Board Thread:The Panopticon/@comment-26845762-20151212000440/@comment-24894325-20160630154441

If anyone still thinks it shouldn't be included, please go play the game at least up to the middle of Chapter 2 before making further judgement. The game is free after all, and available worldwide (unlike the Adventure Games), so there's nothing stopping you. I'm sure if you had a more informed view of the topic, you too would understand why it should be included. There is no reason not to! With all due respect, having the same knowledge as you does not necessarily imply having the same opinion as you. I played the game extensively and know exactly what you are talking about. I don't really have a strong opinion on inclusion/non-inclusion, with a slight preference for non-inclusion. I do think, however, it is necessary to provide full information about the game for the admins and elders of the Wikia to decide whether the four rules are satisfied.

For instance, I was a bit puzzled by your description of the dialogue in the Apalalpucia level above. Why say "the Doctor" instead of "the Eleventh Doctor" and then "the Eighth Doctor". But the difficulty is, there are two of each in the game: the normal one and the expert one. Some also have a fan variant. And by now probably fourth copies from the signature series. And then some characters were given a fifth variant, prefixed SA. And I am not talking about two copies of the same individual taken from different points in their timelines, like young Sara Jane and old Sara Jane. I'm talking about multiple duplicates of the exactly same character. Take River Song, for instance, we have: I do not remember a slightest attempt to explain the presence of multiple duplicates of the same individual from the point of the storyline.
 * 1) Professor River Song (who is a Doctor, within the game's definition thereof)
 * 2) Professor River Song + (who is not a Doctor)
 * 3) River Song
 * 4) River Song +
 * 5) SA River Song