Talk:Pauline Quirke

Prop delete
Instead of just deleting this page, I'm adding the prop delete tag just to be sure. Given User:CzechOut's comments at User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER/Archive 1, "They are simply marketing campaigns, and our coverage of them begins an ends with a real world article about the campaign itself only.", it seems like this "actor" should not have a page on this wiki, unless she has appeared somewhere else in the DWU. Shambala108 ☎  00:29, November 3, 2016 (UTC)


 * I can understand why characters from an advertisement can't have pages but actors surely should. I mean she contributed to the marketing campaign if nothing else. Denchen  ☎  07:21, November 3, 2016 (UTC)


 * Like I said in the post immediately above, I'm just going by User:CzechOut's comments saying that we will only cover the campaign itself. If this actor has done nothing else in the DWU besides this campaign, then I don't think she needs a page. Shambala108 ☎  13:48, November 3, 2016 (UTC)


 * characters, I agree but she still had involvement as an individual if not a character, she was still in the DW ident there for, by the wiki's rules, she deserves her own page. I think she should, I mean she's done more to DWU than say a lot of people covered on the wiki. I think CzechOut mean characters and concepts, rather than actors and so forth. Denchen  ☎  21:16, November 3, 2016 (UTC)


 * Can we received CzechOut's opinion on the matter? Denchen   ☎  21:24, November 4, 2016 (UTC)

You might think CzechOut meant something, but until/unless he chimes in here, his comments have to speak for themselves, and he specifically said the "campaign itself only". Shambala108 ☎  01:55, November 5, 2016 (UTC)