User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45314928-20200606025128/@comment-45314928-20200606143438

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45314928-20200606025128/@comment-45314928-20200606143438 you are being unreasonable. you have no evidence, and the burden of proof is on you. so until you find evidence that the novelisation didn't exist like Harness said it did, or that the story was still part of lockdown - despite Cook dismissing it (she would have clarified that the "short story" was otherwise) - then it should remain invalid.