Board Thread:The Panopticon/@comment-25041817-20180409125033/@comment-188432-20180416230913

We actually have had this discussion before. At Thread:121084, we decided that only info from the website as it appeared in Rose was valid. And we even had a cleanup project about it. So this wasn't just decided upon, it's already been enacted.

Also, even Josiah Rowe himself agreed with SOTO. Since he called for the movement of information gleaned from the RL version of the websites to "behind the scenes" sections, Josiah agreed — along with everyone else in that thread — that the information was not valid for the writing of in-universe articles.

Since there's no new information here run this thread, I'm closing it and upholding the previous discussion. whoisdoctorwho.co.uk is not a valid source.