User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20121212231649/@comment-5617235-20121227040556

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20121212231649/@comment-5617235-20121227040556 "The functional definition of 'invalid source' is that it's one which doesn't get covered here."

Is this definition written down somewhere on the wiki? I'm really sorry if I sound overly suspicious or anything, but that's not the definition that immediately comes to mind for me. The one that I think of is another one that has been used multiple times in this discussion: that an invalid source is one that cannot be used to write other articles. So I think yes, adding a template to those articles would be a good idea, so that people like me whose go-to definition of "invalid" is different from the wiki's definition can see what the rules and regulations are here.