User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-3999524-20141211184047/@comment-3999524-20141212045310

I still think the stronger and more supported interpretation of the wording, which apparently what we're now debating now, supports a regeneration actually having occurred, especially with the Doctor's words on page 141 about the Master having "two and a half bodies" after the Delgado incarnation at that time (being Pratt/Beevers, Ainley, and Roberts). That line makes no sense if Delgado and Pratt are the same incarnation of the character.

The fact that this discussion is even happening shows that the Legacy is neither "definitive" or "unambiguous", as the current policy states.

Cousin Zagreus ☎  04:53, December 12, 2014 (UTC)