User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1506468-20190827123101/@comment-1827503-20190911020436

And in most cases, the "investigation" can be resolved quickly by lack of evidence against. This one was out of the ordinary because we've been working the other way around - we're trying to prove validity rather than invalidity. And we did a good job of it.

Though I don't believe Amorkuz should have gone as far as he did, I think I understand his position. The original three-admin discussion, which the public can't access, must have significantly affected him on Dawns heading into this present discussion.