User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-6433721-20130331231828

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-6433721-20130331231828 It's not rejecting evidence, it's deciding the default position to argue from. There's not enough evidence either way, dude. That's why the argument keeps going. You have to make a definition of default.