Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161223201024/@comment-27280472-20161224154032

SOTO wrote: Not really seeing the logic. I didn't say just "started something that was cancelled". That wasn't my reasoning at all. It started a whole divergent continuity which was cancelled, and soon after even the pilot was wholly written over. You could say that the New Adventures started a "whole divergent continuity." There was a time when some EDA writers (like Terrance Dicks and Lawrence Miles, although the latter changed his mind), and many fans, thought that the NAs were a dead continuity and the EDAs separate. Lots of fans whose brains are too small to handle heretical ideas like looms still insist that it's a separate continuity, or alternate timeline, or similar. But none of that affects this wiki's policy. Contradictions are just ignored.

You say that the pilot was "wholly written over." But last time I checked, there is no authority with such capabilities. There is no canon.

But I agree with User:NateBumber that this really isn't the best time for this inclusion debate, and that it might be better for User:Pluto2 to focus more of their energy on editing the articles that already exist.