User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1317169-20121202170842/@comment-88790-20130116140623

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1317169-20121202170842/@comment-88790-20130116140623 Os OS25 has said, just because they're similar doesn't mean they're the same. They share similar connections but different purposes. One is an dissection of the story's elements the other is to frame the story in relation to others.

The references section isn't in-universe exactly, it only concerns itself with information from the story. Much like the Plot section.

The information could be rewritten to be in the "references" section, but it would lose some of its directness. This is my problem somewhat with MM's suggestion. If we rewrite everything out of the sub-headings to say "This story featured the following spacecraft…" it will become a somewhat tedious collection of information. Or in order to include these sentences some of the information would have to be cut from the article because some things are just too minor than this format would allow.