User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1506468-20190827123101/@comment-30922197-20190906182009

While it is true that the decision itself was a group one, and therefore it is only fair to assume that Amorkuz comments on James Wylder and Arcbeatle Press as a whole do not represent the opinion of Tardis wiki, but only his own, I feel it is quite on topic to discuss those accusations of illegal activities and attacks on the reputation of this independent company, especially as Amorkuz himself isn't a random man on the internet, but rather an administrator of this wiki. Therefore, his words are to be taken as representative of the Wiki itself, which, as Nate pointed out above, matters as far as the online presence of 10,000 Dawns and Arcbeatle Press is concerned.

Hopefully, this whole matter was just a misunderstanding, which could easily be fixed by an apology on the mistaken words spoken in this debate.

As for the stories in question, I am still wondering how exactly they breach this wiki Four Little Rules? I believe it is unnecessary to repeat arguments that have already been made above, but as far as I am able to tell, proof has been brought up that said stories fulfill all the required conditions?

And again, they were not posted on a personal blog, so I feel debating the status of stories published on personal web pages is irrelevant to the matter at hand, which is the validity of those three crossover stories on the Wiki.