User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20150828141837/@comment-5918438-20151025125230

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20150828141837/@comment-5918438-20151025125230 OS, the whole reason behind the sections is not to have to exclude anything, while keeping all forms of multi-Doctor stories separate. At its most broad definition, a multi-Doctor story might be any story which features more than one incarnation of the Doctor. Different sections would contain stories that contain multiple Doctors in different ways. Regeneration stories, as well as stories with flashbacks, wouldn't just "not count" because you feel they don't fit into your definition. The moment we start excluding and trying to define it ourselves, we are going beyond information based on sources, and into subjective opinion central. We are an encyclopaedia (or encyclopedia, depending on where you are on the site), and it is therefore our job to record all definitions of the term, and present the information without judgement.

The whole point here is that everyone has different opinions on how this term might be defined—lots of people will look at the list, and decide that certain sections do not go under their understanding of the term multi-Doctor. And that's okay. That's precisely why we're making it into sections, in fact.

Do we have any objections to a navbox as well? Let's start a conversation.