User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-43908-20150311013943/@comment-27343779-20160111190736

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-43908-20150311013943/@comment-27343779-20160111190736 Yes but it's irrelevant, i'm merely pointing out that, not considering any Romana III, going by TV and ignoring anything else, then the very name "Romana II" is actually debatable but we all use it anyway as a convention.

From this observation, I wonder why prose Romana would be called anything else than "Romana III" as another convention (if Cornell indeed called her Romana III).

Maybe we should change T:ROMANA to reflect these conventions clearer.

(I noticed that my answer is kinda rude, that is not my intention)