Talk:Hospitality (short story)

Invalidity
This story is invalid because it uses the original pre-Doctor Who version of Iris Wildthyme. CoT    ?  04:54, December 12, 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that information! Shambala108 ☎  05:24, December 12, 2016 (UTC)
 * Erm...what? How is it invalid because of that? Shouldn't it meet our four little rules? --Pluto2 (talk) 05:41, December 14, 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, how does that make it invalid? It's the same incarnation of Iris as in the Phoenix Court books, yes, but the incarnation isn't invalid. Fwhiffahder ☎  01:35, December 20, 2016 (UTC)


 * How is this story invalid, could you elaborate for me COT? - Sir DENCH-and-PALMER   ☎  17:35, December 26, 2016 (UTC)

That's not a real reason to make something invalid. OS25 (Talk) 23:05, March 8, 2017 (UTC)

Why is this invalid?
Hello, I just want to know why this story is invalid. 86.152.200.56talk to me 13:35, August 18, 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, this does seem strange. I haven't read the story, but to the best of my knowledge, we haven't had an inclusion or exclusion debate. Can the people who put on the invalid tag explain their reasoning? Never Forget The Day The 456 Arrived ☎  14:13, May 26, 2020 (UTC)
 * Oof, looking back at the top of this talk page and thinking, "Did I do that?" Presumably, I was explaining the reasoning behind this being invalid... Something about the "Phoenix Court universe" being ruled in Forum:Iris Wildthyme: should she stay or should she go? to be separate from the "Doctor Who Universe"... Anyway, um, I think the lines of reasoning which rule this invalid are incompatible (or unable to vibe with or understand) the works of Paul Magrs. Magrs loves continuity, but not in the same way that the people who founded the rules of this wiki seemed to think of continuity. The thing with Iris Wildthyme is that nothing with her is intended to be "non-canon". For what it's worth, I made a page for Phoenix Court, because that's a concept which has appeared in an official Doctor Who story. CoT     ?  17:43, May 27, 2020 (UTC)

Let's follow Thread:212365 on this one:
 * 1) Is there a clear connection to establish this is meant to be DWU?
 * 2) Does it stand on its own? (Is prior knowledge of invalid stories necessary to know what's going on?)
 * 3) Does the problem/situation that invalidated the series of stories which is referenced also apply to this work? 04:49, September 12, 2020 (UTC)