Board Thread:The Panopticon/@comment-45692830-20200511054726/@comment-45692830-20200512213306

I'd be perfectly fine with that being added in to T:NO RW as the wording for what I'm proposing, it's simpler, more general in a sense, and doesn't seem to allow anything problematic in. But it doesn't seem like SOTO was agreeing that the current rules, as written, support this reading.