User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-45314928-20200727170605/@comment-6032121-20200727191310

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-45314928-20200727170605/@comment-6032121-20200727191310 Again, why should they be separated? There is a piece of imaginary rock in the DWU. The BBC owns the copyright to some of its physical feature and its name of "Gallifrey". A story licensed to use "Gallifrey" and said physical features added that the same piece of rock also had features X, Y and Z.

Later stories identify the same piece of rock exclusively by features X, Y and Z, as they do not have the right to mention the features "Gallifrey, orange sky, silly hats". But now, no single person owns the piece of rock in its entirety. Different people own different features of it, and it's silly to create separate pages for every instance of someone using it through feature X instead of feature Y. Just because Feature X happens to be the name "Gallifrey".

I don't believe you're denying that there is evidence in valid sources that the piece of rock called "Gallifrey" by certain sources is the same piece of rock as the piece of rock called "the Homeworld" in other sources. So why shouldn't we have a single page about that piece of rock?