User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20151008023030/@comment-38288735-20200106192032

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20151008023030/@comment-38288735-20200106192032 Schreibenheimer wrote: All that being said, unless the plot keeps the Doctor and the Master from having a decent-length conversation in Part 2, I feel like it would be very poor writing to not have the Doctor address the change-in-personality from the redeemed Missy, so this is all probably very academic.

Well, my last paragraph either didn't age well or aged like fine wine depending on your level of cynicism.

Regardless, I stand by my previous comments that assuming incarnations happen out of the order they're presented in is speculative and, as such, believe that his section of the template should come after Missy (as has already been done, apparently).

I still feel that having an "Incarnation Unclear" section just for the female Master in Harvest in Time is unnecessary as there are a multitude of possible Masters in the story, and the novel is well-represented in the template by the known incarnations present in the story.