User talk:Redranger241

Editing other user's user pages
Hi, please do not edit or alter another user's user page. This is considered vandalism, if you believe something is incorrect on a user's user page please leave a message on the user's talk page. Thanks. --Tangerineduel 17:02, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

Cyberman
On the series 5 page there is no source that the cyberman will be returning in the series finaleThe mysterious 10:48, April 16, 2010 (UTC)

Thats not proof its proof that they are returning but not in the series finalie.The mysterious 10:55, April 16, 2010 (UTC)

It says The remaining 12 episodes will mix classic Who monsters - including the return of the Cybermen - with new villains.

Episode 11The mysterious 12:46, April 16, 2010 (UTC)

Sontaran categories
Hi, as I noted in the edit summary the categories are already applied to the Sontaran category (meaning they don't need to be applied to the race page), much like Cybermen only has the Cybermen category because the 'enemies of the' categories are applied to the whole Cybermen category rather than the individual race article. Thanks. --Tangerineduel 16:29, May 18, 2010 (UTC)

Plots
Please don't copy plots from wikipedia. This can be considered plagerism without proper citation. As we wish for the wiki to be unique, we prefer individually writted accounts of the plot by a user of this wiki, not a wikipedia user. Thanks for understanding. The Thirteenth Doctor 23:44, May 29, 2010 (UTC)

Rory in The Pandorica Opens
You added Rory back to the cast and the list of companions.

Do you have any source for this? As I said on Talk:The Pandorica Opens, the only sources anyone has given are (a) pictures from The Big Bang, which only prove that Arthur Darvill is in TBB, not necessarily TPO, and (b) the fact that he will be on a panel at the BAFTA screening, which proves nothing (unless you believe that, say, Steven Moffat will also be in the episode).

If you have a source, please list it as a reference in the article, or (if you don't know how to use the ref tags--which can be a pain if you use the fancy rich-text editor) at least post it on the Talk page.

Thanks. --Falcotron 20:22, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Time Lady
Hey, what's your source regarding -http://tardis.wikia.com/index.php?title=The_Pandorica_Opens&oldid=381449 "Joanna Page already said she won't be in Doctor Who".

Imdb is the source on a lot of characters to appear - vo could do with a reason why her appearances on IMDB in the episodes is not the case, if only for the consideration of whether IMDB is reliable as a source. Thanks! Blightsoot 21:59, June 14, 2010 (UTC)

Weevils
Although they appeared on set and in pictures, they did not appear on screen, so they are not listed as having appeared. Stop adding to their page that they have. The Thirteenth Doctor 21:32, June 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, it did occur. But that is also speculation. And if true, a spoiler. Speculation has only one place on this wiki, in the forums. And spoilers belong only on pages with the spoiler tag, being the episode pages and the series page, not main articles. Main articles should be spoiler free, so even if they are set to appear, this information does not get added until the airing of the episode. The Thirteenth Doctor 21:38, June 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * I am trying to remove the ones that didn't appear, but of course the one that crops up most is the weevil one and therefore first and easiest to change. The Thirteenth Doctor 21:43, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

Spoilers
Please do not add spoilers to pages, the instance that was last reverted was adding the "Eleventh Doctor Enemies" category to the Eye Patch Lady article. This cannot be added yet because she hasn't been confirmed as an enemy in a television episode that has been broadcast so far. --Revan\Talk 16:56, May 31, 2011 (UTC)

Moving pages
All species pages should be singular. Silurian, not Silurians. Skittles the hog-- Talk 13:39, June 5, 2011 (UTC)

Update
Hey, could you please control your trigger finger in regards to the update template. Some of the articles you are adding it to are hardly in need of such things. For example, Rory Williams is lacking biographical details on an episode that was broadcast a mere three hours ago. This hardly qualifies it as being in need of the "major update" that the template proclaims to be necessary.

I understand that it's not solely your good self who is spearheading this recent spate and indeed it seems to be the done thing nowadays to slap this template around, but I've gotta start somewhere. Basically, in future, could you please ensure articles you flag are in need of a major update. Thanks-- 21:01, September 17, 2011 (UTC)