User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-44988386-20200416234118/@comment-44988386-20200528215947

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-44988386-20200416234118/@comment-44988386-20200528215947 DiSoRiEnTeD1 wrote: still lumping anything other than straight into a single category is wrong.

This is what I'm referring to. Like, as has been said, sexuality is fluid. If we can't do categories for queer characters, since they might change, shouldn't it be the same for the straights? I just don't see why by your reasoning, one can be grouped, but the other can't.

Also, I'm not either, but I kinda don't like the word "turn". Realise, yes, but turn implies it's a choice, which it is not.