Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-1506468-20190827123101/@comment-6032121-20190830141315

I got the impression that at this point he's saying the somewhat more restrained "The 10,000 Dawns material should be considered invalid for the purposes of this wiki for now because stories released by James Wylder do not have to meet the standards of some kind of 'sanity control', be that an editor, editors plural, or a larger organisation that in some other way oversees the publication of the story itself and/or the use of the licensed characters and concepts. To allow these stories to be considered valid would be a slippery slope. If the stories are ever printed properly by Arcbeatle Press they might be valid but that hasn't happened yet, and even if it was, we certainly wouldn't link to the blog version or consider it the actual first release."

But I would appreciate confirmation, and at any rate do agree with AeD that even if it was on his tumblr blog or something, that shouldn't invalidate the release — even though this is not the case here to begin with, and a print release has already happened either way; what Amorkuz termed "release #2" when he broke down the three forms of release under discussion in an above message.