User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-26845762-20151212000440/@comment-1432718-20160630044340

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-26845762-20151212000440/@comment-1432718-20160630044340 I don't really know how to make this clearer. The fact that each player can experience different gameplay means that there is no one "official" storyline. The idea that gameplay and cut scenes are separate, and that we should allow the cut scenes as the storyline, does not take into account the mess that would be created with new wiki users who would potentially see the entirety of the game as valid and edit accordingly.

Incidentally, CzechOut's use of the word "chaos" above has nothing to do with the timelines of the game. He's referring to what I stated in the previous paragraph: the chaos that would result on wiki articles if we allow only some of the game to be valid while keeping other parts of it invalid. Not to mention the mess of trying to figure out how to indicate which parts are valid and which aren't and how to categorize a game with both valid and invalid parts. Sometimes we rule things invalid because the difficulty of the work involved isn't worth it.

Based on my experience with the rules at Tardis:Valid sources, I do not see any information about this game that would allow it to be valid.