User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Reference desk/@comment-4028641-20121204012342/@comment-1209840-20121218041559

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Reference desk/@comment-4028641-20121204012342/@comment-1209840-20121218041559 Well, clearly there's enough narrative evidence to support separate articles for the Pete's World and Mondasian variants. The tricky part is deciding where to put Cybermen who aren't explicitly one or the other. I don't understand why a source as official as the Brilliant Book would be considered unreliable, though; I suspect it's another example of admins buying into the slippery slope fallacy and mistakenly thinking that if one non-narrative source was allowed, all of them would have to be. Unless someone from the BBC came out and said that readers should take the Brilliant Book series with a grain of salt?