User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Help!/@comment-43874324-20200702151414/@comment-45692830-20200709142005

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Help!/@comment-43874324-20200702151414/@comment-45692830-20200709142005 I think you'll find my next sentence was relevant.

Najawin wrote:

And even if not, the spirit of said thread is quite clearly aligned with the message therein.

That is, it's literally impossible for my comment to make this thread more long-winded or repetitive than it would be otherwise (and obviously personal attacks aren't being brought up here), since I would be bringing up Thread:248287 anyhow. (And the exact same comment about interpretation would have to be made) The comment you're responding to is a holistic discussion of that thread, and what you're taking umbrage to is me discussing how there are two interpretations of a comment, with me selecting the one that makes more sense for the thread in question.

I appreciate the idea that one should not be interpreting other people's comments needlessly in principle, but when the actual argument does not depend on the interpretation, it seems to me this concern is wholly misplaced.

DiSoRiEnTeD1, a lot of people who have learning disabilities don't see themselves as "suffering", they see it as another mode of living. Similar issue with wheelchairs and "confinement".