User talk:Invader A

<div style="background-color: transparent;	border: 1px dashed #2f2cb8;	color: #000;	margin: 2em 0 1em;	padding: .5em 1em;	vertical-align: middle;       align:center;        width:90%;        line-height:110%;        font-size:95%;	text-align: justify;        -moz-border-radius:10px !important;        -webkit-border-radius:10px !important;         border-radius:10px !important;         -moz-box-shadow:0 0 40px #2f2cb8 !important;         -webkit-box-shadow:0 0 40px #2f2cb8 !important;         box-shadow:0 0 40px #2f2cb8 !important;">

Welcome to the Invader A!

We hope you'll enjoy being a part of our community! If you're new to either us or wiki editing in general, you might want to check out some of these links:
 * Internal pages
 * Help pages
 * Manual of Style
 * Forums
 * Recent changes
 * User page policy


 * External Wikipedia pages
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial

Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes like this:  ~

Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the Help pages, add a question to one of the Forums or ask on my user talk page.

Reply
I'm sorry that I took so long to get back to you. I've been having trouble with my internet for the past few days, but I will now try to address each of your complaints. I do not believe that no picture is necessary for the Doctor's article. I just believe that we don't need all eleven of them in the infobox at the top of the article, since they each have their own articles anyway. There is a navbox right under the infobox labelled "Incarnations of the Doctor" that fulfills a similar role to the links in the pictures on Wikipedia. There really should be some kind of picture in the infobox on the Doctor's page, but so far nobody has agreed on one in the discussion on its talk page, and the discussion hasn't really been going anywhere for a few weeks. If you disagree, and believe that all eleven Doctors should be in the infobox image, then you should voice your opinion on the article's talk page rather than on my talk page. That way, other users are more likely to see what you wrote and will either agree or disagree with you. I don't know why you are complaining to me about the Dalek page, as I had literally nothing to do with it. There are pictures of some of the older Daleks in the body of the article, but we only show one image in the main infobox for species. Look at the Cybermen, who have gone through much more radical changes than the Daleks have even just in the black and white era, and they only have one image on their page. (There are two on the generic Cybermen page because it deals with two totally unrelated versions of the Cybermen) I agree with you that the Dalek's current design is probably the worst in the history of the show, and I hope they change it before too long. I would happily support changing the infobox image to show the Davies era Daleks instead of these ones, but I think most people probably prefer to show the most reason version. If you really want the Dalek page changed, then you should bring it up on the talk page. The reason the Doctor's page is in past tense has nothing to do with the fact that he is supposedly going to die. We all know that Moffat will find some way around it. Especially since Matt Smith is going to be in the Christmas special. All in-universe articles are written in past tense. See Tardis:Manual of Style. I hope that I adequately addressed all of your advice and complaints.Icecreamdif 19:02, September 26, 2011 (UTC) 17:21: Tue 20 Dec 2011