User talk:Dalekcaan14

Series edits
Hi, I would encourage you to voice your opinions on established edits in either the Forum or on the individual page's talk pages. Your edits thus far may be interpreted as vandalism. --Tangerineduel 03:05, December 15, 2009 (UTC)

The End of Time
The End of Time is a part of the 2009 Specials, so please do not change it to Series 5. Thank You. --Bigshowbower 10:20, December 27, 2009 (UTC)

Warning
Please do not alter established edits such as The Christmas Invasion, the placement of The Christmas Invasion and other specials is established not just on that TV story page but throughout templates, guides and other articles on this wiki. I strongly encourage you to discuss these edits in the Forum, frequent reverting of edits may be considered vandalism and action may be taken should these edit wars continue. --Tangerineduel 12:25, December 30, 2009 (UTC)


 * Final warning. Do not alter series information on story articles, any alterations to story article (or related pages) will result in you being blocked from editing on this wiki for a period of 1 week. --Tangerineduel 07:22, December 31, 2009 (UTC)

Infobox pictures
On 23 January 2010, you edited Doomsday so as to replace the infobox picture. As of today, almost two months later, you have not uploaded the picture. We all can forget things, especially if we're doing a lot of edits at once. I'm sure I've unintentionally forgotten to upload a picture I inserted into a page. But pictures, especially those on episode infoboxen, are rather important to the visual design of an entire page. In future, you might want to think about uploading the picture before you change it in the article. Or you might want to occasionally go back through your own edit history and remind yourself of changes you've made to articles. Either way, please remember that pictures on episode pages and major character pages are amongst the most important pictures on the wiki, due to higher traffic volumes on those pages. Thus, don't change an image in those positions without replacing it with a valid file. Thanks.  Czech Out  ☎ | ✍ 23:00, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

11th Hour
Article title changes such as the one you attempt should be stated on the talk page. Can you cite a source that states the title is 'The 11th Hour'? Thanks. --Tangerineduel 12:27, March 20, 2010 (UTC)

Warning
Please do not move story articles without proof of their title changes. If you move further articles without out citable proof of the title's name this may be viewed as vandalism and action taken. --Tangerineduel 12:09, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

Participating in discussions
It is vital that you sign your posts on discussion pages, and that you move your comments to a level of indentation so that readers can understand what posts have been made by which users. It is also generally thought bad form to add your comments to an earlier part of the thread. Moreover if you do place your comments "out of order" in a thread, you decrease the chance that it will be read, as many people automatically scroll to the bottom of the thread and only look there for new messages. If they don't find anything they recognize as new, they won't necessarily check the history and compare versions to find out how the thread has been changed.

So here are some tips: This is the original post. ~ (These four tildes (~) sign the post.)
 * This is the next post. ~
 * This is the post after that.
 * This is where your addition to the thread goes. ~

Now that's a very neat thread. And most of our threads aren't quite so neat as that. Each colon you add
 * indents
 * the
 * text.
 * It'd be nice if every new post went to the next level of indentation, but it isn't strictly necessary. As long as your post is on a different level of indentation as the one before it, we'll be able to easily see your post.

Thanks for contributing — just please do take a few simple steps to make your voice be heard more clearly.  Czech Out  ☎ | ✍ 01:44, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism
Stop adding that a Cyberman's electrical shock can rip open a Dalek's casing, and that many Daleks were killed in the battle of Canary Wharf. If you add this again, it will be treated as vandalism and an administrator will be involved. The Thirteenth Doctor 12:02, July 18, 2010 (UTC)

Torchwood
Please stop adding that image to the page. Simply because the previous season used that image does not mean that the next will. Also, the image is not correctly dimensioned so it looks weird and pixelated. The Thirteenth Doctor 19:43, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

besides Starz have made a new logo with the New World tag at the bottom, ill find the picture to upload Revanvolatrelundar 19:45, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. I was unaware that starz had made a new logo. I only added the Season 3 logo because it was more likely they would use that than revert to the Season 1-2 logo.Dalekcaan14 19:49, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

Info incorrect
Yes I did revert it. All the statistics you gave were incorrect. You claimed that only two Cybermen died? Not on my television they didn't. You claim there were hundreds of Daleks? You can't possibly know the exact figure, but the Doctor does put emphasis on the "millions" bit. You claim the Cybermen were winning the fight. Nope. For all these reasons I reverted you edit.

However, many of the other facts you gave were useful. The article fails to resolve the events of Doomsday so that information would be valuable. Fell free to re-add it and thank you for your contributions.Skittles the hog-- Talk 11:45, April 14, 2011 (UTC)

These facts were not correctly conveyed and so I took it to be the entire force. I don't see such a fact being useful in anycase.Skittles the hog-- Talk 12:15, April 14, 2011 (UTC)

Warning: blocking imminent
Please don't edit Cyberman (Pete's World) again. If you make another edit beyond your 2:26 (Hawaiian time) edit, I will be forced to temporarily block you per tardis:editing policy. Please take your issues to the discussion point and work with others to achieve a wording you can live with. Thanks :) 12:37:57 Thu 14 Apr 2011
 * You have been blocked. But only for a tiny sliver of time to allow the situation at the above-named page to cool down.  In this two hours that you can't edit, I encourage you to please read tardis:editing policy to understand why this action has been taken.  I would invite you, as well, to please bring a discussion to talk:Cyberman (Pete's World) after the two hours has expired, so that you can work with other editors to come up with a wording that you can  live with.


 * You retain an ability to edit your own talk page, so if you have any comments about this blocking, please feel free to make them here. Please don't feel badly that you have been blocked. I am sure you meant no malice in making your reversions.  We do  want you editing here in the future, but we take a dim, swift and harsh view of edit warring. We want to encourage collaboration, not simple gainsaying, around here.   12:50:55 Thu 14 Apr 2011


 * Block lifted. Unbeknownst to me, our blocking policy was changed since its introduction.  It was originally that one's third reversion of a page was the threshold at which one could be blocked.  I see now, though, that it's the fourth edit that gets one in trouble.  I apologise for prematurely blocking you and therefore remove the block.  However, the point still stands.  Please don't merely revert articles; take your proposed controversial edits to the discussion page and talk them out.  Out of a spirit of fair play, Skittles the hog has been similarly warned that he is on the edge of violating our editing policy, so you are not being picked on.  13:37:08 Thu 14 Apr 2011