Talk:Bad Wolf (entity)

Safe Assumption?
In the article, there is an notation:
 * We do not know if she also restored to life the other victims of the Daleks or restored the damage done to Earth itself by Dalek orbital bombardment but it can be assumed she did as the Earth is back to normal by The End Of The World.

Why is this an safe assumption? It is clearly stated in The End of the World that the National Trust has the ability to shift back the continents, and that the planet is a "Classic Earth." It would be safe to equally assume that the National Trust has undone any damage from the attack. Is there any particular reason that this assumption is accepted? -- Kooky 21:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC)


 * that doesn't seem like a safe assumption to me, either. also, the comment has an out-of-universe reference, which reserve for Real World articles and Behind the Scenes sections. I'll fix it. --76.24.26.185 22:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I've taken it out completely, based on the logic that if she had brought back the other victims of the Daleks, there would be several billion immortals just like Jack. That would seem unlikely. Monkey with a Gun 08:04, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Time War
If a "Time Vortex-enhanced Human" is powerful enough to destroy the whole Dalek fleet and a "Time Vortex-enhanced Timelord" would be “a god”, then why didn’t the Timelords use this power in the Last Great Time War?


 * There's so little known about the Time War, there's plenty of potential reasons. Maybe they did, and that's what ended the war. Maybe they tried, but the Dalek army in its prime could counter it. Maybe since the Doctor's TARDIS is old, the Time Lords have much better weapons to be used.
 * In any case, it's not a good idea to give yourself god-like power, especially when it fatal and will drive you mad. -<Azes13 02:34, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
 * Because it would have led to the destruction of the universe, probably. He said they'd be a vengeful god. -- Noneofyourbusiness 17:26, December 2, 2009 (UTC)