User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-88790-20140219051032/@comment-6032121-20201007165217

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-88790-20140219051032/@comment-6032121-20201007165217 I'd (groan) already closed this prior to the Great Discussions Data Loss thing, but the cliffnotes version is: the only consensus on display here is "no consensus"', or, rather, the consensus seems to be that these should have been decided on an individual basis.

Closing this with no change to current policy: all the concerned stories remain valid until further notice.

If anyone believes any specific episode of this series should be deemed invalid, they are free to open an exclusion debate, if they have specific evidence to present regarding Rule 1 or Rule 4. If anyone's planning to do so, remember that "story" on this Wiki doesn't mean "three-act structure", it means "does this depict a series of events in the DWU".