Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-27280472-20161218221939/@comment-5918438-20161218225949

The example given is The Wings of a Butterfly, which was later adapted into an audio story which we do cover. I cannot speak for the original intent behind the clause. It does not mention the opposite, but I can't see any reason why we'd cover something as valid which the BBC pulled back on before its initial publication. In other words, even if it briefly passed Rule 4, it was never officially released in that capacity, so fails Rule 3, at the very least.