User talk:MakeShift

<div style="background-color: transparent;	border: 1px dashed #2f2cb8;	color: #000;	margin: 2em 0 1em;	padding: .5em 1em;	vertical-align: middle;       align:center;        width:90%;        line-height:110%;        font-size:95%;	text-align: justify;        -moz-border-radius:10px !important;        -webkit-border-radius:10px !important;         border-radius:10px !important;         -moz-box-shadow:0 0 40px #2f2cb8 !important;         -webkit-box-shadow:0 0 40px #2f2cb8 !important;         box-shadow:0 0 40px #2f2cb8 !important;">

Welcome to the Will k!

We hope you'll enjoy being a part of our community! If you're new to either us or wiki editing in general, you might want to check out some of these links:
 * Internal pages
 * Help pages
 * Manual of Style
 * Forums
 * Recent changes
 * User page policy


 * External Wikipedia pages
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial

Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes like this:  ~

Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the Help pages, add a question to one of the Forums or ask on my user talk page. 07:54: Wed 21 Dec 2011

Image upgrades
Hey :) Thanks for trying to improve the quality of an image. However, it's important to remember that in the process of improving, you can't then break a local image convention. Your improvement unnecessarily pushed the size of the image over 100kb, which is our size limit for most images.  The quality difference is so marginal, that breaking this rule can't really be justified.  Another important thing to remember is that the only image quality we care about is the way the pic displays at 250px. (Why 250px? Because that's the largest width at which a pic will be displayed on a page.)

If there's no obvious improvement on the article page itself, then there is no reason to improve the quality of the image. Don't let this stop you trying to improve images, however, as there are many of our images which could obviously be improved, even at thumbnail width! 16:05: Fri 15 Nov 2013