Howling:666

A lot of fan speculation (including on this forum) pointed out all of the occurrences of 666 throughout the last year, arguing that it was an arc word (like Bad Wolf or Vote Saxon), and therefore a major hint to the finale.

And yet, in the finale, there was no Beast. While the Doctor did have a line about how opening the time lock would bring "Hell on Earth, literally" or something like that, the enemies were Rassilon and his council, who have little or nothing to do with the Beast.

But now I'm curious, what were all those 666 references about? Was it just overzealous fans looking too hard? Or RT playing with the fans by giving them false hints? Or a bona fide clue to some secret meaning in the finale that we all missed? Or setup for Moffat, or for RTD's upcoming series of Torchwood? --99.8.229.156 11:19, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

I am fairly sure it's just overzealous fans looking too hard. Zach Schmidt 18:09, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

You mean, the last five years. Every single season has mentioned the number, and Torchwood mentioned the number. It was in The Christmas Invasion, The Impossiblle Planet, Doomsday, very vaugely in The Last of the Time Lords, Voyage of the Damned, Midnight, The Stolen Earth, and Planet of the Dead. It was also in an episode of Torchwood series 1.

Both my friends, random people, and stepdad, pointed out as the series went on, "Why do I keep hearing the Devil's number in Docvtor Who and Torchwood?" It wasn't the last year- the last five years have had the number. From series 1 to Planet of the Dead, the number 666 keeps coming up.

In The End of Time, there was a church scene that mentioned how a demon came to Earth long ago. The chruch dipicted God (who has been mentioned by the Beast), and that was the Beast's intention- he is a demon, and wanted to attack Earth from the skies (space).

But the thing about the number is, it's not just there- it's hidden in every a majoruty of the time. Someone who has close connections to people who get leaked info on what the producers are palnning way ahead mentioned, "Ever wonder why the Beast's number has been showing up many times since the the revival?"

It's what one would call a super-hidden plot device spanning seasons upon seasons. Bad Wold spanned series 1, 2, 3 and 4, Torchwood spanned series 2, stolen Planets spanned series 4, 666 spanned series 1 to the next series.

Bad Wolf appeared everywhere and spanned 4 entire series- everyone said it meant nothing, and it turned out to be a hidden plot device. The same applies to 666. It has been hinted that it keeps appearing to span the entire series and head on until we finally reach a future finale whenever. Also, another reference was made in Children of Earth to the Beast. Delton Menace 02:46, January 13, 2010 (UTC)

^See what I mean? Just overzealous fans looking TOO hard. Zach Schmidt 02:53, January 13, 2010 (UTC)

I didn't have to look. I noticed like that. Everyone noticed the reference. Well, most fans noticed them. And as I said, it was highlighted that the number kept appearing, and directly hinted that it means something. You're one hell of an idiot. Bad Wolf spanned for seasons, not on thought it meant anything, no one through the stolen planets meant anything. It's always the same. Stop being a closed-minded fool. Delton Menace 03:19, January 13, 2010 (UTC)

Delton Menace, cool you jets. There is no need to call names, it just shows how small your argument is. No need to call me an idiot; it's just a tv show. Zach Schmidt 04:08, January 13, 2010 (UTC)

Well, Bad Wolf was only a hint for the first season, until they explained it; since then, it's just a reference back to what we already know--Bad Wolf Rose left marks all over history just for that one finale, but those marks still exist. Similarly, Torchwood wss only a hint for the second season; now that we know what Torchwood is, it's a reference to something we already know, just like UNIT.

So, if the 666 thing is an intentional hint planted across 4 seasons, and never used, either it'll be one hell of a reveal in season 5, or Steven Moffat will just drop it as a loose thread (as others have often done when they took over as exec/script editor/etc.).

But many of the fans have pointed out that there were specifically a ton of references hidden in season 4, and in the contemporaneous year of Torchwood. Maybe they're all wrong--maybe it's just overzealous fans looking for patterns that aren't there (as Zach says), or maybe it's been there all along and those fans just didn't notice it until season 4 (as Delton says). But if they're right, it should have led up to something, and I'm wondering how we all missed it. --99.8.229.156 06:40, January 13, 2010 (UTC)

Well put. Zach Schmidt

Someone mentioned that they thought that no one believed that Bad Wolf was a reference to anything? I remember, shortly after the episode Dalek, being linked to the Bad Wolf mini-site from the BBC site! Feumas 21:53, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

If the beast was going to make another appearance he would have done so in the end of time. Russel T. Davies wrote the first episode of the first series, when he didn't even know when he would be leaving, Steven moffat didnt know when rtd would be leaving, so why on earth would R.T.D write an episodes containing the number 666 for another writer when the events would be happening years from 2004/5. If the beast was so important he would have been given more than just a double episode and would have been mentioned heavily fairly recently. New writers (some) new production team - no Beast im sorry. Saxon 3 16:52, February 14, 2010 (UTC)

Get rid of that attitude, Saxon3. Are you one of the writers? Are you one of the producers? No. And the Beast was mentioned very recently. Steven Moffat confirmed, too, that he was aware of Russell T. Davies leaving over two years before he left, and he also revealed that he was wanted to become new head writer long before we found out. He said so himself in an interview. To put it, too, one of the series 5 episodes is called "The Beast Below" and the finale is the Beast's quote of being the "heart of darkness". Delton Menace 00:44, February 15, 2010 (UTC)

Why are you so obsessed with this conspiracy, Delton? Wouldn't you prefer to leave it up to Steven Moffat, Doctor Who's best writer? Don't you trust him? I mean seriously, I will make a bet with you that 666 means nothing. I will bet you ten thousand whatever-your-currency-is that this is all a stupid conspiracy that means nothing. the twelfth doctor 18:46, February 16, 2010 (UTC)

I agree with the twelfth doctor. and what attitude? your just not happy somebody is against you theory, and only the first 3 titles have been confirmed and the beast below is not one of them (so far), but i cant see why R.T.D would put a hint to a monster that wouldnt be created until the second series in to the first episode of the first series.Saxon 3 21:16, February 16, 2010 (UTC)

I am staying skeptical about this. I hope that the villain for the finally is somthing new that we have not seen before, but this is Doctor Who and I will love every second of it regardless. (maybe a little less if it is another Dalek finally). I too have noticed several of the 666 refferences, though, and have read about others on various posts; however, if someone is able compile these references together in order of airdate, it might help this argument.MasterIII 07:05, February 17, 2010 (UTC)

@ Saxon 3: Beast Below is a confirmed title, along with Eleventh Hour and Victory Of The Daleks. Beast Below doesn't mean it has to be the Beast though. the twelfth doctor 11:57, February 17, 2010 (UTC)

Is it, oh sorry about that. Anyway, Delton Menace, do you worship the devil or something, because you seem to be obsessed with the beast and 666. and even if the "Beast" is in the beast below - wow he's only got one episode. And if i remember correctly, Matt Jones wrote the impossible planet and the satan pit, and he hasnt written any episode since. the beast below is written by steven moffat, can't see any reason why he would want the beast back.Saxon 3 20:49, February 20, 2010 (UTC)