User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1506468-20190827123101/@comment-30881616-20190911022848

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1506468-20190827123101/@comment-30881616-20190911022848 Thank you very much for your response. My question, however, is more on where the burden of proof rests in a case that has come under a community discussion: as far as I can tell, the terms of T:VALID (as quoted above) clearly states that the burden of proof rests on the party seeking to “declare a story invalid”—that the onus is upon them to provide “sufficient evidence” to prove what is alleged; User:Amorkuz, however, seems to have been operating on a quite different understanding of T:VALID, and I would like to make sure that we are all on the same page.

(edit: this is in reply to Shambala108's post above, not Bwburke94's)