User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359/@comment-26975268-20130515221906

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359/@comment-26975268-20130515221906 Actually, I'm beginning to see what you're saying, Czech. Since almost everything contradicts, we'd pretty much be treating the adaptations as notDWU anyway.

I still hold, however, that maybe we should allow things that don't contradict to be valid, so that we can have a hypothetical page on the contrafibularity flu. If we don't cover both, then we'll be dismissing a potentially good page.