User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5791028-20150709160234/@comment-4028641-20151008192240

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5791028-20150709160234/@comment-4028641-20151008192240 Yes, but that doesn't mean that I can't question them.

What a silly, silly rule. Why is it that our policy on making stories invalid or valid strives so hard to not be connected with concepts of "canon" yet is clearly based around those thoughts and no their own principals? With removing continuity sections from these pages, openly trying to act like these stories don't exist and attempting to remove them from non-narrative pages, and suggesting that editors avoid dedicating themselves to invalid stories and sections at all, it's pretty clear that we don't practice what we preach at all.