User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161223201024/@comment-1272640-20161228091026

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161223201024/@comment-1272640-20161228091026 I see what you mean. So are you opposed to the "conflicting accounts" proposal, in which we would treat Shalka/Stone and the 2005 series as equally valid?