Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-1506468-20190827123101/@comment-1350697-20190830140614

I don't think any of the 10,000 Dawns material should automatically be rendered invalid even if it were all posted on his personal tumblr account -- the posting of Martha Jones' MySpace blog on MySpace clearly does not in any way have that effect on it, either.

I think at this point the central point Amorkuz, as the main person arguing against inclusion, is making, is probably roughly as follows: "The 10,000 Dawns material should be considered invalid for the purposes of this wiki because stories released by Arcbeatle Press/James Wylder do not have to meet the standards of some kind of 'sanity control', be that an editor, editors plural, or a larger organisation that in some other way oversees the publication of the story itself and/or the use of the licensed characters and concepts. To allow these stories to be considered valid would be a slippery slope."

Is that accurate?