Board Thread:The Panopticon/@comment-1317169-20121202170842/@comment-188432-20130111221905

I don't want to derail the conversation, especially since we seem to be able to find some common ground here. But I do feel compelled to note that we are editors. It is our job to note what information is appropriate for an article. Definitionally, we do cut information, all the time.

I'm not advocating we delete the article hairdryer. I'm just saying that of all the things one might have noted about Dalek, that little bit is towards the irrelevant end of the scale.

So that's why I say I support the inclusion of "hairdryer" at Dalek only in an inline list. And if that inline list isn't available, then it certainly doesn't deserve the space afforded by a bulleted list.