Talk:Arcan system

Deletion tag
There was no explanation given for a recently added deletion tag. Xx-connor-xX ☎  19:59, May 5, 2020 (UTC)
 * Actually, there was. "No citation", in accordance to Tardis:Citation. OncomingStorm12th (talk) 20:15, May 5, 2020 (UTC)
 * Also, might I add, no pages link to this one, making it a orphan page. While not a delete-worthy problem, it should be amended as well. OncomingStorm12th (talk) 20:20, May 5, 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, I did so because there was no source given for the information above Behind the scenes. I wasn't sure of a better tag, but it can easily be removed if that issue is resolved. The behind the scenes mentions the The Torchwood Archives, which is currently not a considered a valid source so it couldn't be the source for the above information, unless the article is recategorised as invalid. (Although I think from the Amazon preview pages and publisher's summary, as a story told through in-universe documents a la Apocrypha Bipedium, The Time Lord Letters, The Secret Lives of Monsters it might be worth re-evaluation. But I don't have the full book and this isn't the place so that's a thought for another day :P) Toqgers ☎
 * Sorry about that Toqgers, I misunderstood the “No citation” bit. Xx-connor-xX ☎  20:43, May 5, 2020 (UTC)
 * Nah it's cool! I'll make sure to use a more appropriate template next time if there is one. Take care! Toqgers ☎  21:48, May 5, 2020 (UTC)
 * No, Toggers, you used the template correctly with the correct reasoning. Shambala108 ☎  21:54, May 5, 2020 (UTC)
 * Yep, template was completely fine - just a brain fart on my end. I randomly thought that the "No citation" was the default message if no explanation had been given, don't ask me how. Xx-connor-xX ☎  22:01, May 5, 2020 (UTC)