User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161223201024/@comment-1272640-20161224075610

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161223201024/@comment-1272640-20161224075610 SOTO wrote: Not really seeing the logic. I didn't say just "started something that was cancelled". That wasn't my reasoning at all. It started a whole divergent continuity which was cancelled, and soon after even the pilot was wholly written over. So? That's not the point. Just treat it as an alternate universe. Don't deem it wholly invalid if it passes the four little rules. That's the guidelines that we, as a wiki, have decided are the ones used to determine whether something is a valid source. There's no precedent for a cancelled divergent continuity clause.