User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359/@comment-188432-20130515021602

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359/@comment-188432-20130515021602 Nah, the situations are fundamentally different. With TV Comic redraws you can just say "either the Third of the Fourth Doctor" did . Easy. Done. With Human Nature it's not actually that obviously based on the book. It's really not. They are two adventures that have in common that the Doctor turns into a human who teaches at a boy's school. But that's it. They are different in almost every important factual detail, and one doesn't call into question the validity of the other — except maybe for the fact that the book has a Tenth Doctor (but not Tennant's Tenth Doctor) in it.

I just don't see how we can practically cover both of these Birthrights, because they are very closely aligned in detail to the book, but you have different people doing the same actions. So for every point you made, you'd be doing the dance of "according to this source, it went down like this; according to this other source, it went like this".

It's far easier to say, "The audio doesn't count, so if you wanna talk about it, you can only do so in the BTS."