Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-1506468-20190827123101/@comment-1827503-20190912195044

After reading through those past long discussions, I discovered a tiny problem.

The Lego Batman discussion was closed on an apparent lack of licensing for the Daleks, despite it being a commercially released work in which the creators claimed they had the license. So there's a past case of a creator's licensing claim being ignored, albeit under much different circumstances.

(To be clear, I don't support revisiting the validity of Lego Batman. But ignoring the other three rules, it has a stronger Rule 2 argument than the Dawns crossovers do.)