User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Tales from the Tardis/@comment-188432-20130325173913/@comment-4189499-20130417050035

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Tales from the Tardis/@comment-188432-20130325173913/@comment-4189499-20130417050035 Just wondering, when it comes to a debate like this when people are starting to consider head-counts, even if only from a "your the only one who agrees" or "the community disagrees with you" perspective, that doesn't take into account anybody who either clicked on the highlighted link, agreed, and then went on with their business, or anybody who is mostly just reading this thread and, although maybe having an opinion, can't see any point in expressing it because somebody else already has. Is there any way of re-highlighting this thread? Maybe de-highlighting and then re-highlighting again. This might bring back some of the people with the opinion that Vienna shouldn't be included, or at least might draw a few more people's attention to the fact that there is actually a debate going on about this; that this thread has evolved into something more than just an announcement. And maybe if there are any other people who are just reading the conversation without participating, maybe it's time to speak up, even with just an "I think Vienna should/shouldn't be included for reasons others have already stated". Hey, I'll start.

Personally, I think Vienna seems to be more trouble than it's worth, for reasons others have presented above, and that the statement from the makers of the audios does seem to pretty clearly state that they don't intend for it to be inside the DWU, although you can believe that it is if you want. As a result, it should be considered to be outside of the DWU.

Because of the evolution of the form of this thread, I think it would benefit by brining more people to it at this point in time. Just an idea. OK, I'll go back to just lurking around now. If you disagree, feel free to just ignore everything I just said. It's just that this conversation doesn't seem to be getting very far.