Forum:General discussion about how to improve the wiki

I feel that the TARDIS Index File needs major improvement. Some qualms I have:


 * The inclusion of myriad non-canonical sources. IMO this is to the detriment of the TIF as we end up with articles on things like the life of the Master where we have three contradictory reasons for the Master going evil; one televised, one from a book and one from an audio play. We could probably just cut a lot of the spin-off media loose.


 * Severe lack of detail, grammatical errors, spelling mistakes anhd plain misinformation in the majority of articles.


 * Flawed character profiles- Home Era? Race? There is nothing on families or occupations.

Have a look at Memory Alpha for an idea of the direction this wikia can take. 124.184.174.192 03:20, December 19, 2009 (UTC)


 * See Tardis:Canon policy, we include the TV series, novels, comics, audio dramas, spin-offs.
 * Memory Alpha is quite restrictive and takes a different approach to its wiki, as do other wikis such as the Stargate Wiki, Babylon Wiki and other wikis throughout.
 * Many of the charaters don't have family or indeed occupations. --Tangerineduel 04:49, December 19, 2009 (UTC)


 * As an aside, where Memory Alpha takes a more restrictive policy, Memory Beta takes the approach (like the Tardis wiki) that spin-off media is good. Sometimes it does make for contradictions or issues, but hey, what Doctor Who episode doesn't have those to begin with? :) -- sulfur 15:09, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

The show itself is just so rich and I just feel it's a shame that it is not getting the attention it deserves when focus is kept on spin-off media of greatly variable quality and canonicity. --124.184.174.192 12:36, December 20, 2009 (UTC)