Forum:Tags on talk pages

One thing I've noticed is that the talk page tag isn't very noticable any more. It used to be bright orange, so very noticeable, but now it's just plain, and doesn't really stand out. I mean, have a look at Talk:The Silence. There's already theories starting there when they should be going in the Howling. Can we edit the talk page tag so that it stands out more?

Ps... also while I'm here, can we change the wiki's background? It's passed April 23rd... so can we change it to something new? Thanks. --The Thirteenth Doctor 16:11, April 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * The colour is not changing, all we can do is make it like all other top of the page banners (e.g. spoiler etc). I'll try and do that soon, if CzechOut is not by. As for the wiki back ground, I'll chnage it a light grey colour, and then we can decide to chnage it later if we want. Mini-mitch\talk 16:20, April 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * I want to bring this up again. The tags obviously aren't working. Mini-mitch, I've seen you, and other admins too, constantly asking people to take their discussions from talk pages to the Howling, and it must start to get really frustrating for you. Surely there is something else we can do to make it easier? I mean, you said the colour isn't changing, but why not? What's wrong with putting it back to being orange? It's not as though it's a main part of the wiki, the part that's supposed to look good. It's a talk page. It's going to be messy most of the time. --The Thirteenth Doctor 10:37, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * The colour of the tag is absolutely irrelevant to whether people obey it. This tag has been multiple colours and widths.  It's had pictures and it's gone with just text.  There have been times in the past when this tag has been placed multiple times on the same page, and yet people still talk about precisely what they want to talk about.  People are going to use talk pages occasionally for discussing the subject, rather than the editing of the subject. It just happens.  It happens even on wikipedia, where editors tend to be more knowledgeable about talk pages.  Remember, wikia is different from wikipedia in that talk pages are not standard features.  You have to request that talk pages be enabled.  Therefore, many editors don't quite "get" the purpose of talk pages.  Indeed, talk pages on wikia replace comment bubbles, which are for talking about the merits of the subject, rather than how to edit the article.  My point is, this is a battle we will never completely win.  We should put one message at the top of a troublesome page, and be done with it.  The effort in the past to put this message on every single problem section was wholly redundant.  There is no reason that talk pages should look ugly, cluttered up by these messages, just because it's easier to type a template call than to type out a real messages.  A nicely-worded unique message is far more effective at stopping this kind of thing that just putting a template in the middle of the page.   15:03:15 Thu 12 May 2011

Placement on page
Looking back over my revision notes at Talk Page, I remember now what the issue was with it. It's been used historically as a top-page banner and a sectional note. Because it's been used at the sectional level, I originally converted it to the new layout as a sectional note. My initial revision is here, which I think works better on pages like Talk:Utopia (TV story) and talk:Rassilon, where it's right in the middle of the page. If, however, we are determined that it should be used only at the top of talk pages, as at talk:The Doctor, then I think the current full-width approach works. Thing is, I do think we need to decide how it's going to be used in order to determine the best design.

Were I to advocate one over the other, I'd say go for the most unobtrusive design, and go for the smaller note, but to always place it on the top of the page from this point forward. As discussed above, people don't really pay these things that much heed. The important thing is to have it on the page in a consistent place so that you can refer to it with the language, "Please note the message on the top left of this page." But I don't care that much one way or the other. I just want it used only once, and at the top of the page. That part at least, can be very easily enforced by bot. 15:49:08 Thu 12 May 2011


 * The problem was with the old tag, was it was too small, and User did not notice it. It was only after The Impossible Astronaut aired, and the Little girl from the episode's talk page became full of speculation that I made it bigger. This only slightly helped. I think that the font should be in the center of the banner, and the banner made about half the width of the page and placed in the center. If any speculation creeps onto these talk pages, we will simply have to removed them and say to the User "I am sorry I had to remove your contribution from the talk page, please may you use the Howling to discuss speculation and rumours." (Could this even been a banner for a talk page, i.e like the vandalism one?) Mini-mitch\talk 15:19, May 13, 2011 (UTC)


 * I agree, I think we should write into a relevant policy/note it within the banner speculation and such that is outside the that of the article's talk page will be deleted. That way the tag more becomes a notice of what will happen if/when speculation creeps in.
 * I think it should be on the top of the page and never used as just a sectional thing, so as an alert rather than a warning which is what what it's used as a sectional element it appears.
 * I also think we should add the tag by default to all new TV series articles (both stories and major characters) just to preempt people's discussions and to stop "Is X character the Rani?". --Tangerineduel / talk 15:33, May 13, 2011 (UTC)


 * Well the reason that the lettering is off-center is because it was given a style id of a top-page banner, which it didn't have in my original concept. Pagetop banners all leave space for a 200px picture.  If we put a picture in there, it'd look fine.  But I didn't do that at the time because, again, I didn't know whether we were going for sectional or top-of-page use.  I definitely don't like mini-mitch's idea of essentially returning this banner to the ugly, center-of-page, half-width jobby that it was before.  For stylistic consistency it should either look like real world or section cleanup.  I'm fine, either way, but function must precede form; we must decide what we're doing before we can decide how.


 * Additionally, I vigorously dispute MM's assertion that size, location, or wording matters particularly with this message. That's why I say it should be there on the page so we can refer to it, but it might as well match everything else on the site.  Again, I don't think new editors are maliciously flaunting this rule.  It's just that our rule is frankly weird for Wikia wikis.  Again, most Wikis don't have talk pages, and those that do, don't have rules against this kinda posting.  We're using wikipedia rules for talk pages, and wikia's mostly not like that.  23:18:08 Fri 13 May 2011