Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-4028641-20170304230925

I disagree. As I said much earlier in the thread, how LEGO treats non-DWU franchises has no relevance to this discussion. And if anything, we should not be calling this invalid simply because it's somewhere in the middle. It's the specific and unique treatment of the DWU that caused us to even have this discussion in the first place, and I would say it's important to consider this as well.

All that we have is that Moffat wouldn't say that the DWU wan't the version in the LEGO franchise, and personally that's good enough for me for now. I don't feel a need to wait on anyone else's quotes.