Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-1789834-20170225000846

OttselSpy25 wrote: Reading through the thread again, it's pretty clear that you were being genuine and I was being an idiot. It happens. This is the internet, after all. It's hard to read intentions through font. If you look back at the Faction Paradox discussions, myself and Amorkus were asking so many questions that were frustrating the FP readers/listeners but we were doing it because we not only wanted to understand EVERYTHING but also we wanted to lay down some sort of template format for how this Wiki deals with everything Faction Paradox, were something from that range or a range similar in situation to ever produce more stories.

It's annoying, I know, but I'm never here to push the conversation back a few steps haha. You'll thank us when the next film or tie-in comic or whatever comes out. Then we can hop back to this discussion and say "that's the conclusion we reached for The LEGO Batman Movie, therefore, let's use that and build upon it". Heck, we'll probably be amending it in years to come. :D