Howling:Do you think that the DW folks read this wiki?

I was reading an article and I believe it was an actor (can't recall who) who stated that to find out background about his character, he spent a lot of time reading "the Doctor Who wiki". Are there other ones besides this one?

If individuals involved with the production of DW did consult this wiki as a resource (a Doctor Who Bible, as it were), I can see why there is such a singular focus here on accuracy of past storylines, characters, etc. within the Doctor Who Universe and the deemphasis on conversation, discussion, etc.

Is it known whether this wiki is regularly consulted to fill in details for writers, production crew and the like? I don't know whether they would register or lurk, anonymously. I was just curious if this subject has come up. Badwolff ☎  20:13, June 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * For some time now I've thought Moffat reads this site, specifically the Howling, to see what we think is going to happen, then mucks it up in ways we not only didn't expect, but don't know how to integrate into the wiki. Shambala108 ☎  21:10, June 2, 2013 (UTC)


 * We know someone at Big Finish Productions reads the wiki, since they mocked a misspelling on the Big Finish Podcast page. -<Azes13 ☎  21:22, June 2, 2013 (UTC)


 * Shambala108, "I've thought Moffat reads this site ... then mucks it up in ways we not only didn't expect, but don't know how to integrate into the wiki": I wouldn't put it past him! The man's as twisted as a 12-dimensional corkscrew & it shows in his plots. --89.241.77.88talk to me 21:40, June 2, 2013 (UTC)


 * This is kind of what I was expecting. Of course though, I doubt they'd take the time to register and edit. It would purely for research ("which episode did X happen in?"). So, unless it's mentioned in an interview, like I came across, we'd have no way of knowing. I guess I was wondering if there was another DW wiki.


 * @89, honestly, this is what I love about Moffat. He's unpredictable but usually provides enough information through exposition so it doesn't seem like a plot development just comes out of thin air. Personally, I like not knowing what he is going to come up with as a story arc for Series 8 instead of just having more and more encounters with Daleks and the like. Monster of the week episodes can be entertaining but what causes me to watch and rewatch episodes is trying to figure out how the puzzle pieces fit together, especially looking for clues in early episodes for events that happen later. I don't really need to see The Doctor beat the Daleks in yet another match-up. That's like comfort food and familiar....but it's not enough to sustain a season-long arc. Badwolff ☎  21:50, June 2, 2013 (UTC)


 * When I said Moffat's "as twisted as a 12-dimensional corkscrew", it wasn't a complaint, just an observation. Not a difficult one, either. --89.241.77.88talk to me 22:04, June 2, 2013 (UTC)


 * I was going to say that "monster of the week" episodes can be good & so can "puzzle of the week" episodes. And they can be combined, which sometimes leads to the best & most memorable stories. For some reason -- perhaps my own twisted mind -- it then occurred to me to wonder what Ghost Light would have been like, if done by Moffat. It's notoriously one of the most obscure of the classic series stories, although I don't think it was as baffling as it's often said to be. But what if Moffat had got his hands on it? --89.241.77.88talk to me 22:18, June 2, 2013 (UTC)


 * @89, I've seen a lot of references to that particular storyline, can't remember the context but I'll read over the episode entry on this wiki. To be honest, the only Classic episodes I've seen have been incorporated with The Doctors Revisted series on BBCAmerica. They just weren't aired where I lived growing up. Maybe BBCA will choose this story to present in September when they cover the Seventh Doctor. Badwolff ☎  20:55, June 3, 2013 (UTC)