User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-6032121-20200517150418/@comment-45692830-20200520200527

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-6032121-20200517150418/@comment-45692830-20200520200527 DiSoRiEnTeD1 wrote: list of all final stances (as i can make them out):

ScroogeMcDuck:

in regards to separate lists he seemed to agree with the idea of having one list for emily cook produced content and another for bbc stories

No he did not. This is just obviously untrue if you read the thread. He said two days ago 'Seems to me "stories posted on the Twitter account of the author doing the tweetalong, as part of the tweetalong" seems as good a definition of "official Lockdown! story" as any.'

As for my view, I think breaking up "content specifically created to placate people while in Lockdown" is inherently untenable, due to the edge cases I've outlined above. I think a more general page like Borisashton has suggested is a positive, but that includes things that are delayed as well as things that are created. I don't think a BBC/Emily Cook list is at all tenable, unless we somehow get word that she didn't have a license for any of this, which I find unlikely, given the stuff pointed out in the thread above.