User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-26975268-20130402141145

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-26975268-20130402141145 Wow, wow, wow, back up-- "the show to tell us that they are in fact the same person"

Let's analyse this: where the the show tell us that they're different people? I can't think of a single instance.

As you say "we chronicle what the show tell us," and we can't just ignore facts just because they haven't been explained yet.


 * Fact: She died twice
 * Fact: The Doctor says she's the same woman
 * Fact: All the similarities I mentioned above

Just because "the show hasn't explained how that's possible," doesn't mean it's not true. Sure, we have to be careful with our language; we can't speculate about how.

But we have clear fact, that you seem to be running over with your she-died logic. Yes, she died. Yes, she appeared again in the Victorian era, then died again. And, yes, she appeared yet again in the 21st century. How? We don't know yet. Why? Still unknown. All we have is facts.

So far, the only facts we have our her deaths, her reappearing, and the Doctor stating that they're the same woman. I'd like to see a solid fact' saying that they're different people — not, "in the real world, this would be unlikely."