User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1398253-20130313220310/@comment-88790-20130325140717

The decision to change the publisher's summary is interesting. Well I think it's interesting. That they didn't just re-use the previous edition means that an editor, copywriter or publisher (someone in the publication chain) was told to change the wording. Which would likely have taken time/money. That it was changed or edited I think is interesting, and also notable that there was a change.