User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-28743561-20191009174707/@comment-4028641-20191103134250

Fair, fair.

Personally, I've always felt is was best to cover animated/reconstructed stories on separate pages from the originals. But this has no precedent, so I think it's fine to expand the original to reference this as a reconstructed version. To me, it certainly seems like this was made because of how unlikely an animated version is, so it's basically the same category of content.