Talk:The Blood Line (TV story)

Colasanto?
What's with Frances Fisher's character being called "The Mother Colasanto" on this page? The Colasantos aren't part of the Three Families. -- Noneofyourbusiness 14:43, September 10, 2011 (UTC)

I was wondering that myself. Colasanto is Angelo's surname. He wasn't part of the families. Calling her "The Mother Colasanto" makes it seem like she's related to him, but shes not. We never learn her name, unless its in the credits. Gryffindor1991 16:22, September 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * It's on BBC iPlayer's credits. --MrThermomanPreacher 16:24, September 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Are we sure it's not in error? Considering there's a character called "The Cousin", it seems likely the character should be simply "The Mother". d ● ● ●  19:23, September 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * http://twitter.com/#!/Janeespenson "Looks like an error to me." -- Noneofyourbusiness 01:12, September 11, 2011 (UTC)

"Jack will be back. January 2012."
After the credits of the UKTV airing of "The Blood Line" was a ten second promo, with the Torchwood "T" logo as a background, with the caption: "Jack will be back. January 2012." This was not included in the Starz airing of the episode, and I was wondering whether there has been a statement from anyone about the future of the series yet? 02:06, September 11, 2011 (UTC)


 * screenshot?


 * 50.98.168.205 06:28, September 11, 2011 (UTC)


 * This is it: source 06:45, September 11, 2011 (UTC)


 * Doctor Who Online has suggested here that this was a promo that was only added to the end of the Australian broadcast of the episode and refers to a series of Torchwood repeats that will be shown on the 'UKTV' channel in January 2012; not a hastily arranged new series. It seems it's just for Australian eyes and should not appear in any other territory - I'll let you know on Thursday if it turns up in the BBC broadcast, but it looks doubtfulBaziel 22:01, September 12, 2011 (UTC)


 * If it is about repeats, it isn't very nice of them to play with our emotions like that. I wonder if Davies has grounds to sue them on the basis of making false claims that there will be a release of a product he owns? -- Noneofyourbusiness 00:50, September 13, 2011 (UTC)


 * It wasn't on the BBC Broadcast either, so the Aussie repeats looks like it's the most likely explanation. I would say that there's very little chance of any legal action over it. They've not made any false or misrepresentative claims - all it says is 'Jack will be back' in January; and if you're Australian, that's true, he will be back on your screen in January - nowhere does it mention any new series and they've made sure it's only been screened in the relevant territory.Baziel 20:10, September 16, 2011 (UTC)