User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130109195104/@comment-1317169-20130225000725

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130109195104/@comment-1317169-20130225000725 Now this is a conversation I would like to bring back up.

It should go - they serve no real purpose than to link a handful of people to other work they have done - most of these are non notable roles.

All notable roles should be included in the body of the article - does it really matter if we don't say who else worked on the same franchise? Their pages will have the information.

I don't really think knowing who all worked on 'The Bill' helpful - unless they were a major character in which case it can be added to the relevant actor's page.

Do I care who else worked on the program? Nope. Not unless they were in a close partnership within the program - in which case it can be noted on all the actor's pages...