User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-6032121-20200517150418/@comment-11488851-20200520213950

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-6032121-20200517150418/@comment-11488851-20200520213950 Agreed @Borisashton. What we need is a clear definition rather than that definition becoming loose and changing on a case-by-case basis that will lead to further discussions like this that repeat threaded ground.

There a few options for that. We can take the broad approach that all stories released during Lockdown count, but that's too broad because it would include every story.

We can then boil it down to who made the story but then this restricts releases based on author.

Then there's the more equal ground (which I support) which is we include any story as Lockdown if it can be prove someone in part of the story's production desired/made the story for inclusion in the Lockdown event.

Of course, there can be other definitions but these are the three that have come to my mind.