User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-4028641-20170428003456

Thefartydoctor wrote: Well you're right to say that the boundaries of the DWU can sometimes be undefinable. However, we can still define them. Every time we're faced with a new medium, such as the Dr Men range, we ask ourselves the most important questions and we thrash out what needs to be thrashed out. It's not about "I don't want this in the DWU", it's about "Do we have all the information necessary to place it in the DWU", and the answer in this context is "No".

Not really. There's a potent lack of evidence that the Dr. Men books are set in the DWU. But there isn't any evidence that the stories aren't set in the DWU. That's the big disagreement here. I can not accept a story being guilty before innocent just because it's a little weird.

I respect your belief that hidden somewhere in the void is the answer to this question that three people on the internet care about and no one else. But we can't keep this forum open perpetually under the pretense that someday someone maybe will give us an answer, and I can't accept calling it invalid simply because "Eh, who knows right?"