Talk:The Universe is Calling (TV story)

New title
I tried a couple of times giving this page a title containing the # sign. But apparently that is not possible, so I took a line from the teaser that I think describes it pretty well. --DCLM ☎  00:24, December 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * Please... someone respond. --DCLM ☎  08:05, December 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * You can't use number signs in titles because #Text means a link to the Text heading in a given article. Generally, if, say, credits give "Soldier #2", we link Soldier 2 instead. Where are these titles coming from, anyway? 10:18, December 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * "The Universe is calling ..." is the subject of the email I received on 13 Jul (from the BBC DW website), advertising that this teaser would be released soon. The following email, with this teaser (16 Jul), simply had "Unveiled: The Series 11 teaser is here ..." as the subject, and "New Doctor Who, New Friends, New Adventures" under the main image/link. 10:26, December 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see: the 13 July email was the same day as this video, a teaser for the teaser, called "The Universe is Calling". And the 15 July video is just "Doctor Who: Series 11 Teaser". But it does end with the "The Universe is Calling" title card. Couldn't we cover both on this page? 10:29, December 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * We could, yes. My initial thoughts were just that these two should be seperated. But you're the caretaker admin. Do what you must. --DCLM ☎  13:13, December 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * So... do they merge or do we keep them seperated? --DCLM ☎  08:38, December 12, 2018 (UTC)

Fan Criticism
"The teaser notably received fan criticism for heavily featuring food in it and for the Doctor slowing down time around her." Do you have a source for this? Skeletondoctor ☎  10:35, December 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * That's what people complained about when it was released. --DCLM ☎  13:11, December 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * But do you have any noteworthy examples of these complaints? This is the first I have ever heard of people having such issues, it can't be taken as fact without sources. Skeletondoctor ☎  13:57, December 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * Since it's quite some time ago... no. But it was a pretty huge criticism back then. I'm sure if you were to do some digging, you'd find it though. --DCLM ☎  14:03, December 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * It's your responsibility to do that digging if you want to include it in a wiki article. Wikis don't work if anyone can submit unsourced claims. Skeletondoctor ☎  14:16, December 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * Tell that to the 100s of other unsourced claims that are also on this Wikia. --DCLM ☎  14:43, December 11, 2018 (UTC)

We don't make mention of fan opinion or polls on this wiki unless they are sourced. This material needs a source or it will be removed. And more importantly, one or more examples of a rule being broken doesn't mean the rule can be ignored. It just means we have too few clean-up users around here to do the job thoroughly. Shambala108 ☎  14:54, December 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * Then what must be done must be done. I certainly can't find it anymore. Things are much easier to find and add when they are relevant. This article should have been created when it was relevant back in July. --DCLM ☎  16:14, December 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * Think about it, if we allowed general comments about "fan criticism" without sourcing, then anyone could write whatever they want based on their own likes and dislikes. And keep in mind, that articles are created when someone has the proper amount and combination of knowledge, time and desire to create a page. I'd wager that most people currently editing on this wiki never even heard of this item until its page was created. Shambala108 ☎  16:31, December 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * So nobody watch teasers? It was pretty huge topic at the time. --DCLM ☎  20:44, December 11, 2018 (UTC)