User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5545417-20150725190725/@comment-1827503-20150731040543

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5545417-20150725190725/@comment-1827503-20150731040543 Since the only one of our four rules up for grabs is #4, here's the text of the rule, more or less:

"If a story was intended to be set outside the DWU, then it's probably not allowed. But a community discussion will likely be needed to make a final determination... Extraordinary non-narrative evidence must be presented to the community for a story to be kicked out based on Rule 4."

So the question becomes, is there any "non-narrative evidence" that these backup stories are set outside the DWU?