User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-26975268-20130201045831/@comment-188432-20130205224628

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-26975268-20130201045831/@comment-188432-20130205224628 SmallerOnTheOutside wrote: More importantly, though, shouldn't we open a discussion on whether or not to split all the pages into two now too (also over in a week), so that we can do it all at once? The way I see it, it wouldn't hurt to have two discussion on a similar topic at once. I've answered this several times now. See posts 56 and 64, the very first post, and several others in between. The fact of needing a BTS version of every day of the week — all of them, every single one of them, each of the 366 possible days — is non-controversial, and an obvious application of existing policy.

The only matter up for discussion is the nature of the dab term itself. We do not need a discussion to split the articles. Splitting the articles is the only way that we can both obey policy and keep the BTS information on the majority of pages.

Please do not ask this question in the same way again. If you feel that I have not answered your question, please rephrase your question.