User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-31010985-20180428165444/@comment-4028641-20191213184458

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-31010985-20180428165444/@comment-4028641-20191213184458 I understand that everyone is protective of pages like Vorgenson, but my point about bringing this up is simple. The story said page is based off of, a play put on for a limited time, is invalid because it's a piece of media that doesn't exist. There was no home media adaptation, no official release as I know, it's a thing you could pay to see that now does not exist. Additionally, when it did, it was a different thing from show-to-show. Our ruling was that, because of this, we couldn't make pages about what goes on during the story. The same for things like The Doctor (The Ultimate Adventure).

Stories such as Dr. Who (Dr. Who and the Daleks) and Ninth Doctor (Scream of the Shalka) are not like this, they are stories which were made invalid on the basis of "we can and will make pages on these, but they're not canon so they should be treated differently." this is the sole difference between the two kinds of stories, and if sacrificing one kind helps make the site run better I am all for it, despite how charming I find some of the ones which would likely be deleted.