User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-1293767-20130331210737

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-1293767-20130331210737 TenCents wrote: I'm curious as to why BBC isn't counted as a valid source: they are, after all, the ones who own Doctor Who. There would be no Doctor Who without the BBC.

Yeah, this is what I don't get. Like I said earlier, "P.S." was relegated to non-canon (which I agree with) because of Chibnall's statement and I think there's even another thread about Vienna Audios or something going on right now where they were labeled non-canon because of an official statement as well. So I don't understand why the BBC's statement in this case can't be used for clarification. :-/