User talk:Azes13

Intro
--Freethinker1of1 23:18, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Welcome to the TARDIS Index File Doctor Who wiki! Looking forward to seeing more contributions from you.


 * Hi,
 * Just wanted to say that I thought your Chula article was great. Nothing wrong as far as I can see.
 * --Mantrid 06:00, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree. Excellent job!
 * --Freethinker1of1 11:30, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Excellent...
 * Azes13 13:58, 24 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Greetings,
 * Welcome to the TARDIS Index File wiki project. Your contributions are MUCH appreciated.
 * BTW, sorry it's late, I've been away for quite a while.
 * --GingerM 00:27, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

About your userpage
"Well, I can't think of any other ways to pad this out." You can always brag by adding a list of the articles you created. :) Anyway, on another completely non-related point, it might just help if you vote for featured article noms on Talk:Main Page, seeming as so far nobody else has. 20:50, 31 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Hey, I did mention how I liked the dinosaur page.

Hi
Hello Azes13, I know I haven’t been here long but I would like to make a valuable contribution to Tardis, I was wondering if you would think I would make any good as an Admin. Joker1138 ( The Hub )
 * Well, if you want, I suppose you could be an Admin. Personally, I haven't found much of a difference between being an admin and regular accounts. Azes13 20:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, How do i become one? Joker1138 ( The Hub ) [[Image:Daleknew.jpg|25px]]
 * Give me a while to work it out... Azes13 20:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you Azes13 :-) Joker1138 ( The Hub ) [[Image:Daleknew.jpg|25px]]

Dalek Hierarchy
What's the Dalek Hierarchy?--Si 20:20, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Human Time Lords
To prevent Sichamousacoricothingmabob asking this question sans capitales (or something like that, I'm not that good à français) and with every third word tpyoesd, I'll ask it myself: Would you, Azes the Thirteenth, like to join the Human Time Lord Order? (note: you do not have to be a Human to join the order, although it helps) 17:47, 26 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Naw, man. Sovereign Earth Reptile Empire all the way! Actually, that seems like an nifty idea. Maybe I better get some stuff for that...
 * Also, can't help you with the French stuff. Sorry! Azes13 19:13, 26 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Euh, ça va. Mais tu te rends comte de les noveaux seigneurs du temps sont pas-pas-d'interventionist?
 * Or something like that... not that you'd understand it to see where I was inevitably wrong... and for the record, there's already a strong Earth Reptile Empire anyway. A bit slow off the mark there. Some 65 million years too slow... 19:46, 26 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Schwa? Something about intervention? Man, I should have paid more attention in French class.
 * Also, there was a strong Time Lord empire too. Not sure how far off the mark you are, what with them ceasing to exist... Azes13 20:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Good point... I think... 20:57, 26 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Enh, it's good enough. I'll get back to you if I can think of a better come-back. Azes13 21:07, 26 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks... AH! I've just worked out what you were on about! *realises he shouldn't sound so exited* Well, the idea of the Human Time Lords is to remake the Time Lords, so once the training's done they will exist again! (I think that's what you were on about) Na-na-na-na-na-na! *realises he shouldn't act so childish, and how much like a police car he sounded when doing that* Erm... yeah, that's it... I think... erm... oh yeah, what about schwas? 15:53, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, the idea of SERE is to remake the Silurian Empire, so once the training's done they will rule again. The Human Time Lords replaces the Time Lords (who are dead), while SERE replaces the Earth Reptiles (who just fail at conquering and become a token minority for Earth Empires). Therefore, both organizations are equally valid based on the idea of replacing major powers with a new one.
 * Yeah, that's right, you got OWNED!
 * Also, schwa means "I should know what you just said, but I don't". Azes13 20:18, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Hmmm... I see... sorta... 16:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Good enough for me! Azes13 20:04, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

hello.
hello there deranged wave. u hav a bebo?Quark16 19:52, 20 May 2008 (UTC)


 * ...I have no idea what you just said.

Your work
I think you are great! I've edited just a few, normally 4th Doctor, but I couldn't do better than you!

Chula Page
I think the work on Chula is great. It's my favourite episode out of the 9th AND 10th, so I'm proud when I see some helpful info. I can safely say you are a real helper on TARDIS Index File!

Neil12Neil12 11:00, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Regeneration Page
Hi Azes, Thanks for correcting the tense in my edit of the Regeneration page, I hadn't realised in universe articles were supposed to be in the past tense (ooops). I notice that you've also removed some content that I added to the page and also some older content. I'm somewhat new at this and am unclear as to why you've done that, as it seems relevant to me? Could you give me an indication of why you have made that change so that I can put the information where it should be or know why it shouldn't be included.

Regards Grabthar 04:43, 9 June 2008 (GMT)


 * Let's see: I added back the bit about growing back a hand because the sentence was unfinished, I changed the section on the Master only because I was working with an older copy which didn't have that format, the part about the Doctor trial seemed to fit better with the section on control, I removed the section about the control of Romana and the Doctor because it's best not to speculate on matters in the main text and I removed the part about the Master stopping his regeneration because it had been said before and it wasn't about an aborted regeneration.


 * I think that's everything. Any other questions? --


 * Thanks. It was the part containing the conjecture that I was most interested in, you see I had expanded a pre-exsisting point of conjecture that was already on the page; as I'm new to this wiki I didn't know what the policy on that sort of thing is so I just followed the pattern of what was already in the article. You say "it's best not to speculate on matters in the main text" does this mean there is a place where speculation, such as the one removed, should be included? I was trying to get the atrticle to read in such a way as it highlights that, whilst there is a lot of source information on the subject, that clear conclusions can't be drawn.

Thanks again. Grabthar 14:40, 9 June 2008 (UTC)Grabthar 15:38, 9 June 2008 (GMT).