Talk:Series 4 (Doctor Who)

Hmmmmmmmmmm, this is very interesting. Donna's back in the first episode, Martha mid-way series, Captain Jack sometime and Rose sometime as well. 4 companions, meaning theres 5 in the TARDIS crew. What were they thinking? The evil dudeArnie 16:41, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Possibly setting something up for the specials they're doing after season 4? That or they're going to band together and form Time Vortex Sentai TARDISranger to fight evil space aliens across the galaxy in the TARDIS Megazord. --Colleyd 18:08, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Woof


 * Well, this way they won't feel too bad if they start killing off companions. "Your script kills off Donna? That's all right, we still have 3 companions to use."
 * That or they are looking for more ways to have spin-offs. --

I hardly belive of regenaration of the Doctor. That will not explain why the show has been put back a year, because David Tennant(who plays as Tenth Doctor) goes to the Royal Shakespeare Company for a year.

Unbelievable Rumours
Most of the rumours is a bunch of bull. First of all, Julian Bleach wouldn't play Davros because he just played the Ghostmaker in From out of the Rain. Second, if Daleks have been confirmed to return, why the plural on Daleks? We all know Caan is the last left. Cybermen in Silence in the Library? They are stuck in the Void, which has been sealed. Thats also another point to ask; how does Rose escape the parallel universe? The evil dudeArnie 10:15, 21 March 2008 (UTC)


 * People just don't think about speculation some times. Remember the rumour that Adam Mitchell would appear in Torchwood - he was left in 2012 people.  The thing is, if we are having a rumours section, then we have to put in rumours into it - so the only way to lose them is to lose the rumours section.  Also, it has been confirmed by the BBC that Rose will appear - so no doubt the episode(s) will explain where she came from.  Jack's the man - 11:57, 22 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The rumours section should not exist.
 * The only instance when it should is if you can cite a source and reference it in the manner of a source see The Dark Dimension page for an example of a referenced page.
 * The articles should deal in facts, not random rumours which aside from one of the indented bullet points don't appear to have any proof that they're anything other than fiction. --Tangerineduel 12:09, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

i have just seen this discussion and i think there are two good reasons to have a rumour section: 1. the roumor section keeps people from adding the same rumour over and over again as facts somewhere else. 2. if i have heard/read a rumour it is good to be able to doublecheck it here. and to see the fact, that what i heard is just a rumour. Just my opinion -- Q 1712 18:07, 28 April 2008 (UTC)