User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-1789834-20170224235716

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-1789834-20170224235716 OttselSpy25 wrote: I wouldn't be shocked if the Thirteenth Doctor (played by Richard Ayoade) were to pop up in The Lego Movie 2. We are looking at a much bigger picture than just this movie.

Which is why we're asking all of the relevant questions (even if they may seem trivial to you) now. It means that if we can nail the relations between how the LEGO franchise treats Doctor Who material and how the Tardis Wiki treats the LEGO franchise, this exact thread can be used as a basis for further threads. I've gone out of my way to discuss whether this or that matters and whether certain things hinder the validity of this movie... that's not me being stupid (my house is filled with novels and audios that I've read/heard a thousand times), this is me asking the questions and getting the answers.

Frankly, walking into this thread, I was completely opposed to anything LEGO getting into this Wiki. Especially any off-shoot of LD. Now, I'm warming to the idea of this movie being valid. What you said about Rachel Smith isn't really what I was getting at. I'm sure everyone at Marvel/IDW/Insert Other didn't just gain a license and that was the end of it. They must have communicated.

I don't want us to accept this rather timid movie (a bunch of Daleks appearing isn't the worst this Wiki's seen) into our circle of validity and the sequel completely breaks all sorts of rules. What then? Moreover, we haven't discussed whether we're approaching the fact that this is most obviously a sequel itself to The Lego Movie.

Conclusion: we're asking any and all questions now so that when the time comes to summarise everything, we haven't left anything out. So when the next LEGO Batman Movie comes out, or when The LEGO Doctor Who Movie comes out, we'll have a much clearer idea of how to approach/tackle it. :)