Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161223201024/@comment-95.147.32.223-20170201204952

This wiki has this to say about the piriod just before and after it was released As a result, the "official" nature of the Shalka webcast was in doubt from even before it was released. After the web cast, in February 2004, plans for sequels were indefinitely shelved. For a period, it was unclear if the new television Doctor would be the Ninth or Tenth Doctor, but this was settled in April 2004 when in an interview with Doctor Who Magazine, Davies announced that the new television Doctor (played by Christopher Eccleston), would be the Ninth Doctor, relegating the Richard E Grant Doctor to unofficial status. This suggests shalka was still official until April 2004 at lest and plans for a sequel to shalka continued after the new series was announced whoud indicate that the new series and web series where considers compatible at the time also it should be noted how little work had on the new series had been done by the end of 2003 the question remains do letter reference invalidated the story to not also give that RTD cornel and Moffat have all mad stem ants that everything is canon can any thing they say invalidate a story