Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-1272640-20171120030047

Shambala108 wrote: Please read Thread:223085 as I have now asked you to do three times.

I know you were talking about the DYD thread. So was I. That's the thread where User:CzechOut and User:Tangerineduel applied the decision at the Worlds in Time thread to the DYD and FYF ranges and User:Imamadmad (the only non-admin who was interested enough to post) posted her agreement.

I think the big difference here is that you don't think small changes in narratives for different people is worth declaring something not valid, but it is considered that way on this wiki. Same parts "in a different order" is still a different narrative. I guess this is just a case where we have to agree to disagree. For me, the differences are minor enough I don't consider it significant to the extent it renders the story invalid. But oh well. I've stated my opinion on this topic. If everyone else is fine with the current DYD policy, then I'll concede.