User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-27280472-20160606210324/@comment-27280472-20161108173445

Sorry for the personal attack - it honestly wasn't meant that way. I didn't think through how it could be read well enough.

Shambala, you said "if you have any arguments that are not already covered in that debate." The "you" and emphasis seem to imply that what I have argued was covered in the inclusion debate, as well as that I hadn't read it - and neither of those things is true.