User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161223201024/@comment-25117610-20170125211954

Pluto2 wrote: Amorkuz wrote: I'm sorry, was there a consensus? I can find three posts by CzechOut saying it is invalid. I cannot find him agreeing that it is valid. Could you quote him on this please?

Because my understanding of the word consensus is when everybody agrees, not when somebody said their piece and doesn't see anything that would change their opinion. It's not about a consensus on its own. It's about majority AND consensus. Except validity/inclusion are hardly (if ever) about consensus or majority. It is about evidence. And, right now, as I see it, User:CzechOut has stronger evidences that it wasn't meant be DWU than anyone else has evidence that it was.