Forum:Charity anthology short stories

Why are we writing articles about stories that appeared in a charity publication, and are, therefore, no better than fan fiction? Isn't one of our sacrosanct rules that the BBC has to have licensed something for us to care about it? Shouldn't we be shunting all this info over to the fanon wiki instead? I'm especially troubled to note that some of these stories are slipping over into firmly real world cats like Fifth Doctor stories. The twain should never meet. Either something is real world or it is non-canonical. I can kind of understand the utility of an article about the charity anthology — you need it there to say that we don't cover it — but we should resolve now to abolish the articles about the individual stories, and refer people to the articles at one of our sister wikis instead. 05:18:35 Mon 28 Feb 2011