User talk:Gallicus

{| width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background:skyblue; border: 2px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|

Welcome aboard, Gallicus!
Welcome to the TARDIS Index File. We only take the best! Here are a few good links for newcomers:
 * Internal pages
 * TARDIS crew members
 * The Panopticon
 * Current events
 * Help pages
 * External Wikipedia pages
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article

Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~ or use the button above the edit space, that looks like a signature.

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the Help pages, add a question to one of the Forums. 20:12, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * }

The Invasion animation
Heya :) I note that you changed 2 entertain because you felt that BBCi actually sprang for the two animated Invasion eps.  I'm having difficulties finding proof of this.  Did they, in fact, debut as a red button feature on a BBC rebroadcast of The Invasion?   If so, do you have proof of that event?

To be fair, I don't have any proof that 2 entertain paid for them, either. We have proof that 2 entertain copyrighted the relevant making-of featurette on the DVD ("Flash Frames"), but the episodes themselves are credited as "Cosgrove Hall for BBC TV", which doesn't help a whole lot. Any additional sources you could provide would be helpful.  Czech Out  ☎ | ✍  01:12, 22 May 2009 (UTC) 16:13: Tue 20 Dec 2011

Vandalism at DVD page
Tangerineduel beat me to it: the page is now protected against edits by new or anonymous users. Thanks for the heads up, though! —Josiah Rowe ☎  01:50, July 26, 2012 (UTC)

Monobook errors
I see you're a long-time WIkia editor so you're not going to like this answer. But you should have gotten a message at some point — though you may have dismissed it without reading. So it's my unpleasant task to tell you that Monobook is offered here on an as-is basis only. It sometimes goes out, particularly after Wikia have made a major revision. Which they did last week. I'll eventually get around to fixing it, once I figure out whether this is a bug that Wikia are going to correct, or if it's something for which I have to find a workaround. In the meantime, I strongly suggest that you switch to the Wikia/Oasis skin, where there are no such display errors. In short, Monobook will get fixed, but I can't give you an ETA at this stage.07:35: Wed 15 Aug 2012
 * Ahhh, but the constriction of widths is its virtue, not its weakness. It forces us all to work to the same widths, which means it reduces squabbles about the placement of pictures, or the layout of tables.  We all have 680px, exactly — whether we're reading or editing, whether we're looking at it on a 100-inch television or a 17-inch monitor.  It's much better for collaboration.


 * And, if that's not good enough for you, then consider that it's simply what our host wants us to use. IP users cannot — full stop — use Monobook, and they're by far the biggest population of our community.  Registered users have Oasis as the default.  Wikia really don't consider Monobook at all in their decisions, which is why we locally have to offer it on an as-is basis.  It's really only old fogies like you and me who care about the good ol' days with Monobook.


 * Don't worry, though: I put a lot of work into the Monobook skin.  It'll return.  Just be sure to pop up every now and again in the Oasis skin to check the way your edits appear to most people.  There are some cases where it looks fine in Monobook but awful in Oasis. And we always have to consider the way pages look to the overwhelming majority of our readers.  If you haven't already, you'll want to install this code, which will give you a nifty little button that allows you to switch to Oasis on demand without having to go through Special:Preferences.  07:56: Wed 15 Aug 2012