User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-6032121-20181104204754/@comment-6032121-20181105150414

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-6032121-20181104204754/@comment-6032121-20181105150414 I know; that's precisely why I included the warning. But as I outline in the rest of the post the statement would be pretty groundbreaking if true, so I think we really should try to get to the bottom of it. And the intent of this thread is as much to check its accuracy as it is to discuss what to do next — indeed, as I argued, the precedents are such that the main question is whether the statement was accurate, as the course of action would seem pretty clear-cut if it is.