Template talk:Romanas

Two things

 * 1) First of all, why is this protected? There has been no vandalism to this page, and unlike  or, a lot of information on this page is not contentious. Thus, this should not be protected.
 * 2) This brings me on to my second point, where I would've done this myself, but an invalid section should be added so Romana (Battle for the Universe) and Romana (Time Fracture) can be added.  📯 📂 13:16, 6 January 2022 (UTC)


 * I too am confused why this page is locked. I'll add that it would be appropriate to use Roman numerals rather than Arabic numerals in numbering Romana's incarnations, given that's how they're counted in the page titles. – n8 (☎) 21:42, 16 February 2023 (UTC)


 * It's not that I'm wholly against unlocking the page but I can't help but note that Epsilon went directly from "a lot of information on this page is not contentious" to making a highly contentious proposal, haha. Adding an invalid row to a navfobox is, as far as I know, unprecedented, and bears a lot more discussion before a single user can be permitted to just add it. Scrooge MacDuck ⊕ 13:25, 5 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Well, at the very least, Romana (Time Fracture) is present in valid sources so she needs to be added. Even if Romana (Battle for the Universe) is left unincluded for now, frankly, over a year and a half later, this template should be un-edit protected. 01:49, 31 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Regarding Romana (Time Fracture), where would you place them in the template? Bongo50   ☎  08:56, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Time Fracture
I was going to add it myself but the page is protected. Could someone add Romana (Time Fracture) to the incarnations section of the template? StevieGLiverpool ☎  18:09, 30 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Where in the order do you think they should be placed? Bongo50   ☎  08:58, 31 July 2023 (UTC)


 * If the Time Fracture Romana's placement is unclear, couldn't a new section be made for her? Cookieboy 2005 ☎  10:14, 6 August 2023 (UTC)