User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-24894325-20170121220436/@comment-28349479-20170122220225

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-24894325-20170121220436/@comment-28349479-20170122220225 Amorkuz wrote: First of all, I did not edit the body of Lolita. I simply removed disputed elements from the infobox and provided two references to the relevant policy by two different admins. What is indeed ironic is that then Pluto2, who herself created the page Toy Story (short story) in complete disregard of T:POINT, immediately accused me of violating the same policy. What evidence do you have to dispute that Lolita is a TARDIS? What evidence does anyone have to dispute that Lolita is a TARDIS? In The Book of the War and the Faction Paradox audios, Lolita is definitively identified as a timeship of the Great Houses, that is to say, a TARDIS, per everything I cited in my last post. The actions of Pluto2 have nothing to do with me (and I don't understand why they were brought up), though considering that Toy Story (short story) was created a week ago, while this discussion was created yesterday, I don't see how she could have possibly violated T:POINT.