Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-27280472-20161222145551/@comment-1789834-20170125180908

You know my stance on the matter. I don't really think there's a reason in me posting anything else. It's all in the comment starting with "Hold on." My brain is still fried after the last discussion.

But in conclusion: I'm against putting ANY Baker's End into the DWU as "valid" due to Bafflegab's constant criss-crossing. They do it for fun and because they can, and quite frankly, I'm not against this criss-crossing because it sounds quite fun. However, if we took it all seriously, we'd be adding their whole œuvre into the Wiki. Plus, Baker's End is obviously written to give Tom Baker a role away from Doctor Who. To my knowledge, his most important role as the Doctor is not even mentioned as a role undertaken by the character of "Tom Baker". Correct me if I'm wrong.