User talk:OttselSpy25

Missing the point at 2013
You're kinda missing the point I'm trying to make at 2013. I'm not just saying that you have to wait until the date that DWM says something will occur to add that bit of info to the page. I'm saying you have to actually go down to your local shop and see it on the shelves, or at least go to http://amazon.co.uk on 28th January and personally verify that it's for sale. Never blindly trust DWM, for they are occasionally wrong. Always verify what they, or any other news outlet, says. 15:54: Mon 28 Jan 2013

See also sections
Please don't add see also sections. Find a way to work the link into the text — and I mean a natural, logical way — or don't include a link at all. There is no reason that one should "see also" the Doctor's fur coat from brainy specs, for example. 08:44: Fri 01 Feb 2013

Amy's glasses
If you do ever make an article about Amy's glasses, let that be the name. There's no need for her last name or the type of glasses, as it's unlikely we'll ever have another Amy giving glasses or another kind of glasses belonging to an Amy. "Amy's glasses" is fine. 08:50: Fri 01 Feb 2013

Merge tags
Hey. When adding a merge tag to an article only add it to 1 article. For The Question and The "Doctor Who?" running joke you've got it on both. As the template starts it says "It should be relocated at ". This is useful for the discussion to have it on one page rather than on both and if/when the discussion concludes with a decision admins know in which 'direction' to merge the articles. I know you've noted the whys of merging the pages on both templates but ideally the merge template should be used on only one of the pages, further explanation can go on the talk page. Thanks. --Tangerineduel / talk 14:25, February 1, 2013 (UTC)