Board Thread:The Panopticon/@comment-4189499-20131115045802

To start with, just to make sure I'm not doing something wrong, we are free to talk about the prequel for the 50th released by the BBC on their official YouTube channel earlier today right? Anyway, just in case the strict rules surrounding the 50th extend to the prequel, and also for the sake of the people who have not yet watched it, I won't mention any specifics. However, the ending (including the credits) seems to have some strong implications for the way articles about the revived series Doctors are written, or should I say titled, especially when viewed with the end of The Name of the Doctor (TV story) in mind. So, in light of this new information, do we need to reconsider the naming of certain important articles on this wiki? This is really hard to explain without giving any of the events in the prequel away just in case, but hopefully you know what I mean. 