User talk:Azes13

Excuse me. Please help unvanalise the wiki in this time of need. Thank You.

Intro
--Freethinker1of1 23:18, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Welcome to the TARDIS Index File Doctor Who wiki! Looking forward to seeing more contributions from you.


 * Hi,
 * Just wanted to say that I thought your Chula article was great. Nothing wrong as far as I can see.
 * --Mantrid 06:00, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree. Excellent job!
 * --Freethinker1of1 11:30, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Excellent...
 * Azes13 13:58, 24 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Greetings,
 * Welcome to the TARDIS Index File wiki project. Your contributions are MUCH appreciated.
 * BTW, sorry it's late, I've been away for quite a while.
 * --GingerM 00:27, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

About your userpage
"Well, I can't think of any other ways to pad this out." You can always brag by adding a list of the articles you created. :) Anyway, on another completely non-related point, it might just help if you vote for featured article noms on Talk:Main Page, seeming as so far nobody else has. 20:50, 31 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Hey, I did mention how I liked the dinosaur page.

Hi
Hello Azes13, I know I haven’t been here long but I would like to make a valuable contribution to Tardis, I was wondering if you would think I would make any good as an Admin. Joker1138 ( The Hub )
 * Well, if you want, I suppose you could be an Admin. Personally, I haven't found much of a difference between being an admin and regular accounts. Azes13 20:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, How do i become one? Joker1138 ( The Hub ) [[Image:Daleknew.jpg|25px]]
 * Give me a while to work it out... Azes13 20:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you Azes13 :-) Joker1138 ( The Hub ) [[Image:Daleknew.jpg|25px]]

Dalek Hierarchy
What's the Dalek Hierarchy?--Si 20:20, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Human Time Lords
To prevent Sichamousacoricothingmabob asking this question sans capitales (or something like that, I'm not that good à français) and with every third word tpyoesd, I'll ask it myself: Would you, Azes the Thirteenth, like to join the Human Time Lord Order? (note: you do not have to be a human to join the order, although it helps) 17:47, 26 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Naw, man. Sovereign Earth Reptile Empire all the way! Actually, that seems like an nifty idea. Maybe I better get some stuff for that...
 * Also, can't help you with the French stuff. Sorry! Azes13 19:13, 26 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Euh, ça va. Mais tu te rends comte de les noveaux seigneurs du temps sont pas-pas-d'interventionist?
 * Or something like that... not that you'd understand it to see where I was inevitably wrong... and for the record, there's already a strong Earth Reptile Empire anyway. A bit slow off the mark there. Some 65 million years too slow... 19:46, 26 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Schwa? Something about intervention? Man, I should have paid more attention in French class.
 * Also, there was a strong Time Lord empire too. Not sure how far off the mark you are, what with them ceasing to exist... Azes13 20:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Good point... I think... 20:57, 26 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Enh, it's good enough. I'll get back to you if I can think of a better come-back. Azes13 21:07, 26 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks... AH! I've just worked out what you were on about! *realises he shouldn't sound so exited* Well, the idea of the Human Time Lords is to remake the Time Lords, so once the training's done they will exist again! (I think that's what you were on about) Na-na-na-na-na-na! *realises he shouldn't act so childish, and how much like a police car he sounded when doing that* Erm... yeah, that's it... I think... erm... oh yeah, what about schwas? 15:53, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, the idea of SERE is to remake the Silurian Empire, so once the training's done they will rule again. The Human Time Lords replaces the Time Lords (who are dead), while SERE replaces the Earth Reptiles (who just fail at conquering and become a token minority for Earth Empires). Therefore, both organizations are equally valid based on the idea of replacing major powers with a new one.
 * Yeah, that's right, you got OWNED!
 * Also, schwa means "I should know what you just said, but I don't". Azes13 20:18, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Hmmm... I see... sorta... 16:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Good enough for me! Azes13 20:04, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Your work
I think you are great! I've edited just a few, normally 4th Doctor, but I couldn't do better than you!

Chula Page
I think the work on Chula is great. It's my favourite episode out of the 9th AND 10th, so I'm proud when I see some helpful info. I can safely say you are a real helper on TARDIS Index File!

Neil12Neil12 11:00, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Regeneration Page
Hi Azes, Thanks for correcting the tense in my edit of the Regeneration page, I hadn't realised in universe articles were supposed to be in the past tense (ooops). I notice that you've also removed some content that I added to the page and also some older content. I'm somewhat new at this and am unclear as to why you've done that, as it seems relevant to me? Could you give me an indication of why you have made that change so that I can put the information where it should be or know why it shouldn't be included.

Regards Grabthar 04:43, 9 June 2008 (GMT)


 * Let's see: I added back the bit about growing back a hand because the sentence was unfinished, I changed the section on the Master only because I was working with an older copy which didn't have that format, the part about the Doctor trial seemed to fit better with the section on control, I removed the section about the control of Romana and the Doctor because it's best not to speculate on matters in the main text and I removed the part about the Master stopping his regeneration because it had been said before and it wasn't about an aborted regeneration.


