User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1506468-20160828082056/@comment-6032121-20191102002700

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1506468-20160828082056/@comment-6032121-20191102002700 I think placing it in "Other universes" is needlessly speculative. Yes, there are discrepancies. But if we are all agreed that this is definitely intended to be the David Warner Doctor, then what do they matter? We should handle this the same way that we handle it when a 1960's short story is obviously intended to feature the First Doctor, but calls him "Dr Who" and states he is "an Earth man". Later stories contradicted both these things as the mainstream mythos continued to be built up, but so what?