User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-55646-20130131174641

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-55646-20130131174641 I understand that. I guess to me it's just that the goal here should be functionality as a resource, rather than simply as an objective organizer of data. I myself would actually be ok with an omnibus article and three articles you could link to if you want completely undiluted facts about the individual incarnations. It would be inefficient and pedantic, and ultimately a waste of time, but would satisfy both parties (save, I guess, for CzechOut, whose initial complaint is apparently the number of articles rather than the distillation of information).