Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-24894325-20170302225328/@comment-1432718-20170304162142

SOTO wrote: I don't really see the need to discuss every story that is obviously not intended to be set in the DWU. Sometimes, a story just breaks rule 4, and there's no discussion needed unless someone wants to contest that with new compelling evidence to the contrary. ^ This. Don't mistake the recent surge in inclusion debates for a need to discuss each and every story. ^ And especially this.