Board Thread:The Panopticon/@comment-86.174.105.135-20161211174119/@comment-24894325-20161215190103

DENCH-and-PALMER wrote: Amorkuz wrote: Why not use the approach from #1 for #2 also? No need pal Just to be sure I understand what you mean: "No need to apply Shambala108's approach for #1 to #2"? Or "No need to use her approach at all?"