User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5791028-20150709160234/@comment-4028641-20151008002628

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5791028-20150709160234/@comment-4028641-20151008002628 I'd hate to back-track the conversation... But... I just watched all the clips in the game that feature the Doctor and I'm actually not totally convinced that the game is invalid

I mean, if this had a different artistic style (aka, looked like an adventure game or something) then none of us would question if it was valid or not -- we'd just treat it as a crossover like we did with Star Trek... The game certainly seems to take itself seriously, and works really hard to make both the Back to the Future and Doctor Who games fit into continuity... They even get the wording right (the Doctor calls it "Rift technology...") I'd say that what we have so far isn't quite enough to put the game out.

Of coarse the main game didn't even feature the Doctor outside of cut scenes, so we didn't get to encounter the "multi-Doctor" problem discussed above or any other key issues mentioned above. All I'm saying is that we should wait for the Doctor Who pack to come out to judge if the whole thing breaks our policies. But right now we don't have much to eliminate it besides "it looks like lego."