User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1293767-20151029072618/@comment-5918438-20161207050024

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1293767-20151029072618/@comment-5918438-20161207050024 Bwburke94 wrote: This was for the "save Face" pun, wasn't it? Oh yeah, my plan all along. In all seriousness, this has been going on for over a year now, and I do genuinely feel my proposal is not only adequate, but the best we've got from a year's worth of discussion on this.

Then if we ever question in the future whether or not something is a two-parter, we don't need another year-long discussion, because we can just look to the four rules, and see immediately if it passes. We don't even search to look for quotes on production intent for this.

And again, we're not defining two-parters for fandom or for any individuals any more than we define canon; we're making editing easier for ourselves by keeping things consistent. Anyone is free to consider anything a two-parter, or a sixteen-parter for all I care, as long as we stick to our guns here.