User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-2.31.133.219-20170428080708

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-2.31.133.219-20170428080708 The point about wether something invalid till proven otherwise got my attention as for rule four it states that "Extraordinary non-narrative evidence — such as the story's author directly saying that the story doesn't happen in the normal DWU – must be presented to the community for a story to be kicked out based on Rule 4. " which segests tat if we are satisfied that it passes rules 1 to 3 then it is valid till proven otherwise