Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-1678571-20200811174238/@comment-45692830-20200811193727

Sure. I used reference book as an example. The reasoning here actually seems to suggest that this isn't the case, but, again, I'm not exactly suspecting that this wiki is 100% consistent over a period of seven years (especially not over rule 1, which I think we can all agree is an absolute mess of a rule). I just brought up the immediate precedent I remembered.

If there's more recent precedent, or more applicable precedent, I'm all for it.