User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-24894325-20170302225328/@comment-24894325-20170304163123

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-24894325-20170302225328/@comment-24894325-20170304163123 Mea culpa. Mea maxima culpa.

I really was simply confused by the contradictory messages in the categories and the lack of the "invalid" tag. I did not mean to open any new debates.

Perhaps, I should have used the Reference section for asking about the decision on inclusion. Maybe, it still makes sense to move this thread to reference section now, in order to avoid the temptation to open more debates on similar topics. Once again I apologise.

I am very happy that this story was never considered valid as it is clearly not.