Board Thread:The Panopticon/@comment-24894325-20170121220436/@comment-24894325-20170123012703

Procedures are very important.

The "affirming" Thread:208233 has not been closed by an admin. Which means that no affirmation has been reached and no edits are allowed based on to-be-achieved conclusions at the time of their closing. Thread:206566 is properly closed, yes. The word "Lolita" is mentioned there twice, both times in the context of "House Lolita". Was it decided on that thread that specifically Lolita is a TARDIS? No.

Just for the record, what you say in this thread about Lolita is extremely interesting (and I am thankful for the explanation). It may even have persuaded me, but the thread is also open, meaning that editing Lolita to be a TARDIS based on this thread is also premature.

What is a non sequitur for you is somehow important for me to orient myself in the brave new world of FPentry. I know it's a happier occasion than Brexit but it still requires getting used to. Moreover, this question is directly relevant to the original topic.

What can lay this "non sequitur" to rest is a consensus reached on this thread, reopening of the improperly closed thread started by Pluto2, reaching consensus there, followed by a closure of both threads by an admin (not necessarily the same one).

PS Are proper names ever used in FP, or is it written so as to torment poor editors here with all those Ships, Pilots, 101-forms, baby-timeship-monster-non-TARDISes, etc.?