User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-25939326-20141229205450

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-25939326-20141229205450 Is Shada]] a valid source? I know the home video version isn't, but could it be argued that anything in the book that doesn't violate the webcast and audio versions is valid, with the Eighth Doctor instead of the Fourth Doctor, of course. Or is it invalid because it novelises the home video version, which is invalid?