Board Thread:The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130205174048/@comment-188432-20130218202230

Hearing no dissent, all category:days of the week articles shall now have a companion article created in the form of '1 Jan (real world) and all production material shall be moved there. In cases where this leaves the original, un dab-ed page without any information, the un-dab-ed page shall be deleted, awaiting re-creation at such time as the day is found to have been specifically mentioned, or directly implied.

For clarity, this means that if a story specifically identifies a day — 3 July, say — and then has a character saying, "Yesterday, I did such and such" or "The next day, the Doctor and Sam did something they'd never done before," then we can start articles at 2 July or 4 July. But the logical existence of days is not enough to justify an in-universe about every day of the calendar. As was decided in the last major revamp of category:years articles, a date must be mentioned or directly implied for there to be an article about it.

Put simply, we want all our pages to say something of actual relevance to the DWU — not merely:
 * 3 July was the third day of July.

Also, note that this decision obviously means that we will also be splitting up other pages in category:dates. So expect in the near future to have 1963 (real world), 1990s (real world), and even November (real world).