User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-9435571-20150101203351/@comment-26975268-20150102042802

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-9435571-20150101203351/@comment-26975268-20150102042802 First of all, I should point you to T:ROMANA and Forum:Romana's Incarnations' Names. This has already been discussed, and we made a decision back then.

...That said, a case could be made for "First" and "Second" simply because of Luna Romana. I have done any research personally on this, but T:ROMANA quite clearly states that the current names are never used in-narrative. If indeed these are, that might change matters. But I could do with some quotes here for context — are we sure Trey is truly referring them by the titles "First Romana" and "Second Romana", and not simply calling them the "first Romana" and the "second" one? Is there a "the" preceding those titles in dialogue? Are those names used consistently within that story? In other words, what's your case for changing the system that's already long in place?