Talk:Fourteenth Doctor

Cowards?
you are cowards
 * For doing what? 22:48, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your inaccurate assessment. May you have a blessed day. —Danniesen ☎  19:14, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

It's not a suit
Its a waistcoat


 * Thanks for pointing it out! I'll correct it now. 23:06, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Is this the 14th Doctor?
Can we really be sure that this is the Fourteenth Doctor? We still don’t know what happened and there was a lot of talk about degenerating in this episode. Tennant might not be the Fourteenth Doctor any more than the Master was. <—-spoiler content was removed. —->. 73.132.191.69talk to me 04:10, 24 October 2022 (UTC)


 * There's a BBC press release/website post that calls him the 14th. If they change it later we'll cross that bridge when we come to it. For now he's the 14th. Najawin ☎  04:16, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh com'on, we all knew it would end up being David. They simply had no other choice considering how low the franchise has fallen over the years. XD--ModestyElyonLane ☎  08:10, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * That's kind of besides the point, ModestyElyonLane.. TheGreatGabester ☎  14:17, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * It’s also wildly inaccurate despite people continuing to cry about it. Danniesen ☎  10:18, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Vortex Butterfly
I'm a little confused; how's the 'Vortex Butterfly' quote relevant? That's referring to the number of possible incarnations, not about 'revisiting' faces. TheGreatGabester ☎  12:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * It refers to the fact that the Doctor will have more than 12 regenerations, so it's become tradition to quote it on the page for every incarnation produced by a regeneration after the Doctor's twelfth. Whether that's a good tradition is another matter. – n8 (☎) 16:03, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Paisley Tie
Appearance section states he is wearing paisley tie but it just isn't.

Current main image
The current main image is from the 60th anniversary preview. I thought images from previews weren't allowed? WaltK ☎  02:41, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * And now it's from the comic? How are images settled upon? Surely a grab from the Centenary special is the most obvious? FractalDoctor ☎  23:17, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Right now, in terms of officially released stories, COMIC: Liberation of the Daleks seems to be the best available image for an infobox. I'm sure it'll become a TV screenshot after the next episode, though. Cookieboy 2005 ☎  23:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't quite understand the logic behind replacing the still with the comic image; why is it the best available image, exactly? Because he's wearing a more neutral expression, or something? I can't think of any other reason not to use a still from the episode. TheGreatGabester ☎  17:24, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I agree. It might be because pictures where the subject is looking left are preferred, but that's by no means a requirement. Jack &#34;BtR&#34; Saxon ☎  17:26, 11 November 2022 (UTC)


 * I suggest you guys read Tardis:Guide to images and Help:Image cheat card; in short, it's a combination of a. the character facing left, b. it being a non-blurry image (the best images we can get from Power unfortunately are cropped in and don't look great resolution-wise), c. a neutral expression (something the Doctor lacks in Power, as y'know, his face is scrunched up in confusion). While usually images are chosen from a character's primary story medium, which usually is television... this isn't yet the case, as the Fourteenth Doctor's only story so far is a comic, and a scene at the end of another Doctor's episode doesn't really count.
 * The page will more than likely use a television screenshot eventually, but from the images available currently, the comic image is superior. In an ideal world we'd use a promotional image, but unfortunately this Wiki has weird policies that no other rational Wikis have, and we can't even change the policies as our policies are currently performing a Catch-22.


 * TL;DR: television ≠ (automatically) best image for an infobox. 17:33, 11 November 2022 (UTC)


 * You needn't make such a suggestion because I've already read it.
 * a) Shambala said at Talk:Dodo Chaplet that looking left is "no big deal".
 * b) File:Fourteenth Doctor.jpg, for example, can hardly be described as "blurry".
 * c) The pictures for the First Doctor or Second Doctor aren't neutral.
 * I'm not saying that the current image is inappropriate, but that an image from the TV series would be no worse than this one. Jack &#34;BtR&#34; Saxon ☎  18:16, 11 November 2022 (UTC)


 * I much prefer the previous image, the one from the television episode. I don't see what was wrong with it? DrWHOCorrieFan ☎  18:26, 11 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Regarding points a. and c., they're exceptions to the rules; but that's just it, they're exceptions. Under some circumstances images of characters facing right are allowed or having non-neautral expressions, yadda yadda, but they are not the standard as laid out by the policies.


