User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-27280472-20160606210324/@comment-20607870-20161129210741

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-27280472-20160606210324/@comment-20607870-20161129210741 Pluto2 wrote: I don't see what the basis was for declaring DCTT invalid because "Seven dies". That's speculation, and not stated in the narrative itself. In fact, it's left unclear whether the Seventh Doctor died. All we have is a burnt umbrella, which is very flimsy evidence. To claim "it's invalid because Seven dies" without solid narrative evidence isn't enough for me. We don't even see a body, so I think the inclusion debate should be reopened.

100% agree - it's like saying definitely that Twelve killed the half face man, we don't know that for definite. I believe the thread should be reopened.