User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Tales from the Tardis/@comment-188432-20130325173913/@comment-4189499-20130415033633

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Tales from the Tardis/@comment-188432-20130325173913/@comment-4189499-20130415033633 Maybe, since the biggest problem here seems to be a matter of policy wording, since the main policy writer can't think of how to phrase things so we could include Vienna but not a whole bunch of other things, maybe the people in this thread who want Vienna to stay in can try their hand at drafting a policy which would work to allow in Vienna but not the others. If they can successfully do it, maybe it would be more likely for that to become policy and for Vienna to be deemed valid on this wiki. If nobody can figure out some good wording, it will have to be concluded that Vienna is invalid. Just an idea. Anyone agree?