Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170222095120/@comment-4028641-20170226204058

AeD wrote: I haven't, either, which is why I was being vague, but yeah, it seems to.

But we can't just say "The events of DiT are 100% defo a dream." People are going to have their own interpretations, and sometimes secondary narrative claims are too silly to support all the way. What if our readers don't care about the '90s Virgin books?

A secondary book can not be allowed to definitively decide canon like that. The best bet is to include DiT in articles, while adding "According to some sources, this adventure was a dream."