Talk:Ian Chesterton/Appearances

What does that mean?
"Comprehensive but not definitive" What is the useful distinction? Boblipton 00:45, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * What indeed.  These lists of appearance pages piss me off so I don't spend much time here, precisely for this reason.  They should be done automatically, through the use of categories, rather than being a managed list.  The message shouldn't appear at all, as nothing on a wiki is ever truly "definitive" anyway.  No need for only these appearance lists to bear such a message — especially since, as you rightly point out, there's no useful distinction between comprehensive and definitive.  I think the person who wrote that was probably meaning to say, "comprehensive but not complete".  But, as I said, no message like this should adorn these appearance list pages.  01:16:23 Sat 06 Aug 2011

Thanks, Czechout. I'll remove it.Boblipton 01:20, August 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * It was one of those notes that was on many list of pages early on in this wiki's life, one of many things that was never removed.
 * I think it was just to say 'we're still building this page, don't complain if story X isn't here'. --Tangerineduel / talk 15:08, August 6, 2011 (UTC)