User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-6032121-20200906002332/@comment-45692830-20200906002450

As stated in said thread, this comment wasn't yet present when rule 1 was created, it's just a typo instead.

Edit: Actually, a very weird circumstance. It was put in not long after rule 1 was put in. So I suspect what happened is that Czech wrote this up while he had three rules planned, realized he wanted four rules, then didn't change the stuff that had numbering when he c/ped it in. So part anachronism part bad proofreading?