User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170222095120/@comment-82.3.146.201-20170224191309

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170222095120/@comment-82.3.146.201-20170224191309 Are there any other arguments to state that this story is invalid.

Points that can not be made are


 * The DWM four years later. See aforementioned


 * Licensing It's BBC, they still own it


 * Discontinuous and silly Nothing changes, see all the accounts of how the Master left Cheetah World and A Rose By Any Other Name


 * EastEnders is a fictional universe in the DWU Read First Frontier and the aforementioned


 * It's parodic It's not, a bit silly but no more than Time Crash


 * It's rubbish We know - though it's never a reason


 * The BBC disowned it They didn't, take a look at the Yearbooks and the WHOology