User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1506468-20190827123101/@comment-30881616-20190907145305

Amorkuz wrote:
 * "All content on this website is either the property of Arcbeatle Press, or has been used with permission by its creator."

User:Amorkuz, your own eyes should have told you, when they saw this piece of evidence, that it is describing two disjoint sets. Either/or.

With the 10,000 Dawns crossovers that constitute the topic of the current discussion, the fact that they have been published by Arcbeatle Press as part of its 10,000 Dawns series has been quite well-established throughout this thread, and if I understand your recent posts correctly, you yourself do not dispute that point. But with these comics though, in which way can they be construed as publications by Arcbeatle Press? And, more to the point, in which way do these comics not qualify as fair dealing/fair use?

And, even more to the point, in which way is pointing toward this unrelated case on-topic to the case at hand, in compliance with Tardis:Discussion policy?

The only connecting logic I can think of is if one argues that more than one type of content cannot exist on the same website—in which case, doesn’t that mean the sheer fact that this Wiki has copyrighted images on it means the legal claim on every image file tagged with the “Public Domain” copyright tag must be considered suspect?