Talk:The mighty 200

I do not think this page sahould be deleted it was a poll conducted in doctor who magizine and therefor seeing as this wiki is dedicated to all things doctor who I think it whould stay. If it is deleted then I will make another one and if that version is deleted then I will make another do I make myself clear. --Catkind121 14:47, December 7, 2009 (UTC)


 * How is this page any more special or relevant than the numerous other polls that DWM have run? Or indeed any more/less special than any of the other articles that DWM creates?
 * Additionally I might note that this is not the first time this article has been created, The Mighty 200, Doctor Who Magazine: The Mighty 200, The Mighty 200 (2) all of which were created around September, and deleted. This wiki is an encyclopaedia of Doctor Who yes, however 'The Mighty 200' was a reader poll of Doctor Who, the opinions/votes are from the readers of Doctor Who Magazine, the awards were given by what the readers have voted on. Which means the poll is the reader's views on Doctor Who rather than being about Doctor Who. --Tangerineduel 15:14, December 7, 2009 (UTC)

I belive this is a Doctor who wiki, and therefore since this covers Doctor Who and Doctor Who Mercandising, then I belive that it should stay. JM 18:13, December 7, 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes, this wiki does cover merchandising. But the poll isn't merchandise. The Doctor Who Magazine is the merchandise. The poll is a section within the magazine.
 * How is this article doing anything more than re-publishing what's in the magazine? Or servicing information?
 * What about the DWM Issue 79 - Season Poll, DWM Issue 169 - Annual Poll, DWM Issue 176 - DWM Poll and DWM Issue 332 - DVD Poll? Plus the numerous other polls that are within the DWM issues that don't currently have articles. --Tangerineduel 03:23, December 8, 2009 (UTC)

This should stay as it still covers Doctor Who, those other polls can be as they are linked with Doctor Who. I think as this is linked with the episodes, and 200 episodes was a landmark celebrated, I feel that the artical should stay.JM 17:42, December 8, 2009 (UTC)