User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-86.178.203.198-20140629173408

Are these to be treated as 'canonical'? I appreciate that the book gives an in-universe explanation for the material, but that doesn't mean that they are actually more-or-less true reports (in fact, they stem from dreams). Furthermore, taking another tack, it's a bit of a frivalous book, which I don't think we are to take seriously, hence why the genre labelled on the back cover is "Humour".