User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-27280472-20161218221939/@comment-5918438-20161218225201

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-27280472-20161218221939/@comment-5918438-20161218225201 Well my post is now nearly redundant. I would agree, right now, that we don't necessarily have grounds to exclude it if it doesn't fail Rule 2 at all. But I am not willing to simply close this discussion just yet.