Talk:From Raxacoricofallapatorius with Love (TV story)

Where has this been revealed (ie episode title, information about the content, and the actual proof of this episode being produced)? Bad Wolf Bad Wolf 17:50, 14 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Looks plausible except for the title. DoctorWhoNews.com mentioned a Children in Need SJA special, so this looks plausible enough to me. though they hadn't mentioned a name for the mini-episode. --Stardizzy2 19:44, 14 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I've found the source and added it on the page. But the page looks like it needs big work on the structure and stuff. Bad Wolf Bad Wolf 21:56, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Sorry! Was my bad. I made half the page then had to dash. User:Clockwork Apricot 22:18, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Timeline placement
Having not yet seen Series 2 in my part of the world, I can't correct this myself: the infobox says it happens after Enemy of the Bane, the article says after Day of the Clown. Which is it? 23skidoo 13:54, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Enemy of the Bane was the series finale, so we can assume (by production order) that this episode occurs after that. Or we could assume it happened at some point earlier in the series.  In which case, the earliest it could happen is after The Day of the Clown, since that was the episode that introduced Rani. 90.198.228.173 21:12, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, that makes sense. I'm going to reword it slightly as it makes it seem right now that the episode takes place right after Day of the Clown. I queried because I don't know if one of the characters left the series after Clown -- or after Enemy of the Bane -- which would have dictated an exact placement. 23skidoo 14:17, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Errors, discontinuity, etc.
Its a comic relief special. It isnt meant to be taken seriously, or match up with "canon". Does there really need to be "in-story" reasons for the cast wearing red noses?!


 * You know what is serious is the fact you have committed what could be seen as vandelism, is there reason why you felt the need to delete it? An admin has been notified.Bigshowbower 12:35, October 23, 2009 (UTC)

Yes. Ive explained why I did it. I felt the need to delete it because it is irrelevent. No normal person would expect a silly sketch done for charity to match up exactly with series continuity. Also, its spelt "Vandalism". --MinkyCat 12:38, October 23, 2009 (UTC)

But still to delete it, it doesnt matter if its irrelevent, some people like to know the error or plot holes, and its not fanboy stuff either. Its not hurting anyone, you can just ignore it. Bigshowbower 12:44, October 23, 2009 (UTC)

Ok, truce? We got off on the wrong foot there. I just think its a bit long winded, and comes across like the section is arguing with itself. Would you mind if I edited it a bit, just to make it look less messy? --MinkyCat 12:51, October 23, 2009 (UTC)

Sure a truce is fine by me, I would rather you edit it very well then deleting all of it, I apologise If I came off as rude, it just because the wiki has had problems with vandals, and Im getting sick of vandals (not you) Bigshowbower 12:57, October 23, 2009 (UTC)

And I apologise for coming across as "new guy who thinks he knows better than everyone else"! Ill try and be subtle when I tackle that section. --MinkyCat 13:01, October 23, 2009 (UTC)

Nah its fine, I think everyone comes off like that at first, have fun editing Bigshowbower 13:04, October 23, 2009 (UTC)