User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-28349479-20161216221639/@comment-20607870-20161220211409

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-28349479-20161216221639/@comment-20607870-20161220211409 Shambala108 wrote: DENCH-and-PALMER wrote: Judging by responses, users in favour of coverage are:

Natebumber, Fwhiffahder, Pluto2, OncomingStorm12th, 86.186.186.124, 86.4.236.22 (Philip Purser-Hallard), AndrewHickey, 188.220.60.109 (Stuart Douglas), 31.48.185.212 (Simon Bucher-Jones), BWBurke94, Swablueme, DENCH-and-PALMER

And neutral or undecided are:

Shambala108, SOTO, CoT

Quote and add names here for which side you're on. That's enough of this. This is not a matter of voting, it's a matter of whether FP fails or satisfies policy, that is Tardis:Valid sources. No more asking people which side they're on, as this has absolutely nothing to do with this issue. Present facts if you have them, quotes from those involved with production if you have them, but no more of this "which side are you on". This thread takes a long time to load, and we don't need any lists of who believes what.

Sorry pal