Talk:Intru-da-window

Why is the at page even the candidate for deletion?

Reason
Why is the page a candidate for deletion if it is a canon joke said by multiple doctor who characters?


 * Like the deletion template on the page says, I don't believe that punchlines to jokes deserve their own page. Jack &#34;BtR&#34; Saxon ☎  20:05, 7 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Seems to be an obvious deletion candidate. We wikify nouns. This isn't a noun. Najawin ☎  21:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Intruder window or Intruda window would be a noun though. – n8 (☎) 20:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC)


 * It would be, but there's no such thing as an "intruder window". It's just wordplay. Jack &#34;BtR&#34; Saxon ☎  20:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Considering we have pages on on other jokes such as Knock-knock joke, I'm not sure why there is any reason to delete this page. 20:45, 25 March 2023 (UTC)


 * I can’t believe it was up for debate whether “intru-da-window” was a thing. Danniesen ☎  20:46, 25 March 2023 (UTC)


 * A knock-knock joke is a kind of joke, though, not a specific joke. I don't think it makes sense to start making pages for individual jokes and naming them after their punchline. Jack &#34;BtR&#34; Saxon ☎  20:47, 25 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Yeah. A knock-knock joke is a kind of joke as Jack said. “Intru-da-window” isn’t a joke, it’s the punchline of a joke. Literally a play on a word. Danniesen ☎  20:49, 25 March 2023 (UTC)