User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1827503-20141023232658/@comment-1827503-20151028052209

OttselSpy25 wrote: So, what I can tell so far is...

1) If the discussion did set the precedent, it was for 'To Be Continued' and not for 'The Doctor will return in...'

2) If the discussion did set the precedent, it is still open for change and discussion as it has not been talked about for five years

3) The discussion did not any precedents. That's the big one here. The discussion did not set any precedents. It was an officially unresolved discussion based on a flawed standpoint, as the original discrepancy was probably the result of Shada or something.