Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161223201024/@comment-1272640-20170117224347

AeD wrote: I think after all the dissecting that's gone on re: the Shalka Doctor's "number," the most that we could possibly acknowledge on his article is that he's clearly meant to be a post-McGann one. Anything above that is what Wikipedia would call "original research." So are you in favor of treating Scream of the Shalka as valid, and its Doctor as just an unspecified post-McGann one?