User talk:Time Lord the Incognito

Not a fanfic wiki
This is not the place for you to put your fan information on TARDIS types. If you're interested in doing that, you can create your own wiki and place your information there. But these pages are meant for information from licensed Doctor Who stories. Najawin ☎  01:55, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Fun fact, it also violates wiki policy to delete other users comments on your talk page. T:VAN. Najawin ☎  02:00, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * T:NO FANFIC. I'm afraid we have to worry about the license. If your work isn't licensed it does not belong on this wiki. You're welcome to make another wiki to host your fan content, but this one is not for it. Najawin ☎  02:16, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

 Response from  IWAN WUSHKWAROK : "Regarding TARDIS, these additions that I have installed are confirmed", if in doubt, then review and compare information on all TARDIS that I have studied and confirmed.

 Response from  IWAN WUSHKWAROK : "Don't worry about the license"


 * I really advise you listen to Najawin's helpful advice, lest an admin ban you for several policy violations you've already committed. Sorry for being harsh, but it's the truth. Epsilon  📯 📂 02:21, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

 Response from  IWAN WUSHKWAROK : "And what do you advise? Just sit?"


 * You're perfectly welcome to edit this wiki as the rest of us do. Add to pages sourced information from licensed valid materials, remove incorrect information, summarize stories that don't have plot summaries eg, or correct spelling errors. But fanfic is not welcome on this wiki. Najawin ☎  02:30, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Response from  IWAN WUSHKWAROK : "Ohhhhhhhh!!! I had an idea thank you !! Thank you both very much! I adore you both)"  Response from  IWAN WUSHKWAROK : ""So I got an idea that I definitely won't ... give up. Like this wiki page, I'm going to keep" fanfiction people "from licensed and verified stories, but" fanfiction stories "will be kept here on this page. . "-" if the course of my thoughts to you is not puzzled, then thank you for your attention "

+++"Have you ever had just one fan page on this website?" "Or a manager of such an industry"?


 * I'm not entirely sure I understand this comment. I will say that fan content is not allowed on user pages either except under specific circumstances, see, again, T:NO FANFIC. We've covered fan content that is then published by one of the relevant licensors be it at the time or after the fact (EG, The Paul Spragg Memorial Short Trip Opportunity is a fan contest where fans submit short stories to be made into actual audio plays by Big Finish. We cover the winners.) But fan content that has gone unnoticed by any of the relevant license holders? This isn't the place for it. Najawin ☎  02:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Response from  IWAN WUSHKWAROK : "Sorry, my Google translator makes mistakes like T9 on mobile phones, I didn't know that there are such contests (0_0), you interested me more in this.

I wanted to tell you that in the future there will be no "conflicts" as now, an example is our joint correspondence, which has a great discussion. I wanted to tell you this.

Plan A is to create a "tardis fan club wiki", its main idea is not to touch your wiki (licensed). + You can send fans to another wiki (my created wiki, not licensed), + you will have less hassle on this topic.

Plan B is to create a fan wiki, but working with you.

Plan C - I will rewrite my page as "NO FANFIC page", which will indicate the appropriate rules for fans of Dr. Who, so that they do not touch this wiki TARDIS (licensed), and they could edit to write their ideas on my wiki page (fan club) ).

If you do not understand, ask me again, then Google translator can make mistakes in the text."


 * Politely, while I'm not an admin, I see no reason why this wiki would send users to a wiki you created. Wikis for fan content already exist. Doctor Who Fanon Wiki and Doctor Who Expanded already exist and are linked in the T:NO FANFIC section of our rules. If you were to create a wiki, it would be one you had complete control over for your own works, but these other wikis are more general repositories for fan work. This wiki is not affiliated with them, nor is it likely to be affiliated with your wiki. I believe there's only one wiki we are affiliated with, and that is w:c:factionparadox. None of the options you're suggesting seem likely. Najawin ☎  03:39, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Response from  IWAN WUSHKWAROK : "Thanks for the info ..."


 * I've told you this before, but you can't delete your own talk page, it's a violation of T:VAN. Najawin ☎  04:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Response from  IWAN WUSHKWAROK : "But you also get into my privacy," Interjecting of authorial opinion into an article ", and I have the right to change the content of the page, because I am the author of my page"


 * Read T:VAN. You explicitly do not, you gave up that right to FANDOM when you made an account here. You are a steward of your own talk page, not its owner. Najawin ☎  05:12, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Response from  IWAN WUSHKWAROK : "Mention the SPECIFIC clauses of the rules under which you accuse me. And write systematically what to do ..."


 * From T:VAN:


 * Please remember that your talk page (for example, User talk:TimeTraveler) is not "yours". It is not in any way a private messaging space.  It is a public discussion that happens to be directed at you.  It's vital that it be kept unaltered so that people can follow conversations you might be having.  You may certainly archive your talk page according to our archiving policy, but you don't have the right to just blank it or edit other people's comments on it.


 * Just to underline the point, it is absolutely an act of vandalism to edit or delete someone else's comments on "your" talk page, as this would be an easy way to put that person's comments into an entirely different context than the one they originally intended. Remove a couple of lines here and there from someone else's text, and you could easily turn someone from "well-reasoned" into "attack dog". Also, if you remove offensive comments, you make it harder for an admin to help you deal with the offending editor.


 * It is best, therefore, to think of yourself as the steward of "your" talk page, rather than the owner of it.


 * User:Shambala108 has blocked you for three months as a result of this, so I suggest you read Help:I'm blocked. Najawin ☎  05:26, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Response from  IWAN WUSHKWAROK : "I ask the administration to review the rules of their society, because they have a lot of mistakes in the rules" "I don't consider it vandalism"

Rationale and answers
The answer is for User:Najawin "''Dear reader, if you are interested in this supplement, then wait until January 23, 2021, and today FANTIK will be released as a supplement to the History of the Doctor Who Universe. Avoiding paradoxes.

It was a violation of my policy that you said that this story was not a FANFIC, despite the fact that it had not yet been published and had not yet been read by you. Read the fan fiction first, and then draw conclusions. @Goodbye "Don't worry about the license"''   -  WUSHKWAROK IWAN