User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-20607870-20161120213354/@comment-1789834-20161123035041

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-20607870-20161120213354/@comment-1789834-20161123035041 What separates BBV and SOS is rule number four. Was it intended to be set within the continuity? While SOS may well have a license, and would therefore pass the second rule, the same cannot be stated for rule 4. The BBV products, no matter how terrible some of them were, pass all four rules. Let's not forget that's how we deem something valid. SOS does not.

This conversation is stale. It should never have been opened up as no new, contradictory sources have been provided.

And for the record, I have my own personal opinions on whether the BBV products are valid or invalid; but I go with the Wiki's ruling at the end of the day. :)