Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161223201024/@comment-1789834-20170125231159

I know you said about the whole Vienna thing and it going against the usual protocol for "authorial intent"... I'm just wondering... you'd never get a statement or any form of proof from the BBC or from BBC Books because it's so tiny and insignificant. So, I'm wondering whether admins would look at an official statement made by Paul Cornell in a non-biased context and take it as "authorial intent". It's grasping at straws, admittedly, but I'd be interested in hearing your guys' opinions.