Talk:Tara King

Conjecture rename
In this case, renaming to Tara King would imply that Verdigris violates of rule 2 on T:VS, which is clearly not the case. So I think a rename would be wholly inappropriate here. Danochy ☎  14:15, 29 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Nah. Rule 2, in use, is reserved for DWU concepts; there are countless examples of Doctor Who stories using unlicensed, non-DWU concepts. If we were to invalidite every story for that reason, we'd end up with huge swathes of invalid stories, including television episodes like Mindwarp, which uses a presumably unlicensed Xenomorph, for example. 📯 📂 14:21, 29 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Besides, there is ample precedent for crossover characters' pages using the full characters names even if they're not stated within a source. 📯 📂 14:23, 29 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Right, you're correct, but the point still stands. We're not about to go around (indirectly) accusing a story of copyright violation - the character was thinly veiled for a reason. And this is different to a licensed crossover character. Any unlicensed "crossover" characters in the same predicament I would take similar issue with, regardless of a precedent. Danochy ☎  14:32, 29 August 2021 (UTC)