User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161223201024/@comment-1272640-20161224050306

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161223201024/@comment-1272640-20161224050306 SOTO wrote: We've never discussed this? I see nothing new here at all. Scream of the Shalka's unquestionable invalidity as a source was already established in Forum:Is The Infinity Doctors canon?, for example.

Do we really need to open discussions on everything we've ever slapped the tag on (or, as it were)? The thing is, Shalka passes the four little rules with flying colors. No one actually debated Shalka in that discussion - it was just a single person saying something.

1. Is it a story? Yes.

2. Was it licensed? Yes.

3. Was it officially released? Yes.

4. Was it intended to be set in the DWU? Yes. It was advertised as a continuation of the series.