User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-188432-20130514042227/@comment-188432-20130514205836

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-188432-20130514042227/@comment-188432-20130514205836 But SOTO, if they don't know what the word prequel means, then it means nothing when they use it.

And as for your second paragraph: pure speculation on your part unsupported by any narrative fact. That's not to say that it won't be confirmed later, but, nah, you're just laying that interpretation over the piece. Don't get me wrong: it's a completely plausible interpretation, but there's absolutely nothing which definitively confirms it. It's not "definitely implied".