 * I think that's everything. Any other questions? --


 * Thanks. It was the part containing the conjecture that I was most interested in, you see I had expanded a pre-exsisting point of conjecture that was already on the page; as I'm new to this wiki I didn't know what the policy on that sort of thing is so I just followed the pattern of what was already in the article. You say "it's best not to speculate on matters in the main text" does this mean there is a place where speculation, such as the one removed, should be included? I was trying to get the atrticle to read in such a way as it highlights that, whilst there is a lot of source information on the subject, that clear conclusions can't be drawn.

Thanks again.
 * Grabthar 14:40, 9 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The speculation should be put under the paragraph in italics, like the section on how regeneration may be given to non-Time Lords. _-

Absent Admins
I'm sending this out to all the currently active Admins here, with regards to this Forum posting Forum:Absent Admins.

It's the suggestion that all the admins who have not been active in the last two years have their admin user rights dropped.

This is the list of users to be dropped back from admins.


 * User:***Stardizzy***
 * User:Amxitsa
 * User:Jaster
 * User:Joker1138
 * User:Josiah Rowe
 * User:Mantrid
 * User:Nhprman
 * User:OncomingStorm
 * User:Sean-Black

User:Freethinker1of1 was also on the list, though as he started this wiki I think that would be a bit of a kick in the teeth.

Please put your thoughts on the forum or get back to me with opinions or what we should do etc, thanks. (Also if you think I've missed any active admins can you send this message onwards to them also, I've sent this to User:Doug86, User:Ghelæ, User:GingerM). --Tangerineduel 15:42, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Mod abuse
You banned '82.28.241.19' for 3 months yet according to this Wiki's policy on bans due to Vandalism, only a ban of length maximum 5 days may be implemented. I suggest you read your Wiki's policy on banning if you are unaware. I hope this was not intentional mod abuse.

http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Tardis:Vandalism_and_Unhelpful_Content_Policy

I hope you are enjoying undoing all my articles. You think you've got me this time but you're wrong. I will aquire more IPs, more and more. Welcome to my new empire. No one is safe. Not even Bedfordshire. Its busses will soon be running late.

Wikia Entertainment
Hey there! I'm Scott from Wikia Entertainment. I just wanted to stop by and say hi; see how things are going here. Are there any big projects that the community is working on right now? Please let me know if the Entertainment Team can help out with anything, and feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! —Scott ( talk ) 23:22, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Join the club
Hey, would you like to join the Gallifreyan club at User talk:Doc Who10. You can get badges and awards! Cheers! -- Twelfth Doctor K-9.jpg( TARDIS Console Room )

God
Hello. I write regarding your comment on the God entry. You say:

That doesn't seem to be right. I can remember at least two references to Doctor being more agnostic than plain atheist and I can't remember any references to god in Castrovalva, Everything Changes or They Keep Killing Suzie. The fact that it's out of universe doesn't really help its case. I'm just going to remove it. -<Azes13 22:47, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Can you tell me where these references to the Doctor's agnosticism might be? How confident to you feel about the claim that the Doctor is more agnostic than atheist?

Thanks!


 * No, I can't remember that. I wrote that months ago and I've long since forgotten what the references were. If I was to hazard a guess, I think it might have been in Placebo Effect, St Anthony's Fire or maybe The Pit. -<Azes13 14:26, September 8, 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia
I took the text from Wikipedia, I thought that was ok, seeing as their are quite a few entries saying 'This article features text originating on Wikipedia'I'm A Hydroponic Tomato! Bigredrabbit 21:12, November 11, 2009 (UTC)


 * I find that very hard to believe, considering I can find none of your pages on Wikipedia and I can find them on The Bumper Book of Doctor Who Monsters, Villains and Alien Species with near identical text and the same images. Even if you did take the information from Wikipedia, you still needed to add the Template:Wikipedia tag. -<Azes13 22:56, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

Mighty 200
Hey, don't suppose you can wade into the discussion on the The mighty 200 talk page? I'm just having a somewhat hard time re-iterating my point given the interesting method of argument on the talk page. Thanks. --Tangerineduel 12:02, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

New main page
There's a discussion in the forum concerning a new main page could you take a look in, I've just reverted its addition to the main page as I feel there should be a full discussion (with admin input) before it goes live on the main page. Forum:New Home Page?. Thanks. --Tangerineduel 02:32, January 3, 2010 (UTC)

Myloki page
Did I commit some faux pa when I wrote that page? because I'm rather new at this, but the edit that was done is rather ... dull to be honest. Should I write them more "just the facts" in the future?Bumbles the Time Lord 23:03, February 3, 2010 (UTC)Bumbles the Time Lord


