User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-28349479-20161216221639/@comment-28349479-20161217212158

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-28349479-20161216221639/@comment-28349479-20161217212158 SOTO wrote: Then I encourage you all to leave the passive role, and fix these issues on the FP Wiki. Add content. Expand articles. Gets others to join, and build a bit of a community. Only then will things get done.

As we've said, the one biggest main issue with the FP Wiki is its separation from this one. A vast amount of Faction Paradox material and stories directly depends on context in Doctor Who, Bernice Summerfield, and Iris Wildthyme, and discussing Faction Paradox without a foundation in this context is simultaneously useless and impossible. The only solution is to bring it back in.

And I completely intend to abandon the passive role! I would love nothing more! Several others in this thread, as well as multiple people I've talked to outside of Wikia, have agreed with me that they would love to help contribute to Faction Paradox articles on this wiki, should the transfer be approved.

We at Tardis have no reason to go back on our earlier decision to split that franchise off into its own wiki. This issue should not be brought up again unless there is new evidence that was not considered in previous discussions. We came to our conclusions from discussion in Forum:How do we best include Faction Paradox on the wiki? and Forum:BBV and canon policy. I would advise you all to read those to better understand our reasoning.

I agree that everyone should read those threads, and I linked them in the very first paragraph of my post for that exact reason. However, as I also said in that paragraph, everything I cited in the OP specifically wasn't mentioned in those previous debates. With all due respect, I don't understand why new or not-previously-mentioned quotes from Lawrence Miles, other authors, and editors concerning Faction Paradox and the DWU wouldn't qualify as enough to bring up this topic again, and I don't think I'm disrupting this wiki by doing so. It certainly wasn't my intention! I'm not arguing with the rules or trying to prove a point; I'm just saying their correct application to Faction Paradox wouldn't result in a ban.