User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-26285319-20170104192003/@comment-1827503-20170104192247

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-26285319-20170104192003/@comment-1827503-20170104192247 This would not place Shalka as permanently invalid. Your proposed rule excludes works which were never meant to be continuous with the established DWU, but Shalka was meant as a continuation at one point in its development.

And of course, the definition of "established DWU" could be used to exclude Rose onward.