User talk:WaltK

'''Welcome to the Thanks for your edits! We hope you'll keep on editing with us. This is a great time to have joined us, because now you can play the Game of Rassilon with us and win cool stuff! Well, okay, badges. That have no monetary value. And that largely only you can see. But still: they're cool!

We've got a couple of important quirks for a Wikia wiki, so let's get them out of the way first. British English, please We generally use British English round these parts, so if you're American, please be sure you set your spell checker to BrEng, and take a gander at our spelling cheat card. Spoilers aren't cool We have a strict definition of "spoiler" that you may find a bit unusual. Basically, a spoiler, to us, is anything that comes from a story which has not been released yet. So, even if you've got some info from a BBC press release or official trailer, it basically can't be referenced here. In other words, you gotta wait until the episode has finished its premiere broadcast to start editing about its contents. Please check the spoiler policy for more details. Other useful stuff Aside from those two things, we also have some pages that you should probably read when you get a chance, like:
 * the listing of all our help, policy and guideline pages
 * our Manual of Style
 * our image use policy
 * our user page policy
 * a list of people whose job it is to help you

If you're brand new to wiki editing — and we all were, once! —  you probably want to check out these tutorials at Wikipedia, the world's largest wiki:
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial

Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes like this: ~ ~ ~ ~

Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the Help pages, add a question to one of the Forums or ask on my talk page. SOTO ☎  16:08, September 19, 2019 (UTC)

File sizes
Please note that all images uploaded to this Wiki must be smaller than 100kb in size, as per Tardis:Image use policy. OncomingStorm12th (talk) 23:48, April 2, 2020 (UTC)
 * My apologies. The issue is I do not know how resize images accordingly... WaltK ☎  19:31, April 3, 2020 (UTC)

Thank you!
Hey, sorry to bother, but I just wanted to thank you for your remarkable work in making Queer representation in Doctor Who an actually good page!! I know you did most of that months ago, but still... good to have that stuff on the wiki. :) CoT     ?  17:54, May 27, 2020 (UTC)


 * Sorry for the late response, but thank you! WaltK ☎  20:35, July 7, 2020 (UTC)

Daft Dimension image
Ah, sorry about the colours. But that's actually my own scan, not any variation of yours. If you can use your own file and yield a version that's 1) widescreen rather than 'tall', and 2) 420px or larger without being grainy, by all means replace my replacement. This was really just a rushed job so that the file wouldn't have to be deleted altogether (which is always messy). --Scrooge MacDuck ☎  18:30, May 27, 2020 (UTC)

Doctor Whoah!
Hi there, I saw your post on Talk:Doctor Whoah!. I have access to all the Doctor Whoah! strips via their DWM issues. I don't really want to start another big project so soon (as I'm about to conclude work on documenting Doctor Who?) but what I will do is slowly add to the table at Doctor Whoah! which will give you half a clue for most of them about which stories correspond to which issues. Does that sound alright? Feel free to contact me if it is still ambiguous from who features in them.

I see you have coverage of The Daft Dimension to be getting on with in the mean time, anyway. Good work on that so far by the way! Best regards, --Borisashton ☎  23:53, May 30, 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you! I’ve actually mostly reached my limit with my Daft Dimension coverage for now, having covered nearly all the ones I have access to. But I'm definitely raring to go on Doctor Whoah! with my trusty compilation book at the ready. Cheers for making it just that little bit easier with the table! Much appreciated! WaltK ☎  00:03, May 31, 2020 (UTC)

Timeline discussions
Hi, since theory talk pages don't provide any form of notification, I just thought I'd like to invite you to take part in the various (slowly progressing) timeline discussions taking place at the moment. We started at Theory talk:Timeline - Second Doctor, and we've since started several more wide-reaching discussions at Theory talk:Timey-wimey detector, and then the discussion at Theory talk:Timeline - Seventh Doctor. If you're not interested, that's fine, I just thought I'd let you know in case you were. Danochy ☎  04:05, June 9, 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks for letting know! I’ll be sure to take a look. WaltK ☎  17:52, June 9, 2020 (UTC)

Question on continuity
Hello, User:WaltK. I wanted to ask you something that could prove useful to deciphering the placement of an entry for the Thirteenth Doctor timeline theory forum. In At Childhood's End and A Little Help From my Friends, does Team TARDIS act surprised to finding out the Doctor had previous companions, or mention they've never met a predecessor of their's before? Thank you for time.BananaClownMan ☎  15:06, June 13, 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't believe they act surprised in ALHFMF... when the Doctor tells her friends what happened to her in Blink, it does prompt Yaz to say "You said "we". You weren't alone, then", which could give the impression that the idea of the Doctor having past companions is a new concept to them, but it's hard to determine. I haven't read At Childhood's End, so I can't say on that one. WaltK ☎  18:00, June 13, 2020 (UTC)

Lizzie
Hiya, on Lizzie (The Runaway TARDIS) you've uploaded a pretty good image, and as much as I like it, is there a version of the image with a larger crop, showing off more of her clothes? Epsilon the Eternal ☎  19:37, July 1, 2020 (UTC)


 * I believe the current one is good enough. It fits into the standard that other profile images follow (head and shoulder shots). WaltK ☎  19:44, July 1, 2020 (UTC)


