User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20121212231649/@comment-1209840-20121218052538

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20121212231649/@comment-1209840-20121218052538 I think too much is being made of the terminology. Whether or not "invalid" articles have "continuity," the information normally organized into the continuity section may still be of interest to readers. If the continuity and reference sections were merged wiki-wide, as this thread proposes, it seems like it wouldn't even be an issue, and no one would seriously argue that the reference sections should be stripped from invalid articles and hidden away in their talk pages.