Forum:What does it mean for a story to be released in its entirety?

Okay, this sounds like a silly question, but bear with me. T:SPOIL says that
 * A spoiler is any information — in-universe or behind-the-scenes — coming from a story which has not yet been officially released in its entirety(notwithstanding multi-part stories with days-long gaps between the release of their constituent installments).

Back in the day this was held by some to apply even to page creation/opening a page to editing, and the following statement was made
 * Okay, there's not an exact date there as to when the article can be created by an admin. That date doesn't need any specificity because the article is created as a locked article. But there is an exact date as to when it can be opened to editing. That doesn't happen until the credits roll on the first broadcast wherever in the world has the debut. In other words, The Impossible Astronaut will be open to editing at approximately 8pm British Summer Time, 23 April 2011. -User:CzechOut

However, as The Star Beast began in the UK, the entire video was uploaded to Disney+. I could watch any part of the story at a whim, skipping immediately to the credits before the actual title sequence. (And, indeed, I used the "preview" function to scan ahead in the story as I watched to see if a certain leak was true. I had it guaranteed <2 minutes after the episode was uploaded.) It's tempting to suggest that we just ignore the nuances of this potentially going live earlier in some areas than the UK, but Forum:Implications of US premiere for our Torchwood Miracle Day coverage says we explicitly can't do that.

So the question becomes, was the entire episode released at this time? I... think so? The file is on a server, it's being sent out, if we say that youtube videos release at when they're uploaded rather than that time + runtime, I think we have to say that for this as well. But it's a weird situation. And if so, this means that as soon as the episode starts in the UK the page would be open for editing unless a change is made. Is this what we want? Does it matter? I dunno. But it's definitely worth discussing. Najawin ☎  22:49, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Discussion
Aaah. Good question.

I'm inclined to say "it is released its entirety but we should maintain the one-hour-grace-period policy with different language to justify/explain it". The policy's good in itself, but insisting on an idiosyncratic definition of "released in its entirety" that wouldn't really make sense to an outsider is not a good idea. It's common for online spaces to have a "no spoilers about the just-released thing until [length of time] has elapsed" policy of some sort; this could be ours, no more or less.

But I'm interested to hear others' thought.Scrooge MacDuck ⊕ 23:34, 25 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I agree that there should be some form of grace period, even just so that editor's policing recent changes (as I was doing during today's broadcast) and stuff aren't spoiled. Moreover, with episode pages being able to be created months in advance, this removes the need to rush in and get the page's foundations layed. There's a lot less that needs doing immediately after broadcast, and letting the full length of the episode pass feels most cortious to editor's who are watching the whole thing in order. Bongo50   ☎  23:44, 25 November 2023 (UTC)


 * What if there's a 90 minute special? Is the grace period still one hour? Najawin ☎  00:17, 26 November 2023 (UTC)