Board Thread:Help!/@comment-15755849-20131229214328/@comment-188432-20131230021713

An additional level of moderation is simply not practicable. We're just not big enough. I know of no other Wikia wiki who has such a thing. When admin are chosen, they get the gig in in good faith. They become admin because we believe they're right for the job. I have never seen any admin on this wiki, in the entire near-decade of our existence, who has abused his or her powers.

That doesn't mean admin don't make mistakes. But I've never seen anyone here abuse the faith placed in them. And it's only abuse that would warrant a review of their position.

So even if we could, we're certainly not going to be holding some kind of admin tribunals every time an admin reverts your work. Nor are we going to waste the time of other editors using the forums to review your work.

This issue affects only you. It does not involve "the public". I'm happy to undertake one review of your recent work so that you'll better understand our ways. But — it's your talk page or nothing.'

The Panopticon is for issues that affect the whole wiki. It is not a place for people to air their individual grievances in the guise of "public spiritedness" or "concern for the community".

You're mad cause your stuff got reverted. This is a wiki. It happens. You're warned it will happen every single time you submit an edit. So when it happens, try to find out why it happened. Learn from it. Ask the specific person involved why they reverted you. You'll end up being a better editor for it.