Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20170115234322/@comment-1272640-20170121234620

AeD wrote: It having been meant as part one of two when part two never happened is not reflective of the final product, and seems irrelevant to me, but yeah, the AHistory thing -- Parkin including his own book in how he views the DWU -- kinda pushes it over the edge, dunnit? Exactly. It's hard to argue that authorial intent was that TID was an alternate universe when said author is making it clear TID is in the main universe - i.e. the opposite of what the original decision is asserting.