User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20170101103803/@comment-188432-20170126071403

As has been pointed out in another thread, some of the inclusion debates that have been offered in the last month or so feel as if they have been done in bad faith. And they certainly have increased the work load of a volunteer administrative staff.

So while I normally try to give a rationale, I've got to crack on here. It is not a reasonable or common interpretation of Blakes 7 to believe that it is a part of the DWU.

The majority of our readers are here -- let's face it -- because of the 2005 series. Which can't even be called "the new series" anymore. They are simply not going to buy this assertion.

If you wish to contribute around Blakes 7, please proceed to w:c:blakes7.

As for the one alleged crossover character of Carnell, SOTO has proposed a perfectly workable notion:

If you want to remark that a certain character originated elsewhere, or explain that part of their backstory if relevant, you can link to [the B7] wiki in a BTS section.

Additionally, we will not cover the B7 episode Warhead in any way.