User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1317169-20121202170842/@comment-188432-20130123042336

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1317169-20121202170842/@comment-188432-20130123042336 I'm compelled to narrowly agree with OttselSpy25's third paragraph. The notion that continuity flows in only one direction is both unenforceable and unhelpful. If something happens in Story A, but then recurs in Story B, we obviously must leave a note about it on both pages — or we might as well just delete the section altogether.

However, his first and second paragraphs are a bit more debatable. I think we can and should define what the contents of any section should include. It helps our readers if we work to a common standard. That's the major point of this thread. We're attempting to find an easy-to-understand, easy-to-uphold definition for these two sections.