Talk:Steven Moffat

Removed phrase
I've removed one contention of the article, which is archived here. Speaking of the themes of Moffat's Who, this curious statement came up:
 * no one has died onscreen except as a result of old age or illness

This might have been written before Silence in the Library, cause clearly all but one of the guest cast dies there. They might've been saved as routines in a computer program, but they're all dead in any corporeal sense. And that's not counting the crewmates of the SS Madame de Pompadour, who were harvested for their internal organs.  Czech Out  ☎ | ✍ 20:10, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Steven Moffat really likes fish.
"prisoner zero = fish

star whale = fish

saturniayns = fish

old people in the dream = fish like

sirulians = reptiles yeah but kinda fish like too?

basically﻿ steven moffat loves fish. the man loves fish."

Quote from a comment on the youtube vid of the Christmas special preview. I didn't notice it until I read the comment, but now it seems so obvious.

perhaps include something about this in the "Monsters" section? 173.180.24.7 07:14, December 26, 2010 (UTC)

That's a REALLY good point, I didn't notice that..... It's kinda creepy if you think about it...............Fish............... Ech............... TheTARDIScontroller 08:53, December 26, 2010 (UTC)

how are multiforms,ecknodines,homo reptilia and star whales fish -Please Sign your post-

The multiform is eel-like. An eel is a type of fish.

A whale is a type of sea creature which resembles a fish in it basic body shape. a star whale also resembles a fish in this way. I won't defend the silurian reference from the original quote, although I think that reptiles and fish do resemble each other in that they both have scales.

But now I've realised Steven has a thing for aquatic-ish stuff in general (i.e. the names River Song and Amy Pond) not just fish-like stuff.

(I am 173.180.24.7 but changed address) 173.180.191.120 05:29, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

BEING UNFAIRLY CENSORED

Hi there, so a piece i wrote on here had been removed without any kind of multiple person review. As the topic is VERY sensitive involving a possible plot to kill off dr who forever i would like to know why the piece was 1 - removed without an option to edit and 2 - removed without any log made of the attempt to post

I feel like I am being "swept under the rug" and would hate all you real doctor who fans to hear about this scandal before its too late to act!!

THe convo placed on my user talk is pasted below - seriously?!?!

Spoiler policy
Hi! Since you are new here, you may not have seen the spoiler policy plastered all over the wiki. We do not allow spoilers here, so your edits at Steven Moffat and Talk:Steven Moffat have been removed. I strongly encourage you to read our spoiler policy, which you can find here. Thanks! Shambala108 ☎  20:23, August 17, 2013 (UTC)

Hi there, erm yeah dont get cheeky kid we all know what spoilers are!!! first of all is a warning for fans NOT a spoiler as the "Spoiler" is the complete DEMISE of dr who and ironically THIS site also :P!! Furthermore the piece mentions everything as "rumors online" and hence CANNOT be a true spoiler!!!

This is a pretty shitty reason to pull my piece however the log of my attempt to post this will be enough to say "told ya so" when the time comes so IM covered num-nut!! Yeah I'd like a second opinion on this piece as a spoiler - could a DIFFERENT MOd here please comment!! - and am FULLY WILLING to consider and edit of the piece instead of outright removal! If nothing further happens bt tomorrow i WILL re=post my piece and wait for a DIFFERENT mod to pull it :P