Board Thread:Help!/@comment-15755849-20131229214328/@comment-15755849-20131230015933

Shambala108 wrote: Our stories are straight. CzechOut was referring to your question about policing admins; I was referring to the wiki as a whole (perhaps misunderstanding the point you made that I quoted in my post; sometimes I post too much info in an attempt to educate all users who might be reading).

As for your removed posts, this wiki has no interest in publishing anything about DW's future, because as we have seen countless times, things can change before they happen. As every edit window states, we care about the Doctor's past, not his future. We also don't publish speculation or spoilers. We do have a place where you can post this info if you wish, at Howling:The Howling. This is the only place on the wiki where spoilers, speculation and theories are allowed.

If you want to see all our policies listed in one place, you can go to Category:Policies.

Hope this helps clear things up.

Hmmm.....perhaps just not as straight from my perspective then although I feel the public will read and agree with me here LOL!

I was actually attempting to merge both of these points in my initial post. The idea being that you admins do need an additional level of moderation so we the public can feel comfortable knowing that relevant Dr.Who facts are neither censored nor edited before posting on here. The two points then merge when I point out that the best way to keep us feeling comfortable here is to periodically review yourselves and publish these results for us all to see. However, if y'all can't be bothered with doing a proper job here........well some would ask why you're an admin in the first place....myself I will simply post my suggestions for improvement and leave it there in the hopes i'm not censored as usual!

No I've posted my issues with post deletes on CzechOut's user talk although now wondering if it was yourself - again - who pulled it down Sham?! Anywho - I feel that its more appropriate to discuss there but will make two points just to tie it all up here also.

My post on series 7 written on the 29th was regarding the same post made on this wiki (by me) on the 29th referring to the improvement in writing quality since the new exec started supervising Moffat - these are all facts fyi not opinion or speculation and I would have included further citations if given the chance - which I wasnt. Now yes I get that this is a paradox - and ive shamed you all by asking why such a paradox isn't appreciated here - but it was in no way referencing any future events regarding Dr.Who it was infact referencing either the present or past quite deliberately - would you like to have another go at your explanation here?! LOL!

My post on Steven Moffat page written on the 29th was referencing a page started on Facebook "Dr Who Forever" (https://www.facebook.com/pages/Doctor-Who-Forever/205186176304084) that was designed to prevent Steven Moffat finishing Dr.Who forever just for his own ego. This page was started in June 2013 and hence it is also referring to the past and not the future. If the page itself refers to the future then this is not a point you can argue since you are reviewing my words not the citations themselves - many episode reviews used as citations will contain some mention of possible futures so why cant my page :P - Do you want to have another go at this answer too? ;)