 * Justifying a television screenshot just because it's a television screenshot regardless of quality on the basis that "oh but on this page an exception has been made" is counterintuitive. The comic illustration best satisfies the rules, even if we don't agree with them, and we unfortunately need to abide by those rules. 18:53, 11 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Another perspective: you guys are saying "why is the comic illustration better", but can I ask you, why is the television screenshot better? 18:56, 11 November 2022 (UTC)


 * My two cents: there seems to be some confusion over whether this is a requirement/rule that needs to be strictly enforced, or merely a guideline. It would seem important for everyone to be on the same page. (I don't claim to know the answer, I'm a newcomer to the wiki.) TheGreatGabester ☎  19:07, 11 November 2022 (UTC)


 * A screenshot from the television story is by no means required to be the image. Nor is it the best we have. Besides, we don’t usually use post-regeneration images when more options are available. —Danniesen ☎  19:11, 11 November 2022 (UTC)


 * In that case, further protracted and opinionated arguments about which image is better will probably take place. Maybe it makes sense to 'default to' the comic image for now, if it fits the guidelines the best; still, these guidelines seem a bit arbitrary and overly-fussy, if you ask me. TheGreatGabester ☎  19:27, 11 November 2022 (UTC)


 * I think the rule at actual stake here is the "primary medium is preferred" rule that recently vexed us on the matter of Bernice Summerfield. I think at this stage it's fair to argue that comics are the Fourteenth Doctor's "primary medium": it's the only one in which he's yet headlined a story. An image from a story where this Doctor is the main character should prima facie be preferred to one from a story where he only has a short cameo appearance at the very end. Obviously, if ("if") the Fourteenth Doctor were to star in full-length TV stories in the future, a screenshot from these would clearly take precedence over the comic image — but until then? I think it's a fair argument to make. Scrooge MacDuck ⊕ 19:23, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * TheGreatGabester; these guidelines seem a bit arbitrary and overly-fussy, if you ask me... trust us, we know. We’re working on changing that. Unfortunately, for the time being, certain... obstacles... are making it a tough task to deal with. ——Danniesen ☎  00:42, 12 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Hopefully things should open up for change on Monday or Tuesday. The holiday meant no progress on that front was happening today. Najawin ☎  00:50, 12 November 2022 (UTC)


 * I understand; we've been dealing with similar administrative issues over at Stranger Things Wiki recently. TheGreatGabester ☎  21:23, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

First Actor to Play Multiple Numbered Incarnations
Surely it should be pointed out that this is the first instance of an actor playing two mainline numbered incarnations. I feel like that has some significance in that the Fourteenth Doctor is a mainline Nth Doctor in a way the Curators, alternate Doctors and Shalka/Fatal Death aren't. IRegisteredForTimelines ☎  05:19, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
 * This is noteworthy, yes. I have added it to the page in the BTS section. I already added this on List of Doctor Who television stories a good while ago. Danniesen ☎  10:27, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

It's a tweed overcoat, not a trenchcoat.
Looks more as an overcoat of tweed instead of a trenchcoat. I zero know why people mistake it for a trenchcoat.

Corrections to add
There are corrections to add.

The Fourteenth Doctor wore a double-breasted overcoat of navy-blue tweed, not a trenchcoat.

The Fourteenth Doctor's waistcoat and trousers be made of maroon and turquoise tartan, not brown.

The Fourteenth Doctor wore a teal tie in Liberty of the Daleks.

Not Sure About This Line
"The third of the Doctor's 'skinny man' iterations"

The line kinda feels to me to be somewhat vague and unhelpful. In 'skinny man incarnations' is it referring to the Ten, Meta Ten and Fourteen, Ten, Post Journey's End-Ten and Fourteen, or Ten, Eleven and Fourteen, or something else. Cause if Ten, Meta Ten and Fourteen,

If the first, I believe Meta Ten shouldn't really be considered 'An incarnation of the Doctor'. If the second, prior wiki precedent pretty explicitly classes Post JE-Ten and Pre-JE Ten as the same incarnation, which'd make Fourteen the 'second' not 'third', since the regeneration was aborted. And if it's the third, it just seems like a vague and unhelpful descriptor as what distinguishes those three as 'skinny men' over Two or Five or Eight for instance. And if something else, what? IRegisteredForTimelines ☎  08:35, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

