Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-4028641-20170305235317

I truly admire the belief that someone out there cares enough about us to give us the exact specific quote that we need to call it valid. But as I've discussed before, I just kinda doubt that it's coming. The only meaningful quote on if the DWU is the Lego DWU has been from Moffat.

"When asked if the game was considered canon Moffat proclaims “everything is canonical”."

- http://forbiddenplanet.blog/2015/more-from-sdcc-doctor-who-and-lego-dimensions/

Again, this isn't a LEGO Doctor Who movie. It's a LEGO Batman movie. It's been a miracle that we've gotten as much info as we have, considering how many much more interesting things there are in the movie.

It's been questioned if there even is a DWU in the franchise, and I simply don't think that saying that is speculation from an in-or-out-of-universe point-of-view. We know that there's a DWU in LD, we know that each villain in the Phantom Zone is from a different universe.

LD is set in the same canon as The Lego Movie and The Lego Batman Movie is also set in the same canon as The Lego Movie. Thus it was meant that the Daleks are from a DWU, there is a DWU, we have no proof that there's more than one DWU. So all we need to prove, as far as I'm concerned, is if that DWU is meant to be the real DWU. And right now, other than "Legos are stupid, shut up," I can't think of many cases to be made for this DWU not being the DWU.