Board Thread:The Panopticon/@comment-26975268-20130201045831/@comment-188432-20130222043532

The problem has been that they were fixed up to a certain point and then people didn't believe that was the way the dates worked, so maybe some of them got wrongly "corrected".

So I can't guarantee now what's right and what's wrong. I imagine that the current round of expansion of DWM issues has probably not correctly represented publication date. I'm hoping, though, that they've at least been using the right cover date.