User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20151023051229/@comment-4028641-20151112213546

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20151023051229/@comment-4028641-20151112213546 It another forum, Czech has refereed to the item as a mistake needed to be deleted, along with SP. Czech wrote: I think DAN still exists too, and is, I think, on SOTO's removal list. Existence is not the same thing as policy. So I think that that makes his take on the prefix pretty clear -- it was meant to be removed long ago but got missed. If this has already been noted or discussed elsewhere, I apologize.