User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-26845762-20160212224340/@comment-4028641-20170125110136

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-26845762-20160212224340/@comment-4028641-20170125110136 I don't think "who will have interest in this?" is really relevant to if it's valid or not. If that were the case nothing from the Short Trips books would be valid.

I'm not saying Czech is wrong about BBV being an unimportant topic, I'm saying it's absolutely within logic to presume that he could make such an oversight in this specific case. It seems to me that this is a case of previous mis-information.

Czech's stance was that any BBV story that has licensed stories was valid on this wiki, and he believed that this story did not have any instances of this. But he was wrong -- and understandably so, since this story is so damn obscure. I would love to hear his take on the topic, but I truly believe that this is fairly open-and-closed. I just feel like it's been open long enough.