Howling:River pretending not to know Clara?

This is my first time posting one of these, so let's see if I can get my thoughts out right. Also, I have to say I'm a big River Song fan, so I might just be keeping my hopes up that she'll return!

Did anyone else find it strange that River Song seemed not to know Clara when they were introduced? This is the River who, having died, apparently knows all she'll ever know about the Doctor, but seems like she's never seen or heard of Clara. But after Clara is in the Doctor's time stream, she says "Spoilers", hinting that she knows who Clara is to the Doctor, and what's going to happen. She also seems to be familiar with the Doctor going to Trenzalore. I just feel like there's more going on here than meets the eye, especially since all of these characters have a propensity to lie. [Unsigned but appears to be Rhoslynn 08:29, May 20, 2013 (UTC)]

River certainly does lie (& pretend -- quite convincingly) in order to avoid "spoilers", so it's entirely possible she's doing it again.

River died in the first story we saw her in Silence in the Library/Forest of the Dead, so the fact that The Name of the Doctor was later in her timestream than that (meaning she's dead, except on CAL's hard drive) needn't prevent her appearing again -- alive.

We still don't know who was the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS phone number, thereby getting her to Trenzalore to save the day (rather a lot of days, in fact). River has always seemed to me the most likely suspect. Clara's failure to recognise River doesn't mean much. At the point when Clara met the "woman in the shop", she'd not be likely to pay that much attention to what the woman looked like, so even a fairly thin disguise would have been enough. (It's generally only after they've travelled with the Doctor for a while that companions become properly alert for signs that things aren't what they seem to be.) Clara having that phone number was utterly vital & there aren't many people who'd have known it & been able to give it to her. If it wasn't River, it was still someone important to the events & we don't know who.

"I just feel like there's more going on here than meets the eye": I reckon that's as safe a bet as you'll ever find! --89.242.72.3talk to me 10:32, May 20, 2013 (UTC)

i always thought that the woman in the shop was clara herself but one of her incarnations or a future one who geve herself the number to set up her meeting the doctor.....but yes i think river will be back she knew why trenzalore was so terrible for the doctor when nobody else did (as it is his biggest secret after all) even to the point of her reaction was of shock and fear where as her reaction to soon be going to the pandorica before was pretty relaxed even though in both situation the universe was going to die........she knows what the secret means to the doctor even if she doesnt know what it is exactly (which she might) she will be back

rule number 2: river always knows more than she is letting on 87.83.10.218talk to me 10:54, May 23, 2013 (UTC)

87, "i always thought that the woman in the shop was clara herself": That thought did occur to me but the big problem with it is that all Clara's incarnations look like Clara & we know that Clara can recognise herself. Of course, a much older Clara is a possibility & it wouldn't need to be one of her other selves. It could be the original Clara at a greater age. Alternatively, it could be a Clara in some kind of disguise.

My own main suspect for the "woman in the shop" is still River. Like the creator of this discussion (presumably Rhoslynn), I simply don't believe that River didn't already know Clara. River is good at that sort of pretending. She has to be. An outstanding example is in The Time of Angels, when River pretends she's never met Amy before. Amy is her mother but, thanks to time travel, she grew up with Amy in Leadworth, she helped to get Amy & Rory together as a couple, Amy was there when she regenerated into her River incarnation & so on. If she could pretend so convincingly that she didn't know Amy, pretending that she didn't know Clara would be a stroll in the park.

Clara didn't seem to know River, either, of course, & that probably was genuine. It doesn't rule out River as the "woman in the shop". A disguise is possible &, at the stage where she met the "woman in the shop", Clara hadn't started travelling with the Doctor, so she hadn't developed the alertness to things not being quite what they seem that tends to go with being a companion. --2.96.17.223talk to me 12:43, May 23, 2013 (UTC)

As an afterthought: Since we don't know yet if Clara will become as good at pretending as River is, it's still possible that she could become good enough at it to get away with being her own "woman in the shop". That would mean that Clara the companion set her younger self up to become a companion. Yet another bootstrap paradox -- something of which Moffat is especially fond! --2.96.17.223talk to me 12:50, May 23, 2013 (UTC)


 * Clara was rather ignorant of all things tech at the time and seemed to ask anyone and everyone for guidance. Just because she was the one who mentioned the woman in the shop it doesn't follow that she met that woman herself.DCT ☎  15:39, May 23, 2013 (UTC)

When the Doctor asked Clara how she'd got the TARDIS number, she not only told him she'd got it from the woman, she also quoted the woman about how good the supposed helpline was: "'the best ... in the universe,' she said," was what Clara told him. That means she at least had a conversation with the woman. Furthermore, Clara described her as "the woman in the shop", not "the woman on the phone" or whatever. It'd be a thoroughly unnatural way of speaking for Clara to say what she did unless she had met the woman & had met her in the shop. The dialogue doesn't leave any real room for another interpretation.

Clara did ask people for guidance about "things tech". That's probably why she asked the woman in the shop for a helpline number, to begin with. --89.240.243.203talk to me 20:45, May 23, 2013 (UTC)


 * Just so glad to see this discussion! Had to make a few small editing changes because some viewers are under the impression because this River Song was dead, that this was her last encounter with The Doctor and we would see her no more. This might be their last encounter in HER timestream (or it may not!) but since The Doctor and her live their lives out of sequence, I both hope and expect to see a live River Song in future episodes. If they are living their lives in reverse order, as she has stated, it's unlikely that their last encounter would be the last for both of them.


 * The only question I have is, like you, I wonder why she would pretend not to know Clara. I know that, like The Doctor, River lies but she seemed genuinely ignorant of who Clara was. But, I figure, since she seemed played dumb with both Amy and Rory when she met both of them despite (TV: Let's Kill Hitler), this isn't unprecedented. Badwolff ☎  21:03, May 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * Badwolff: I can't be sure of this (not with Moffat doing the writing I can't) but I have my suspicions that River pretending not to know Clara is connected with her "Spoilers!" line, just before she fades out. In particular, I think she knows something about Clara's future & she not only wants to avoid letting Clara know what it is but also wants to avoid Clara even suspecting that River could know something about her. In contrast, although River wouldn't tell the Doctor what it is she knows, she didn't seem to mind him realising that she does know something. As you say, with Clara, River did seem genuinely ignorant of Clara. With the Doctor, when Clara was absent, she didn't give such a convincing impression of ignorance. At least, that's how I saw it. --89.241.67.98talk to me 22:27, May 24, 2013 (UTC)

River has pretended not to konw people before...and if this is the River who is saved in the data core of the library, she likely knows about Clara already. I guess we'll just have to wait and see for sure. I would venture it is not only possible, but likely. Whosethebestwho ☎  05:03, May 25, 2013 (UTC)