Board Thread:Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20190928203157/@comment-24894325-20191014072740

Apologies for misquoting Scrooge MacDuck. Indeed, "America's most trusted dictionary" was Borisashton.

However, he did agree with this definition by saying. "But User:Borisashton's point that Merriam-Webster's defines it rather differently stands."

The simplest way of correcting somebody's factual mistakes is to point them out. You might even get an apology as the one above.

Waiting for the mistake to be repeated and then engaging in something that to me sounds like a personal attack: "you are now actively manufacturing a dialogue between us that never happened and misrepresenting both of us."

- Borisashton

seems a violation of Tardis:No personal attacks.

I would like the mods to weigh in on this.