User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-27089953-20200922050158/@comment-6032121-20200922130650

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-27089953-20200922050158/@comment-6032121-20200922130650 While we're here, though, I'm not 100% clear on why we don't cover them as invalid. Isn't that the usual procedure when something makes legal use of a license to a DWU concept, but doesn't set itself in the DWU per authorial intent?