User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20191101112654/@comment-6032121-20200112000347

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20191101112654/@comment-6032121-20200112000347 We are not using the same sense of "academic". I was using "academic" in the sense of "being about a piece of media, spoken about from a RL point of view, as opposed to being an in-universe continuation of its fiction". Not in the narrow sense of "scholarly work done within the sphere of accepted academia". It is academic in the sense that About Time is academic.

At any rate, I apologise for apparently misunderstanding your questions, but they did seem to be to be leading questions. If you trust that what Arcbeatle Press did does fit with copyright, and are only confused as to the how, how does your personal confusion about how copyright works constitute evidence that we shouldn't trust Arcbeatle in matters of copyright?