Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161223201024/@comment-1789834-20170125225734

As I've already been part of one heated debate today, I'm just gonna leave my opinion on the matter and let you guys do whatever. Like I say, I see parallels with the David Warner situation. That's how I'd treat this. To be honest, the only thing making me just about comfortable treating these two novels as valid is that they were republished. That's it. To me, these events play no part in the prime timeline of the Doctor's life.

However, if we are forced to treat them as valid, then I suggest the David Warner route is how we go with this. They're both respectively the Doctor/Master up until a certain point and then they diverge. That's my opinion. I can't be bothered to find the evidence haha. I've had one stressful debate today that's left me very stressed and unnerved, so I'm leaving it to you guys.