Board Thread:The Panopticon/@comment-88790-20140219051032/@comment-6032121-20191102003209

Yeah, I agree with User:Schreibenheimer on this point.

It's possible to get something out of professionals on whether it takes place in the Doctor Who universe, but Tardis's criteria on what counts as "narrative" are too specific to have much chances of a professional sharing them, let alone giving clear statements based on said standards about every webcast series ever.

I mean, we can't just simplify it as "Is this intended to be a thing that happens to the character?", because the authors of And Introducing… would probably say "yes", and yet And introducing isn't considered narrative enough by Tardis.

At any rate, I second User:Shambala108's above confusion (ever so long ago) regarding the potential deletion of Abzorbalovian Rebels in case we rule the Monster Files invalid. Why shouldn't we have pages about characters from invalid non-narrative sources? What purpose would that serve?