User talk:The Thirteenth Doctor

Images
One of the first things I usually do is check the Special:UncategorizedFiles page which is generally where a majority of images that new users upload end up (as regular editors tag images correctly). Thanks. --Tangerineduel 14:28, August 24, 2010 (UTC)

The War of Art
I deleted the section, as it is not in the Manual of style for the Prose layout. You best bet is to drag it up form the pages history and add what was there to the discontinuity page for it the the discontinuity section in the Howling, or add it to the talk page. It just keep all pages consistent and it look better if they are than having different section, (and in this case section in some pages and not in others). Mini-mitch 21:04, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * A section for it in the discontinuity section would be good, but it will take time as pages will need to be made for every book. It could be the case that it goes into the discontinuity section, and we make the pages for the books as we need them? Mini-mitch 16:51, August 25, 2010 (UTC)

Planet of the Spiders
Hi

I undid it because i was trying to find somwhere to watch it for ages and then i seen it on history so i undid and now i'm on part 2 where sarah-janes in the car with captian yates

see ya

Lewody1 10:51 26 * 2010

Planet of the Spiders
soz but i'm sure lots more people want to watch now its not on dvd

see ya

IP editors
Not really, a Wiki is built on all its editors, I can (and will) go through the Adventure Games articles and create-protect all articles that are red-linked which will prevent IP editors.

If you find any recently created articles that have been IP created that you believe are too badly written to make useful mark them for delete, they'll likely be deleted and then created at some later date by editors more fluent with the wiki and its use. --Tangerineduel 14:46, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

nothing
I took your advice, but its been roughly the equivilent of a month and still nothing, would youtell me what I'm doing wrong please. General MGD 109

Yes I have
Wait a minute, I have placed a copy in a form page in where you said, and I have asked what's wrong with it, but no one has given me a reply.

Sarah Jane series 4
Do you approve of my edit on the Series 4 of the Sarah Jane Adventures page about the teaser clip?Ghastly9090 16:32, September 4, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry-
What have I done this time?

~ThePandoricaOpens666 BST 22:09 5th September 2010

My edit to The Doctor.

The Nightmare Man
Hy I have something you might like hope you can find use for it I apologize i just thought you could use it, because i'm no good a editing--Jackr12 16:13, September 7, 2010 (UTC) Glad I could Help--Jackr12 16:18, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Torchwood wikia
I've left a message for Trikster87 on their talk page over at the Torchwood Wikia with information about how to export/import. Some of the pages like Gwen Cooper have been blanked (though the page history remains). So we shall wait and see if they comply or not, if not we'll need to request the pages be removed by the wikia staff. --Tangerineduel 14:02, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Infobox
Hi. How do you put stuff in a Infobox that has just been made? Ghastly9090 15:47, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

The Dark Hoard
I am sorry I was completly unaware that I had deleted the preposed deletion I have not edited the site that often so am not aware of any of this.

its not my personal thought!
its not my personal thuoughts is it though because she does die you watch forest of the dead again

oh yeah why do think waht i call editing is vandilsing you've said that alot

BYE

User:Lewody1

PS:A good idea of a wiki is wikisimpsons you could probaly learn alot from there its good because it can include characters lst look heres an example

how is that true
how is that true because i remeber you created all series 5 episodes like 4 moths befire it came out cause i like to look at the history of them like 1 year before it came out with all those rumors that werent true

sorry i can't talk to you any more cause mr smith is on the 1 show

Please Check With a Reliable Source Before Putting Down Assumptions
In one of your recent edits, you restored a production error in the episode Vincent and the Doctor regarding the usage of the term "solar system". However, the claim that there is only one solar system is largely unsupported by most academic sources. The term "solar system", though derived from Sol, does not necessarily imply the stellar system with the Sun. In World Book at NASA, the term is used to describe any stellar system (http://www.nasa.gov/worldbook/solarsystem_worldbook_update.html). This practice is largely adopted by many academic researchers, e.g. Artymowicz's article "Beta Pictoris and Other Solar Systems" in the Space Science Reviews, Boss' "Looking for earths : the race to find new solar systems", Taber's "Life in other solar systems", Wilbur K. Brown's "Possible mass distributions in the nebulae of other solar systems" from Earth, Moon, and Planets Volume 37, Number 3. I am quite perplexed as to why you would make such an assumption only based on the etymology of the term. I am certain that some people may choose to use the term to describe exclusively the Solar System, but to claim that using the term "solar system" in way consistent with academic and technical usage as an production error based on your personal belief is largely unjustified, please avoid similar edits. --222.166.181.131 19:23, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Please do not make edits on subjects in which you don't understand. The term "solar system" has always been used in the sense of describing any stellar system. The terms "planetary system" and "stellar system" used in this sense are quite recent inventions to avoid the ambiguity posed by the word "solar". It would be most inaccurate to say that "solar system" is a colloquial way of referring to a stellar system. Your respond on the talk page of Vincent and the Doctor suggests that you checked with Wikipedia because you are not knowledgeable in the subject. After a brief glimpse, I find the article you refered to as "solar system" is an entry on "the Solar System"; the source in the footnote for the definition of "solar system" on that specific wikipedia article is Merriam-Webster's 11th Collegiate Dictionary, which if you click on it, will direct you to a page that says:
 * solar system


 * noun
 * Definition of SOLAR SYSTEM


 * : the sun together with the group of celestial bodies that are held by its attraction and revolve around it; also : a similar system centered on another star

The article makes itself quite clear that it's referring to the Solar System. I am quite confused as to why you would edit something when you acknowledge that you really know what it is. When you make any edit, please make sure you have a clear understanding of the subject concerned and the edit would not be based on anecdotal knowledge or assumptions. Thank you.--203.168.176.42 23:08, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

information before "unstubbing"
Hi Thirteenth Doctor you seem reliable so im going to ask how much information is needed before the stub is gone. Please tell me and do NOT chastise me for asking a stupid question. DalekVictor554 07:58, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

howd u find that out

=)
You've been busy haven't you?

Reply
Sorry then, I did it by accident, I thought I was on your talk page, dont know what went wrong. Come on, do your really want articles to look dull? Images add colour to the article and capture peoples attention.

User pages and redlinks
I've made an edit to the user's user page by adding   tags around all of the templates it preserves the page's layout for the most part while preventing the templates from becoming templates.

If you find any others like this you can do as I've done, but given the level of change to the user's user page leave a note indicating what you've done and why you've done it. Thanks. --Tangerineduel 18:16, September 13, 2010 (UTC)

Questions and Comments
Honestly some of the people on here, everything has to be done to an exact way, you lot are like Terminators or Cybermen or Daleks.

If editing someones user page is considered vandalism how comes you can edit their page in the first place?

Completely devoid of emotion or desire. Ive added the pictures again but THIS TIME ive added better detail and I think now they add stuff to the article. Is this OK?

Well. Seems OK I suppost, I did'nt mean to offend anyone, but sometimes it does seem like this wiki is run by people who dont even like Doctor Who, you and other users seem to be, not saying this is true but, you all seem to be like machines, who need Doctor Who as fuel, and your mission is to create a detailed encyclopedia of it and making it as boring and uninteresting as possibly, as well as picking on users you dont like. But you're probably not like that at all so I wont say it again.