Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-9741601-20131124191500/@comment-9741601-20131124193612

As someone who appreciates accuracy, your usage of the term "Ockham" over the more conventionally understood (but frankly incorrect) term "Occam" speaks volumes about the weight of your recommendation.

Nonetheless, >99.999% is NOT 100%, and even if the inference would tend to fulfill the simplest explanation, it isn't completely proven. However, I will confess that even if the full first names were used and were in fact Ian and Wendy, it still wouldn't mean they were the SAME Ian and Wendy, and the problem still remains, without an actual inference from dialogue or other clues.

To that end, what should the policy be for such determinations in the future?