Talk:Doctor Who Files

Confusion with Captain Jack's Monster Files
I removed the "Internet" section as it seemed to get the Doctor Who Files publication mixed with Captain Jack's Monster Files. This article is the only source I can find suggesting that the books and the webcasts are part of the same project. I'm adding a link elsewhere, though. 68.146.64.9 23:59, January 26, 2011 (UTC)

Narrative source?
I don't own these books, but it does not seem to me that they're narrative. They seem to be more encyclopedic, and thus not a story. If this is the case, then, according to Tardis:Valid sources, should be slapped on all the pages, and they shouldn't be covered on this wiki. Can someone who has access to these either confirm or deny that they're narrative? --SOTO ☎ 04:58, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * After a due, if brief, inclusion debate: yeah, those are narrative alright, or rather, they contain stories. The issues themselves are neither "narrative" nor "non-narrative," any more than a particular issue of DWM. --Scrooge MacDuck ☎  09:21, October 2, 2020 (UTC)

Are these classified as fiction or a reference books?
As described it seems to be a series of reference books but I'm not entirely sure. Either way can this be noted in the page?