Talk:Looking for Pudsey (TV story)

"Two part"?
I was watching the entirety of Children in Need and it was only one sketch that was repeated twice throughout the night. Therefore, this should be counted as a 'one-parter'? Hopefully, the person that wrote this hasn't counted the Christmas sneak peek as the other half haha.

(If my signature doesn't show, this was written by User:Thefartydoctor. I've been having signature problems.) The  Farty  Doctor   Talk  03:59, November 19, 2016 (UTC)


 * It's two part, the first part features Capaldi for all of five seconds and it features Mel and Sue and others. Part two was added later in the night where Capaldi had a bigger role and Tim Peake and Len Goodman were in it. Yeah, it&#39;s me &#34;Denchen&#34;... I couldn&#39;t believe it either.  ☎  08:05, November 19, 2016 (UTC)


 * That doesn't make it a two parter. A two parter is one story continued over two episodes/parts. What you're describing is the first part merely being a cut of the second part. Therefore, it's a one parter with two cuts. Kind of like the difference between Doctor Who Confidential and Doctor Who Confidential Cut Down (or whatever it was called). They're the same episode but with the latter has less of the original in it. The  Farty  Doctor   Talk  16:08, November 20, 2016 (UTC)


 * I realise this, you're right. Sorry for the trouble. Yeah, it&#39;s me &#34;Denchen&#34;... I couldn&#39;t believe it either.  ☎  16:11, November 20, 2016 (UTC)


 * Don't apologise. Wikis need people like you and I to debate this stuff. And sometimes it gets tricky haha. Especially when it's not even part of the Whoniverse haha. The  Farty  Doctor   Talk  16:13, November 20, 2016 (UTC)

Charity specials
Can I create a category for charity specials? Yeah, it&#39;s me &#34;Denchen&#34;... I couldn&#39;t believe it either.  ☎  12:43, November 20, 2016 (UTC)

Doctor Who-part
Do we add everything from the Children in Need special or are we sticking to the part that is Doctor Who? --DCLM ☎  13:57, November 20, 2016 (UTC)