Board Thread:The Panopticon/@comment-1827503-20141023232658/@comment-183721-20151005122919

Mewiet wrote: Yes, assumed, when we should be basing it on facts. If there is credible evidence that says they are a two-parter, then we need a citation for it, not your assumption. My assumption? How about this wiki's assumption? I'm following the wiki's lead here, mind you.