User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20200905235227/@comment-24048868-20200906061442

We can also look at the stories themselves, as well as BTS evidence. Since the claim here is that the stories are parodical, it's probably worth clarifying how the wiki defines parody, and whether or not every parody is invalid (based on the reading of current policy). These are more than questions, than opinions, in the hope to progress this thread in the right direction. Here's one definiton: "writing, music, art, speech, etc. that intentionally copies the style of someone famous or copies a particular situation, making the features or qualities of the original more noticeable in a way that is humorous."

- Cambridge Dictionary