User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1296654-20200616211544/@comment-45692830-20200616220719

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1296654-20200616211544/@comment-45692830-20200616220719 That's not new evidence. I could levy that charge at any thread ever. When you're evaluating arguments for and against, some measure of subjectivity must come into play, since we're not working in formal systems, there's inherently some degree of personal bias. (Indeed, the charge can be levied that even in those formal systems the probabilities assigned have personal bias, hence the split between subjectivist and objectivist Bayesians)