User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-45314928-20200610043202/@comment-45314928-20200610174917

i struggle to understand you at all @ChubbyPotato.

you say that it is "not speculation to say [the extract] comes from the novelisation" but then question the novelisation existing in the first place... that makes no sense, it either came from the novelisation - because the novelisation existed - or it didnt.

you keep coming into these discussions (like you did with the Monk's validity discussion) and saying that you agree with Scrooge / Najawin but then the points you make completely side with me and against them.

it was both Scrooge and Najawin who speculated about when the novelisation was written, i have never once made comment to when it could have been written, yet you say that Harness having "written this novelisation long before this tweet" is the basis of my argument when it literally is not.

please try to read all comments clearly, and if you dont understand someone's point or argument - ask them, dont just make it up and put words into their mouths.