User talk:The Thirteenth Doctor

Face tendril
Hey, I left my thoughts on the Face tendril page. Thanks for keeping me informed. --Tangerineduel 13:21, May 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * Next time, if there's a redirect, as there was, just ask an admin (such as me or Doug86) to move the page to it, rather than moving it to a similar article name. This just means we have to move the article again. The article has been moved to Multi-form (admins need to do this because it involves deleting the redirect prior to the move). (I left a comment rather than move the article as I was unsure if you wanted further discussion or whatever) Thanks. --Tangerineduel 13:29, May 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * I wasn't critising (or trying to discourage you), in fact most pages can be moved by anyone. It's only if what you're trying to move it to already exists (as a redirect or otherwise) an admin needs to duck in and delete the page so the page you're trying to move can go there. Thanks. --Tangerineduel 14:07, May 27, 2010 (UTC)

Time Field
My PC crashed a few months ago, I get it back up, the nature of this wiki has changed. First of all the page is in the wrong tense it should be the time field was not the time crack is. It is written in the wrong manual of style. I am going to change it to past tense not present tense. --Catkind121 13:15, May 31, 2010 (UTC)


 * Well I think you are wrong it should be in past tense this is about the doctor who universe and everything in it should be written in past tense. --Catkind121 13:29, May 31, 2010 (UTC)


 * No. The cracks are am in-universe article and therefore are in the past tense.
 * The term ongoing events is referring to articles like the Series 5 (Doctor Who) article which has the Template:Current event tag on it, or articles relating to ongoing concerns like Steven Moffat's page where he is currently the Executive Producer of the Doctor Who.
 * With regards to in-universe articles on-going is a purely subjective term because all in-universe articles are written with the perspective from the very end of the universe where all in-universe events are in the past.
 * The stories that make up the sources for the Time Field article are either broadcast or yet to be broadcast and as you shouldn't cite yet to be broadcast/published stories as they can't be verified. --Tangerineduel 13:48, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Reply
I have no idea, sorry. You best bet is to ask an admin. Mini-mitch 22:10, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Discontinuity pages
Forum:Discontinuity revisited is the forum page where the change in the discontinuity pages was discussed, I'd suggest adding to the discussion there. --Tangerineduel 07:07, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

Monster size comparisons
I deleted them because they didn't have a source listed on the image page. If they were out of universe they could still be used if they were placed within the Behind the Scenes section. The images would still need to be sourced (sources go on the image page as described in the copyright tag. Thanks. --Tangerineduel 16:35, June 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes, as I said when I responded to your first question. They did sit with prop deletes on them for a fair few days. --Tangerineduel 17:19, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

Talk page archiving
Good question, we don't currently have any policy in place with regards to article talk page archiving. I'd suggest posting a topic in Forum:Panopticon to get other user's feedback on it.

In the case of the Time Field discussion (and in fact all article talk pages) the talk page should be used to discuss the editing of the article and how it's put together (or its name etc) rather than the theories and speculation that's crept in there. I've place the Template:Talk Page at the top (likely it will do nothing, but it serves to alert people and point towards The Howling). Thanks. --Tangerineduel 14:34, June 2, 2010 (UTC)