User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-25117610-20170305024818

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-25117610-20170305024818 OttselSpy25 wrote: But with the Daleks, they're kinda just the Daleks. No big twists, no gags, nothing breaking from what we would expect from regular ol' Daleks. This basic difference to how Doctor Who is treated can not be emphasized enough. Well, hold on. From the beginning of the thread you argue that what we see Daleks doing on the movie is what we'd "expect from regular ol' Daleks". Yes, the backup comics are very, very silly (which is why I don't even bother reading them anyway, but they are still valid by community consensus.

One difference, though: on those, we see the Doctor (undeniably the very same we see ever since An Unearthly Child)

As you said yourself, "the important clarification is that the film is not set in the DWU at all". So it is a bit more difficult to prove that the Daleks we see here are the same as these Daleks than to prove the Doctor on this story is the the same Doctor on this story.

We don't get a name (Dalek) in the story, which I agree is not essential, but would be helpfull. The least we "deserve" to consider the Daleks on TLBM to be the DWU unniverse would be similar behavior, which I, and apparently Thefartydoctor don't seem to find similar at all.