User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161223201024/@comment-1272640-20170125223633

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161223201024/@comment-1272640-20170125223633 Here's my new proposal:

1. Scream of the Shalka, its novelization, and The Feast of the Stone are to be treated as valid sources.

2. No change is to be made to the title of the article Ninth Doctor (Scream of the Shalka), given that the novelization unambiguously states the Doctor is in his ninth incarnation.

3. We can either treat The Master (Scream of the Shalka) as the same Master, placing his info under "Undated events" in his main article, or keep them separate.

Either way, there is certainly proof this was set in the DWU. The novelization has the Master reminisce about having stolen several bodies, for example. Thus, it passes rule 4.