Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20191101112654/@comment-31010985-20191202020238

The new evidence is pretty clearly laid out in the OP but to shrink it down to a barebones form:

A new story was released in a similar way to the others. This isn't actually a new point but is the biggest change in the status quo since the last debate.

Then this: Borisashton wrote: In this tweet, posted in order to familiarise readers of Life After Death with the other characters that the titular Lady Aesculapius had met, states “You can read all three of the 10,000 Dawns stories set in the Doctor Who Universe (for free) here”. Any reading of that that isn’t these stories were intended to be set within the DWU is frankly a stretch.

There was also discussion of your somewhat flawed closing statement. Please take any explanations of your closing statement from the far more in depth version in the OP rather than the following extremely shortened version.

Basically I found the quotes regarding universes were referencing 10,000 Dawns as a series (which is unambiguously invalid) rather than than the crossover stories. See the Assimilation² precedent outlined in more detail above. Also I brought up the never-mentioned fact that the titular 10,000 Dawns is a multiverse of universes meaning the fact that they are set in different universes is also established narratively.

I also concisely explained the "confusing" situation regarding the publication of the stories: Borisashton wrote: T:OFF REL dictates that the official release date is the date set by the publisher, in this case Arcbeatle Press. This means that the releases that should be covered by the wiki are located here, here, here and here. The first three stories were then collected in an anthology here.

Finally, there was a section about the concerns you had about other authors using Wylder's liscened characters. This one is covered in way more detail in the OP but the short version is that quote specified "not fanworks" and we don't cover non-crossovers anyway so what other authors do with Wylder's characters is of no concern to this wiki.

This isn't technically "short" but I have truncated it as much as possible. I'm sure you appreciate how much evidence had been presented in this and the previous two lengthy debates.