User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170222095120/@comment-4028641-20170227002003

Look, it's only logical. We call DiT invalid because of later statements by the authors and because of copyright issues.

We have neither of these for this short story. So it's valid. I am 100% sure this had been brought up and agreed on before. The amount of time between an editing mistake doesn't make it not a mistake -- someone added the tag when no one was looking and it needs to be removed.