User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-26845762-20160212224340/@comment-24894325-20170125105823

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-26845762-20160212224340/@comment-24894325-20170125105823 Well, I can certainly agree with his sentiment: with half of BF being bare bones, Titan comics barely having plots, a gigantic list of missing pages for BBC book range characters, there is bigger fish to fry. Or let's say not bigger, but you know, there is unfinished business before new business is to be started. What I see is people trying to add more and more valid stories. But after that's done, they go and want to add even more stories. So the question I have is: who's gonna edit this stuff? Especially given that in the heat of the argument some go overboard and get themselves blocked and others insist on "cleverly" (as they think) insulting everyone who opposes them until they are blocked too. And those are some of the most experienced editors among the invalid story crusaders. I mean, jeez, isn't there work enough on FP, work that is hard and subtle, that CzechOut thought was technically challenging? One of the rules of the forums is that if something is proposed, the proponents have to provide the man/woman/entity-power to implement the decision. It was mentioned at some point that there are barely 2-3 editors working on FP. And one of them is simultaneously arguing for at least four more things to be inducted. I just don't see this ending in quality material being put up when resources are spread this thin.

As for CzechOut clearly making a mistake. He's been very open in the past about making mistakes on inclusion debates. In fact, he's just reverted his own closure of FP as invalid and was very gracious about it (which is more than can be said about some of his opponents). So why don't you give him the courtesy of actually waiting for his opinion, or maybe asking again more politely, instead of judging him in his absence. (Just for the record, I'm not sure "See Thread ### again", which was the original wording, is really a question. It provides zero information about the specifics of the topic and sounds like an order. At any rate, there have been so many major events since then, that asking again might not be remiss.)