User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20121212231649/@comment-5617235-20121226045622

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20121212231649/@comment-5617235-20121226045622 Okay. I think I may have figured out a compromise. I'm sure that it has a flaw somewhere, but hear me out...

I think OS25 was on the right track with the idea of putting the Continuity section of each page under a different title, but Mini and CzechOut have rightfully pointed out that continuity by any other name is still continuity.

What I *think* is the issue here is this: Stories that this wiki has decided are not in the DWU cannot have continuity.

But here's the thing: as it says in the notdwu flag, some people may consider these stories a part of the DWU anyway.

So what I propose is this: We create a section that essentially says: "IF you consider this story a part of the DWU, this is its continuity." (Or, if we want to just stick to our views and not talk about the reader's, then something like "IF this story were a part of the DWU, this would be its continuity.")

Well, that's my plan for a compromise. In my eyes, it satisfies both parties. If any of you see a problem (which I assume someone will, given the long and lively discussion we see before us), please tell me what it is.

Bubblecamera