Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20200505204802/@comment-44988386-20200708181139

Scrooge MacDuck wrote: However, since the page covering them is clearly titled "BBC Writers' Comics", I don't foresee much trouble with people thinking it would apply to any Comic Creator comic. Heck, as you say, that entire part of the BBC website is now offline, so the idea that someone would go through the touble to dig up an equally-missing fan comic from the same era and try to smuggle it into the Wiki is… fairly far-fetched.

We cover licensed BBV audios like I Scream even though it can and does cause people to occasionally try to create pages about Punchline or The Stranger. That never deterred us before, and the line is (for non-Wiki-users) a lot blurrier for BBV than it is for this.

(I mean, 'cor, we objectively didn't, to my knowledge, have to deal with any such attempt to add a page for an unlicensed Comic Creator fancomic, in all the many years the BBC Writers' Comics are unquestioningly covered on the Wiki.)

Yeah, I'm now just realising I didn't fully grasp the title's meaning. Oops.

However, I'm still on the fence. I'd be fine if these are still valid, I like having a big universe, it's just that it's very shrouded and such with speculation. I'd like to have the full picture.