Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170306172600/@comment-4028641-20170311231228

"Unanimous" as a phrase was a reference to the fact that there has been no differentiating opinion in the thread. That is still true. It is still a fact that the debate so far has been unanimous. As in, no one has disagreed, and these days if people didn't agree with something they would tell you about it.

All have said only on thing: that if this debate has not had any new opinions or thoughts in two to four weeks, then there is no point in keeping the thread open. This is not a controversial topic, evidenced by the fact that the biggest controversy has been about why there hasn't been any controversies. If we let it sit while we patiently wait for someone to disagree because someone has to disagree apparently, then in four years we're all going to remember that this thread was ever a thing and by then we have to start all over.

I would not say this about a forum that had different sides or opinions inside it. I have not said this about the LEGO thread. But if a forum is created, no one manages to disagree for a reasonable, and no one can even think of a solid argument for someone that would disagree, then there is no problem with closing the thread down after something close after a reaasonable amount of time.