Talk:Sex

Is this Page really necessary?
Is this page really neccesary? And if so, would it not be better to dim it down to 'realtionships', doctor who is aimed at 7 year olds as well and i think its highly inapropriate to have something like this where they are likely to access it. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pharap (talk &bull; contribs) 19:29, 22 May, 2010 (UTC).

Yes, it is appropriate. Sex is a fact of life, and if they know enough about it the search the word "Sex" on a Dr Who wiki then they probably know about it already. Fan555 19:33, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah...I'm very concerned too...shouldn't we remove all the Torchwood articles because of the 7 year olds? Let's all pretend on this wiki that Jack Harkness never existed and the Virgin Queen references were directed to some olive oil that the Queen uses..Amy never seduced the Doctor neither, she was grabbing him because there was a earthquake caused by the explosion that affected all of time and space...and all those humans in Doctor Who...they came out of human looms...It's the Whoniverse...things work differently, there's no sex...and by Omnisexual, Jack means he could only fall in love with G-d, and he was just being friendly with the people he met....You know the Satan reference...it was meant to be about a red dragon that Jesus kept as a pet...--203.168.176.42 12:18, July 18, 2010 (UTC)

I don't think this page is nessecary. Sure, fact of life and all that, but not when you're younger than 13/14 it shouldn't be. Kids who watch it can just ignore the references, we don't need a whole page all about it just because Ace clearly wasn't satisfied with just seeing aliens, and no one searches it, it's one of the hot spots on the wiki. So I reckon it's a bad idea. Plus, can't we focus on the better side of doctor who? – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zaffie (talk &bull; contribs) 02:54, 18 August, 2010 (UTC).

No. Sex is natural. It is necessary. It is referenced many times on Doctor Who and it is just as important to document these references and happenings as anything else. Doctor Who is not a kids show, it is a family show. That includes adults too. This is an encyclopaedia which documents everything, including sex. --The Thirteenth Doctor 14:03, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

I agree with The Thirteenth Doctor in that this Wikia documents everything in and related to the Doctor Who Universe and many stories have referenced or included sex within its content. therefore this page should be here. Revanvolatrelundar 14:50, August 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * Please...The better side of Doctor Who? (I say in a disbelieving tone).
 * I agree with both The Thirteenth Doctor and Revanvolatrelundar. This is an encyclopaedia that details everything, that includes; Genocide, Murder, Assassination (and that's just the Crime category), there's also Guns and Alcohol articles. --Tangerineduel 15:31, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

Image
Would it be okay to post an image of Rex and Vera having sex for this article? --MrThermomanPreacher 19:07, July 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't know. It does illustrate the article perfectly, but is very adult-orientated. Keep it for now, let's just see what other users think. BroadcastCorp. 10:29, July 27, 2011 (UTC)


 * Vera and Rex having sex is an event in the DWU, so that's an end to any question of licentiousness. Any image drawn from a DWU show is fair game here, so long as it actually illustrates the article in question.  The only fear I'd have is one of discrimination.  I don't mind putting an example of the heterosexual act as the primary pic in the infobox.  But I do think that a pic of homosexual sex, since it,too, exists within the DWU, should be pictured later on in the parts of the article that examine homosexuality.  Thanks to Captain Jack, the pictorial representation of sex is an "all or nothing" deal.  16:26:52 Mon 22 Aug 2011


 * I wonder at the appropriateness of the current image because there's nudity involved. I don't personally have any problem with nudity, but do we really want to go the NSFW image route on this wiki?  There are plenty of other screenshots from this scene and others which would be equally as applicable to the article, without risking getting this site categorized as something it isn't. &mdash; Rob T Firefly - &#916;&#8711; - 02:01, September 7, 2011 (UTC)


 * Please note this discussion was continued, and resolved in favor of use of this image and others like it, at Forum:Image appropriateness issue. &mdash; Rob T Firefly - &#916;&#8711; - 19:32, September 15, 2011 (UTC)

Homosexual? Only Humans are that. All the others are, you know, just... straight? Straight is the word, yeah. BroadcastCorp (talk | contribs) 19:54, September 3, 2011 (UTC)

Page move?
Shouldn't this page really be moved to "Sexual Intercourse"? I mean, I know I'm being pernickety, but it isn't really called "Sex", is it? Sex is just a contraction of sexual intercourse. Asplich 11:56, August 21, 2011 (UTC)


 * That's a good point. I think it should be moved as well.


 * Um, no, it actually is called sex. Intercourse is a more precise clinical term, and, as far as I know, one that has never been used in the DWU.  20:07:07 Mon 22 Aug 2011