Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-1789834-20170428003056

Well you're right to say that the boundaries of the DWU can sometimes be undefinable. However, we can still define them. Every time we're faced with a new medium, such as the Dr Men range, we ask ourselves the most important questions and we thrash out what needs to be thrashed out. It's not about "I don't want this in the DWU", it's about "Do we have all the information necessary to place it in the DWU", and the answer in this context is "No".

Don't get me wrong, I know where you're coming from. Like I've said, this is a win-win regardless of validity because the Dalek cameo is so badass. But I'd rather do this by the books. And I'm waiting for that one piece of evidence that shuts me up. I'm waiting for that one thing hidden in that one article somewhere on the net or in a magazine that denies me a comeback. Until that happens, we can't reach a consensus. I'm not being difficult, I just think it's awfully rash to say "we allowed Dr Men, so we can allow LEGO Batman movie". By your own words, you were disappointed at people who used "LEGO is stupid" as a defence mechanism. Well I'm not using that. I'm using logic.

And I also think we can learn from the Dr Men example. We can learn that it's not the medium that matters. It's the evidence. And there is no evidence that the Daleks were taken from the Doctor's Multiverse and placed in the LEGO Phantom Zone. :/