Board Thread:The Panopticon/@comment-27280472-20160606210324/@comment-1432718-20161128234457

DENCH-and-PALMER wrote: someone says "There is no canon" - I don't know about you but that will tee someone off, passing the Wiki's (100% brilliant) opinions as fact. Did you read Tardis:Canon policy? The paragraph entitled "Doctor Who and canon" specifically states the actual policy of the BBC, not the wiki's opinion. That's why we constantly state "There is no canon", because the BBC has not declared a canon.

DENCH-and-PALMER wrote: I'm not having a dig at anyone, I'm just helping you understand that it comes across as quite rude - and when one is typing it can be read differently to how another will read it. The latter is why I use my "best wishes" after messages, so no niceties will come across as nastiness. So basically we admins can't win. We write to educate new editors, we tick off the older ones. We cater to the older editors, we alienate the new ones.

But it is past time to get this discussion back on track. If you have an issue with canon, bring it up at Tardis:Canon policy. If you have an issue with our valid sources policy, bring it up at Tardis:Valid sources.