Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-4028641-20170225003158

OncomingStorm12th wrote: Now, I'll state something that's indeed very obvious, but I feel like it should be here just for the sake's of stating it: even if we do deem this a VS, we definetelly should not add any other sequels (like a possible "The Lego Batman Movie 2") or spin-offs that may come from this movie if the said movie does not contain DWU elements.

Absolutely, I completely agree. Even in the LD debate I was arguing for us to only include levels which included the Doctor.

If a LEGO product does not have anything from the DWU, it's just about as relevant to this wiki as Cyberon.

Thefartydoctor wrote: From what we've discussed here, and this is just a summary so that we're all on the same page, the Daleks have entered a portal in The Phantom Zone, which is a jail outside of space-time. The portal (or rift, wormhole, vortex...) connects up to the DWU. I take it we're treating this portal as either a natural occurrence or as a man-made structure using a natural occurrence. What I mean by that is the Cardiff rift was a natural occurrence, but the "invisible door" that the Tenth Doctor creates to project through to Darlig Ulv Stranden is man-made using the natural broken barriers of reality.

This connection to the DWU via the portal, the license itself and the authorial intent of these Daleks being the Daleks [source needed] is the reason why most of us find in favour of this movie being valid? How's that for a summary? Any comments regarding this should be bringing new information to the table rather than recycling things we've already concluded.

Also, I reckon we should leave this thread open a while longer for as many people to see the movie as possible.

Yea, that sounds like what we've agreed upon so far.

As for how long we keep the thread open, I vote that we try to close it down around the same time that the film stops being in the theatre.