Howling:Would the Sontarans really annhilate the Rutans?

In "The Gunpowder Plot", the Rutans and the Sontarans both race to 1600s England to retrieve two doomsday weapons that would completely wipe out an entire race. At the end, both have one weapon, but the Doctor has meddled with them so they would be dangerous to use. But would the Sontarans really have used the weapon to destroy all the Rutans in the first place? With no Rutans there would be no war and with no war the Sontarans would have no purpose in life. With no enemy, they would either be forced to wage war on their own or another race to ensure they died in battle, because to them it was a disgrace not to. I think in TGP they only came to make sure the weapons didn't fall into Rutan tentacles and never intended to use them. Any thoughts? 87.102.117.106talk to me 11:28, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

I'm sure the Sontarans could and would find other enemies. They seem quite good at provoking hostile reactions. --89.241.75.207talk to me 17:25, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

What puzzles the Hell out of me is what actually started the war. Discrimination between two obviously different races probably comes into it, but I'd expect the Sontarans to go to war with an enemy that posed a real threat, like the Cybermen, who want to take over the universe, not a bunch of green jellyfish. 87.102.117.106talk to me 17:54, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

Well based on the fact that the Sontaran-Rutan War has been going on for practically forever with no sign of ending, I would say that both sides seem pretty evenly matched. Who knows how the war started anymore? I doubt that the Sontarans and Rutans even know what they're fighting about at this point. For all we know, the Sontarans only became the cloned war-based race they are today because they've been fighting the Rutans for so long. Or maybe before the Rutan war, they tried to earn honor and die in combat by attacking every planet they found, but the Rutans fought back a bit more than they expected. Anyway, I'm sure the Sontarans would be more than happy to finish the Rutans off if given the chance. I'm not sure exactly how the Sontaran's system of honor works, but I should imagine that there is more honor in killing your enemies and winning a war than there is in dying in battle. If they were ever to defeat the Rutans, then I have no doubt that they would find a new enemy to fight in no time.Icecreamdif talk to me 20:56, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

Which leaves only one question: which race is the most likely candidate for them to go to war against, if they ever annhilate the Rutan Host? 87.102.117.106talk to me 21:53, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

The Daleks are probably the only race that enjoys war even more than the Sontarans do, but the Sontarans would probably rather fight against an enemy that they actually have a chance of killing. The universe is a very large place, filled with countless species of which we've only seen a tiny fraction of. It probably doesn't matter anyway, because it doesn't look like the Sontaran-Rutan war will end any time soon.Icecreamdif talk to me 23:35, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

As Sarah Jane told Kaagh in 2008 (SJA: The Last Sontaran), the Sontaran-Rutan War will still be going in 10,000 years. She was (I think) referring to The Sontaran Experiment, and there was no sign then that the war was nearing its end. Finding a new enemy doesn't seem like a matter of urgency, right now. --89.242.67.48talk to me 00:42, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

Bear in mind that in TGP the Rutans managed to create two deadly weapons that would have stopped the war at the push of a button. If they can create a weapon like that once, they can certainly create another one. 87.102.117.106talk to me 10:47, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

And you say this because of your detailed knowledge of the physics,manufacturing capability, intergalactic politicals and strategic and tactical state of the war at that moment?

There is a tide in the affairs of men. Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune; Omitted, all the voyage of their life Is bound in shallows and in miseries. On such a full sea are we now afloat, And we must take the current when it serves, Or lose our ventures.Boblipton talk to me 12:41, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

Well on the wiki, it says that the Rutan Host reproduce by binary fission. This creates two Rutans at once. I reckon the fact that two weapons have been produced in TGP when realistically they only need one suggests some similar manufacture happened here, and that the weapon could be more biological than technological. That could mean they are still diffocult to produce, but I doubt the Rutans will have given up on the idea of creating another couple of doomsday weapons since then. 87.102.117.106talk to me 12:51, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

And perhaps the Sontarans figured out how to block or stop the doomsday weapon about 1650. Perhaps it was not as overwhelming a device as believed. Perhaps it was all a bluff. Far too much disputation on this wiki seems to araise out of the statement "I cannot instantly understand in full and complete detail how this situation arises on first noticing it. Therefore it is nonsense!" I prefer to look at the situation and derive explanations from it. Or sometimes I prefer to shrug and ignore the matter entirely. I have some issues with the details of th Whoniverse, the same as anyone here. Sometimes the storytelling overreaches itself. Not infrequently, in an ill advised attempt to increase tension, we see the threats escalated to a full planet, a full race, the universe. Ah, the universe is doomed. Again. Those, however, are errors in story-telling, not in matters of sacred texts or morality. I enjoy the show, I spend a lot of time on it. I also do other things. If this seems terribly important to you, maybe you should go volunteer work on a campaign or go to a highway and pick up litter. Boblipton talk to me 13:23, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

Believe it or not, coincidentally I actually do volunteering work and today I helped pick up litter. But what it even has to do in the slightest with a fictional millenia long intergalactic war, I have no idea. 87.102.117.106talk to me 15:52, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

I applaud your community action. It shows that you have other causes, some of which are definitely more socially useful and which also have a positive result, albeit temporarily. Boblipton talk to me 20:35, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

Just about everything is temporary, if you take the long view. Even the universe won't last forever. While it lasts, it's a good idea not to let ourselves be buried in litter. --2.101.62.55talk to me 20:50, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

And yet here we are. Boblipton talk to me 20:53, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

Temporarily. --2.101.62.55talk to me 21:03, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

Uhh, forgive me for asking, but what does this have to do with anything?Icecreamdif talk to me 04:16, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

Forgiven and nothing, respectively. --89.241.77.143talk to me 05:43, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

So are we going back to the discussion now, or do we still have a load of random unrelated stuff to go on about? 87.102.117.106talk to me 16:39, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

Good manners and concern for other people are never irrelevant and should not be random. Boblipton talk to me 21:38, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

I can't do a pukka English accent (especially not in typing), so you'll have to use your imagination: Hear, hear. Well said, sir! --89.241.73.161talk to me 03:02, January 10, 2012 (UTC)

Okay, in that case, are we going back to the discussion now, or do we still have lots of relevant and unrandom stuff to go on about? 87.102.117.106talk to me 16:26, January 10, 2012 (UTC)

I urge you to feel free to take this discussion in any direction that you think will not bore the audience. Boblipton talk to me 17:43, January 10, 2012 (UTC)