heck is that?  Czech Out  ☎ | ✍  17:17, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Talk pages
For me (as I can't say for others) most of the stuff that ends up on my talk page I deal with and then it's done. If I ever need to refer back to things I usually through the history of my talk page. --Tangerineduel 13:05, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Strike
It should be deletyed as it affects the number of Votes counted by the # --Skittles the hog 09:03, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Clever, dont you hink your a bit bossy by the way as you seem to have taken charge of everything so everything I do you insult me for!--Skittles the hog 10:13, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Sorry if I offended you, thenaks for apolagizing, it wasnt a specific thing you said but rather how you kept going against my ideas but its okay now You've explained that thats just your ideas. I do much the same. Thanks--Skittles the hog 10:05, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Species Stubs
Could you go here: Category:Species Stub and see if you know anything about any of the stubs there. If so could you add information and then delete the stub template as im trying to remove all species stubs. This would be a great help :)--Skittles the hog 10:56, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

What sort of assignments? Im bored, can I help?--Skittles the hog 10:59, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Oh I thought you meant on the wiki, im an idiot. Good luck, im off to finish those stubs! Thanks anyway--Skittles the hog 11:04, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Time's Champion

 * sure, I'll explain. Craig Hinton and Chris McKeon worked on a fan novel together entitled Time's Champion. digressions to go over arguments justifying fan theories which reference fan fiction (digressions to justify personal views of continuity, full stop, actually) don't really belong here and most especially not in in-universe sections. I feel a bit cruel deleting these sections when I suspect that Chris McKeon (or at least one of his friends) added these sections. at the very least, though, they don't belong in the main (in-universe) section of the articles.


 * next time I delete a large chunk from any article I will, in future, explain why I did so.

--Stardizzy2 18:28, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Fan Fiction
I certainly don't want to vandalize. The addition of the short story "Under the Stairs" falls under the category of fan fiction, however the novel Time's Champion, although an unofficial publication, can be argued is more than this. It is a full-length novel, based on a commissioned author's work and edited and printed by Doctor Who affliated professionals. It represents many years of work and planning, as well as the final fictional work of Craig Hinton's life. The story also is recognized by respected series podcasts and websites. It has been included in many noted affliate website for sale; the story itself is being circulated by readers and its effects on reader's perceptions of continuity are clear as any other officially published novel. It should be noted, also, that there are examples of unofficial stories which have gained "canonical" status due to their importance on the character development and backhistory of the Doctor and/or companions, such as "Schrodigner's Botanist" in the Perfect Timing collection serving as Grant Markham's departure, or Craig Hinton's own "One Perfect Twlight" as the origin of Kamelion. Therefore, based on precedence and the notariety of this novel, I feel that it is perhaps unfair to label "Time's Champion" as simply fan fiction, whose additions to continuity on this wiki would be dismissed as potential vandalism. Consider, the John Benton webpage now lists the character's birthday as 6 January, 1938, a date supplied by "Time's Champion." The Valeyard page is sure to note the origins of the character based from this novel as well, as it is the only source in Doctor Who fiction to examine this backhistory. In all, I feel that it should not be a problem to list the continuity point that the War Chief is the Master based on information provided in "Time's Champion." After all, what is Doctor Who but all fan fiction? :)--Medusa Cascade 01:05, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Medusa Cascade 01:04, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

SJA Names
There in the latest DWM - now cited on wiki as well. Jack's the man - 16:21, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

BIT (more to a simple question LOL)
Hi, no worries I'm not offended! I know it was a simple question,and I suppose I did long windedly answer your point with a fuller explanation than you expected. I suppose I saw an opportunity to share my thinking in the hope of some discussion with someone visiting the pages and interested enough to comment? If thats the only criticism of the pages though I'm quite happy. Thanks for the support by the way. The Librarian 23:03, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Blog
Thanks, i thought it was crap, i really need to update it. Thanks anyway :)--Skittles the hog 16:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Cybermen
It seemed to me to make more sense this way, all the other articles dealing with duplicates in Pete's World have "(Pete's World)" to differentiate them from their main timeline counterparts, so I figured that the Cybermen should too. Doug86 22:36, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Vandals and Inappropriate User names
The user has been blocked. However in a general sense (I think there's a couple of other users with 'odd' user names), usually look at their contributions can indicate whether they're here for vandalism or not. Only if they're vandalising I would tend towards blocking for their user name (as long as it's light-hearted enough) but other offensive user names of course would get blocked. --Tangerineduel 14:52, 27 August 2008 (UTC)