Talk:How The Monk Got His Habit (unproduced novelisation)

Edit War?
Actually, technically speaking, you're the one engaged in an edit war. The fourth edit is the edit war. I made a substantive revision, you undid it, I undid that, and you undid it again. Please revert that back until resolution of current thread. Until then, T:BOUND. Najawin ☎  05:21, June 10, 2020 (UTC)
 * you will reach the fourth reversal before me. how can you repeatedly question Harness’ comments for the novelisation but let the television story go without such speculative doubt shrouding the article. DiSoRiEnTeD1 ☎  05:22, June 10, 2020 (UTC)
 * Obviously because the novelization makes no sense when you consider the context of novelizations at the time. That's not true for TV episodes at the time. Najawin ☎  05:28, June 10, 2020 (UTC)
 * makes complete sense, unless you try to speculate on information you arent privy to. Target novelisations were rebooted in 2015 (the same year this story was pitched to television) after 21 years. Harness would not be "incompetent" to pitch this story - who is to say what Target were going to do once they were back, they could have stuck to their formula of recreating television stories or they could have decided to also recreat unproduced ones too - worth a short for Harness to get his story out there. we just dont know! DiSoRiEnTeD1 ☎  05:33, June 10, 2020 (UTC)
 * There's this little thing called "induction". Regardless, the correct course of action would have been to pitch his Zygon 2parter, then, once he built up social capital, tried for the more radical approach. What you're suggesting is just unrealistic. Najawin ☎  05:44, June 10, 2020 (UTC)

Is this real?
From what I can tell, there is a debate over whether this is real or a joke. OK, I personally lean towards it being a joke, but don’t think it’s quite so blatantly a joke as the so-called "Alternative Script Extracts from Dalek". But I also fail to see why either way should effect its validity status, simply where it fails rule 2 or rule 4. But, most importantly, could we not simply ask somebody involved and solve this whole issue? --NightmareofEden ☎  11:28, November 20, 2020 (UTC)