User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-43908-20150311013943/@comment-28349479-20181105190241

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-43908-20150311013943/@comment-28349479-20181105190241 Shambala108 wrote: OK, let me stress this for new users and those who can't seem to remember: That's fair. But in the future, please refrain from "subtweeting" me in this way. I'd much rather that you just directly say my name or quote my comment. As they say: I'm in the room, you know!

In any case, I've edited my post to clarify my intent and make sure it doesn't violate that rule. For future reference, could the anti-"calling for closure" policy be codified in Tardis:Discussion policy or elsewhere, to prevent misunderstandings? This just isn't the first time I've come close to falling afoul of it: in particular, I'm thinking of Thread:237423, where I was reprimanded for calling for closure due to rule violation, which seems notably distinct from calling for closure due to apparent consensus. If someone posted a nonsense or offensive thread on these forums as vandalism and I asked for closure, would that be violating the rule? Does that extend to requests for deletion of vandalism on the wiki? I just want to make sure I understand it fully so I don't break it in the future.