User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1451563-20180913002703/@comment-1451563-20181210082213

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1451563-20180913002703/@comment-1451563-20181210082213 Well I appreciate your contributions whether your admin hat is on or off, so thank you either way. As for the post about the English language, that was a relevant part of the discussion that Soto made a point to bring up, so where assertions are made that I know to be questionable grammatically speaking, I will speak up. Apologies if and when I ever fail to do so in a non-accusatory way.

As for the perspective of proving he/she versus proving they, my whole point in starting this thread was to show that the overwhelming majority of all of the evidence we have that is relevant to this issue in the show already inherently contradicts the they usage and supports he/she. The argument has been made pretty thoroughly, and much of the relevant dialogue dissected, and most of it points to he/she.

Others have since proceeded to provide individual instances that lend evidence for they, but so far most of them have been questionable at best upon analysis or are coming from an argument being made almost exclusively based on out-of-universe information or ideas.

I was simply continuing with this process how I see it has been going.