Talk:Minister of Chance

So, I know it's early days, but is his spin-off series worthy of note? The extent of it's connection to Death Comes to Time is unclear as of yet, but it IS the same character. Third Bannerman 01:17, April 25, 2011 (UTC)Third Bannerman

It depends on its nature whether we record the spin off here, from what I've heard so far it seems to just be created by fans and not a proper production company like Big Finish. If this is the case then it is unlikely that we will regard the spin off as canon like the Doctor Who Audio Visuals plays. --Revan\Talk 16:55, April 25, 2011 (UTC)

Fair enough. Although I would add that the fans involved are the Minister's creator Dan Freeman and so are being produced by the copyright holders, unlike the AVs. Plus, IIRC, the people involved are all being paid a wage, which probably puts them closer to Big Finish than the enthusiastic amateur approach of the AVs. Or, I suppose, like the Obverse Books Iris Wildthyme series which IIRC is covered. I'm not especially commited to either outcome myself, just asking - so thanks for clarifying policy. :) Third Bannerman 22:11, April 26, 2011 (UTC)Third Bannerman

If you are right and a proper production team like BBV or Big Finish is doing the series then by our policy it should be canon. Check Tardis:canon policy and see if you think it falls into our boundries. --Revan\Talk 19:43, April 27, 2011 (UTC)

The new Minister of Chance Audios are being done by a company called Radio Static that includes the Licence Holders & creators of the non-BBC copyrighted content from Death Comes to Time, including the Minster of Chance and other original characters created for that production. All actors are being paid for their work on the new audios. As far as quality is concerned, they're better than BBV, and about on the same tier as Magic Bullet Productions. It's obviously a small studio, but they are producing quality professional product. So far the only Doctor Who connection is the Miniser, but there have been a couple subtle references to other things from Death Comes to Time as well as the larger Whoniverse in general. Anyway, I hope that clears up any questions as to the veracity of the canon of these productions. Cousin Zagreus 01:05, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

I've created a page for the series at The Minister of Chance, feel free to take a look and add any information that is missing. --Revan\Talk 12:08, June 20, 2011 (UTC)

Why is the Minister of Chance audio series not on this wiki? It seems to be pretty explicitly tied to Doctor Who. I mean heck, the website for it is doctor-who-spin-off.com, it even has a big "Doctor Who: Death Comes To Time" logo on every page (except for the main one). The Minister from these audios is listed as the next regeneration of the Stephen Fry incarnation http://www.doctor-who-spin-off.com/who_is_the_minister_of_chance.php and he's even mentioned as a timelord.

It's pretty clear they're marketing this as a Doctor Who spinoff, it bears the Doctor Who logo and features a character introduced in Doctor Who. How does this not warrant inclusion? Have I missed something important here?


 * The main problem here is over if it is licensed or not, which it appears to lack BBC approval. On the other hand, it does only feature characters copyrighted by the creator... Similar to K9, which we only feature do to the involvement of Bob Baker. So I personally think it should be included. I'll look into it a bit though... OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 00:14, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * WAIT, NO, User:CzechOut has stated it is not to be covered, I'm stepping out of this. OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 00:37, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * @Duke1337: The audio series isn't on this wiki because its producers have explicitly said that it's in no way shape or form a part of the DWU in audio interviews on the Flashing Blade Podcast, amongst others. Also, Death Comes to Time has been voted outside the scope of the things we cover, because it's producers gave interviews in DWM which cast serious doubt as to the seriousness of their narrative attempt.  They flatly admitted it was a one-off, and had they been granted the right to produce the series by the BBC — and they were in contention for it alongside RTD — they would have gone off in different directions than DCTT.  So DCTT is a narrative oddity, a curio on the way from the 1996 movie to Rose, and it does not deserve much of our attention on this wiki.   01:23: Mon 01 Oct 2012