Board Thread:The Panopticon/@comment-45314928-20200610043202/@comment-45314928-20200610200511

@Scrooge "since Harness called it "discarded", it was to be considered invalid" so... this site will take his word for that, but wont take the word of it simply being an extract from the novelisation...?

you continue to propose that this was licensed as part of lockdown but you refuse to accept that this is the odd one out of all the other releases. it was not produced / organised by Emily Cook (we know that cook has had some contact with Chris Chibnall but this is for her licensed work only), and was not pre-planned (as Harness stated that it was only shared as an afterthought due to fan interest) or promoted by any other site.

theres simply no evidence that it was licensed, and as User:Shambala108 told you on Talk:The Castellan has returned and has brought a message from Gallifrey! (webcast) we have to be very strict when it comes to licensing.