User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-5442547-20130319195443/@comment-188432-20130401045731

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-5442547-20130319195443/@comment-188432-20130401045731 So much for your earlier apology, eh?

No one could look at how much work I've put into this discussion, or its precedents, and—with a straight face—assert that I've abused power. I'm looking at the whole of what we need to accomplish as a community and asserting that 14 minutes in 1993 isn't worth the amount of effort we're putting into this discussion.

I have to make judgements all the time about when to close discussions and when to keep them going. It's important to do that; otherwise we'd never get anywhere. This discussion has been open for two weeks, and that's really enough—given that it's hardly the first time we've put DiT under the microscope.

And you know what, OttselSpy25? You've been there for almost every one of these discussions. So you can't claim that your views haven't been heard.

I completely understand that it's frustrating when your ideas aren't carried forward. But that happens sometimes. Let it go. This is a really minor part of the wiki. And it's an unusual case with no real applicability to any other story. This isn't setting some sort of precedent that's going to be carried forth over and over again. We're talking about the worst part of Doctor Who history that the makers didn't even think was "Doctor Who history". It's not worth the bad mojo, man.