User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-5692737-20161005140711/@comment-24894325-20170603233402

TheChampionOfTime explained why at least two of these stories would most probably require a license were they released commercially. But it does not really matter. Tardis:Valid sources clearly states:


 * A story that isn't commercially licensed by all of the relevant copyright holders doesn't count.

And as if that was not clear enough, there is a clarification regarding charity publications:


 * And no, it doesn't matter that the story was written by someone who has otherwise written licensed fiction. Or that the publisher did a nice thing and gave his or her profits to charity. Or that the work was almost published by the BBC.

In order to include these stories as valid, it is necessary to demonstrate that they have been commercially licensed by all shareholders. No evidence to this effect has been provided. No evidence is likely to be provided: it is strange to expect the production company to obtain a commercial license for a charity product.

The stories are not covered on this wiki.