User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Help!/@comment-43874324-20200710191251/@comment-88790-20200827151409

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Help!/@comment-43874324-20200710191251/@comment-88790-20200827151409 MemoryAlpha has a decent amount of pages in its w:c:memory-alpha:Category:Crimes category, none of which I've been able to find have any warnings on them. Memory-Beta also contains a similar category w:c:memory-beta:Category:Crimes.

As Jack "BtR" Saxon alludes to, how do we decide what requires a trigger warning and what doesn't? And in trying to or trying to define which pages 'deserve' a warning are we going to be doing worse? That's why an overall statement like the Tardis:ParentPage but a more neutrally named one would be better. So that an informed decision by someone visiting can be made.

I'm not against the idea for a tag on story pages, like that which is on some older cartoons and other older media, linked to a page that explains these stories are a production of their time. Something that is properly cited, and can give context / provide information beyond just being a tag for stories. That way a properly cited page can inform the tag, the tag links to the page etc.

Regarding the issue of Arachnids in the UK, it may be worth re-visiting the Tardis:Guide to images to consider some sort of best practice regarding the story pages, as they're some of the most highly trafficked of pages where people are likely to encounter an image like that is currently on Arachnids in the UK.