User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161222064850/@comment-1789834-20161222112424

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161222064850/@comment-1789834-20161222112424 DENCH-and-PALMER wrote: Thefartydoctor wrote: And no, it doesn't pass rule 4. We don't know where Moffat stands on the issue. If you have a source, feel free to post it. Until then, it doesn't pass rule 4 and thus isn't valid haha. Usually when it's on the BBC and nothing has been stated otherwise and it breaks no other rule it's then considered a valid source.

Only if it's part of an official series with an official license. There's a difference. That's why conversations like these pop up. Born Again was set in a continuous narrative and thus ticks rule 4 regarding intention. Doctor Who's various appearances at the Proms are generally not considered part of the narrative and thus don't tick rule 4.