User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-1272640-20171120023324

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-1272640-20171120023324 Shambala108 wrote: I don't want to derail the thread by harping on an old policy decision, but I have to clarify the old forum decision that was subject to Pluto2's accusations.

A forum post (Forum:Doctor Who: Worlds in Time) helped to establish the idea that narratives must be consistent across users in order to be considered valid sources. Based on that forum post, two admins, not just "users" as stated by Pluto2, applied that decision to two novel formats where you get to choose your ending. Far from Pluto2's accusation that the thread allowed "no consideration to what others might think", User:Imamadmad, who is not an admin, posted agreement with the thread. No other users expressed interest in the matter.

I would suggest that all users, when participating in the forums, read any suggested policies/articles for themselves. This will allow the user to have all the information that applies to any forum thread in question. I was talking about the DYD thread. And Worlds in Time isn't really a big deal. It's the same story, but some people might get the pieces in a different order. It's still the same planets visited for everyone. What difference does it make since it's the same narrative, but parts are in a different order?