User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-26975268-20130201045831/@comment-26975268-20130201201123

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-26975268-20130201045831/@comment-26975268-20130201201123 Shambala108 wrote: I agree. I'm assuming you're agreeing to get rid of the empty "Events" sections?

Anyways, as of yet, there are four things I'm implementing on all the articles:


 * 1) As long as an article has at least one in-universe event, I'm adding leads. See my second post and respond to tell me how we should prioritise events.


 * 2) Changing from "{Actor's Name} ({Character's Name} in {Media Type}: {Story Name}) died in {date}" to "{Actor's Name}, who played {Character's Name} in {MT}: {Story Name}, died in {date}." I find unnecessary brackets like that look unprofessional.


 * 3) Changing things about actors births from either of the above two, to "{Actor's Name}, who would play {Character's Name} in {MT}: {Story Name}, was born." They hadn't played the character yet, so it seems wrong to say that they "played" in in past tense.


 * 4) I haven't started yet, but I'm going to start getting rid of empty "Events" section.

I'm now going to restart from January before I continue, since I've added a couple of things to my to-do list on date pages. If anyone has any objections to the above four... things... I'm implementing, please state your objection and why below as soon as possible. If you guys disagree with anything, and give a good reason for it, I'll just undo the "bad" edits. Thanks.