User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-27280472-20160606210324/@comment-1272640-20161129205812

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-27280472-20160606210324/@comment-1272640-20161129205812 I don't see what the basis was for declaring DCTT invalid because "Seven dies". That's speculation, and not stated in the narrative itself. In fact, it's left unclear whether the Seventh Doctor died. All we have is a burnt umbrella, which is very flimsy evidence. To claim "it's invalid because Seven dies" without solid narrative evidence isn't enough for me. We don't even see a body, so I think the inclusion debate should be reopened.