Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-45314928-20200606025128/@comment-45692830-20200606055404

Clearly a discarded novelization is an unproduced story. A proposed extract, however, would be called an extract, given the discussion going on at the talk page, which was the context for the person asking the question. You can't explain this inconsistency. Similarly, you've consistently failed to address the issue where she merely says he mentioned it. Rather than posted it or released it.

Now, to claim that you addressed the word choices is simply false. You haven't done so prior to this, and quite frankly, you've only done so half way now. You're assuming that the fan is using a word in a truly bizarre way, and ignoring that Cook is using a word that makes no sense, something you have never once even attempted to explain.

As for other statements, I think you'll find that the BBC website I linked does not actually mention Lockdown! on it at all. At best it says "Fans around the world will be remembering and reminiscing this anniversary with a live stream of Rose, with many using the hashtag #TripofaLifetime to chat on Twitter" - which is only there to lead into Davies' prose work, and this is not specifically from Chibnall, unlike another statement made on that website.

As for the idea that I said this was a "Lockdown! associated release", I've never once used the term before now, at best I said it was a release associated with Lockdown!, which is a far more vague statement. I've consistently maintained that I do not believe it possible to erect the kind of barriers you want around Lockdown! releases.