User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161223201024/@comment-1827503-20170121234005

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161223201024/@comment-1827503-20170121234005 AeD wrote: *looks up thread*


 * looks back down*

It's questionable because it's a one-off run of webisodes that was supplanted by the revived television series. It's essentially an Unbound story. Trying to fit Shalka into continuity is like trying to eat soup with a fork. We need to consider its impact on pages before we throw it into in-universe articles, even if this means Rule 4 needs to be redefined.