User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-30970988-20170118180633/@comment-82.3.146.201-20170123194310

NateBumber wrote: 82.3.146.201 wrote: Natebumber's post seems to have vanished, good job I quoted it... otherwise it would have been lost forever.

Must be a glitch. Never mind. I removed it because I decided I actually wouldn't settle for covering it as invalid. Ah right.

Based that Dan has said that MOC is in the DWU and DCTT isn't.

That's problem over, that's sorted. MOC is valid.

However we do have some that are "against" for reasons currently unknown to us. It'd be great if they were shared.