Board Thread:The Panopticon/@comment-6032121-20200517150418/@comment-45692830-20200618223754

Not technically confirmation. :>

Look. I know it was written for this event. Everyone does. I'm not arguing anything like "we should merge these pages". I'm arguing "under the criteria given for merging the Monk pages - they were stated to be discarded material multiple times and there wasn't a clear statement that they were made for the event - this also counts".

I think this criteria is bonkers and we need to be a bit more subtle in how we evaluate things due to framing devices and the like. That's my entire point.