User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-1789834-20170226030307

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-1789834-20170226030307 If the LEGO team has said that there are numerous avenues that they could go down, and if they have also said that this is pretty new to them, is it not safer for us to bide our time and not make any decision yet? Maybe a 100% conclusion just isn't possible at this time. We're all fighting different corners and that's because this movie's validity can be interpreted many ways. Maybe we should take a step back, wait for some more people to say things, wait for interviews and behind the scenes on the eventual DVD release, features in DWM... ANYTHING that gives one side of the argument that edge.

Right now, guess what? I'm back at square one. I no longer have an opinion. To me, this movie seems like it's trying to distance itself from the previous LEGO movie. Then again, it's clearly got some of the previous characters in, such as Wildstyle. On the one hand, that portal logically leads to the DWU. On the other hand, it also logically leads through to the kid's dad's basement.

My own, personal conclusion: no-one is winning this debate because there are so many conflicting conclusions that you can reach from the evidence given (or not given). When this happens, we can't just jump and call it valid or invalid. We simply keep this thread open until more information reaches the table. Other threads in the past have been open for literally years before a decision is reached. What d'you say?