Board Thread:The Panopticon/@comment-39450671-20200330222925/@comment-1789834-20200606133625

Scrooge MacDuck wrote: Essentially, there's no rule saying pages about individual versions of Time Lords must be about separate regenerations in particular, so why not cover stolen bodies on their own pages?

I evidently must have misread this then. No worries. How would you handle this potential separate yet no separate Master? Would you have Tzun Master, Master (Dust Breeding) and Tipple Master (ignore rubbish name) but then mention the possibility of them being the same Master? I can see what you're getting at and understand what you're trying to do. It's admirable and I understand these speculative timelines aren't a great idea. But that just moves speculation elsewhere, right?

How would tackle the whole "these Masters aren't necessarily the same guy... but they also could be the same guy"? haha