User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-4028641-20170428004547

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-4028641-20170428004547 Those are not the rules. There is no such rule that states "if something is weird, you'll have to prove that it still counts or else it'll be invalid forever." Indeed, a lack of reasoning to call it invalid basically makes it valid.

There is no place on this website where such a rule is written down, and in this thread when you have made this case I have always disputed this. If there is no strong case for something to be invalid, then it is valid.

Indeed I also feel sorry that we have repeated ourselves several times, although I'm not sure I support your slightly accusing tone. I have listened, and I disagree. Those aren't our rules, as I have said since the beginning.