User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161223201024/@comment-1827503-20170202045504

95.147.32.223 wrote: This suggests shalka was still official until April 2004 at lest and plans for a sequel to shalka continued after the new series was announced whoud indicate that the new series and web series where considers compatible at the time also it should be noted how little work had on the new series had been done by the end of 2003 the question remains do letter reference invalidated the story to not also give that RTD cornel and Moffat have all mad stem ants that everything is canon can any thing they say invalidate a story I think it's clear we need to figure out exactly what Rule 4 is and isn't. When exactly did it become outside the bounds of the DWU?