Board Thread:The Panopticon/@comment-24894325-20170121220436/@comment-1789834-20170123063708

NateBumber wrote: A question to you: [...] Have the Time Lords ever created and exclusively used timeships like those that aren't TARDISes?

You haven't answered my question. If these are TARDISes, why aren't they called TARDISes? Legal reasons? I asked a simple question that seems to have been ignored. I'm asking for enlightenment on the subject.

Huh? The only time I've cited a random Benny novel is to point out that if we decide that the Great Houses' timeships aren't TARDISes, Brax's timeship and many many more will need to be reclassified as something other than TARDISes. You misinterpreted the use of my mentioning her. I was describing to you how an outsider to these FP debates feel when an editor edits things into articles and then provides explanations which take a hundred and one routes. She was a hypothetical. I wasn't talking about you personally.

It was affirmed in the admin-closed-and-approved Thread:208233 You're quoting an affirmation from a Thread that hasn't been closed yet. Similarly the Timeships vs TARDIS Thread hasn't been closed yet. See why I'm concerned?

What is your new evidence that the Great Houses' timeships aren't the Time Lords' TARDISes? I repeat- the onus is not on me to disprove. The onus is on FP readers/listeners to prove. The best way to do that is to head on over to the Timeships vs TARDIS discussions and get it closed rather than ignoring it. Forgive me if I'm reading your response wrong, but you're taking this way to personally. We're not attacking you. We want this information to be placed into the Wiki correctly. We can't do that if people are using unclosed threads to affirm/confirm facts.