Talk:Tara King

Conjecture rename
In this case, renaming to Tara King would imply that Verdigris violates of rule 2 on T:VS, which is clearly not the case. So I think a rename would be wholly inappropriate here. Danochy ☎  14:15, 29 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Nah. Rule 2, in use, is reserved for DWU concepts; there are countless examples of Doctor Who stories using unlicensed, non-DWU concepts. If we were to invalidite every story for that reason, we'd end up with huge swathes of invalid stories, including television episodes like Mindwarp, which uses a presumably unlicensed Xenomorph, for example. 📯 📂 14:21, 29 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Besides, there is ample precedent for crossover characters' pages using the full characters names even if they're not stated within a source. 📯 📂 14:23, 29 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Right, you're correct, but the point still stands. We're not about to go around (indirectly) accusing a story of copyright violation - the character was thinly veiled for a reason. And this is different to a licensed crossover character. Any unlicensed "crossover" characters in the same predicament I would take similar issue with, regardless of a precedent. Danochy ☎  14:32, 29 August 2021 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, Danochy, but while I can see your argument, I think that following your rationale would lead to changes to dozens, if not hundreds, of pages across the Wiki compared to the current practice. The (non-Marvel-owned) cameos in Party Animals not named on-page, alone…! Which, I think, makes this a T:BOUND issue — we can discuss the wider change, but until such a time as a consensus builds up in favour of making that change, then the Tara page should be treated like all the other ones. We can't appear, to an external user not versed in the current debates, to "pick and choose". Scrooge MacDuck ☎  19:04, 29 August 2021 (UTC)