User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20200505204802/@comment-45692830-20200709020644

Actually, reviewing the four little rules again, I think I've convinced myself that these comics aren't licensed, at least, not by the metric we care about.

Certainly they're licensed in the sense that people are allowed are allowed to use the assets, but they're probably not allowed to do so commercially. Rule 2 explicitly asks for a commercial license. And I'm not sure we have that. (I will say that I don't think "commercial license" is a term of art, but I think that's what's meant by the rule.)