User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-26285319-20150613195843/@comment-88790-20150712162519

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-26285319-20150613195843/@comment-88790-20150712162519 The obscure references are easy to fill in, because they're notable, hence why they're there. Said obscure things also mean they're good for building the wiki.

As Shambala101 said, writing plots is hard. Especially for something as long as a novel. Doubly so for the sometimes complex NAs and MAs. I have occasionally tried and it is a hard balance between basically retelling the novel and being detailed enough to provide a summary without doing the former.

I however disagree about the job of this wiki to be the be all and end all location for plot summaries. Yes they play their part, but I don't believe a plot on an article is a substitute for the story itself.