User talk:Mini-mitch

'''Please leave all new messages at the bottom of the page. Also, please take new heading for each discussion. Please sign all message. - as is required by poilcy. Please also note that comments that are: unsigned, rude, a personal attack, vandalism will be ignored.'''

Untitled message 1
I'm not saying it is, I'm saying it looks like one. It just doesn't look very appealing.

I re-uploaded it from someone else, who had uploaded it as a .png.

If I sounded mad, my bad. OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 18:29, January 3, 2013 (UTC)

Name
After almost 125 responses (!), the discussion over the wiki's imminent name change appears to be nearing conclusion. You have 24 hours to register your objections at Thread:117468. If you don't, the name will change to Tardis Data Core tomorrow. 22:59: Tue 08 Jan 2013

Please apologize for implying I am a liar
Your auto-deletion of my edit on Quick Reads brands me a lair. Please actually check the edits before you blindly delete them. Look at the cover for The Silurian Gift. Does it say £1 or does it not say £1. Do you actually own any copies of Quick Reads. I do and they contain 100 pages of story text. If you don't want people to contribute information, then lock the damn pages and make them accessible only to you and your buddy CzechOut. 70.72.211.35talk to me 17:08, January 20, 2013 (UTC)

Spelling
(you spelled "note" wrong at the top of this page, and "message" should be plural...) OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 01:29, January 26, 2013 (UTC)

Message Wall
I have a huge, running ticket of all the little bugs I find with the Wall Forum, and I filed this one back in December. I'll be going back in February to give BertH a nudge on the issues that haven't been resolved by then. They have a huge backlog of fixes still lingering from their Christmas break, and I wanna see what happens by February before I start saying, "Hey, whatever happened with this one?" 01:29: Sat 26 Jan 2013

Don't delete videos just cause they're "unused"
I know you love to delete unused files, so I should tell you that videos don't obey the expected rules of file usage. If you go to cricket bat, you'll see a video in the right rail. This video, File:Coming to terms with regeneration - Doctor Who Castrovalva - BBC is actually on cricket bat, regeneration and Fifth Doctor. But being in the right rail doesn't "count" towards the file usage stat, so you get this false positive "no pages link to this image" message.

For this reason, I'd advise that you not delete videos on the basis of the "file usage" stat. You should pretty much assume that every video uploaded is being used somehow, even if it's not readily apparent how. 08:18: Sat 26 Jan 2013

Re:Speculation
Oops... I had a source, I just forgot to add it... Keep in mind that that page is very aggravating to edit, what with the "spoilers" warning popping up ever five seconds... OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 01:32, January 27, 2013 (UTC)

Block
I just got this message when I tried to edit a page.

I'm sorry. I'm so sorry. You're blocked. Blocking admin 		Mini-mitch Reason		Vandalism. Pure, simple vandalism at the following page(s) --> Block start 		13:56, February 10, 2013 Block end 		infinite Intended blockee 		199.27.76.23 Block ID 		3907 Current IP 		199.27.76.23

You can contact Mini-mitch or another administrator to discuss the block. Please include all details in the above box — but especially the block id number in gold — in any queries you make.

I really don't think that I've done anything to deserve blocking. I've certainly never vandalised a page. Is this a mistake? I'm flabbergasted, I really am. --GusF ☎  14:30, February 10, 2013 (UTC)


 * Well, that's a relief anyway! I thought that it was a mistake as I knew that I had done nothing wrong and the block became intermittent after I posted the above message. Thanks for the explanation! --GusF ☎  14:44, February 10, 2013 (UTC)

How many bleeding sources do I need?!?!?!?!
I've been told that I'm not providing sufficient sources to say that episode 12 will be "The Last Cyberman".

Now I don't know how you run this god forsaken wiki but why the hell is four sources (one of which is a bleeding interview with Neil Gaiman himself stating that it's called "The Last Cyberman") not enough?!

And yes I am annoyed and you're bound to get this day in and day out so you're probably more annoyed than I am right now...

Scott Davidson ☎  21:17, February 11, 2013 (UTC)

50th
Well, to be frank I see no issue with adding it to the page. But carry on. OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 00:23, February 12, 2013 (UTC)