User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20191101112654/@comment-38288735-20191116053448

Yes, that seems like an aggressive response to what looks like a misunderstanding. Borisashton asked Doug86 if his support was the closing opinion of an admin, and they said yes, but did not close the thread. It seems like a perfectly natural thing to ask about. Perhaps Doug misread the question, had second thoughts, or simply forgot to close it, but we wouldn't know which without asking.

EDIT: Just realized that you probably meant the admin's closing arguments had to be well-worded and that could be the source of the delay. Still a bit strongly-worded, but thank you for the information.