User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-6032121-20200517150418/@comment-6032121-20200517154945

If you're just going to repeat these weird unsubstantiated claims I don't see how this conversation can progress to any sort of consensus on what needs to be done.

This is a quote from the lead of the page:

"Doctor Who: Lockdown! was only the hub[disputed statement] of several varyingly-official watchalong projects on Twitter at the time. (…) Nor were the tweetalongs the only occasion for the release of new webcast Doctor Who content, with Russell T Davies or even the BBC itself releasing new webcasts not connected with a particular watchalong in an effort to spread awareness of various facets of the crisis."

- [|The current lead]

And here is the sentence directly before the table: "Several new short stories and webcasts were released to tie into the watchalongs, or the COVID-19 pandemic in general, some of them on a dedicated Doctor Who: Lockdown YouTube channel."

- [|The current #Associated_releases section]

You may quibble whether a list of stories "tying into (…) the COVID-19 pandemic in general" belongs on the page at all, though only if you have a viable alternative. But no one paying attention could read through our page and form the impression that we were claiming Emily Cook had anything to do with United we stand, 2m apart or Incoming Message.