User talk:Bold Clone

2010 Archive Jan. '11 Archive

Edit warring
Please do not continue to edit war the headers of the Trickster's Brigade page. Allies can be contained with members as a different group.--Skittles the hog-- Talk 21:52, February 4, 2011 (UTC)

Exactly why there is a different header with the central block of members. I suggest posting on the talk page as edit warring is against policy.--Skittles the hog-- Talk 21:56, February 4, 2011 (UTC)

Blocking policy
You have not agreed to leave the page alone and discuss the matter on the talk page before changes are made, under the Tardis:blocking policy you can be blocked for around 2 hours if you continue to do this. Consider this your final warning. --Revan\Talk 22:06, February 4, 2011 (UTC)

You don't understand what I meant, you were reverting the edits back, they should have been left alone and then a TP discussion should occur. --Revan\Talk 22:09, February 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * I agree with Bone Cold here, it seems a bit unfair that just because he did not go to the talk page, he should get blocked. Other Users were part of the edit war. However, now he done the right thing and started a discussion. Mini-mitch\talk 22:13, February 4, 2011 (UTC)

To be honest I have been looking at the big picture and not the specifics of this edit war. But in future try to leave the page after revertion and ask the users to discuss on the talk page. Thanks. --Revan\Talk 22:13, February 4, 2011 (UTC)

Policy
I think there should be a minimum, but I think it should be something you bring up in the forums. Also, I think that the 4 edits in 36 hours is too long. It should be 4 in 24 hours or something similar.Mini-mitch\talk 22:33, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, and it was only removed by Czechout to stop an edit war. Mini-mitch\talk 22:34, February 4, 2011 (UTC)

Pic removal at The Doctor's TARDIS
As the editor who put up the several pictures at The Doctor's TARDIS which you removed, I'm curious why you clearly didn't want them there. Did you not think they helped illustrate the subject meaningfully? I'm genuinely curious why you didn't like those additions to the article.