 * Well, this website is an encyclopedia. There's no need to be sensational when writing the articles. Just try to stick to the facts. -Kacie (talk ) 00:06, May 12, 2010 (UTC)

Not sure what the point of that was.
Hi, mind if I ask why you reverted those changes in the Weeping Angel article? If you don't understand why using a template for repetitive tasks is preferable I'll gladly explain it to you. —ff 14:39, May 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * It just makes the page look weirder and less consistant. Anyway, it's hardly that repetitive. I don't see why you can't just copy/paste the citations the regular way. -<Azes13 17:13, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, I created the template to make the pages look more consistent. Since the template will always produce the same markup, how does it make pages look less consistent? Copy and pasting stuff is the source of many errors and doesn't allow to change the appearance later, for example by introducing a non-breaking space between the prefix and the title. —ff 07:21, May 25, 2010 (UTC)

Assistance with a discussion on forum
Hi, I'd value your input/discussion on this topic in the forums Forum:Italics or Quotation marks?, I'm not comfortable making a ruling solely based on a running conversation between myself and CzechOut and would value other admin's points of view. Thanks. --Tangerineduel 06:07, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

Reply
Ok...I'll be revisiting the pages anyway.The Librarian 00:16, July 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * BTW would you recommend a comic story character category or advise I leave it uncategorised? The Librarian 00:22, July 12, 2010 (UTC)


 * "Comic story character" seems too out-of-universe. There's plenty of in-universe categories and sub-categories; you should be able to find suitable ones. -✍  21:09, January 3, 2011 (UTC)

you deleted my page
hi i am iateda and you deleted my page asking if the doctor would survive 12 regenerations. i was wondering why you did this and also if you could be so kind as to give me your opinion on the matter. if i did something wrong please tell me what i did so thet i dont repeat the mistake.


 * Discussion are supposed to be on the Forum. There's already a discussion on the number of regeneration here; add to that or make a new one. -20:34:21 Fri 11 Mar 2011

--Tangerineduel / talk 14:37, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

15:59:59 Tue 29 Mar 2011

Mini-mitch\talk 17:32, June 10, 2011 (UTC)

Doctor Who: Lost Adventures
Hi im the creator of a fanon site that is going pretty well and was wondering if you could make a link to it from your home page? TheTrueDoc 18:55, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

The Silence
Hi,

Any particular reason why you deleted the information I contributed. Although what I wrote was not explained in the episodes featuring The Silence I feel it gives a very good description as to why no one can remember them once they turn away. The BBC website article on them says they have powers of telepathy, crypsis is the scientific definition of avoiding detection by other organisms, and their power involves people losing their memory so my contribution combines allthese different bits into one theory that explains them perfectly.

As such please explain the reason for deletion.


 * You're not supposed to put speculation on the page, only what's actually in the episodes themselves. They way its described in the paragraph would make it seem like the theory was actually posited by the Doctor or something, when it was actually just made up by you. -17:09:17 Mon 22 Aug 2011

Brain parasites
I'll accept your removal of my page associations, but I disagree (mostly) with each of the three reasons you listed for removing them. I had suggested that the Tumour alien and the Brain parasite were the same species in two different seasons of Torchwood. 1) You correctly pointed out that they don't look alike - but you wouldn't expect them to... Jack said that the "Tumour alien" incubated in Katie's head (suggesting that it is a juvenile); and you couldn't fit the "Brain parasite" into a person's head (it only deposits the larva, which grow in the victim's brain).  These two forms are basically identified as: young vs mature.  2) The symptoms of "insanity" and "Alzheimer's" (aka presenile dementia) are different, depending on how much detail one goes into (less different if you're just generalizing). One "incubates" in the brain, the other "deposits larva which drill into the brain". The parasite was said to "take a long time", while we don't know how long Katie was suffering apart from the mis-diagnosis of "quick-onset Alzheimer's". 3) Neither alien occurrence is named, although Jack calls one "a species of Brainspawn" in TW: Immortal Sins. It's true Jack doesn't mention the other case in either situation (whichever came second in his timeline). As I said, I accept the removal, I just thought there was a strong case for the association.Watcher4200 08:53, August 27, 2011 (UTC)


 * For this sort of situation, you don't want to overcomplicate things. It's easier to assume that two different organisms are different species instead of one species with different traits on different occasions.


 * 1) That would mean the parasite starts out small, develops into a starfish-like creature and then develops into a worm-like creature, requiring it to completely change its shape and/or lose much of its mass. It's easier to assume that the brain parasite starts out a worm, grows into a worm and leaves the host as a worm.
 * 2) It would seem like a leap to go from memory loss to some form of insanity where you back out of a war. No reason to assume the symptoms change that drastically over time unless they say otherwise.
 * 3) "A species of brainspawn" would just show that there is more than one type of parasite that inhabits the brain, so we don't have to assume every brain parasite is the same species. -<Azes13 01:39, August 29, 2011 (UTC)