User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161223201024/@comment-25117610-20170125231040

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161223201024/@comment-25117610-20170125231040 Thefartydoctor wrote: It's about common sense really. No-one with half a brain-cell would allow Dr. Who and the Daleks to be valid in a billion years. I don't need to list any reasons because everyone in this comment thread knows them haha. Let's look at that Paul Cornell thing. But that's exactly my point. If even a story that wouldn't be valid "in a billion years" can be reprinted, how could a non-clear like Shalka be deemed valid only because it was reprinted?