Howling:The Voice in the TARDIS

In "the Pandorica Opens" back when the cracks were the big threat of the day, River is trapped on an exploding TARDIS. During this point, a voice warns "Silence Will Fall" just before everything gets kind of hectic. No one's made mention of that voice, not really in universe or out since then. Now that we've seen what might be the end of the Prophesy or at least the beginning of it, I think it bears wondering. WHO was that voice? Was it the Great Intelligence, falling back through the Doctor's Time Stream? Was it something else? Or will possible be left alone and never mentioned again? Vohn exel ☎  06:49, June 13, 2013 (UTC)

Moffat confirmed in an interview it was the Silence that blow up the TARDIS. Why we don't know and it probably should have been shown in an episode. Either way we can assume the voice was the agent they sent to destroy the TARDIS. 82.19.216.220talk to me 09:14, June 13, 2013 (UTC)

Oh, well, if Moffat said it in an interview, it must be true! It's not as if he ever lies about what's going on. (Enough of the sarcasm.) --89.241.67.154talk to me 11:52, June 13, 2013 (UTC)


 * Yes indeed "Moffat said it in a interview", honestly. You're absolutely right he should have put it in the story, as far as the site's concerned and as a rule among fans about many shows, nothing anyone says about events in the story are true unless they are confirmed in the story. All the same can we have the interview please, seeing the context could help? Also it'll probably be worth listening to that voice referred to if it sounds like a "Silent" ie a potential "Silent" on the TARDIS then it would go a long way to confirming what Steven Moffat said. Have you done that or are you just taking it for granted when you make that "assumption"?DCT  ☎  12:19, June 13, 2013 (UTC)


 * Not only are out-of-universe statements by Moffat unreliable -- the man has openly said that he lies to preserve the surprises in his stories -- but also the fact that it hasn't been revealed in an episode means he (or another writer) could simply give a different explanation without needing to "explain away" any discrepancy. That's been done before & it was done by a writer far less deceptive than Moffat:


 * When he wrote Dragonfire, Ian Briggs had no idea who or what was responsible for the "time storm" that took Ace from Perivale to Ice World. He said so in a note on the script & pointed out that the writer of some future story would need to explain what had happened. As it turned out, that writer was himself & the future story was The Curse of Fenric, 2 years later. Because no explanation had been given in any episode, he wasn't obstructed by having anything to fit in with or to explain away.


 * Moffat, in The Snowmen, likewise had no contradictory explanation to fit in with or to explain away when, after over forty years, he showed us the origins of the Great Intelligence & let us know why it attacked the London Underground in The Web of Fear.


 * As long as there's been no in-universe explanation, a future writer (Moffat or another) can do with the TARDIS explosion, even after a delay of several decades, what Moffat did with the "Yetis in the Underground" incident: explain it retroactively. --89.241.67.154talk to me 14:50, June 13, 2013 (UTC)


 * Except I'm less sure that Moffat genuinely doesn't know why the TARDIS exploded. He's running the show leading to 50th Anniversary and even if he hasn't got a clue or was thwarted somehow in explaining it I still think he wants us to think he knows. It's hard to understand why he would answer a question on the TARDIS explosion at the moment though it tells us very little whether or or it's true. We still really need the quote if it exists.DCT ☎  16:33, June 13, 2013 (UTC)

The more we know in story the less the statement seems to make sense. Blowing up the Tardis to get the Daleks and Cybermen to put the Doctor in the Pandorica doesn't kill the Doctor, kills River rather than the Doctor in the exploding Tardis, and probably destroys the universe. That all seems not consistent with the stated goal of the Silence. Unless they somehow knew how it would all work out, and they risked the existence of the Universe to get Amy and Rory together to make Melody, in order to have a weapon to kill the Doctor later.

What could they fear as the danger of Trenzelore which would be worse than the destruction of the universe?Phil Stone ☎  17:21, June 13, 2013 (UTC)

DCT: I wasn't saying that Moffat doesn't know. He may well do & intend to reveal it eventually. What I was saying is that, until it is revealed in an episode, what Moffat intended hasn't been fixed as what happened. I used Briggs as an illustration because, with him, we can be quite certain that what was eventually revealed wasn't what was initially intended -- because nothing was.

Whatever Moffat may or may not have intended when he wrote Series 5, as long as it hasn't been revealed in an episode, he's free to come up with a new explanation. If Moffat were to stumble under the wheels of a bus or get himself fired (or whatever) & another writer had to take over, that other writer would be free to come up with a new explanation. (I was 89 earlier.) --2.101.58.225talk to me 18:54, June 13, 2013 (UTC)

I completely agree on that. Another example might turn out to be The Doctor Currently Living in Pete's World. RTD apparently shot a scene with the "two" Tennant Doctors with the meta-crisis version ending up with a piece of the Tardis he could grow into his own. But the scene was not shown. Now we have Tennant and Piper booked, and who/when are they, and do they have a Tardis? Moffet can confirm RTD's desire for Pete's World to have a Tardis, he can deny it, or he can ignore it by using an earlier Doctor and Rose from this world. Phil Stone ☎  19:55, June 13, 2013 (UTC)