Talk:The Fires of Pompeii (TV story)

Discontinuity, Plot holes, Errors
"If the eruption of Pompeii gave psychic vision of an alternate timeline in which the Pyroviles succeeded and there was no eruption "without the Doctors intervention" then how did Lucius Dextrus see Donna from London, she should not appear in his timeline and be a Pyrovile."

In this scene, they are not seeing the future, they are reading the Doctor/Donna's minds, so even if London didn't exist, Donna knew she was from London, and he read that.

Non-interference with history
Should this really be on this page as i don't see its relevence to this article. surely it would be better suited on its own article Dark Lord Xander 12:05, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

The TARDIS translation circuit and the puns
It is clear from Lucius' response that it did a better job of pun-rendering than in DW: The Web Planet. (I mean come on, Isop-tope?) Anyway, my guess is that the harmless/armless pun would be rendered "Sed non est bracchiatus" (bracchium meaning arm), a pun on "bracatus" (meaning foreign, barbarian, or effeminate, lit. "trousered"). And I assume that the sun/son pun would be rendered as a "sol/solus" (sun/alone) pun of some sort. "Every sun must set ... it will rise alone", perhaps? Any other thoughts? - Tawaki 05:37, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

Fixed point in time?
If the eruption is a fixed point in time, then how come the Doctor is able to save someone? So shouldn't "time" know that the Doctor will save someone from the destruction of Pompeii and therefore it has happened, and it was fixed that a group of people were saved.--81.98.0.33 16:49, December 31, 2009 (UTC)

The thing about changing time is that there is logical loopholes, ways to cheat and keep the timeline good, all you need is a bit of imagination.Besides, one family wouldn't have made a lot of difference, and it's been mentioned that in most cases the universe compensates for changes in the timeline. Excalibur-117 17:06, December 31, 2009 (UTC)