User talk:CatherineMunro

Page deletion
Hi, thought I'd post this on your talk page rather than carry the conversion on on Doug86's talk page. I understand Dudman's wishes, as I've just done a Google search and the first page result is this wiki's article page on her. (And I can fully understand that she doesn't want to be forever connected to Doctor Who (similar things have been said by numerous actors who have appeared on the programme over its years)

As far as proceeding goes. As she has requested that we remove the page this will of course be done, however do you think it would still be okay to have a page along the lines of 'List of Doctor Who Adventures Sub Editors', that way we maintain a collected information source without having a dedicated link to the page. (I'll creation protect the page after deleting it to prevent any later creation of the page). If such a page exists there'll probably need to be an intro paragraph stating/clarifying why some people don't have pages dedicated to them. Thanks. --Tangerineduel 15:18, 7 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Claudia D. should work in a list. However, there is an issue of the Magazine articles, the Magazines are pretty public and all we're really doing is re-writing what is available to the public in the Magazine. So the Dudman listings on the Magazine pages can tunneled towards the list page, but the name will still remain on the individual Magazine article pages, as they're not specifically focused on Claudia, but rather on the article's subject matter I hope this is acceptable.
 * I know this is on the same field as everything else, but we're not talking a dedicated page, this is something covering a magazine where she is given credit (the same credit as in the magazine). If we changed her name listing on the magazine article pages I just feel that we're compromising the accuracy of the article pages because we're manipulating the information. --Tangerineduel 15:59, 7 August 2009 (UTC)