Board Thread:The Panopticon/@comment-26975268-20130201045831/@comment-26975268-20130206150235

Certainly not "non-valid." Possibly "non-canonical" or something along those lines. Hmmm...

Actually, I have an idea: Since we're splitting the pages, the real-world pages only include real-world information. So I suppose we can still have a behind-the-scenes section of the in-universe information, where we have information not considered part of the DWU by us. For example, we can include dated information from the Brilliant Book 2012. Obviously, we're not there yet. But I just wanted to put the idea out there in advance so you can think about it.