Talk:Aztec

Aztec v Mexica
So, since I'm back, and I planned on eventually getting around to this before I left, we should have a discussion about "Mexica" and "Aztec". Against Nature uses "Mexica" almost exclusively, only using the term "Aztec" when in reference to what the modern characters are calling the Mexica. I think there's sufficient evidence to equate the two (and so have a redirect page under the name of "Mexica"), and also to merge the pages of Aztec and Aztec Empire - as the book refers to the "Mexica Dynasty" (hence as a political group) as well as the Mexica as a people. Obviously this is a constellation of related changes, so I figured I'd open up discussion. Najawin ☎  04:13, 30 August 2022 (UTC)


 * I don't know about merging the Aztec page; couldn't it be used to describe the people of the Aztec and/or Mexica empire? We have Human Empire and human for example. Shambala108 ☎  15:12, 30 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Definitely could. But the page as it's currently written is a little ambiguous, as it's often referring to things that took place in the Aztec empire as things that apply to the Mexica/Aztec civilization as a whole. Hence why I suggested just the merge. Najawin ☎  18:16, 30 August 2022 (UTC)