User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45692830-20200723133026/@comment-39988495-20200723150414

Hats off to Farnell for knowing about the wiki's policies, to add a framing narrative to make it a "valid" source.

So... it ticks off all of the four little rules...
 * It's technically a story, as per the framing narrative.
 * Released by the BBC, so it's definitely licenced by the BBC.
 * It's a book, so it ticks rule three off.
 * And of course it's meant to be set in the DWU, hence why Farnell added the framing narrative in the first place.

I wholeheartedly believe this deserves to be made valid.