Forum:This New Page Protection is ruining this wiki

Am i the only one who sees this full page protection thing is ruining the pre-airing and post airing. for example the SJA series 4 pages are STILL stubs months after release. All this stuff about unsourced info. It isn't hard for enougher idiot to click edit, Highlight the text and click delete, Whose with me? Joshoedit 18:43, December 22, 2010 (UTC)

Yes you are the only one, ever since I started using this wikia most of my edits have been reverting the edits of people who think it is funny to vandalise pages, the protection lets users get on with adding things to the wikia and not stopping to constantly revert edits. Revanvolatrelundar 18:47, December 22, 2010 (UTC)

Joshoedit is right. Stubs are no use to this wiki and should be removed as soon as possible. People who think it is funny to vandalize pages are morons. Alpha111 18:53, December 23, 2010 (UTC)

The thing is about vandals THEY NEVER ATTACK PRE-AIRING ARTICLES, and if we allow information on the series page why not the episode page? and the thing thats bugging me since this has all started. the discussion was never promoted to other members, 99% of members found out when "The Vault of secrets" page was created Joshoedit 03:46, December 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * Look, It's never going to happen so stop winging and go edit a Tetrap.--Skittles the hog 12:18, December 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * It should actually be you that checks the forums to see what is being discussed. It is sounding like you thinking that every User needs to be informed of every discussion taking place within the forums. You should have looked in the forums and read the discussion and then put across your opinion, instead of moaning about it after it a decision has been made, you should have taken the time to read through pages in the forums so you know what may happen on this wiki, and not expect User to tell you about every discussion that is happening. Seriously though, get over it. You've put across your opinion and at this moment the Christmas Carol page is semi-protected, so you can edit it, since you made such a fuss about it. Mini-mitch 11:49, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

Quote: "The thing is about vandals THEY NEVER ATTACK PRE-AIRING ARTICLES"
 * Wrong, as is the case with you and many new users, they tend to focus on the next episode.--Skittles the hog 15:35, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * No, The thing your calling vandalism is a honest mistakes, And the next episode is still a Pre- Airing page!
 * @ Mini-mitch, Well last time i cheeked every on else was putting the finishing touches on series 5 and starting to work on series 4 (SJA)
 * Also these pages are also candidates for deletion as they to not have the required information Joshoedit 20:58, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * How exactly does page-protection correlate to the SJA stubs? The full protection is removed shortly prior to broadcast, and there is really all that much to put in them before it. It's the editors themselves, unable to devote the effort for whatever reason that makes keeps the articles as stubs. -  I. Am. Excalibur-117-(talk • contribs) 21:20, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * How exactly does page-protection correlate to the SJA stubs? The full protection is removed shortly prior to broadcast, and there is really all that much to put in them before it. It's the editors themselves, unable to devote the effort for whatever reason that makes keeps the articles as stubs. -  I. Am. Excalibur-117-(talk • contribs) 21:20, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

(Joshoedit) Actually the users are placing unsourced rumour. aka vandilism.--Skittles the hog 21:36, December 24, 2010 (UTC)