User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-45692830-20200511054726/@comment-6032121-20200511161054

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-45692830-20200511054726/@comment-6032121-20200511161054 You're on the wrong thread for questions about the story's validity. This is the inclusion debate. But the supposed "frequent and unexplained fourth wall breaks" have already been brought up there, and largely refuted, though the thread has yet to be definitively concluded by an admin ruling.

Also, The Castellan… was created as invalid because of the much more blatant and unexplained lapse in in-universe logic. But it's not a hard precedent, I think, because there's never been a proper inclusion debate with an admin decision. (And I don't think there should be one yet until User:SOTO's concerns about the thing's copyright status as expressed on the talk page are alleviated.)