User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20170922234931

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20170922234931 Found this when I was going through the delete tags: Interweb of Fear (home video). Is it valid or not? For the record, I have no idea what this is, but it doesn't seem like a narrative to me from the descriptions. I'm posting what was given on the talk page for convenience:


 * I would argue that with the archive footage chosen and the narration at the time the footage was playing it has a valid narrative and therefore should merit inclusion. --User:Borisashton 19:37, January 29, 2017 (UTC)


 * It just features a few clips in the documentary like Thirty Years in the TARDIS, they are just featured. No minisode was featured. Special:Contributions/82.3.146.201 19:42, January 29, 2017 (UTC)


 * When the narrator says 'We had a problem' (or something similar) archive footage of a man getting murdered by the War Machines plays. This seem like a narrative (albeit a very loose one). --User:Borisashton 19:48, January 29, 2017 (UTC)


 * But it's still part of the documentary, joined together - unlike other minisodes featured in documentaries. Special:Contributions/82.3.146.201 19:51, January 29, 2017 (UTC)


 * As I said above there is a narrative, which means it's a story. From what I can tell passes the four little rules due to this. --User:Borisashton 19:57, January 29, 2017 (UTC)


 * In a documentary, it doesn't warrant a separate page, it's unwatchable individually. Special:Contributions/82.3.146.201 20:06, January 29, 2017 (UTC)


 * I've just had time to watch the documentary (with just the bits with the archive footage from The War Machines) and it makes sense on it's own as a brief history of the BBC website with the archive footage linking the narration. --User:Borisashton 16:15, February 4, 2017 (UTC