User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20121207092215/@comment-146099-20130105125448

CzechOut wrote: No, the case is that there is no such thing as a "Tardis Index File".

Right, that's what I originally thought.

I think you'll (that's the community, not you Czech) find that on the whole, consensus is not defined by numbers anyway, but rather discussion. I fail to see any outstanding reasons why Tardis Index File should stand, which suggests it's tipping in favour of a name change. I really don't think it's a good idea to use the name of something that's not even in the DWU. I'm personally also against Tardis Information System as, while it does have foundation, there's simply no need for it. Tardis Wiki is helpfully concise; I doubt the "outside world" gives a damn about some superfluous reference anyway.