Board Thread:The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20151008023030/@comment-30325516-20191107221125

If we were talking on a timeline page, I’d agree 100% and say that’s gold. But on the main article it’s just speculation and conjecture, the same sort that’s led people to believe that the Tzun Master was dying in Happy Endings when the actual novel suggests nothing of the sort.

I just don’t think we should be knitting together contradictory narratives on the main page unless there’s some kind of source that makes sense of things, like for example Planet of Dust and Day of the Master pretty much clarifies the Master's Post TV movie timeline and makes sense of all the seemingly contradictory accounts of what happened to him following the movie.

As I say, personally I’d agree with you, but looking at things from the point of view of what’s best for the accuracy of the article and what fits best in line with the rules of wiki, I think the “according to one account” solution, is the best one until further notice.