User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-5791028-20150117172224/@comment-1432718-20150604020706

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-5791028-20150117172224/@comment-1432718-20150604020706 MystExplorer wrote: Well, we already have pages for it, so we're not ignoring it, CzechOut. That ship has sailed. Well, no, since those pages were created without a ruling on the inclusion, it's still possible to decide against inclusion. If that happens, all the related pages will be deleted.

I agree with CzechOut that, from an administrative viewpoint, it's not worth covering these stories if it will lead to questions about other ranges that have already been ruled non-valid (e.g. Vienna). We don't want to have to constantly undo edits made by new users who think that covering this range means we cover all the others.