User talk:ShadGray

Welcome back!
Hi :) Good to see you around again. I'm just gonna replace the previous welcome message with something a little more up-to-date, if you don't mind. Also, I should tell you that since you were last here in 2010, we've formalised our rules about signatures, and yours is currently in violation. Please read T:SIG LOOK and Help:Signature and the whole of Signature policy for more info. Basically, your sig fails because it doesn't include separate links to both your user page and your user talk page.

Thanks for your suggestions on the whole companion thing, but they were a little vague. You mention that our list doesn't tally with yours, but don't give any specifics. Which list are you talking about — for there are several lists of companions — and who specifically has been ignored or included contrary to your expectations?

Also, I would't say that our previous discussions failed to come to any conclusion. Instead, our consensus is that there is no definition. Those two things are subtly, but importantly, different. To agree that there is no definition is very different to saying that there is a definition, but we just haven't found a way of expressing it. The truth is that there is no definition, which is the sentiment expressed at Companion. 15:29: Sat 29 Jun 2013