User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5545417-20150725190725/@comment-1432718-20150818024100

We still have two users on this thread who dispute the nature of these stories. No decision has been made yet. Until a decision has been reached, I suggest that there should be no adding of new information from these stories to articles, but also no removing of what's already on the pages.

If anyone who has read the stories still wants to dispute the nature of these stories (not the canonicity - we aren't concerned with that here, see Tardis:Canon policy), please make your arguments here, without getting into canonicity or continuity problems.