User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1272640-20161218210151/@comment-1272640-20161219210543

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1272640-20161218210151/@comment-1272640-20161219210543 SOTO wrote: Given what we know, it was never officially released with all the rights in place. There is no way this can be considered a valid source.

If you consider the version permitted by the BBC, it was unproduced, and if you consider the final version, it was a charity publication which lacked all the rights it needed. Since we don't cover charity works, this can really only be covered as an unproduced story, with a note on how he published it himself afterwards anyway. That's what I'm proposing - an article on the unproduced version.