Board Thread:The Panopticon/@comment-1451563-20180913002703/@comment-6032121-20180921185946

Thanks for coming back, Game-Fanatic, and making your point clearer — albeit through a wall of text.

I'm afraid you're fighting a losing battle with the matter of "anomalies". I'm personally with you, but Amorkuz has pretty unequivocally ruled that while the evidence supports such an interpretation, it's still an interpretation, and thus out of bounds for the Tardis Wiki (rather like how we don't quite have official confirmation that the Face of Boe is Jack Harkness, even though there probably isn't a Doctor Who writer alive who'd disagree, and thus this Wiki still keeps the pages separate).

You're quite right to point out that the idea that Time Lords are beyond gender-stereotyping is not only contradicted elsewhere, but contradicted right there in the scene. That's something to bear in mind.

But mostly, I'd focus on the fact that I stated many times and which you reignited — by pointing out that this very conversation about gender-fluid Time Lords still does not use "they". "They" is simply not a way of referring to gender-crossing Time Lords that is supported anywhere in valid sources, regardless of whether Time Lords have a "general" gender or not.