User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161223201024/@comment-1350697-20170117222703

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161223201024/@comment-1350697-20170117222703 I think after all the dissecting that's gone on re: the Shalka Doctor's "number," the most that we could possibly acknowledge on his article is that he's clearly meant to be a post-McGann one. Anything above that is what Wikipedia would call "original research."