User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1506468-20190827123101/@comment-1350697-20190907183812

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1506468-20190827123101/@comment-1350697-20190907183812 The only element of the original debate still on the table is which release date counts as the "official" release date, with one side arguing for the original date of the blog release, and Amorkuz arguing for the date the pdf collection of the three stories was released. (It remains unclear to me why the story being posted on a blog is in any way invalidating, or different from being released as a pdf.)

That said, I agree with AlanSmithee1963 -- at this point, the other two (three?) mods/admins involved in the original decision are growing increasingly notable by their absence, and some further insight into why this group came to the decision they did might be good.

I also agree Amorkuz's behaviour deserves to be discussed further, be it here, in another thread, or in some other context -- Amorkuz had repeatedly made various serious accusations, and has now clearly veered into the realm of, let's say, harassment-adjacent behaviour. If any non-staff user behaved like this, we'd surely be facing bans, blocks, or other punitive measures, so this can't possibly be appropriate behaviour for staff.