User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161222080541/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170105124808

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161222080541/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170105124808 SeaniesBeanies wrote: Yes from my point of view, but marking them as valid changes nothing. You still can't reference them in other articles based in the mainline DWU as they're completely separate entities. You wouldn't, for example, be able to reference David Warner's Doctor when writing about David Tennant's, as they are not narratively continuous with each other.

You could, however, when would writing about an unbound Doctor ever need to occur in an article about the Tenth?