User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20190928203157/@comment-31010985-20191006142315

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20190928203157/@comment-31010985-20191006142315 Amorkuz wrote: If you think that establishing facts (e.g., whether Arcbeatle Press is a self-publisher or a small press similar to Thebes Publishing) ... This is a bad example is it not? Haven't we already established repeatedly that Arcbeatle is not a self-publisher (at least according to "America's most trusted online dictionary") and even if it were it would not matter as there is no policy that excludes self-published stories.

It is extremely hard to "return to discussing the contents of these posts" when the facts you present are not relevant to the matter of validity and when you reply to the thread with your only new piece of information being that you believe "facts matter".

Which of the four little rules do you think these stories actually break and have your opinions changed since you proposed the anthology release as the official release date for the three stories?