User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1317169-20121202170842/@comment-88790-20130325145252

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1317169-20121202170842/@comment-88790-20130325145252 I agree with MM's earlier comment that Ratings would be better in the infobox under "Premier broadcast" and "Premier network" we could have "Premier ratings".

Location information could be in a sidebox as I placed in my example above.

That would along with MM's suggestion of rewriting Production errors remove many of the bullet points.

I'd like to reference two New Adventure book pages, just to illustrate that removing the bullet points would probably help both pages in different ways. White Darkness (novel) and No Future (novel) have the most different References sections to one another. White Darkness is mostly bullet points and No Future is all sentences.

Removing the bullet points from White Darkness and replacing them with sentences that CO and MM have suggested would help, for example from the Minerals subheading the info would become; "The minerals argot, bauxite and scopalamine are referred to." this would quite likely help the flow and readability of the article which is very bullet point heavy at the moment.

With No Future with its longer sentences removing the bullet points wouldn't really affect the page very much. Though as CO suggests some thinning or combining of information could occur to decrease the amount of subheadings or information below them.

I agree with MM we should still keep the subheadings as they are.

I disagree, though understand about not keeping them separate. Though I would still like a separate "Continuity" for specific paragraphs of continuity information (though we do need to rename it to something not "Continuity") it can be within whatever we eventually name this section but for some information concerning continuity it needs to be separate from the other subheadings as it crosses several subjects.