Howling:The Doctor And River What Next?

Well this is kinda a sensitive thing but if the Doctor and River are married then surly they have to consummate there marriage (i said it was sensitive) which could mean the creation of a human-galifrayen time lord which i think might get complicated but still if they do not consummate there marriage then it is technically not valid ( i think they will because of rivers comment in impossible astronught) now this will cause the show to become more interesting in my opinion but it may fall in to the generic plot of the child becoming a antagonist... which would be a bit same old but still what i am very interested about is will there be things that happen during the birth on "beginning" of the child which could make for a very interesting plot and character some of you may pick up that i mean it beginning in the TARDIS in mid flight which could mean for a very interesting being for example time lord.2 or something along those lines (possibly time king but than sounds odd) tell me what you think about the topic and my little idea.

Happy Whooing

Whooligist talk to me 16:32, May 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * I think that we can probably take it as a given that the Doctor and River will consumate their marriage, if they haven't already. Given the way that River's entire story arc has gone so far though, I would think that we would have already seen their child if they were going to have one together. Maybe the Rani is their daughter(that was a joke). It is probably more likely that any child of theirs would be conceived in River's cell at Stormcage then in the TARDIS while it is in flight, because I think after what happenned the last time the Doctor would have the sense to land the TARDIS before having sex with River. Even if they do conveive a child while in the TARDIS while it is in flight, it probably wouldn't matter much unless Madame Kovarian or someone kidnapped and experimented on it. Melody would have been a relatively normal human girl if Kovarian hadn't messed with her DNA. Being conceived in the TARDIS is just what made Kovarian's experiments possible. Icecreamdif talk to me 20:02, May 2, 2012 (UTC)

I've suggested elsewhere that Doctor Kent in The Weding of River Song was their daughter. Now I'm going to suggest the character to be be played by Jenna-Louise Coleman. Why, after all, were we shown the Gallifreyan character on the Doctor's crib in A Good Man Goes to War? When River said of it "I haven't seen that for a long time," what were the circumstances under which she had seen it before? When the Fourth Doctor said of Romana "You're a good-looking woman, probably?" what was the cause of that?

Yes, I know. I'm a sick B*****d.Boblipton talk to me 21:36, May 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * Well, River might have been referring to seeing the cot as a baby, although it would seem unlikely that she would remember that. Hopefully the cot is something that will be picked up on again, and hopefully the Gallifreyan symbol on it will be shown to have some kind of meaning. Do you have any reason to suggest that Dr. Kent is the Doctor and River's daughter, or is that just a random guess? Jenna-Louise Coleman might be the Doctor and River's daughter, since Moffat said that "Who she's playing, how the Doctor meets her, and even where he finds her, are all part of one of the biggest mysteries the Time Lord ever encounters. Even by the Doctor's standards, this isn't your usual boy meets girl." Of course, Moffat might decide to move away from every one of the Doctor's companions being related to him and River, but we'll see. If she is the Doctor's daughter, then that opens up the question of what she was doing for the first 20-something years of her life(possibly more with regeneration.) After all, River could hardly have raised her in prison, and I can't really see a later version of the Doctor travelling around through space and time with a baby. I guess she could have been born after River got her pardon in Flesh and Stone, or she could have also been kidnapped by Kovarian, which would seem kind of repetitive.Icecreamdif talk to me 22:44, May 2, 2012 (UTC)

Think silly. 1: How did the photographs in the orphanage (including one of Amy and an infant) show up there? 2: Melody regenerated about January of 1970 in New York. We next see her in Leadworth some time after Easter of 1996 as "Mels". Other people have complained of that gap as a problem. I see it as an opportunity, particularly if you throw in time travel.Boblipton talk to me 23:40, May 2, 2012 (UTC)

the idea i had of the TARDIS thingy was just me wondering if it could be possible i doubt the new companion will be his daughter it would be hard to fit in although if they do have a child i hope it is before Amy and Rorys departure/possible death it just would not be fair on the kid or on amy and rory.

Happy Whooing

P.S. Person who made last comment plase sign it thank you Whooligist talk to me 23:06, May 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * I always just assumed that the pictures of Amy with the infant were of her with Melody at Demon's Run. The time between 1970 and 1996 is certainly a bit of a mystery. It remains to be seen if that was just an oversight on Moffat's part, if he decided to just let the audience draw their own conclusions, or if there will be future stories that show how the young Mels got to 1996. Presumably the Silence just found her eventually and brought her to the future in one of their TARDIS-like-machines. Either way, I don't really see what any of that has to do with a possible child of the Doctor and River.Icecreamdif talk to me 00:30, May 3, 2012 (UTC)