User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-6032121-20200517150418/@comment-31010985-20200517224237

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-6032121-20200517150418/@comment-31010985-20200517224237 DiSoRiEnTeD1 wrote: how is it highly debatable which stories are part of "Lockdown!". id have thought that only the stories credited as being part of "Lockdown!" (coincidentally the exact same ones worked on by the founder emily) are the stories which are part of "Lockdown!". how is that debatable? The logic of Lockdown! stories are the ones that are Lockdown! stories is highly unhelpful when trying to have a serious debate, especially when that debate has already established it is not a cut-and-dry matter.

You ask for evidence that How the Monk Got His Habit among others is a part of Lockdown!. I should think the fact that it was released with "#TruthOrConsequences" is suffficent evidence as that was the hashtag one could use "join in the conversation". On the other hand, if it is not sufficient evidence you have just proved why the matter is debateable.