Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-26285319-20150407171302/@comment-4028641-20150414213203

Shambala108 wrote: OttselSpy25 wrote: When we say "Tom Baker's Shada isn't canon," what we're essentially saying is "we're passing judgement on an issue of canon in the DWU," and that's something that the site simply should not do, especially considering that we barely can justify it. Let the readers decide which version they consider legitimate, and how they interpret the different versions.

Please see my first and second comments above about canon and how it is handled on this wiki. We are not passing judgement on DWU canon; we are not telling anyone what to believe when it comes to this story or any other. We are merely defining what stories are valid sources for in-universe articles, which you are well aware of, having been involved in several inclusion debates.

Even so, it is rather silly, and passing judgement is exactly what we've done in this scenario. We've tried to answer a question that should really be left up to individual opinions, and with little justification.