User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-4028641-20170224224719

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-4028641-20170224224719 Amorkuz wrote: You explained how DWU is treated in other invalid sources of the LEGO franchise.

Strawman.

It was declared invalid because of the minor RPG elements of the game. The narrative itself was deemed entirely valid, and since it is part of the LEGO canon, it is very important to deciding if non-video game Doctor Who products in this range are valid.

Once again: Just because we declare something invalid doesn't mean that we get to pretend that it doesn't exist in discussion. Non-valid doesn't mean non-canon.