User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161223201024/@comment-1272640-20170125230149

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161223201024/@comment-1272640-20170125230149 OncomingStorm12th wrote: Pluto2 wrote: Thefartydoctor wrote: We treat this Master as we do the Master played by Gatiss in the David Warner audios, in my opinion. This guy isn't the same Master. His past is the same but his future is different. In fact, it's almost the same scenario except Warner's an alternate Third Doctor, whereas here we're dealing with an alternate Ninth. I like the idea for the Ninth Doctor. So we'd treat it as an alternate universe, like the Unbounds? That is fine by me, as long as we treat then as valid sources! But how can we trat it as an alternate universe, if they give us no evidence. We only treat it as an alternate universe if they tells us, give evidence it is. We do not decide it as an alternate universe just because it doesn't fit well with what would be the "main universe" Cornell is on record as referring to the story, after the fact, as "unbound".