User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-27280472-20160606210324/@comment-1432718-20161110040257

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-27280472-20160606210324/@comment-1432718-20161110040257 DENCH-and-PALMER wrote: No logic is applied to the validity of stories Have you completely read through Tardis:Valid sources? Or the dozens of inclusion debates we've had on this wiki? Because the policy is the end result of years of discussion trying to determine what to include on this wiki. Flippant statements do not help your argument.

If you have actual sources (preferably quoting the two people cited in the original forum thread), post it here. References that are not only invalid, but also use the words "apparently", "most likely" and "it is possible", will not be considered in this discussion.