Howling:Supernatural

I was wondering abou the supernatural in the doctor who universe. The whoniverse seems pretty content to provide a scientific explanation for most things but there is alot left to the imagination. For instance Vampires. I am not too sure if there is any spin off material about it but from what I saw in state of decay they seemed very supernatural, they couldn't be killed by bullets lived forever drank blood all turned to dust when the great vampire died. Plus there have been demons and supernatural creatures like the destroyer in battlefield and the mara. The new series has even had supernatural creatures like the beast, and Abbadon. You could even say the midnight entity was supernatural too. So I guess I have three questions to ask. One, what do you think of having supernatural creatures in Doctor Who and I mean actuially supernatural creatures like the vampires and the beast not like say a really powerful alien gets mistaken for them like Vampires in venice. I personally love the idea of them being real but I do understand why others hate it as it does bring a whole new world when you have Vampires and werewolves. Two do you think that the Silent Menace will be supernatural, I dont think it will be actually supernatural like the Beast but I do think it might be supernatural themed I.E. really powerful and god like mysterious [Black Gaurdian, Midnight Entity, Weeping Angels] Steven Moffat seems fond of these fairy tale type stories and the title's of the last two episodes do suggest that. Three I know this is probably better suited to the Panopticon but I will just post it here anyway do you think we should have a supernatural category. I mean the Doctor has fought a lot of supernatural creatures, or at least put something about them because as far as I know the supernatural does exist in some form in the Whoniverse like the Beast. User:Winehousefan 16:50, 27 March, 2010, [UTC]&nbsp


 * They are not supernaturaul beasts, they are aliens. ☆ The Solar Dragon  ( Talk ) ☆ 15:28, May 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * As Solar Dragon says the things you mention are aliens or scientific elements.
 * If you're looking for categories related to what you're talking about see; Category:Occult, Category:Religion (also from within this category you'll find categories like Category:Supposed deities), Category:Theories and concepts, Category:Myths and legends. --Tangerineduel 15:46, May 27, 2010 (UTC)

Okay I see there are enough categories for wierd things in the whoniverse dosen't need to be another. Also I don't think all of them were meant to be aliens The doctor didn't know what the beast was and in Torchwood the said Abaddon and all like him imprisoned all over the universe were demons too. Winehousefan 16:35 May 27 [2010]


 * The Doctor didn't know what the beast was because the beast was from before time and the doctor couldn't imagine what that meant. The beast is from before the big bang. It is the "truth behind the legend". V00D00M0NKY 17:16, May 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * Clarke's Third Law is "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." An (out-of-universe) Doctor Who corollary (which I think comes from either Philip Hinchcliffe or Graham Williams, but I can't find the reference) is "Any sufficiently scary alien is indistinguishable from a monster."


 * The Black Guardian lives outside time, draws power from darkness and chaos in our universe, is immortal, and has powers restricted only by his compact with the other 5 Guardians. So, why is he not described in supernatural terms, while the Beast is? I think there are two reasons.
 * The Beast is the source of human myths about demons, so he's readily understandable as a demon in our terms, while the Guardians are completely outside the scope of our understanding. (And remember, the Doctor is talking to, and for the benefit of, humans almost all the time--and where he isn't, the show is probably interpreting for us).
 * The Doctor knows a good deal about the Guardians, and therefore often lapses into his typical technobabble when talking about them, but knows almost nothing about the Beast.


 * I think that's really all there is to it. Nothing is truly supernatural from the right vantage point, but some things are easier to describe that way from our vantage point. --Falcotron 17:21, May 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * It strikes me that it might be worth having a page (not just a category) to talk about this stuff. But only if we could find verifiable in-universe explanations for why some things are referred to as "supernatural" or "occult", in the same way we do for "magic". (By the way, if you haven't looked at the article on magic, you should.) --Falcotron 17:24, May 27, 2010 (UTC)