User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-33695797-20200828040941/@comment-45692830-20200831004409

I think this overstates the case. The review I mentioned makes a clear distinction between this book and the ones prior. Are there some we would have to litigate if we went with the broad proposal? Certainly. Are there a massive amount? I'm less than convinced.

Regardless, even if this would be a damning indictment of the broad proposal's effectiveness, the narrow proposal seems perfectly fine.