Howling:Breaking the Fourth Wall

In the show's history the fourth wall has been broken a few times in clever ways.


 * The Dalek's Master Plan - The First Doctor wishes the audience a happy christmas.
 * Rememberance of the Daleks - Ace hears someone talking about a new sci-fi program on the TV in England, 1963.
 * Blink - The Angels never move even if the audience are the only people who can see them.
 * The Wedding of River Song - DOCTOR WHO? DOCTOR WHO? DOCTOR WHO?

I'm just wondering are there other episodes of DW, TSJA or TW notable for breaking the fourth wall? 87.102.117.106talk to me 18:36, January 6, 2012 (UTC)

The Daleks' Master Plan is a definite breach of the 4th wall, since the Doctor addresses the audience directly. The others are arguable.

In Remembrance of the Daleks, we don't (quite) get to hear the name of the programme. It's self-referential but doesn't really breach the 4th wall.

In Blink, not seeing the Angels move is really just giving the audience the same point of view as the characters and that's not breaking the 4th wall.

The Wedding of River Song is again self-referential but no more.

As far as I can recall, The Daleks' Master Plan is the only unambiguous breach in the show's history. --78.146.183.1talk to me 22:53, January 6, 2012 (UTC)

I'll accept your argument for ROTD and TWORS but "Blink" I like to think breaks the fourth wall. In one scene a woman is looking through a crack in a door. An Angel from the garden comes up behind her and... stops. Why? Why not get on with it and zap her into the past? Nobody was watching it. Or were they? 87.102.117.106talk to me 00:07, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

That's a reasonable question. The trouble with trying to answer it is that we don't know enough about who or what needs to be observing an Angel to stop it. If it was limited to intelligent beings, that would raise the question: How intelligent? As a defense mechanism, which is what the quantum lock is, it wouldn't be much use if any old predator could gobble up an Angel, as long as the predator was dim-witted enough. Conversely, if being observed by any organism capable of observing was enough to stop an Angel, they'd hardly ever get the chance to move. In the case you cite, I could speculate that maybe a stray cat happened to glance at the Angel. For all we know, that might do it -- but it's not a very satisfactory explanation. I don't think it qualifies as "breaking the 4th wall" but it is a hole in the plot. --78.146.183.1talk to me 00:46, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

i also saw a 4th doctor episode not so long ago where the 4th doctor seems to be breaking the 4th wall right after stepping out of the tardis, although it could have just been a soliloque (sp?). i can't remember which episode it was, but i know for certain it was in season 15 or earlier as i have not seen later episodes yet. Imamadmad talk to me 02:16, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

Info: "soliloquy". Episode description rings no immediate bells. Can you remember which companion(s) and/or monster(s)? A soliloquy is quite likely -- the 4th Doctor especially had a habit of talking to himself, even if there were others present. Other incarnations have done the same but not usually as much. --89.241.73.88talk to me 05:11, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

it's in face of evil, episode one around the 3:30 mark on this copy if you would like to take a look http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7z738_the-face-of-evil-part1_shortfilms Imamadmad talk to me 06:58, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

Got it. He's definitely talking to himself but facing the camera. "A little look round, Doctor? Why not." It's not the audience he's addressing. His tendency to talk to himself is probably aggravated by not, at this point, having a companion. --89.241.73.88talk to me 07:58, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

The TWORS thing does come kind of close to breaking the fourth wall. The basic description of the question "the oldest question in the universe, hidden in plain sight," doesn't really make sense from an in-universe point of view, but in real life it obviously makes sense because it is the title and has been for the entirety of the show. Still, I'd say that that is really just being self-referential and not actually breaking the fourth wall.Icecreamdif talk to me 09:49, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

Imamadmad just reminded me - on the Dailymotion version of the "Terror of the Zygons" there is a scene before the episode starts to play where the Doctor steps out of the TARDIS with a message from the Brigadier, and talks to the audience. However I wouldn't say that's part of the episode - that's Tom Baker telling us about the episode. "Attack of the Graske" breaks the fourth wall, but no matter what anyone says I will never regard that as canon. 87.102.117.106talk to me 10:52, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

Now I think about it I probably wouldn't regard the part in TDMP where the First Doctor talks to the camera as canon. After all, it's William Hartnell wishing the audience a Happy Christmas, not the Doctor. 87.102.117.106talk to me 17:16, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

Maybe it was but it annoyed me when I saw it (aged 12). I thought then and still think now that they shouldn't have done that. It did have the effect of breaking the 4th wall, whether it was the Doctor or Hartnell speaking. --89.241.75.207talk to me 17:43, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

If it really annoys you, 89, just imagine that one clip is in the exact same realm as Doctor Who confidential. In fact, just imagine it like this clip http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/dw/videos/p00mffw3 but incorporated into an episode, because there was no other media formats back then. 87.102.117.106talk to me 18:04, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

If it had been stuck on at the end, after the close of the episode proper, that would have been OK. It would have been the same as, in a theatre, the lead actor appearing in front of the curtain, after it was down, to wish the audience a Merry Christmas. The point is the curtain having come down first. I suspect the makers of the show realised it had been a mistake. They never did anything like it again. --89.242.67.48talk to me 00:27, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

Wasn't it Hartnell's decision anyway? 87.102.117.106talk to me 10:43, January 8, 2012 (UTC)