User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20170618182814/@comment-24894325-20170618235645

Ah, I think I'm starting to understand where this misunderstanding stems from. Suggesting to put the Monks' image on Martin Luther King Jr while keeping other appearances at Martin Luther King is indeed quite mad. If OS25 thought that I am advocating this, at least, I now understand why they were so unhappy.

The solution to this puzzle is, however, very simple: the post suggesting to discuss MLK on Martin Luther King Jr was made at 21:19, June 8, 2017, before the page was moved at 21:28, 8 June 2017‎. I of course meant the page for MLK, whatever it was called at the time. In fact the moving of the page was based on the information provided by OS25 in the discussion.

Ok, so at least now something starts to make sense, finally. The longest debates are often based on a misunderstanding.