User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-90.206.97.20-20200429191109/@comment-6032121-20200429214029

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-90.206.97.20-20200429191109/@comment-6032121-20200429214029 Yes, it's a bit odd to say the least see someone arguing for the validity of a novel which is already considered valid and whose validity has not been questioned on the talk page or anywhere. This Wiki by all appearances does recognise that How to be a Time Lord is an epistolary novel like any other, already. So, for that matter, is The Official Doctionary.