User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Drax Cave/@comment-7302713-20130424002107/@comment-7302713-20130426013012

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Drax Cave/@comment-7302713-20130424002107/@comment-7302713-20130426013012 Got it. Went back and fixed the one page you didn't get (thank you btw).

Interesting...and really explains the whole articles needing citation category disappearing and reappearing without my doing anything. But when I look at the histories of these pages, the century and decade category aren't there until readded. What I'm saying is that the articles needing citation category is only missing visually, it comes back without any provocation and is never missing when looking at the source. But the century and decade categories didn't reappear with the article needing citation category and look missing in the source as well. Are you saying that even though they manifest differently they are both products of the same "technically interesting" quirk? Because if so, then that is really, really interesting. They should both function the same way, right? Categories on a page because of a template? What's almost as weird is that while I was editing my brain interpreted them differently. I remembered that the needing citation tag was tied to the template but somehow forgot that the years categories were. Though while it's possible my brain perceived this because of how missing categories came back, I don't think it's possible that they came back differently because I perceived them to be different.

Wouldn't it be easier per Game of Rassilon to add the years category through the template instead of manually, or is there some reason we don't do this?