User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-20607870-20161120213354/@comment-1789834-20161121205245

Wait I meant Frontier states it. Either way, it's invalid because a valid source states it is. That's how the Wiki works. :) But when you say that an invalid source shouldn't dictate validity, you're very right. Frontier however is valid. If another valid source is created (unlikely) and states otherwise, then the discussion can be opened again. I'd live SOS to be valid but we have to follow the laws of the Whovinerse haha.