Board Thread:The Panopticon/@comment-1317169-20121202170842/@comment-188432-20121226232057

Ignoring OS25's point as a violation of T:POINT for the moment, I'll third Tangerineduel's "connections" as a good word for the combination of these two sections. Might I suggest that for the next week we concentrate debate in this thread over whether that name, and the general concept of combining the two sections, seems appropriate to everyone?

Once those two issues are decided, we can start a new thread for how to operationalise any changes to the way we convey information in the new, combined section.