It's in reference to the Doctor Who The Official Annual 2024 feature The Strange Case of the Skinny Man, which highlights that the Fourteenth Doctor is the third Doctor in total to have the David Tennant body, after the Tenth Doctor and the Meta-Crisis Doctor, and refers to them all having the "skinny man" body as being unique. BananaClownMan ☎  09:13, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Ah I see, there's a source behind it. That makes more sense as to why its there though I still contest that the wiki itself doesn't consider Meta 10 to be on the same level as the Tenth or Fourteenth Doctors (To the point where he's not even mentioned on the main overview of the Tenth Doctor's page, nor does he appear in the incarnation box among the 'widely accepted' incarnations) so I do think it should still be worth a discussion for the sake of consistency with regards to what degree of significance is attached to the Meta Crisis Doctor in relation to the numbered incarnations.I think at the very least the overview should treat the Fourteenth Doctor's appearence more in the abstract rather than directly quoting said source, acknowledging the point that this is indeed the third product of a regeneration to possess the Tennant face but distinguishing between the Meta-Crisis Doctor and the Tenth Doctor proper. IRegisteredForTimelines ☎  10:15, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Conflicting opinions
Okay, so me and @BananaClownMan have been reverting each other's edits for a short while now, and to not risk an edit war, I'm taking it to the talk page. Not for the first time.


 * 1) First of all, @BananaClownMan has added instances of where the Thirteenth Doctor has considered and/or risked regenerating. I don't feel these should be here because they're not references to the Fourteenth Doctor, just the potential of regeneration. Furthermore, as it is pretty clear the Fourteenth Doctor is not a typical regeneration given the stuff going on with his clothes, he couldn't have been anticipated so it means these references are all the more tenuous.
 * 2) Secondly, I disagree with the section about The Power of the Doctor, as not only is it a bit over-detailed for something that doesn't even feature this incarnation of the Doctor (and using  to link to The Master's Dalek Plan/Thirteenth Doctor's regeneration is more elegant as it allows for lots of detail on those pages) I feel the way it's written veers too close to "Master-Doctor" territory.
 * 3) Thirdly, the way BCM phrased the section about A Letter from the Doctor isn't in-keeping with T:VS as it mentions concepts such as "First Doctor's renewal" with those exact words, which weren't used in the story itself.
 * 4) Fourth, he's removed my expanded section on Under Control because it "uses too many semi-colons". It doesn't, that's how you phrase multi-clause sentences in a list.  22:54, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Got to admit, it's a little hard not to take that opening a little personally, especially with a previous discission brought up, and with the time taking to hyperlink and scrub over it. It does come across as unneeded sarcasm, and a little hostile at a gut reaction. But, with that out the way, explanation time

1) Every Doctor currently has such moments listed on their pages under "A day to come" because regenerating would result in the next incarnation. However, I do see the potential for irrelevance. In fact, I've thinking about dividing the information since the Doctor's regenerations were given their own event pages; moments of potential regeneration going on the regeneration pages, while balant examplrs of future incarnations remaining on the Doctors' pages. For example, all the hints to the Tenth Doctor's regeneration throughout the 2009 specials going on the regeneration page, but him meeting the Eleventh Doctor while dreaming in COMIC: To Sleep, Perchance to Scream staying on the Eleventh Doctor page.

1.5) I still don't know what you mean by this, as the Fourteenth Doctor is, by all accounts, an incarnation true. Not only do we see him emerge from the Thirteenth Doctor's regeneration, but Russell T Davies himself as confirmed him to be the fourteenth incarnation, as opposed to the Tenth Doctor revisited.

2) I have no idea what this "Doctor-Master" is, but the version I am advocating just covers what happened, how it happened, why it happened and how it got undone. And all those just go over how the Master forced himself into being the incarnation succeeded the Thirteenth Doctor, thus hijacking the fourteenth incarnation for himself for a few hours. The version you currently advocate cuts out the Spy Master for the generic term "the Master", includes the Daleks and Cybermen despite their small role in the overall event, and absconds the details in how the process was reversed.

3) I believe we covered this previously with regards to the Toymaker in GAME: . Though I am reminded that I still need to participate my thoughts on your forum about this. After all, are we, as an encyclopaedia website, a place people come to research information, to skirt away naming something because the source material, though highly implies it, does not name it outwrite, even when we know what is being referenced?

4) I'll admit, that was a bit of an abbreviation. Though the structure could have worked with regular commas just a well and some information cut for space, I didn't have time to rewrite it as I had to leave for my bus to work, and just put "To many semicolons" because I lacked time to go into detail, but I didn't want to leave it blank, as that felt rude to do.

I hope you find these explanations satisfactory. Sincerely, BananaClownMan ☎  10:22, 26 November 2023 (UTC)