User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-33695797-20200828040941/@comment-45692830-20200831002431

From the amazon reviews:

"Previous editions, presented the fictitious material in a sort of "non-fiction" manner. This time around the publishers include more pre-production and script related material, conceptual drawings and all, which is cool, but does break the guide-book illusion created successfully by the first two volumes."

So it seems this particular book would merit an inclusion debate if we're going with the broad proposal (which is where in-universe non narrative content within a non fiction reference book can be included anyhow) or be excluded if we're going with the narrow proposal (where the entire book has to be fictional).