User talk:Kanetheundertaker25

Redlinks (and links in general)
Hi. Please stop removing redlinks from pages. As explained on Tardis:Redlinks (which I linked in my edit summary, redlinks are usefull. You are a new user, and so bound to make mistaked due to unfamiliarity with the wiki rules (which is totally expectable - we've all been there). But please don't remove these links. All nouns that appear in a story can/should get pages. OncomingStorm12th ☎  02:39, October 25, 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi I'm not sure why you decided to ignore User:OncomingStorm12th's message above mine, but maybe you'll listen to an admin. Your edits at The Nine violate Tardis:Redlinks. Please read the policy and please, in the future, if an experienced user reverts your edits and gives a reason (as OncomingStorm12th did), learn from those edits and don't undo them. Thanks Shambala108 ☎  02:50, October 25, 2019 (UTC)


 * My apologizes, only just seen these messages, it won't happen again Kanetheundertaker25 ☎  22:36, October 25, 2019 (UTC)

Red links and edit wars
Since you ignored two previous instructions, which cited the appropriate policy, one of them from an admin, it is time to advise you on another policy, Tardis:Edit wars are good for absolutely nothing. Here is the situation you are currently in: It is high time to stop changing the page and engage in a dialogue on Talk:The Nine. In the future, it is never a good idea to try forcing your point of view by persistently reverting edits of others, especially after being instructed not to do so by an admin. The right way of approaching disagreements is a discussion. If you have further questions regarding the policies cited above, please do not hesitate contacting Tardis:Administrators. Amorkuz ☎  12:39, October 25, 2019 (UTC)
 * As you have been advised above, your edits at the Nine are in direct violation of our policy Tardis:Redlinks.
 * Your edits additionally replace "rupture" with a completely different word "rapture", which may be described as "editing text within an article so as to include obvious falsehoods" and may, under certain circumstances, be qualified as vandalism.
 * Your latest edit goes against explicit instructions of an admin.
 * Your next edit would go against explicit instructions of two admin and would constitute an edit war.


 * My apologizes, only just seen these messages, it won't happen again Kanetheundertaker25 ☎  22:36, October 25, 2019 (UTC)


 * Duly noted. When there is a message on your talk page, there is a little notification on the lower right part of your screen (unless you are using a cell phone, I don't know where it appears on that). Trying to be cute, we made it say, "You have a hypercube". That means there's a message on your talk page. Thanks! Shambala108 ☎  22:40, October 25, 2019 (UTC)


 * Duly noted. Kanetheundertaker25 ☎  22:36, October 25, 2019 (UTC)

Margaret (Companion Piece)
Your edits at Margaret (Companion Piece) violate Tardis:Spoiler policy. Please stop readding this spoilerly information. Thanks, --Borisashton ☎  23:15, October 25, 2019 (UTC)


 * It's not a spoiler thats her name! Kanetheundertaker25 ☎  23:18, October 25, 2019 (UTC)


 * If her surname is not revealed in a story that is currently released then this wiki considers it a spoiler. --Borisashton ☎  23:20, October 25, 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi, I know it's no fun to be constantly receiving messages telling you how to edit, but we have a lot of rules here. And one of our strictest is Tardis:Spoiler policy. Most new users don't realize that we define spoilers very strictly. Please read the policy, and understand that experienced users, like User:Borisashton, are familiar with our rules and help the admins by trying to educate new users. Thanks Shambala108 ☎  23:26, October 25, 2019 (UTC)

ok Kanetheundertaker25 ☎  23:27, October 25, 2019 (UTC)