User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20170618182814/@comment-24894325-20170618234113

OttselSpy25 wrote: The contradiction I saw is evident.

You moved Martin Luther King Jr to Martin Luther King due to an audio not mentioning the Jr, and then suggested that the picture of Martin Luther King Jr could be discussed at Martin Luther King Jr exclusively, without any reference within the article to who the person in the picture actually is. Could you please provide a quote where I say that the picture should be discussed at Martin Luther King Jr separately from Martin Luther King? I certainly never intended this to happen. But I'm just curious: what gave you this impression?