User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1506468-20190827123101/@comment-6032121-20190827124248

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1506468-20190827123101/@comment-6032121-20190827124248 I confess myself outright puzzled at all these sudden deletions. User:Amorkuz justified each one with T:NOT, but T:NOT is a very large policy — which part of it is meant? From what I recall of reading over the various pages involved, the short stories in question did use licensed Doctor Who concepts, no different from any other crossovers.

("What I recall" is, of course, an important modifier. The fact of the matter is that regardless of how this debate ultimately goes, it would be much easier for everyone if we still had access to the pages in question. Couldn't they at least be recreated as sandboxes for the time being, so that we know what we're talking about, exactly? The Internet Archive hasn't got it backed up, or at least not all of it.)