User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-45314928-20200727170605/@comment-6032121-20200727211318

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-45314928-20200727170605/@comment-6032121-20200727211318 DiSoRiEnTeD1 wrote: Literally the second rule in the “four little rules” says that these stories need to be commercially licensed by ALL copyright holders or the entire thing isn’t valid. As has been pointed out before, T:VS regulates what stories we cover, not how we cover them. The Book of the War is licensed by all relevant copyright-holders, because it doesn't need the license to use the word "Gallifrey" to be able to say things about the rock previously identified as Gallifrey. Fercrissake. We've been over this. The legal entity "Gallifrey" is not the same thing as "the in-universe planet called Gallifrey", and it is legally possible to use what can only be the latter without having a license to the former.

What you have not been over is new. Rotting. 'Evidence. We have asked you several times what new facts you are bringing to the table that weren't discussed in the original debates which established the current policy regarding our treatment of "the Homeworld". Why do you not answer this extremely relevant question?