User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-6032121-20200517150418/@comment-45314928-20200518000946

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-6032121-20200517150418/@comment-45314928-20200518000946 Borisashton wrote: My proposal was to remove the list of ambiguous stories from the Lockdown! article and port them over to a new article where they can be covered in a way that provides more information to readers.

I think an article about all coronavirus affected stories would be good. But the "stories" section on "Lockdown!" should not be deleted entirely. it should still cover ONLY the stories emily cook organised, just like it covers ONLY the watchalongs she organised (earlier it included other watchalongs which were removed).