User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45692830-20200510214412/@comment-6032121-20200723184648

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45692830-20200510214412/@comment-6032121-20200723184648 Let me clarify something: there isn't a full interview. The quote I posted is all we hear from Peter Harness in the article — the format of it is just tiny widget about most of the Emily Cook Lockdown! webcast, and each one has a short quote, specifically about that webcast, by its writer.

You have yet to explain how something whose existence was causally linked with Doctor Who: Lockdown! — something which would not have been released when and how it was released, had it not been for Lockdown! — could possibly have "nothing to do" with Lockdown!. That's a completely different question from whether it's licensed, whether it's part of Lockdown!, or whether we should cover it.

If Harness talking about the potential Dimensions in Time continuity reference (or some other deleted detail) in The Zygon Invasion caused me to, today, go out and create a fanfilm recreation of how that scene would have looked — then obviously we wouldn't cover it on this Wiki, or even mention it. But my hypothetical wholly-unlicensed fanfilm would still have something to do with Lockdown!. I don't understand why you keep repeating this obviously untrue thing, even though it doesn't actually impact the matter of our coverage of Monk.

Note that the same DWM article also validates the view that while there are some Doctor Who: Lockdown! webcasts that are licensed and some that are not, Emily Cook embraces fanmade, unlicensed tweetalongs as belonging under the name of Doctor Who: Lockdown!. "Shortly after the COVID-19 crisis transformed the way most of us lead our lives, Emily Cook hatched the idea of Doctor Who: Lockdown. This was '''the umbrella term for online Tweetalongs, where fans could revisit old episodes together, alongside some of the people who wrote, made and starred in them."

- DWM 554