User talk:Dark Lord Xander

MA?
The general known consensus among...well everything gives the prefix for the Virgin Missing Adventures as MA and NA for the Virgin New Adventures. It seems a little odd to create another. (Especially when MA has been used both in press like DWM and in other web publications). --Tangerineduel 12:58, 13 July 2008 (UTC)


 * That's fine. There's a list of abbreviations at Tardis:List of prefixes (it's also top of the list in the Category:Abbreviations category). It's got (I think) all the abbreviations used for this wiki on the list of prefixes page. (Also useful to prior to creating pages check out the 'What links here' link). --Tangerineduel 13:07, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

wat ?
im sorry but wat do you meen. Does my contributions link not work ? its works for me ! um .. as u can see im confused. How do i fix this madnesss ? nice page by the way !Quark16 13:27, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

id like u 2 fix it if it not to much trouble ?Quark16 15:00, 14 July 2008

Original Series
thanks just wondering im a classic series fan and lik it better tan the new series but if your trying to introduce a fan of the new series to the classic series wat story would u recomend. Somthing short maybye ? Robots of death ? wat waz ur first classic story ? wat would be a gud classic story to watch is you have only seen bout 2 or 4 new series storys. Thanks hope im not bothering u ! Quark16 15:21, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

thanks if been trying to introduce a few users here 2 the classic series. Just wanted ur oppinion. btw ive seen all thoose stories very good. Ever think bout using the talk box widget ?Quark16 15:27, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: About Template
Sorry, I couldn't find any other template for disambiguating articles with simmilar names (ie The Rani and Rani Chandra). Wasn't sure exactly how that's done here; is there another template? Or would you just put the whole formatting in the article? - Khlieeq 08:40, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Wasn't sure before, although should the disambiguation page be created on "Rani" (which currently redirects to "The Rani"), or a new page — "Rani (disambiguation)"? -Khlieeq 09:01, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I took the assumption that it should be just "Rani" as the disambiguation, as per Cyberman and Martha. -Khlieeq 09:10, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Fannon
I apologies for the "vandalism"; do you know of a place where Doctor Who Fannon can be placed freely? I'd appreciate your help.

--79.74.21.139 16:52, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

BF project
I am happy to lend a hand even though I am unable to get my hands on any BF audio stuff due to where I live. I may order some of Play.com :) --Skittles the hog 19:39, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Userpage Code
Also wanted to say your very clever at using that wiki code, I dont understand it so I hope you dont mind that I borrowed the basic code for you to do list. Sorry--Skittles the hog 19:44, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Featured article
Cheers, you seem to have just suddenly appeared on this wiki and become a part of everything lol.--Skittles the hog 14:57, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

IDW
I'll put it on my to-do list, certainly. It might take me awhile as I'm entering into a fairly busy week. 23skidoo 06:54, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Signing
It WAS my brother using my account. Im not a cheat.--Skittles the hog 13:31, 26 July 2008 (UTC) Ive resinged it for him, also the sontaran gallery was created by me and is a good feature on the page and is not messy.--Skittles the hog 13:34, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

I was jus telling you how you were wrong. You are entitled to your opinion.--Skittles the hog 17:36, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Its ok, you know now that it will be him sighning if i put his name so he maze well use my account.--Skittles the hog 12:06, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

"Going overboard"
All I'm doing by flagging these battle/event pages is to try to create debate. Logic demands that if the page for the battle in Revelation now has wide support for deletetion, many of the rest need to be culled as well. As for them being "vital" to the wiki, a quick look at their "What links here" pages puts paid to that argument. Most are basically stale pages, just like the Skirmish at Tranquil Repose page. I mean, c'mon, "Battle on the Dalek Saucer"? What the heck is that?  Czech Out  ☎ | ✍  17:17, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Talk pages
For me (as I can't say for others) most of the stuff that ends up on my talk page I deal with and then it's done. If I ever need to refer back to things I usually through the history of my talk page. --Tangerineduel 13:05, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Strike
It should be deletyed as it affects the number of Votes counted by the # --Skittles the hog 09:03, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Clever, dont you hink your a bit bossy by the way as you seem to have taken charge of everything so everything I do you insult me for!--Skittles the hog 10:13, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Sorry if I offended you, thenaks for apolagizing, it wasnt a specific thing you said but rather how you kept going against my ideas but its okay now You've explained that thats just your ideas. I do much the same. Thanks--Skittles the hog 10:05, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Species Stubs
Could you go here: Category:Species Stub and see if you know anything about any of the stubs there. If so could you add information and then delete the stub template as im trying to remove all species stubs. This would be a great help :)--Skittles the hog 10:56, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

What sort of assignments? Im bored, can I help?--Skittles the hog 10:59, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Oh I thought you meant on the wiki, im an idiot. Good luck, im off to finish those stubs! Thanks anyway--Skittles the hog 11:04, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Time's Champion

 * sure, I'll explain. Craig Hinton and Chris McKeon worked on a fan novel together entitled Time's Champion. digressions to go over arguments justifying fan theories which reference fan fiction (digressions to justify personal views of continuity, full stop, actually) don't really belong here and most especially not in in-universe sections. I feel a bit cruel deleting these sections when I suspect that Chris McKeon (or at least one of his friends) added these sections. at the very least, though, they don't belong in the main (in-universe) section of the articles.


 * next time I delete a large chunk from any article I will, in future, explain why I did so.

--Stardizzy2 18:28, 16 August 2008 (UTC)