User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-6032121-20181230112657/@comment-1432718-20181231031105

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-6032121-20181230112657/@comment-1432718-20181231031105 This one's pretty easy. Given the information available, this is invalid. Before I get to the reasons why, I need to provide a bit of necessary information.

Many participants in inclusion debates (not saying this thread's OP is one) are well aware of the "four little rules", but they haven't read the complete information located at Tardis:Valid sources. Stated there, just because something has some kind of narrative, doesn't mean we include it. That page gives some examples.

That being said, what we have here is the same kind of thing. It's pretty clear that this is not intended as narrative. Therefore it fails Tardis:Valid sources and falls into the "invalid" category. Given that three admins (including myself) consider this not valid, it's a foregone conclusion.

And I agree with User:Amorkuz that these Yule logs should be on one page per the Adventure calendars. To address User:Scrooge MacDuck's concerns, this kind of thing would only come out once a year; the information currently under "References", "Notes" and "Cast" can be added as a paragraph or two under each year's Yule log entry. There's no indication, at this point, that the BBC will continue airing one of these every Christmas. So for now, the information at the current two Yule log pages should be converted (merged) to one page.