User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20150906221018/@comment-1432718-20161127053508

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20150906221018/@comment-1432718-20161127053508 User:SOTO already explained the reasoning behind the Warner case.

That does not apply here. We don't, as a general practice, apply validity retroactively. Upthread I already gave an example of a supposed sequel to a nonvalid source being also considered invalid, at Forum:Is A Fix With Sontarans Canon? (keep in mind while reading this thread that we used to use the word "canonicity" to mean what we now call "validity"). This situation is not similar to the Warner case; therefore there will be no change in the nonvalidity of the Cushing movies.