User talk:WarGrowlmon18

Explain
Why did you remove the Snowman info from Sardicktown. I see your explanation was "Stop the Vandilism". Also you reverted my edits on Aplan Mortarium. Have you read Tardis:Manual of Style? Please explain your edits--Skittles the hog 20:06, January 1, 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism
Please do not add out of universe sections. Also, do not revert edits to remove such content. Thanks--Skittles the hog-- Talk 19:36, January 7, 2011 (UTC) 07:41: Wed 21 Dec 2011

Twelfth Doctor
Hi! I wanted to explain why your edit to Twelfth Doctor has been removed twice. Character pages, especially Doctor and companion pages, only need a paragraph per story. They don't need long detailed plot descriptions. That's what the story pages are for. If a user reads a character page and wants to know more about the story, they can click on the story page. That's what a wiki is for.

In addition, it was written in the present tense, and since you've been here for quite a long time, you should know by now that all in-universe articles are written in the past tense.

Finally, if a user's edits take too much work to fix, it is perfectly fine for an admin to remove it completely and ask for a rewrite. It is not the job of any user, even admins, to clean up after other users. I've pointed you towards what you need to do to fix your edit, and you should be able to work from there. Thanks. Shambala108 ☎  15:47, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

Spelling
Hi! Please note that we use British spelling on this wiki, as explained at Tardis:Spelling. You can find the more common differences at Tardis:Spelling cheat card. Thanks! Shambala108 ☎  01:47, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh. Not British (I'm American) so I don't really know the difference.--WarGrowlmon18 ☎  02:21, July 20, 2015 (UTC)

Page moves
Hi! Please note that, per Thread:128198, non-admins are not permitted to move pages. Thanks. Shambala108 ☎  05:09, December 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay. I actually created that page minutes before and simply thought of a better title.--WarGrowlmon18 ☎  05:10, December 6, 2015 (UTC)

Runaway Bride
I not sure what the deal is. It's just the way I edit. I admit, if I will sometime fire on the inuse tag, if I feel the need for it. Usually this would be for pages that have virtually information, because there will be plenty to add. The inuse tag means I just keep the page in edit more without the fear of an edit clash.

I never because I didn't feel it warranted it. It was a mere handful of edits I made. Nothing much. MM/ Want to talk? 20:47, February 14, 2016 (UTC)
 * Really??? Hmmm... let's see... I count at least 15 edits before I got sick of clicking New Edit. That's way too much when its all one sentence things and throws the whole editing process off. You can't do that, particularly if they're just one sentence things. Its not like your making huge posts, no these are just tiny one sentence additions. You could be blocked for that. You keep that up I will petition to block you.--WarGrowlmon18 ☎  21:36, February 14, 2016 (UTC)


 * Please, for the sake of discussion, just post your reply on my talk page. Don't post in both, I don't follow User's talk pages. It makes it easier for any future reference. Secondly, I still don't see why its such a big deal. You may also want to look back at the edit history of several pages (Meat (TV story) and Series 3 (Torchwood) spring to mind.) My edit patter was the same back then as it is now. I was an admin when I made those edit and I'ms till an admin now, and there's been no policy written saying I can't edit the way I did. Lastly, please don't threat me.It can be seen as personal attack. Adding to this, I actually can't be blocked for editing the way I did, I'm sorry to say. Please read our blocking policy for more information. Thanks. MM/ Want to talk? 22:02, February 14, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Twelfth Doctor
Page is now protected, and the IP user is blocked. Shambala108 ☎  01:46, June 9, 2016 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for defending the wiki from overly aggressive users. In order to improve our coordination in the future, a couple of points. It is more efficient to notify an admin on their talk page than to continue undoing edits. If need be, the edits can be reverted at any time. So, unless the new state of the page makes babies cry in their prams and birds fall from the sky, it is not necessary to return the page to the original state right on the spot. What needs to be done is to suggest a discussion on a talk page and notify an admin. What should be avoided (and was avoided in this case, which I am very happy about) is replying in kind and making too many undo edits. Note that if one user makes 4 edits and the other user undoes them 4 times, then both have engaged in an edit war and both are likely to be blocked. As I said, it did not happen this time, so let it never happen to you. Thanks for keeping a cool head. Amorkuz ☎  23:02, January 1, 2018 (UTC)