User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20191101112654/@comment-1827503-20191101145552

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20191101112654/@comment-1827503-20191101145552 And so it begins again.

It's important to not get ahead of ourselves, and not to assume anyone meant something they didn't say. Especially where James Wylder and Arcbeatle Press are concerned; both sides in the deleted first thread were citing different things Wylder said, without considering what he meant.

I'll once again start by supporting these stories' validity, as I did the last two times. If some evidence comes out that they might not pass our rules, things may change; I sincerely hope those who argued against validity last time would change their own opinions in the reverse case.