User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-45314928-20200727170605/@comment-6032121-20200727192410

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-45314928-20200727170605/@comment-6032121-20200727192410 I feel like I'm not getting through to you. Two names can refer to one in-universe piece of rock. Different entities can own, and license, the various names, but nobody owns the piece of rock. Heck, the piece of rock appeared long before it was given the name of "Gallifrey". Not being licensed to use the name "Gallifrey" is not the same thing as not being allowed to feature "the planet of the Great Houses", which other sources establish to be named Gallifrey. No copyright is being broken and one singular piece of orange real estate is being referred to.