User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-6032121-20200517150418/@comment-45692830-20200517210844

I think we'll find, if given a second to reflect, that the idea that Emily Cook organizes all of the official content is self defeating. Emily Cook works for Doctor Who Magazine, not the BBC proper. In order for these tweetalongs to work for US audiences, given the nonexistence of the iplayer, Amazon has been making certain episodes available for the day of the tweetalong so that people in the US could participate. Doctor Who Magazine does not have the rights to these episodes, and so cannot actually request that they do this. Hence Cook must be coordinating the tweetalongs with the BBC.

Given this fact, that the BBC and Cook are coordinating, are we to believe that the stories don't have at least tacit endorsement?