User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-30970988-20170118180633/@comment-82.3.146.201-20170123182804

Bwburke94 wrote: The Vienna discussion was screwed up enough that we shouldn't be using it as precedent.

The main difference I see between TMOC and the other works NateBumber mentioned is that the Minister is primarily linked to the DWU via an invalid work. This should not matter, remember that the MOC appeared in a BBC Book. Anyway Dan Freeman has stated that it's in a different universe to DCTT but still in a DWU.

OOI why do you oppose it?