User talk:Reversinator

'''Welcome to the Thanks for your edits! We hope you'll keep on editing with us. This is a great time to have joined us, because now you can play the Game of Rassilon with us and win cool stuff! Well, okay, badges. That have no monetary value. And that largely only you can see. But still: they're cool!

We've got a couple of important quirks for a Wikia wiki, so let's get them out of the way first. British English, please We generally use British English round these parts, so if you're American, please be sure you set your spell checker to BrEng, and take a gander at our spelling cheat card. Spoilers aren't cool We have a strict definition of "spoiler" that you may find a bit unusual. Basically, a spoiler, to us, is anything that comes from a story which has not been released yet. So, even if you've got some info from a BBC press release or official trailer, it basically can't be referenced here. In other words, you gotta wait until the episode has finished its premiere broadcast to start editing about its contents. Please check the spoiler policy for more details. Other useful stuff Aside from those two things, we also have some pages that you should probably read when you get a chance, like:
 * the listing of all our help, policy and guideline pages
 * our Manual of Style
 * our image use policy
 * our user page policy
 * a list of people whose job it is to help you

If you're brand new to wiki editing — and we all were, once! —  you probably want to check out these tutorials at Wikipedia, the world's largest wiki:
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial

Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes like this: ~ ~ ~ ~

Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the Help pages, add a question to one of the Forums or ask on my talk page. -- Mini-mitch (Talk) 16:18, 18 October 2012

Tense
CzechOut has recently (and is still in the process) of updating and consolidating various bits of a MoS.

I apologise for not leaving you a message alerting you to the changes made, I was going to, then got distracted and forgot.

If you look around at practically any of the stories, their intros are all written in the past tense, and as you discovered all the CON intros were/are in the past tense.

As you can see on my talk page, in the sub-section above the one you left (also a side note, please remember to sign your talk comments with four tildes ~ ) CzechOut was responding to my queries concerning tense.

Present tense is difficult because none of the stories are ever "current", they're either a future to be broadcast or released story or they've been broadcast or released. The only true middle ground where present tense could be used is the day they're broadcast / released. As CzechOut has said on my talk page "every use of present tense immediately dates our writing".

As for your minor grammar fix, if you note the next edit I did undo my edit, that one I realised was a mistake. Regarding in line summary, I was quickly rolling back your edits rather than undoing them (rolling back doesn't allow for edit summary editions). Again, as I've said I apologise for not leaving a message on your talk page, I usually try to explain to users changes on the wiki. Thanks, any further questions please ask. --Tangerineduel / talk 16:16, October 30, 2012 (UTC)

Worlds of Time
Because that's what being an invalid source means. Also, the case with Worlds is especially tricky, as there's no guarantee any two players will experience the same thing or the same characters in exactly the same way.

It should be pointed out, as well, that there's an entire Worlds wiki out there, which will undoubtedly be more complete than this one. 19:17: Tue 30 Oct 2012

Recording dates
The plan is, as it now stands, to add a variable to so that SMW can then create a list of stories (TV and audio) recorded on any given day. We will then have a template of some sort on each production day page which will feature that list. Pretty much, the end result will be a box on the page listing stories recorded on that day. It's not yet a fully fledged plan, but that is most likely what we'll be doing some time in the next few months. If you have any more questions, you can go to our tech admin CzechOut; it was his idea. --SOTO ☎ 02:11, December 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * Woah, that was a quick response. Any time. :) --SOTO ☎ 02:14, December 31, 2013 (UTC)

Images
Hi! When you upload an image to the wiki, it must include a license. This is perhaps the most important image policy we have. You can read our image policies at the following locations: Thanks. Shambala108 ☎  03:47, December 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * Tardis:Image use policy
 * Tardis:Guide to images
 * Tardis:Images and perspective
 * Help:Image cheat card
 * Thread:127678
 * Well first of all, ever since the 50th special, I have been deleting several images a day for violating policy. I have left messages on people's talk pages, and they ignore the messages and continue to add images without reading our policies. That's why I started the post at thread:148148, to have one place I could send users without having to type the same message every other day.


 * Be careful when you cite category names. If you just type it like this:, you end up putting the page into the category; therefore you ended up putting my talk page in the image category you were asking about. (I've fixed it, by the way.) If you want to cite — and link — a category on a talk page or forum page, you type it like this: Category:Second Doctor (note the colon at the beginning) and it will show up in the body of your text and be clickable.


 * To answer your question, yes, screenshots from an episode get put in the category "episode name" images.


 * Hope this helps. Shambala108 ☎  04:13, December 31, 2013 (UTC)

Infobox Person
is definitely optional. In terms of layout and design, we want to avoid having an infobox on a page that doesn't have enough text to support it. Many thousands of pages about behind the scenes personnel are little more than stubs, and most of these would be visually swamped by an infobox. (Tardis:Guide to images clearly applies.)

Even on longer articles, though, it's not strictly necessary> We'd prefer you spend the time writing the article to a good standard, than wasting time messing around with n infobox. It's much more important for a "behind the scenes" article to point out the various connections an actor has to other DWU actors, than to ensure the presence of an infobox. Equally a good video of the person can be much more helpful than an infobox.

On other types of articles, infoboxes are important, even mandatory, but with crew articles, they should be seen as a final step, not a first one.

As a general rule of thumb, you probably don't want an infobox that's any more than about 150% the height of the total text on the article, when the browser is opened to its widest extent.

Another way of looking at it is that if the infobox' IMDb link is lower than the level of the IMDb link under the "external link" section, then the infobox isn't necessary. The IMDb link in the infobox should be saving you the time of scrolling down to "external links".

Attacking the issue from another angle, here are some examples of the kind of thing we're looking for in crew articles:
 * Bill Paterson, for an example of how to contextualise a career in terms of DWU connections
 * Mark Chambers (counter tenor), for an example of how to give a broad overview of a career that doesn't have too many DWU conections
 * Chris Hardwick, for demonstrating use of video in lieu of an infobox
 * Greg Nicotero and Todd McIntosh, for articles with adequate context that could support an infobox
 * Kelly A Manners, for a decent use of an infobox
 * Julian Glover, for an example of how to write an article about a person's DWU career, but leverage the rest of the Wikia network to provide details about his career in other franchises

Because what we know about crew varies so much between individuals there's no single right way to write these articles. But if you're serious about writing this kind of article — and we hope you are! — we hope you'll take time to survey a few of them and get ideas about what you think works best so that you can add your unique voice to the wiki!

In a sense, that's more than you were asking in your question. And the answer, again, is that it simply depends whether is required or useful. But I hope you see the challenge of writing this kind of article more exciting because there are so many different possible approaches. 03:02: Fri 03 Jan 2014