 * Sounds reasonable. 👍
 * Epsilon the Eternal ☎  19:47, July 1, 2020 (UTC)

Thread:277667
Hi Walt, just wanted to say that I support your position 100% on Thread:277667. I've always hated those pages, which have always looked bad and look even worse now. Hopefully, the outcome of the thread will be in favor of our position. Never Forget The Day The 456 Arrived ☎  00:20, July 3, 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks man! I'm glad that it's got people talking. WaltK ☎  07:19, July 3, 2020 (UTC)

Bootstrap paradox
Hiya WaltK. You just undid my revision over on Bootstrap paradox, as it was written from an out-of-universe perspective, but isn't the entire page written like that, from the third person? Granted, it was a touch speculative, but shouldn't the info be on that page anyway? (As the whole "wibbly wobbly timey wimey" is also speculation?) Epsilon the Eternal ☎  18:15, July 7, 2020 (UTC)


 * Saying "the events of [STORY TITLE] could also be seen as an example”, in those exact words, is how one would normally write something from a behind the scenes standpoint as opposed to an in-universe, biographical one. The proper way to write from an in-universe perspective would be:

"Iris and Panda did a thing that caused a bootstrap paradox. (PROSE: Iris Wildthyme and the Unholy Ghost)"


 * The only reason I opted to remove it rather than amend it is simply because I have not read the story and thus lacked the sufficient information needed to reword it accordingly. You're free to re-add it as long as you abide by the format I exemplified above. WaltK ☎  20:16, July 7, 2020 (UTC)


 * Gotcha! You and User:Scrooge MacDuck raised good points,so I'll incorporate them into a revised edit.
 * Epsilon the Eternal ☎  20:21, July 7, 2020 (UTC)

Clarifying stuff
Hi, so to clarify some more what we were talking about at Talk:Queer Representation in Doctor Who, what they did was more "cis gays not being aware" as opposed to Rowling or Glinner level sh*t. It's not the easiest thing to hear, but it's part of accountability and such. They are improving, which is good, and not digging in like Dreyfus or Roberts. Just wanted to clarify and such. Never Forget The Day The 456 Arrived ☎  18:43, July 8, 2020 (UTC)


 * So you mean, like, the Greeks Bearing Gifts controversy (which I personally always just chalked up as Davies and Barrowman not being as enlightened on the matter at the time)? WaltK ☎  19:02, July 8, 2020 (UTC)


 * Yep, pretty much, they just were not enlightened enough at the time. Anyway, so on the talk page, what do you think we can use as a "called out" source? Never Forget The Day The 456 Arrived ☎  19:06, July 8, 2020 (UTC)


 * You can see my full response on the talk page, but to sum up, a "call out" section that compiles every time a cast/crew member so much as offhandedly says something out of line probably wouldn't be the way to go. With situations like Davies and Barrowman, whether or not anything they said or did in the past indicated a deep-seated intolerance would largely be up to individual opinion (some may believe there were legit transphobic tendencies there, but I'd personally disagree). No, we should only cover instances where the bigotry of an individual is undeniable; Roberts and Dreyfus, both of whom have repeatedly voiced blatantly transphobic views and have refused to back down on them, fit that bill easily. WaltK ☎  19:36, July 8, 2020 (UTC)

I've put this on the talk page, but yeah, I'm down for that. Thanks for the convo! It's nice to talk to someone is both empathetic about change and personal growth, as well as willing to hold people accountable. Never Forget The Day The 456 Arrived ☎  19:40, July 8, 2020 (UTC)

Re: TDOTD
Aaah, I see. That makes sense. But not only did you post it in the wrong Board, it also sounds like this isn't even really a matter for the forums (or indeed an admin's talk page) as opposed Talk:The Day of the Doctor (novelisation). But since you asked me: I would say that yes, we can derive the existence of a number of copies of "Book (The Day of the Doctor)" and of anonymous readers thereof.

The latter individuals don't necessarily deserve pages as individuals, being so nondescript, though if we did have pages on them, we'd probably call them things like Reader 1 (The Day of the Doctor) and so on. But you can definitely create Bookshop (The Day of the Doctor), with a lede along the lines of "One of the readers of the Curator's book on the Last Day of the Great Time War found their copy in a bookshop which also contained……".

Concerning what happened to the Forums, I'm hoping User:CzechOut will chime in with an explanatory post some time soon, but the keynotes version is: Cheers! And thank you for the congratulations! --Scrooge MacDuck ☎  23:16, October 4, 2020 (UTC)
 * "FANDOM Powered By Wikia" decided to upgrade its source code wholesale, rather than keep adding patches and epicycles to an increasingly Rube-Goldberg-esque, anachronistic Frankenstein's Monster;
 * The new code architecture they've designed didn't support the Forums we used to have at Special:Forum;
 * Consequently, when they started moving Tardis's archives to the new platform (known as the UCP), all the Forums' contents were transferred to the "next best thing", namely the "Discussions" area, which already existed separate from the Forums.

Invalid info
With regards to this: you're not quite right. If it's simply a bullet-point in a wider BTS section, the invalid information should be written in an out-of-universe point of view. But if there's enough invalid material for a full subsection in the BTS section of the valid page, then that can be written in the same in-universe way as an invalid concept page. Scrooge MacDuck ☎  19:37, 18 May 2021 (UTC)